Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You literally can't go down the street in any Indian city or village without stumbling over a woman who's been raped. Rapes in India are difficult to prosecute because village elders think rape victims are whores and would rather get them married off, even if they're children. Indian culture is filled with tales of infantile femicide because they only want sons and daughters are a burden.

This comment is ironic coming from a woman who follows a patriarchal religion called Christianity which chains women through limiting divorce and slut shames women who don't conform to patriarchy

Gee, what you describe about India sounds just like the United States of America, the European Union and every other industrialized country where they sex traffick teenage girls, produce teenage girl (child) porn, and promote Patriarchy.

Patriarchy which calls women who express their sexuality contrary to patriarchal standards are "whores"

It's everywhere

Women think about sex as much as men? Well I'm gonna level with you girl, I spent all day putting wood filler on cabinets, sanding and painting them, then afterwards tracing and labeling the electric lines at my brother's new house that were clearly set up by an insane individual and are going to need to be totally rewired. I also dehydrated some carrots over that time so they didn't go bad, didn't turn out crispy like I'd hoped but they were spiced well at least. I then talked to my mom on the phone for a bit, then headed to KF. I can honestly say that until reading this thread right now I didn't think about sex once during that entire 14 hour period. That's the funny thing about not just sitting around being idle and aimless all the time, when you have things in your life that you're invested in you don't really spend that much time thinking about fucking.
That's why you're horny all the time, you literally have nothing else, no hobbies, no skills to be proud of, just empty existence with desperate hedonism interspersed to give you some reason to wake up in the morning. It's also why you need men to save you, because poor wittle Melinda can't do anything for herself and needs a big stwong man to give her life meaning. You try to fool yourself by doing dumb shit that makes a lot of noise but has no substance like filing outrageous lawsuits, trying to publish half assed books, spouting grandiouse bullshit about religion and spirituality...nobody's fooled, not even you. Just shut the fuck up and do something with your life aside from being a walking uterus leeching off the government dole. You and your kids will be a lot happier if you did.

Wow, you put a lot of effort into writing that all out, um....why?

You could have been helping yourself better by masturbating in your room. You sound sexually repressed.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

This comment is ironic coming from a woman who follows a patriarchal religion called Christianity which chains women through limiting divorce and slut shames women who don't conform to patriarchy

Gee, what you describe about India sounds just like the United States of America, the European Union and every other industrialized country where they sex traffick teenage girls, produce teenage girl (child) porn, and promote Patriarchy.

Patriarchy which calls women who express their sexuality contrary to patriarchal standards are "whores"

It's everywhere

Wow, you put a lot of effort into writing that all out, um....why?

You could have been helping yourself better by masturbating in your room. You sound sexually repressed.

Melinda, no functional human being constantly thinks about sex. It's not sexual repression, it's quite literally just being a normal human being. You're a coomer with an increased libido who's getting no action, just admit that pisses you off because it's abnormal

 

[Deadpool]

This comment is ironic coming from a woman who follows a patriarchal religion called Christianity which chains women through limiting divorce and slut shames women who don't conform to patriarchy

Gee, what you describe about India sounds just like the United States of America, the European Union and every other industrialized country where they sex traffick teenage girls, produce teenage girl (child) porn, and promote Patriarchy.

Patriarchy which calls women who express their sexuality contrary to patriarchal standards are "whores"

It's everywh

Thiw comment is ironic coming from a woman who follows a retarded pagan religion called the cult of Melinda, which chains women through forcing them to be constantly pregnant or have a retarded child suckling at their saggy gross pendulous dugs. Here's an example of Niggerlinda's feminism:

Sane woman: I would like to focus on having a career before I have kids, if I even choose to have them.

Melinda: REEE PATRIARCHY! YOU NEED TO FUCK THE FIRST ABUSIVE BEANER (OR COUSIN) YOU COME ACROSS AND KEEP PUMPIN OUT TARD BAHBIES AND GETTING GOVERNMENT GIBBS ME DATS BECAUSE ELHOMO AND TEH PATRIARCHY REEEE! MY ASS BACKWARD VIEWS ARE THE ONLY TRUE FEMINISM DESPITE BEING OBJECTIVELY WRONG, AND ME BEING THE LITERAL DUMBEST PERSON ALIVE!

Patriarchy which calls women who express their sexuality contrary to patriarchal standards are "whores"

No most people only call people who are whores, whores. Whore.

You could have been helping yourself better by masturbating in your room. You sound sexually repressed.

Awesome example of you being a whore, whore.

 

[White Baby]

This comment is ironic coming from a woman who follows a patriarchal religion called Christianity which chains women through limiting divorce and slut shames women who don't conform to patriarchy

Gee, what you describe about India sounds just like the United States of America, the European Union and every other industrialized country where they sex traffick teenage girls, produce teenage girl (child) porn, and promote Patriarchy.

Patriarchy which calls women who express their sexuality contrary to patriarchal standards are "whores"

It's everywhere

The original subject that we were discussing was not sex trafficking or porn, it was your unsourced claim that most women think about sex once per hour. Most women, in fact, have better things to do.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

This comment is ironic coming from a woman who follows a patriarchal religion called Christianity which chains women through limiting divorce and slut shames women who don't conform to patriarchy

Gee, what you describe about India sounds just like the United States of America, the European Union and every other industrialized country where they sex traffick teenage girls, produce teenage girl (child) porn, and promote Patriarchy.

Patriarchy which calls women who express their sexuality contrary to patriarchal standards are "whores"

It's everywhere

You're also a Christian Melinda, or at the very least Catholic.

 

[Beavis]

Call it a hunch, but I dint think Melinda is going to file a response.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Call it a hunch, but I dint think Melinda is going to file a response.

She will, but it will be so ill thought of that the court will laugh at it and toss out the case like all of the other times.

 

[LoverofPi]

Except that I do and that's why it's been filed

You filed it because you WANT there to be grounds.

That's what you call cave man analysis

And yet you can't refute said analysis at all.

Factually inaccurate.

Your thread was created because you decided to sue Null. Had you not made a nuisance of yourself, Andrew's thread would have remained as a place to mock him for his obsession and bizarre beliefs and you would have been left alone. Hell, even with the thread, you were basically left alone except for updates when you filed another lawsuit. It wasn't until you showed up and started arguing that the thread exploded. There are 728 pages in this thread. At the start of the year there were 43. Think about that for a minute.

I don't need a Troll lecture on ethics. It's entirely hypocritical.

I reserve the right to change my mind based on circumstances and others' actions

See how that works?

And we reserve the right to judge you by action and not word and conclude you love the attention, Mel.

I have a 75% success rate in state court

And in Federal? 0% you say?

I'd rather keep you in suspense

Okay, so we see it's a shitshow a little later than. It'll still be a shitshow.

You're also a Christian Melinda, or at the very least Catholic.

She's basically a Baptist with bits and pieces glued on her and a coat of "I'm a jew" hastily slapped on top.

She will, but it will be so ill thought of that the court will laugh at it and toss out the case like all of the other times.

We can but hope that Mel manages to get herself declared vexatious in federal court.

 

[redcent]

She's basically a Baptist with bits and pieces glued on her and a coat of "I'm a jew" hastily slapped on top.

A baptist wouldn't virgin shame like she does

They'd also promote loving your enemy and practicing forgiveness

Melinda is the very antithesis of this. Sure she believes Jesus is son if God, but then again so do demons.

 

[Pizdec]

You could have been helping yourself better by masturbating in your room. You sound sexually repressed.

Jesus christ woman, is that mexican you call a husband and a man not giving it to you lately? Or is he to busy slapping something other then your face?

 

[LoverofPi]

A baptist wouldn't virgin shame like she does

They'd also promote loving your enemy and practicing forgiveness

Melinda is the very antithesis of this. Sure she believes Jesus is son if God, but then again so do demons.

Fair point. Allow me to amend my statement to say that Mel reminds me of evangelical fundamentalist Baptists, who like Mel primarily use the tenets of their faith as a convenient tool to get their way, judge others, and avoid consequences. The "bits and pieces" are her defense of her own nymphomania and honestly the being very upfront about not wanting to fogive anyone. Most FEBs at least pretend towards that. Mel just can't even pretend.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Mel just can't even pretend.

That's not true. She pretends to be Jewish, a successful writer, a scholar, cited by major publications and teachers, a lawyer, a successful business woman, and above all....A good parent,

 

[Pizdec]

That's not true. She pretends to be Jewish, a successful writer, a scholar, cited by major publications and teachers, a lawyer, a successful business woman, and above all....A good parent,

Imagine pretending to be something you're not to feel good about yourself... oh, wait.

 

[LoverofPi]

That's not true. She pretends to be Jewish, a successful writer, a scholar, cited by major publications and teachers, a lawyer, a successful business woman, and above all....A good parent,

I'd argue that you've really just proved my point. She claims all these things, but she's not any good at actually acting like any of them.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

Actually India is a famous for the oldest published book about the female vagina and how to please a woman through understanding her vagina. True fact. It's in museums now.

And don't forget India is home of the famous Kama Sutra

I knew I liked Indian food for a reason!

God this is the most tone deaf shit. This is literally "The best taco bowl is at Trump Tower! I love Hispanics!" Level of tone deaf soft-racism. Lmao.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'd argue that you've really just proved my point. She claims all these things, but she's not any good at actually acting like any of them.

Well my daughter likes to pretend she's an astronaut when she jumps on her bed, but least she knows a bit of the training she'll need if she wants to do that in the future. Melinda can't even get her case against Null right even when she has Kiwi's helping her out, yet she's somehow a really good lawyer. if she's worse at pretending than a little girl, Melinda must have had a terrible childhood, or just a terrible imagination.

 

[LoverofPi]

Well my daughter likes to pretend she's an astronaut when she jumps on her bed, but least she knows a bit of the training she'll need if she wants to do that in the future. Melinda can't even get her case against Null right even when she has Kiwi's helping her out, yet she's somehow a really good lawyer. if she's worse at pretending than a little girl, Melinda must have had a terrible childhood, or just a terrible imagination.

Given all the evidence, I think terrible imagination is right on the money.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Call it a hunch, but I dint think Melinda is going to file a response.

It costs her basically nothing (other than postage, I guess) and gives her an opportunity to soapbox. Why wouldn't she file it?

 

[Spectre_06]

Yes, anyone who stands up to you morally degenerate, unethical bullies is doing what a winner does: stand up to wrong doing.

Your other haters agree with me. We talk about you all in email threads. They are rooting for me

I like to think of us as a Hitler-Stalin adversarial relationship, where you are Hitler and we are Stalin. We are both morally corrupt, shitty human beings that are part of shitty, morally corrupt groups. neither one of us is clean, but you are 100% treyf.

You aren't a victim

Eye for eye you stupid bitch

Nor are you a victim. You and your whatever-number-this-husband-is are the architects of your own misery.

What makes you so sure it will be a denial?

Maybe you need to be put under investigation for fraud and bribery

Six previous lawsuits being dismissed outright without him having to answer. It took you a couple of years and some wasted money but you finally filed one he had to answer to. I guess it's true that if you don't succeed eventually your dumb ass will if you keep doing the same shit over and over.

Moon's attorney graduated from Appalachian School of Law. And yet you're mocking the school. Ooookay.

What makes you so sure it won't pass?

Maybe you need to be investigated for fraud and bribery

The only one who needs to be investigated is you for your ability to be a caring mother and someone who should be able to have any type of unsupervised visitation with the spawn she shit out. You, 100%, are definitely edging into Andrea Yates territory and those kids need to be saved from you drowning them in the bathtub when your Midol and/or anti-schizophrenia meds run out. Also you're just an unfit mother.

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230. And we can all see what Trump said about that

Even if Trump gets rid of 230 today, so long as the site is closed down in the same day he can't be sued. He'd still be protected for anything posted prior to the repeal of the act. You don't get to just become an even shittier goy by filing more frivolous lawsuits claiming he's not protected for said postings unless a court specifically strikes the law down, which it won't be.

Yes? So do I. 7 years of it. I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for it

Seven years of failure is just experience in failure, nothing else. That's like saying you having ten husbands because you're a psychologically damaged cunt who can't seem to understand that the only men who find you attractive are similarly damaged cunts makes you an expert in marital affairs...of which you are clearly not.

Yes, the Motion to Strike is only part 1. Part 2 will be my Answer/Response to their Motions

I can't wait to see how this goes. I'm excited about the Judge putting your shit down like you were born a girl in China.

 

[DogZero]

@TamarYaelBatYah
Hey Melinda. Just wanted to let you know that in the United States the practical application of law extends beyond the black letter words on the page and is heavily dependent on previous use. This is called Precedent. While its clear you have access at the library to "Rules for Civil procedure" you may want to actually look at how its been enforced.

Luckily I have access to this thing called WestLaw, because unlike you, I actually got into a Law School, and since it is in the top 30 in the nation I get a free subscription.

In the Federal rules for Civil procedure the Motion to Strike is rule 12(f). It is one of the oldest rules that have yet to be amended. It is also almost never used.
To summarize why, Judge Ellen Hollander in her opinion for Blevins v Piatt (citing fourth circuit precedent no less. Hint: that's the circuit you are filing in) stated that "Rule 12(f) motions are generally viewed with disfavor because striking a portion of a pleading is a drastic remedy and because it is often sought by the movant simply as a dilatory tactic.’"

"Dilatory Tactic" @Null perhaps you should begin referring to all of Melinda's suits this way.

Judge Hollander set out a very clear and simple methodology for determining standards for rule 12(f) motions that might help you in your motion. She first wrote that the court has wide discretion and that the pleading must be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleader, sounds good for you right? Read on.

Rule 12(f) motions ordinarily “will be denied unless the matter under challenge has 'no possible relation to the controversy and may prejudice the other party.'"
Blevins v. Piatt, No. CV ELH-15-1551, 2015 WL 7878504, at *2 (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2015)

"a motion to strike a defense “should not be granted when the sufficiency of the defense depends upon disputed issues of fact or unclear questions of law."
Blevins v. Piatt, No. CV ELH-15-1551, 2015 WL 7878504, at *2 (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2015)

Good luck arguing that Null's lawyer discussing improper venue, section 230, and your literal claim "BEARS NO POSSIBLE RELATION TO THE CONTROVERSY"
Also good luck arguing that those responses don't speak to very obvious "unclear questions of law" (unclear to you anyway) or disputed facts.

Here is a link to the case that anyone should be able to access so you might read it yourself and perhaps learn a bit about what you are allegedly studying. https://cases.justia.com/federal/di...e/1:2015cv01551/318416/21/0.pdf?ts=1449312644

What Null's lawyer included in his motion are direct and relevant legal defenses and questions regarding not just your plethora of schizophrenic claims, but also the basic procedure upon which you (failed to) file them. They are inextricably linked to your allegations and therefore clearly fall under this standard for denying any sort of motion to strike that you may be contemplating.

Just because you read through a bit of black letter law does not make you a lawyer and the longer you harbor under this delusion that the application of law is a library visit away and that nothing extends deeper than what you read on the page you will continue to be unsuccessful in your suits.

I will conclude with a line from the case that I find especially relevant to you.
"In general, Piatt seems to labor under the misconception that an allegation in a complaint automatically renders the allegation admissible at trial."
Blevins v. Piatt, No. CV ELH-15-1551, 2015 WL 7878504, at *6 (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2015)

"In general Melinda seems to labor under the misconception that a defense against her allegation automatically renders that defense inadmissible."