One of these things is not like the others.
The other reviewers actually said thoughtful things about the movie. Bob did nothing but make fun of its name. At least he did an excellent job in demonstrating why his "rotten" rating means nothing. Actually, he did manage to tell potential viewers
one useful thing about the movie, completely unintentionally: he did clearly manage to convey that you won't like this movie if you happen to be an idiot. So, good job Bob, I guess?
It's honestly not that far beneath his usual reviews, though. Have you ever
once heard Bob talk about a movie in any
remotely sophisticated way? Have you ever seen him talk about how a film's color balance conveys mood, or how the film's
mise-en-scène conveys the director's vision? Because I haven't. This is why Bob will never be part of the professional circles he sucks up to: he's an ignorant rube whose college degree is just an official certificate from his adult babysitter saying that he showed up and didn't cause trouble for four years. And he can't even score good blow, or give a good blowjob. They have no use for him at all.
I don't know why anyone would hold Bob's reviews in any sort of regard. The quality of the movie is irrelevant to his reviews. All he cares about is having the right opinion for the right people so he can feel validated by them. Seems like he already makes his judgement on most movies before even seeing them.
He's fundamentally unsuited to be a movie reviewer because he absolutely does not care about the quality of a movie at all. He'll mindlessly hate a movie that offends his politics regardless of its quality. If he doesn't mindlessly hate a movie for political reasons, he'll mindlessly defend it if the "wrong" sort of people criticize it because of hatred and the fact that he considers himself a temporarily embarrassed movie director rather than one of the plebs in the actual audience. Even if he genuinely likes something, like that Godzilla movie, he does so in the most childlike, unsophisticated way, which has nothing to do with quality. Even if he genuinely realizes a movie is actual dogshit, he won't ever tell the audience. He's literally the worst professional movie reviewer I have ever seen.
The fact that he can't even make a competent video, with unlistenable audio, faulty green-screening, and so on, is just icing on the cake. But he would be a professional embarrassment even if he used a different format for his content.
Implying he actually watches them at any point. He makes his review from seeing what the people with the correct opinions think then goes to watch the MCU again. Even if he watches the film I guarantee he's sat tweeting all the way through it and not paying attention.
The "review" posted sure gives the impression that he never watched it. Many autistic people have issues with paying attention to things they aren't interested in and it gets worse with age (and falling dopamine levels, due to decreased tetrahydrobiopterin, increased monoamine oxidase B, etc.). I can guarantee you that Twitter addict Robert was not paying attention
at all.