Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

[Begemot]

back to fellating black dicks and whimpering about it in a mixture of lust and surly disdain

Well.

 

[L. Duse]

Boxy won't go IRL, as he keeps moving the goal post. So long as the internet exists, he'll claim research and practice. He is too stupid to genuinely practice his rhetoric, because of fear. He is too lazy to want a job and too delusional to keep one. Boxy needs his basement safe space, as outside of it he cannot ignore the slurs and reality checks. He is afraid to go IRL because he is not who he needs to be.

To put it another way, Boxy is such a disgrace to himself that he does not want to be associated with his own revolution. The faggot wants somebody else to do the work.

This is the supreme cuck. Boxy cannot promote successfully anything he rants about, because everything he rants about did not or will not work for him:

Deport the non-whites. Boxy is deported.

White, married men hold political office. Boxy is neither, nor will he ever be.

Procreation is required to survive. Boxy will never breed, but if he could, no sex as he is non-white.

Communicate to the masses via manifesto. Boxy uses English, a language he discredits in the manifesto.

It is remarkable that someone can lose, always, with no effort or even participation from an opposing party. The one thing this Filipino failure "wins" at is losing, thus negating even that one single pinch of merit he has.

#Don'tBeBoxy

He has been researching for years with no results? No articles? No progress reports? I say @BoxerShorts47 is a coward and a liar.

We already have summarised the silly points he made in this near 500 page thread. What is so difficult coming up with a manifesto and just repeating points made by other white rights activists?

Not difficult really. It is so easy for @BoxerShorts47 to prove me wrong that he isn't a coward and a liar actually. The fact that he can do nothing to prove me wrong and hand out black top hats, puzzle pieces and garbage bins says a lot. He will do that and I just respond by making sure that his reaction score goes down to -17000.

ED: Alright then, took only a couple of minutes for him to give me that top hat. I am going to negrate him down to -17000 before the site closes. I try to keep my promises.

 

[L. Duse]

Done! It took less time to lower it 250 points than I thought.

But while I was skimming through this thread and handing him black hats, I notice this is how @BoxerShorts47 argues.

It is a "strawmans" when you explain to him to why his proposals and arguments don't work, and why the status quo is as it is, for example:

A: @BoxerShorts47, the reason why people are marrying later is for economic reasons. This is no longer an agricultural society. Lowering the age of consent will not work if you want to increase marriage rates.

Boxershorts47: Strawmans!

It is also a "strawmans" when you explain to him the consequences of lowering the age of consent.

A: @BoxerShorts47, returning the age of consent to what it once was during the good old Founding Father days leads to exploitation of girls who only hit puberty at 14 then due to poor nutrition.

Boxershorts47: Strawmans!

Whatever "strawmans" mean, it certainly doesn't mean misrepresenting the argument.

@BoxerShorts47 accuses people of "concern trolling" when they approach him nicely. I notice that this happens when Boxershorts realises he cannot give an answer that makes him look good in his mind. So, he has make up the "concern trolling" excuse and run away.

A: Can you give me a survey or can you tell me how many people have you approached or come round to your arguments? I asked you nicely.

Boxershorts47: Concern trolling!

Me: You say different girls hit puberty at different ages. You argue against one size fits all. But an age of consent is one size fit all. You might be sexually penetrating a 10 or 12 year old who has yet to hit puberty!

Boxershorts47: Concern trolling! You are wasting my time!

And yet @BoxerShorts47 thinks he is winning when he can't even argue straight!

Just yell, "Yes or No?", repeat points made by successive personalities who risked their reputations, showed their faces and use excuses to avoid arguments when people point out counterarguments like the US of A wasn't racially or ethnically homogenous at any point of its history, i.e. the ethnostate didn't exist.

People like Richard Spencer showed his face. @BoxerShorts47 won't even show his thumb even though I and another user have shown mine! He wouldn't even show his ideas for his manifesto even though we have demonstrated we can summarise this entire thread for him.

Why are you hiding, @BoxerShorts47?

 

[Stardust]

Congrats on -17,000, Boxy! Your Reaction Score is nearing the same amount as your student debt.

 

[Sped Xing]

research is work.
someone who works a 9-5 wouldn't have the time to do this type of research
you sound like a boomer, "get a job."

I can tell you've never worked, because you think working 40 hours a week on a regular schedule means you have no time for anything else.


Enjoy my social security taxes, I guess.

 

[Lonely Grave]

It is remarkable that someone can lose, always, with no effort or even participation from an opposing party. The one thing this Filipino failure "wins" at is losing, thus negating even that one single pinch of merit he has.

#Don'tBeBoxy

It reminds me of the Chinese “antis” who struggled so hard to smear vtubers who dared to defy CHINA NUMBAH WAN, only for their toys to be taken away abruptly and their efforts to dwindle into countless self-owns and real punishment from their authorities. Boxy is a microcosm of that, in a way.

 

[SIGSEGV]

View attachment 1766077

Done! It took less time to lower it 250 points than I thought.

But while I was skimming through this thread and handing him black hats, I notice this is how @BoxerShorts47 argues.

It is a "strawmans" when you explain to him to why his proposals and arguments don't work, and why the status quo is as it is, for example:

A: @BoxerShorts47, the reason why people are marrying later is for economic reasons. This is no longer an agricultural society. Lowering the age of consent will not work if you want to increase marriage rates.

Boxershorts47: Strawmans!

It is also a "strawmans" when you explain to him the consequences of lowering the age of consent.

A: @BoxerShorts47, returning the age of consent to what it once was during the good old Founding Father days leads to exploitation of girls who only hit puberty at 14 then due to poor nutrition.

Boxershorts47: Strawmans!

Whatever "strawmans" mean, it certainly doesn't mean misrepresenting the argument.

@BoxerShorts47 accuses people of "concern trolling" when they approach him nicely. I notice that this happens when Boxershorts realises he cannot give an answer that makes him look good in his mind. So, he has make up the "concern trolling" excuse and run away.

A: Can you give me a survey or can you tell me how many people have you approached or come round to your arguments? I asked you nicely.

Boxershorts47: Concern trolling!

Me: You say different girls hit puberty at different ages. You argue against one size cannot fit all. But an age of consent is one size fit all. You might be sexually penetrating a 10 or 12 year old who has yet to hit puberty!

Boxershorts47: Concern trolling! You are wasting my time!

And yet @BoxerShorts47 thinks he is winning when he can't even argue straight!

Just yell, "Yes or No?", repeat points made by successive personalities who risked their reputations, showed their faces and use excuses to avoid arguments when people point out counterarguments like the US of A wasn't racially or ethnically homogenous at any point of its history, i.e. the ethnostate didn't exist.

People like Richard Spencer showed his face. @BoxerShorts47 won't even show his thumb even though I and another user have shown mine! He wouldn't even show his ideas for his manifesto even though we have demonstrated we can summarise this entire thread for him.

Why are you hiding, @BoxerShorts47?

Mass rating is autistic and gay, but so is @BoxerShorts47. So I guess it cancels out.

 

[BoxerShorts47]

A: @BoxerShorts47, the reason why people are marrying later is for economic reasons. This is no longer an agricultural society. Lowering the age of consent will not work if you want to increase marriage rates.

Boxershorts47: Strawmans!

This is neo-liberal cope for 20 years ago. It was obvious policies like equal pay and putting women into education were a disaster and instead of admitting this, they made-up a justification for their failure. "Ya it's totally great that our people aren't getting married, our IQ is getting dumber and we need to import foreigners to replace our own people. That's a prosperous and healthy society."

It is also a "strawmans" when you explain to him the consequences of lowering the age of consent.

A: @BoxerShorts47, returning the age of consent to what it once was during the good old Founding Father days leads to exploitation of girls who only hit puberty at 14 then due to poor nutrition.

Boxershorts47: Strawmans!

1. Good nutrition or phytoestrogens would lead to hitting puberty at a lower age. Inverse of what you said
2. Most women have gone through puberty by 14 and are finished or close to finishing. They are women or more women-like than girl or girl-like (pre-teen).
3. If they're post puberty, they should be put on a path towards marriage not whoredom.

Whatever "strawmans" mean, it certainly doesn't mean misrepresenting the argument.

@BoxerShorts47 accuses people of "concern trolling" when they approach him nicely. I notice that this happens when Boxershorts realises he cannot give an answer that makes him look good in his mind. So, he has make up the "concern trolling" excuse and run away.

You are a concern troll.
You claim to want to help me but really you're just a neo-lib shitlib.

A: Can you give me a survey or can you tell me how many people have you approached or come round to your arguments? I asked you nicely.

Boxershorts47: Concern trolling!

idk?

Me: You say different girls hit puberty at different ages. You argue against one size fits all. But an age of consent is one size fit all. You might be sexually penetrating a 10 or 12 year old who has yet to hit puberty!

Boxershorts47: Concern trolling! You are wasting my time!

I've said that ideally age of consent is set on an individual basis depending on the person, which is the way it was before AoC laws even existed. With that said, on avg, lower AoC 12/13/14 > 16/17/18 for women.

And yet @BoxerShorts47 thinks he is winning when he can't even argue straight!

Just yell, "Yes or No?", repeat points made by successive personalities who risked their reputations, showed their faces and use excuses to avoid arguments when people point out counterarguments like the US of A wasn't racially or ethnically homogenous at any point of its history, i.e. the ethnostate didn't exist.

Yes or No is how you win bad faith debates. You'd used Yes or No against me too. Don't be a hypocrite.

People like Richard Spencer showed his face. @BoxerShorts47 won't even show his thumb even though I and another user have shown mine! He wouldn't even show his ideas for his manifesto even though we have demonstrated we can summarise this entire thread for him.

Why are you hiding, @BoxerShorts47?

Like I said. get @Stardust to send me lewds and I'll send you thumb.

I can tell you've never worked, because you think working 40 hours a week on a regular schedule means you have no time for anything else.


Enjoy my social security taxes, I guess.

It means you don't have enough time to do political research. Politics is a full time job. That's why most voters are "low information."

 

[Just A Butt]

Like I said. get @Stardust to send me lewds and I'll send you thumb.

would you still want them if she was black?

 

[Sped Xing]

It means you don't have enough time to do political research. Politics is a full time job. That's why most voters are "low information."

You spend all day at it, and yet you're still so dumb as to think spelling "because" "bicuz" makes it no longer a Latin-derived word.

Making french fries would be a better use of your time, if you could handle it.

 

[Swiss46]

Like I said. get @Stardust to send me lewds and I'll send you thumb.

Has this strategy of pathetically begging for nudes ever worked for you Garcia? I doubt it has.

 

[KittyGremlin]

what are you trying to achieve by staying here?

 

[Zeke Von Genbu]

what are you trying to achieve by staying here?

Taking in cock is a full time occupation, you just don't always get paid for it.

 

[DamageJoy]

It means you don't have enough time to do political research. Politics is a full time job. That's why most voters are "low information."

Politics are too broad a concept to be fully informed about. In fact politics grow out of real life practical needs and economic/power interactions.
You may spend your life meditating on party politics and ideology, but those are just abstractions that won't address what the people actually care about.

How will your super smart ideology fix the potholes in the road? Pretty basic stuff. People can reflect on that, they can understand that.
Who will be the wining coalition for your ideas? I doubt you can give something proper to the working class or the small/middle business owners who could help you getting a power base.

Most overtly political people online just treat it as a hobby, which is fine. People need hobbies. But don't expect people taking you seriously if you just talk about unpopular stuff instead of trying to find a thing to actually have a discussion about.

what are you trying to achieve by staying here?

To A-log a little. I think he is lonely and happy to have some interaction.
Not to mention there are people who feel validated by people shitting on their views and opinions. It make them feel right.

 

[dirtydeanna96]

Procreation is required to survive. Boxy will never breed, but if he could, no sex as he is non-white.

boxy won't breed because the children of tween moms often have severe health problems even if they do survive. ..
that's why we don't marry kids in the civilized world, you exceptional ephebophile

 

[draggs]

Bitch will spend hundreds of hours watching other sloped foreheads rant for shekels on youtube but he won't read a book because it's too long

 

[Sped Xing]

Guyse tophat me. I want to see if I can zero out my score before Null pulls the pillars down.

 

[L. Duse]

This is neo-liberal cope for 20 years ago. It was obvious policies like equal pay and putting women into education were a disaster and instead of admitting this, they made-up a justification for their failure. "Ya it's totally great that our people aren't getting married, our IQ is getting dumber and we need to import foreigners to replace our own people. That's a prosperous and healthy society."

Strawmans. Because you didn't agree with my argument that a couple's economic situation in a post-industrial economy makes marriage and procreation prohibitively expensive, it is a "strawmans".

1. Good nutrition or phytoestrogens would lead to hitting puberty at a lower age. Inverse of what you said
2. Most women have gone through puberty by 14 and are finished or close to finishing. They are women or more women-like than girl or girl-like (pre-teen).
3. If they're post puberty, they should be put on a path towards marriage not whoredom.

Strawmans. You didn't agree with me that you want to bang 8 year olds. You said you can bang if they are into puberty. Now 8 year olds are hitting puberty because of overnutrition.

You are a concern troll.
You claim to want to help me but really you're just a neo-lib shitlib.

You are a concern troll. See, I can accuse you of this without any justification. Just like how you yell "Yes or No?". I can read minds too and say you want to slaughter non-whites and rape their children. Just like how you assume that I don't want to help you and that I am a shitwitlib.

Like I said. get @Stardust to send me lewds and I'll send you thumb.

That is a concern troll. You claim to be white but in fact you are a nigger who refuses to post thumb because you aren't white. I can read minds too and make baseless accusations and call you a concern troll.

You said you will dox yourself and go IRL at the first page of this thread. Even before you wanted Stardust to post lewds. But you won't even dox your thumb.

This is because you aren't white and you are concern trolling us.

It means you don't have enough time to do political research. Politics is a full time job. That's why most voters are "low information."

If I have time to summarise the thread for you, you have the time to publish your ideas for your manifesto.

We know that you are trolling and you don't have anything.

 

[Bob Barker]

Ah, the autist who's been arguing with @BoxerShorts47 since July. That's on brand.

Sig got permabanned for fed posting before boxy did. Boxy truly won the debate.

 

[Stilgar of Troon]

Sig got permabanned for fed posting before boxy did. Boxy truly won the debate.

@BoySniffer47 doesn't have the balls to fedpost (ironically or otherwise), to be fair. I'm sure he's totally gonna "go IRL" with his manifesto, though...