2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[A_Callow_Youth]

Trump Legal Team Pressing Legal Challenges Into January

President Donald Trump's legal team is reportedly is moving full steam ahead with courtroom election challenges that are now expected to continue into January. Tuesday marked the "safe harbor" deadline, historically accepted as the date by which all state-level election...

www.newsmax.com

"President Donald Trump’s legal team is reportedly is moving full steam ahead with courtroom election challenges that are now expected to continue into January.

Tuesday marked the “safe harbor” deadline, historically accepted as the date by which all state-level election challenges — such as recounts and audits — are supposed to be completed.

But Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, representing Trump in his bid to overturn the election results, said the courts will look at challenges into next month, well past that deadline, the Washington Times reported.

“Justice [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is Jan. 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College,” they said in a statement, the news outlet reported.

“The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on Jan. 20 at noon.”

Ellis reiterated that message on Fox Business’ “Mornings With Maria.”

"Although we have the safe harbor deadline today, and we have the meeting of the Electoral College next week on Dec. 14, the ultimate date of significance is Jan. 6,” she maintained.

According to The New York Times, there are lawsuits left unresolved in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Of the three federal lawsuits still unresolved, two are in Wisconsin and one in Arizona, the news outlet reported.

There's also a petition before the United States Supreme Court involving an appeal of a state lawsuit in Pennsylvania; that suit addresses whether election officials were permitted to accept ballots up to three days after Election Day if they were postmarked by Nov. 3, the Times noted.

The New York Times reported that after California’s certification of its votes on Friday, Joe Biden will have secured more than the 270 Electoral College votes needed to become president.

But the president and his legal team have assailed the election results, alleging widespread and systemic voter fraud and massive errors in the tallying of a record number of mail-in and absentee ballots.

Those ballots were used more than ever this election cycle as a response to fears that requiring in-person voting would expose Americans to the coronavirus."

View attachment 1776388

So to anyone who doubted, I told you so. It's actually infuriating to me, because I personally want this to be over so we can move the fuck on with our political lives but even if Trump loses in the USSC then he just moves on to arguing that the US Senate shouldn't ceritfy the election. And if Trump wins in the USSC, then it's Biden's turn to unleash the lolfare.
Nobody. Fucking. Wins.

You want a horrifying thought? Okay, here it is. This time next year we're still litigating over this election.

>Trump's team citing Ginsburg
Absolute madmen.

Also, I'm fine with that, keep the government too busy suing itself to fuck the rest of us over.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

https://twitter.com/jennybethm/status/1336531926484570112

THREAD: Trump Campaign lawsuit in GA is now available online. It consists of 1585 pages outlining significant evidence of fraud.

Here are some key points:

2,560 felons voted
66,247 underage voters
2,423 votes from people not registered
1,043 individuals registered at PO boxes

4,926 individuals who voted in Georgia after registering in another state
395 individuals who voted in two states
15,700 votes from people who moved out of state before the election
40,279 votes of people who moved without re-registering in their new county

30,000 - 40,000 absentee ballots lacking proper signature matching and verification

The lawsuit also outlines violations of over 30 Georgia laws/codes and includes affidavits.

This is massive!

Read the lawsuit here:

Register of Actions

publicrecordsaccess.fultoncountyga.gov

https://archive.is/th5uM

 

[Superman93's Bitch]

So to anyone who doubted, I told you so. It's actually infuriating to me, because I personally want this to be over so we can move the fuck on with our political lives but even if Trump loses in the USSC then he just moves on to arguing that the US Senate shouldn't ceritfy the election. And if Trump wins in the USSC, then it's Biden's turn to unleash the lolfare.
Nobody. Fucking. Wins.

You want a horrifying thought? Okay, here it is. This time next year we're still litigating over this election. There's actually no mechanism that unarguably shuts this shit down.

I know you know this, but there is no alternative. This democracy is cursed to drown in lawsuit after lawsuit because the founding fathers were dumb enough to trust that common sense, informed opinions, and the ability to read between the lines would persist long enough for people to fill in the gaps of the constitution, and we're suffering for it today.

 

[A Security Guard]

Trump Legal Team Pressing Legal Challenges Into January

President Donald Trump's legal team is reportedly is moving full steam ahead with courtroom election challenges that are now expected to continue into January. Tuesday marked the "safe harbor" deadline, historically accepted as the date by which all state-level election...

www.newsmax.com

"President Donald Trump’s legal team is reportedly is moving full steam ahead with courtroom election challenges that are now expected to continue into January.

Tuesday marked the “safe harbor” deadline, historically accepted as the date by which all state-level election challenges — such as recounts and audits — are supposed to be completed.

But Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, representing Trump in his bid to overturn the election results, said the courts will look at challenges into next month, well past that deadline, the Washington Times reported.

“Justice [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is Jan. 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College,” they said in a statement, the news outlet reported.

“The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on Jan. 20 at noon.”

Ellis reiterated that message on Fox Business’ “Mornings With Maria.”

"Although we have the safe harbor deadline today, and we have the meeting of the Electoral College next week on Dec. 14, the ultimate date of significance is Jan. 6,” she maintained.

According to The New York Times, there are lawsuits left unresolved in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Of the three federal lawsuits still unresolved, two are in Wisconsin and one in Arizona, the news outlet reported.

There's also a petition before the United States Supreme Court involving an appeal of a state lawsuit in Pennsylvania; that suit addresses whether election officials were permitted to accept ballots up to three days after Election Day if they were postmarked by Nov. 3, the Times noted.

The New York Times reported that after California’s certification of its votes on Friday, Joe Biden will have secured more than the 270 Electoral College votes needed to become president.

But the president and his legal team have assailed the election results, alleging widespread and systemic voter fraud and massive errors in the tallying of a record number of mail-in and absentee ballots.

Those ballots were used more than ever this election cycle as a response to fears that requiring in-person voting would expose Americans to the coronavirus."

View attachment 1776388

So to anyone who doubted, I told you so. It's actually infuriating to me, because I personally want this to be over so we can move the fuck on with our political lives but even if Trump loses in the USSC then he just moves on to arguing that the US Senate shouldn't ceritfy the election. And if Trump wins in the USSC, then it's Biden's turn to unleash the lolfare.
Nobody. Fucking. Wins.

You want a horrifying thought? Okay, here it is. This time next year we're still litigating over this election.

Don't know why people think it's Bush V. Gore 2: Electric Boogaloo. Instead of one state that miscounted votes, you have multiple states intentionally pushing straight ticket Biden votes into the ballot box. This is a whole new level that's never experienced before in the history of the United States. No one expected this to happen and it's so widespread, it's hard to organize it.

 

[MrJokerRager]

Don't know why people think it's Bush V. Gore 2: Electric Boogaloo. Instead of one state that miscounted votes, you have multiple states intentionally pushing straight ticket Biden votes into the ballot box. This is a whole new level that's never experienced before in the history of the United States. No one expected this to happen and it's so widespread, it's hard to organize it.

Third world shitholes do this stuff all the time. It can be organized as all the hearings say the same thing.

Trump Legal Team Pressing Legal Challenges Into January

President Donald Trump's legal team is reportedly is moving full steam ahead with courtroom election challenges that are now expected to continue into January. Tuesday marked the "safe harbor" deadline, historically accepted as the date by which all state-level election...

www.newsmax.com

"President Donald Trump’s legal team is reportedly is moving full steam ahead with courtroom election challenges that are now expected to continue into January.

Tuesday marked the “safe harbor” deadline, historically accepted as the date by which all state-level election challenges — such as recounts and audits — are supposed to be completed.

But Rudy Giuliani and Jenna Ellis, representing Trump in his bid to overturn the election results, said the courts will look at challenges into next month, well past that deadline, the Washington Times reported.

“Justice [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg recognized in Bush v. Gore that the date of ‘ultimate significance’ is Jan. 6, when Congress counts and certifies the votes of the Electoral College,” they said in a statement, the news outlet reported.

“The only fixed day in the U.S. Constitution is the inauguration of the president on Jan. 20 at noon.”

Ellis reiterated that message on Fox Business’ “Mornings With Maria.”

"Although we have the safe harbor deadline today, and we have the meeting of the Electoral College next week on Dec. 14, the ultimate date of significance is Jan. 6,” she maintained.

According to The New York Times, there are lawsuits left unresolved in Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Of the three federal lawsuits still unresolved, two are in Wisconsin and one in Arizona, the news outlet reported.

There's also a petition before the United States Supreme Court involving an appeal of a state lawsuit in Pennsylvania; that suit addresses whether election officials were permitted to accept ballots up to three days after Election Day if they were postmarked by Nov. 3, the Times noted.

The New York Times reported that after California’s certification of its votes on Friday, Joe Biden will have secured more than the 270 Electoral College votes needed to become president.

But the president and his legal team have assailed the election results, alleging widespread and systemic voter fraud and massive errors in the tallying of a record number of mail-in and absentee ballots.

Those ballots were used more than ever this election cycle as a response to fears that requiring in-person voting would expose Americans to the coronavirus."

View attachment 1776388

So to anyone who doubted, I told you so. It's actually infuriating to me, because I personally want this to be over so we can move the fuck on with our political lives but even if Trump loses in the USSC then he just moves on to arguing that the US Senate shouldn't ceritfy the election. And if Trump wins in the USSC, then it's Biden's turn to unleash the lolfare.
Nobody. Fucking. Wins.

You want a horrifying thought? Okay, here it is. This time next year we're still litigating over this election. There's actually no mechanism that unarguably shuts this shit down.

All Biden had to do was agree to an audit. But nope questioning the results is racism and hurts "people of color" (read niggers).

Whenever Democrats had a real chance to prove Republicans wrong, they just bailed out. They act like spiteful cunts on the radio mad at Trump gaining voters rather than supposedly Biden outperforming Obama and Hillary.

I don't blame Trump for being suspicious and I have no sympathy for Biden trying to force everyone to believe this illusionary lie that he won.

 

[Reisen Storm]

All Biden had to do was agree to an audit. But nope questioning the results is racism and hurts "people of color" (read niggers).

I still can't help but laugh at this. Like holy shit, it's that simple. But every Democrat and their supporters just got up and arms against it.

 

[CrippleThreat]

I still can't help but laugh at this. Like holy shit, it's that simple. But every Democrat and their supporters just got up and arms against it.

And after that, if Biden still is ahead, we'll laugh, take the loss, and shrug on some "guess it's just the system."

No way in hell can you sell this election as "Just the system at work again, more blatant irregularities and all! Nothing to see here, okay? Try again next time."

 

[GuntPunt]

I still can't help but laugh at this. Like holy shit, it's that simple. But every Democrat and their supporters just got up and arms against it.

In order to control a Democrat, you just need to say whatever platform is that it is -ist. It doesn't really matter the -ist, as long as it isn't contradictory to the big 2: racist and sexist.

 

[Dr J]

So to anyone who doubted, I told you so. It's actually infuriating to me, because I personally want this to be over so we can move the fuck on with our political lives but even if Trump loses in the USSC then he just moves on to arguing that the US Senate shouldn't ceritfy the election. And if Trump wins in the USSC, then it's Biden's turn to unleash the lolfare.
Nobody. Fucking. Wins.

What's Biden gonna do? Supreme Court rules in Trump's favour, Supreme Court's say is final. He could, in theory, mount a challenge at the certification when Congress meets in joint session. But the Democrats don't have the numbers.

Whereas Trump, if the Supreme Court rules in his favour and the electors are changed, great. If the court rules in his favour but the electors vote for Biden anyway, Republicans have a good basis to challenge that at the certification and if the court rules against him he can still challenge at the certification (because it's a political not a legal or judicial process, same as the shampeachment they tried to push on him) and win because he has the numbers.

Biden really needs for SCOTUS to either not take the case or rule in his favour more than Trump does

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

Ok one thing I am going to ask is that if Trump‘s side pulls this off and the progressives try to riot, who is gonna give them the numbers? It looks like a lot of people are already suffering from voters‘ remorse regarding Biden. I know places like Portland are gonna be hotbeds of violence no matter what, but can they really find the will to sustain the type of rioting that would do the necessary damage? At this point the only point to riot would be to torch the urban areas so badly that there is no hope of recovery. If they did this, where would future voters come from for the Dems?

I mean if fraud is proven in SCOTUS, then the progressives in a tantrum have the urban neighborhoods and businesses burned to the ground, they can’t point and say it is Trump’s fault. There is going to be a point where the normally Democrat voting block will have no choice but to acknowledge that every single time a Republican gets a win, they are “punished” by the Dems with riots and tantrums that put them into a deeper pit. Something is going to have to give, right? You can’t riot forever, if you try then people will want to see you removed from society and will gladly let the gov’t hang you.

 

[Dr J]

All Biden had to do was agree to an audit. But nope questioning the results is racism and hurts "people of color" (read niggers).

Trump basically gave Biden the opportunity for a very easy political win. He argues for transparency he looks strong, he looks reasonable, he looks more mature than Trump and if they did a proper audit and found that Biden won legitimately then Trump looks foolish and there's no clouds over Biden when he takes office.

The fact that he didn't take it tells me all I need to know about whether or not he cheated. He knows he didn't win fairly

And after that, if Biden still is ahead, we'll laugh, take the loss, and shrug on some "guess it's just the system."

There's no way Biden won legitimately and his refusal to allow a proper audit and call for transparency is the biggest tell.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

i'm gonna CUUUUUUUUUUUM
look who was riiiiii-iiiiight

uhhhhhhhhh........... yeah

That doesn't sound good

The Texas suit covers the same topic over a wider area. In this situation, SCOTUS obviously decided to decline to hear the smaller suit.

 

[Dr J]

The Texas suit covers the same topic over a wider area. In this situation, SCOTUS obviously decided to decline to hear the smaller suit.

They didn't decline to hear the PA suit. What they did was turn down the request for emergency injunctive relief. Probably because if they took it and ruled on it the certification is void anyway.

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

A chinese spy thot banged OR TRADED FAVORS WITH a whole bunch of American politicians for sweet, sweet intel. including Eric Swalwell

View attachment 1776216

Edit: I cannot guarantee the thot banged the fartmonster

Swalwell has such a retarded look on his face constantly. We pick such winners to be our leaders.

 

[Eggplant Wizard]

Does this imply anything? Feel free to correct me, don't want to get my hopes up too easily.

https://twitter.com/APhilosophae/status/1336421458541768707?s=20

View attachment 1775324

Alabama is actually taking a definitive action on something that isn’t football, Jesus, NASCAR, or rejecting gambling.

Arkansas has decided to exist.

Florida man is suiting up for court, and he’s fucking sober.

Cue final boss music, this might be it!

 

[StarkRavingMad]

You want a horrifying thought? Okay, here it is. This time next year we're still litigating over this election. There's actually no mechanism that unarguably shuts this shit down.

Far from optimal in the slightest ... But still better than rolling over and allowing an election to be stolen.

 

[CrippleThreat]

Alabama is actually taking a definitive action on something that isn’t football, Jesus, NASCAR, or rejecting gambling.

Arkansas has decided to exist.

Florida man is suiting up for court, and he’s fucking sober.

Cue final boss music, this might be it!

Just need Wyoming to be a thing this time around to really seal the deal.

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

All Biden had to do was agree to an audit. But nope questioning the results is racism and hurts "people of color" (read niggers).

That that was one of the state of Michigan's actual arguments against election fraud was as disgusting as it was silly and baseless. I think it was more a tacit admission of guilt than anything. Most people do not know that the black groups involved in counting in some of the metropolitan areas were longtime democrat activists, that they had been training and organizing others for this all year long. The state knew how that scam was setup though, and the cries of racism might be to divert from that.

It looks like a lot of people are already suffering from voters‘ remorse regarding Biden.

Do not underestimate TDS, the outrage the media will whip up, and the left's organizational abilities. Do remember that they control almost every major institution in much of the western world. There will be no shortage of rioters on hand, egged on by an international cadre of spooks to shape them for maximum efficiency. This is the kind of shit they do as a matter of routine, all around the world.

We've seen who wins when Trump loses -- every evil ghoul possible -- so the theory that this is effectively if not literally a color revolution is probably quite sound. The amount of coordination they have expended over these last four years probably dwarfs most anything in the history of the world. This is big shit.

Say SCOTUS crowns Trump: the media will whip everyone into a froth that will make their previously unprecedentedly massive psy-ops from these last years look quaint. There will be no shortage of useful idiots to throw into riots.

 

[Gehenna]

Ah well, there's the rub. Here's which party controls the governor and legislature by disputed state

WI - D governor, R legislature
MI - D governor, R legislature
PA - D governor, R legislature
GA - R governor, R legislature
NV - D governor, D legislature
AZ - R governor, R legislature.

However, GA Gov Kemp seems to be on board with the coup. And the head of the legislature in MI is similarly on board. What would happen in a vote in the legislature? I'm not sure. The fact that Kemp doesn't want to allow a special session and Doug Mastriano was prevented from having a special session in PA makes me think the RINOs are concerned that a vote in the legislature would flip the state though.

Governor doesn't have a say in it so that is meaningless. In the event this thrown to the states to decide its pure legislature.

Which... is less rosy than it appears. Wisconsin and Arizona would be locks in such a case, both are solidly red and pissed with minimal RINOs.... the problem is Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Georgia. High RINO counts, and real risks of being voted out.

View attachment 1774685

Shit going south soon.

They really, really better not try this angle with the Texas lawsuit. Breyer would balk at it, and they need every single one of the liberal justices to stand firm.

Here we go
View attachment 1775175

And Its Happening

What I can figure is that the USSC would rather have one case regarding four states than four cases regarding four states.
But in my opinion rejecting the PA case with not even listed dissenters is a bad sign. It means that they may be reluctant to get involved period unless they absolutely have to; such as a state vs state fight where there is no lower court than the USSC. And even then they might just say "lol no".

If you think that these justices have been left alone during this entire process, you're dead wrong. They've been having meetings with Capitol Police and various other politicians lecturing to them the consequences of "a wrong decision".

You doom, but let me give the flip side. Trump has shown he can protect D.C., Biden supported the riots. The justices know they are in much greater risk from Biden... but can be protected much better by Trump. Additionally, the reason for not listing names is... only controlled by one person.

The Chief Justice, Roberts.

I could spin a ton of possibilities as to why,. but its worth noting A: No other justices get a say, so its not indicative of the bench as a whole, and B: The person who had a say is assumed on the liberal side.

If the 6-3 is true, I REALLY want to know who the sixth Justice was. I'd actually say Breyer is more likely than Roberts.

View attachment 1775396

https://twitter.com/Barnes_Law/status/1336404835558543361

Yes, he is right here. Its worth noting to the people complaining about the others claiming the case lacks in Merit. Merit and Standing are two separate issues. I don't think anyone is insane enough to claim that Texas lacks the Standing to bring the case, but Merit is a separate issue.

It's not a matter of not being interested. They're being threatened. If Trump is crowned by the SC, then it's on the heads of those individual justices. They "betrayed" the Republic, they're now "responsible" for what comes next.

This is why the Texas case is... interesting. If the SC sides with them, it isn't crowning Trump the winner. Its relenting to the states worry, which HAPPENS to make Trump winner (possibly, see above for legislature issues). That degree of separation could very easily provide them cover to make a decision they'd not do otherwise.

Texas case is docketed in the SC, a bunch of other states are joining it. It's probably going to end up as all Republican held states vs all Democrat held states.

This is the Best Case Scenario, honestly. There are more red states than blue states, and it would provide yet more cover for the SC to make a decision unhindered by the pressure of it being "Crowning Trump President".

PA has responded to the Texas lawsuit with the laches argument. “Nobody complained about it before.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/texas-sues-georgia-michigan-pennsylvania-and-wisconsin-supreme-court-over-election

“The state of Pennsylvania has replied to the Texas lawsuit, arguing that it doesn't actually address Act 77 - a 2019 statute which allows voters to cast mail-in ballots for any reason.

Pennsylvania also argues that Texas doesn't articulate how 'massive disenfranchisement' of voters by tossing out the results of the election 'would accord with the Due Process Clause, which requires the counting of votes cast in reasonable reliance on existing election rules,' and that the case at hand wouldn't result in a 'circuit split' - when two or more different circuit courts of appeals might rule differently on the same legal issue (and is one of the factors the Supreme Court uses when deciding to take cases).

PA is also arguing that Texas, or anyone, has had since 2019 to object to Act 77, which violates the 'doctrine of laches.'“

This argument is awful, not least because its well established precedent that you can only sue once damaged so saying "neener neener, its too late" will get shot out of the water by the SC.

View attachment 1775861

Oh shit, that 100% means Roberts wanted to hear it. I was a little worried he'd cuck out completely, but now we know he's at least INTERESTED.

Not... necessarily. I am waiting for confirmation since this is "Anonymous Sources" and I treat them with equal disdain no matter which side of the aisle they come from. That being said, Breyer could have peeled off. He'd have several principled objections to voter fraud, and has peeled off from the liberal justices in the past. I don't think he has ever voted Aye when Roberts has voted Nay, but Roberts is bought and paid for and his judicial 'philosophy' comes in direct conflict with Breyer's. Which I don't think has ever occurred before.

I must say I do enjoy the significant increase in demoralization posters crawling out of the woodwork today

"QUICK! GOOD NEWS! DEMORALIZE! DEMORALIZE! THE TRUMPTARDS CANNOT BE ALLOWED ANY HOPE!

Even as someone who continues to say the chance is very, very slim I find this amusing.

Barnes did a video on his locals board where he explains the texas case.

To very quickly sum up his viewpoint he believes that if SCOTUS hears the case it will be a game changer as ruling in favor of Texas attracts much less problems that ruling on some of the other cases and it's also a solution that addresses all of the contested states at once.

Basically, yes. It echos what I have typed above.

Though I would change it to POTENTIAL gamechanger. Texas needs to bring its A+ game because there is a TON of hurdles and wrenches to be thrown in its works.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1336478948222513152

I seriously hope they just ignore the lawsuit like the arrogant tools they are.