Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

You seem so sure of it without even seeing them.

Guess somebody needs to be reported to the BAR association for fraud

What fraud do you think has been committed here, Mel? What do you think fraud is in this context?

You don't have the intellectual skills to decipher distinguishing factors between lawsuits. I don't need to entertain your uneducated ignorance

You don't have the intellectual skills to make different lawsuits, Mel.
Anyways, this is going to look even more hilarious in hindsight when your motion is denied and your case thrown out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Ok, five-time loser. Have fun with your motion to strike, I'm sure it'll be as beautiful a masterpiece as the rest of your suit.
Just proved my point

At least the lawyer had enough brains to correctly identify that there were 2 prior lawsuits.



What fraud do you think has been committed here, Mel? What do you think fraud is in this context?



You don't have the intellectual skills to make different lawsuits, Mel.
Anyways, this is going to look even more hilarious in hindsight when your motion is denied and your case thrown out.

It's going to look hilarious when someone gets reported to the BAR association

You seem so certain of the outcome


I almost believe the "everything we need" bit, but you definitely don't have lots of what you want. Granted, you want you and your kids to have very little because you live an incredibly sheltered life, but from pictures we've seen and very telling conversations I've read, you don't have many commodities outside of basics.

"Lots of what we want" doesn't mean I lack what I want. It means I don't go to excess and extravagance. I live a simple modest life which doesn't oppress others in the name of consumerism.

There is only one thing I want but don't have: a farm.

And if Elohim wants to delay that, that's Elohim's choice, and I accept that.

Otherwise I have what I want.


Correct... they use birth control to free themselves for more profitable jobs that benefit society. Any retard can raise a brood of semiliterate piglets, yourself being a prime example.

Also, "themself" isn't a word, you dumb pig.

Intelligent women don't use birth control at all because intelligent women follow Elohim's Torah which forbids it.

Intelligent women don't fear pregnancy. They have enough dignity to stand up in the face of male narcissism (Patriarchy) and love their children no matter how those children come into the world



Prove it

Put on a bikini and take a selfie

If your legs are so pretty, prove it,

Showing my nakedness publicly is against The Torah. Why are you asking me to break The Torah?

And secondly, why are you trying to get me to sexually objectify myself?

Yeah, bullshit Melinda. $3000 a year would mean you're making around $45000 a year. Don't try to lie about taxes when people here actually work.

Go read the comment again. Did I say the $3,000 came from only income tax?



You're a lazy nigger bragging about being a parasite.

You're a Capitalistic brainwashed terd bragging about being free when all you are is a slave on some fat rich man's hamster wheel

because you're one of the dumbest people alive

And yet I'm not a Troll on a website trying to feed my sadism through narcissistically abusing designated Scapegoats called "lolcow"s

Your lack of morality is the sign of your stupidity. While my Perfection at the soul level is because I have a Genius IQ.

It's funny how Elohim punishes people for their evil with arrogance and stupidity, you being the prime example here
 
It's going to look hilarious when someone gets reported to the BAR association

Who are you reporting? Legitimate question. Who are you reporting, and to which Bar Association?

You seem so certain of the outcome

Yes, because your case is prima facie absurd. You're acting as if being certain of an outcome is criminal in some way. Is it only okay when you're certain?

And yet I'm not a Troll on a website trying to feed my sadism through narcissistically abusing designated Scapegoats called "lolcow"s

Your lack of morality is the sign of your stupidity. While my Perfection at the soul level is because I have a Genius IQ.

Strongly doubt you have a genius IQ, Mel. But hey, thanks for really going whole hog on demonstrating those NPD traits again.
 
It's going to look hilarious when someone gets reported to the BAR association

You seem so certain of the outcome
You gonna really do it?

Yeah, because we know how bad you are, and we know law. You are unlikely to succeed. There was even caselaw(post) cited that shows you are unlikely to win.
The caselaw in question
Intelligent women don't use birth control at all
Citacion please.
intelligent women follow Elohim's Torah
Citacion please
You're a Capitalistic brainwashed terd bragging about being free when all you are is a slave on some fat rich man's hamster wheel
Citacion please

Edit: I also showed you quite a few caselaw that easily dismiss your case. This matters because even if jurisdiction was valid (and there was a good argument made as to why it isn't) and even if the service was valid, and even if everything you said is true, this shows that you would still lose.
 
Last edited:
Intelligent women don't use birth control at all because intelligent women follow Elohim's Torah which forbids it.
Actually it doesn't and we've proven this time and time again, but a fake Jew like yourself doesn't understand Judaism.

You're a Capitalistic brainwashed terd bragging about being free when all you are is a slave on some fat rich man's hamster wheel
Some of us work from home and have companies coming to us. It's not our fault you've never been successful at making money.

Take a proper IQ test and we'll see about that, I'd be surprised to see triple digits
I'd be surprised if it passed 85. Though IQ tests mean shit all, it would still be nice to see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Actually it doesn't and we've proven this time and time again, but a fake Jew like yourself doesn't understand Judaism.

You posted The Talmud, not The Torah.

Moron


Some of us work from home and have companies coming to us. It's not our fault you've never been successful at making money.

You're trying to compare yourself to a woman who takes care of 6 children and homeschooling while self-employed?

You've made 5 children and you dumped them all off on others people. You're not successful at making money at all. You dump your parental responsibilities on others in exchange for money

Now I'm going to call you a moron twice

Moron


You gonna really do it?

Yeah, because we know how bad you are, and we know law. You are unlikely to succeed. There was even caselaw(post) cited that shows you are unlikely to win.
The caselaw in question

Citacion please.

Citacion please

Citacion please

Edit: I also showed you quite a few caselaw that easily dismiss your case. This matters because even if jurisdiction was valid (and there was a good argument made as to why it isn't) and even if the service was valid, and even if everything you said is true, this shows that you would still lose.

Patience.

My Response will be filed soon.


t hey, thanks for really going whole hog on demonstrating those NPD traits again.

Just because Psychologists says thinking you are Perfect is "narcissitic" doesn't mean it overrides Elohim's Torah

Too big a thought for you?



How many lawsuits have you filed in the past five years? How many have you won?

Against Moon? Or in all?
 
You have NPD.

Too big a thought for you?

That's your hypothesis. But you lack supporting facts


90% sure you said you filled it yesterday.

Also, weird how you didn't address any of my other points

I mailed off/filed a Motion to Strike first only against their Motion to Set Aside Default. That's the primer, so to speak. The Judge then has the ability to strike ALL or only a portion of their Motion to Set Aside Default.

The judge can either (a) GRANT or (b) GRANT IN PART or (c) and DENY IN PART or (d) DENY my Motion to Strike. Once he does that, I will then file a response to whatever the judge hasn't gutted out of their Motion to Set Aside Default.

If he strikes the whole thing I don't even have to respond, the Default still stands.

If he strikes only a part of it, I only have to respond to whatever is not striken.

If he denies my motion completely, then I have to prepare a lengthier response to all of their Motions

The Motion to Strike is a smart first maneuver because it can slim down what I need to respond to
 
You're trying to compare yourself to a woman who takes care of 6 children and homeschooling while self-employed?

You've made 5 children and you dumped them all off on others people. You're not successful at making money at all. You dump your parental responsibilities on others in exchange for money

Now I'm going to call you a moron twice

Moron
Hate to break it to you but I've always looked after my kids. My wife does less work than me and so does our nanny who only has to work around two hours a day right now. I'm the one who works three or more jobs a day seven days a week to look after my family and do the majority of the chores around the house. I do all of that while also going to school. You don't do jack shit other than collect welfare and look after retards who also need government help. I also always made sure to put my kids in the best schools possible because I want them to have a good, successful life when they grow up. We've also never been evicted or need government hand outs because I work my ass off for my family. Too bad the same can't be said about some loose woman such as yourself.


That's your hypothesis. But you lack supporting facts
When the fuck are you going to learn what hypothesis means? Is it that hard to look it up? We have 731 pages showing people that you're narcissistic. Some genius level intellect you have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Hate to break it to you but I've always looked after my kids. My wife does less work than me and so does our nanny who only has to work around two hours a day right now. I'm the one who works three or more jobs a day seven days a week to look after my family and do the majority of the chores around the house. I do all of that while also going to school. You don't do jack shit other than collect welfare and look after retards who also need government help. I also always made sure to put my kids in the best schools possible because I want them to have a good, successful life when they grow up. We've also never been evicted or need government hand outs because I work my ass off for my family. Too bad the same can't be said about some loose woman such as yourself.
Haha, you try so hard when you clearly just proved my point: you dump your children off on other people to take care of them.

Enough said!

We have 731 pages showing people that you're narcissistic.

That's not a fact. Again, that's an allegation.

Do you know what a FACT is?
 
That's your hypothesis. But you lack supporting facts
The fact that you think yourself to have "genius IQ" and "that you are perfect". Since we know neither is true, for you to have such thoughts is, as you yourself admitted, signs of NPD
That's your hypothesis. But you lack supporting facts




I mailed off/filed a Motion to Strike first only against their Motion to Set Aside Default. That's the primer, so to speak. The Judge then has the ability to strike ALL or only a portion of their Motion to Set Aside Default.

The judge can either (a) GRANT or (b) GRANT IN PART or (c) and DENY IN PART or (d) DENY my Motion to Strike. Once he does that, I will then file a response to whatever the judge hasn't gutted out of their Motion to Set Aside Default.

If he strikes the whole thing I don't even have to respond, the Default still stands.

If he strikes only a part of it, I only have to respond to whatever is not striken.

If he denies my motion completely, then I have to prepare a lengthier response to all of their Motions

The Motion to Strike is a smart first maneuver because it can slim down what I need to respond to
That's not related to any of my previous comments, but thanks for sharing your battle plan.
I know how judge's ability to grant orders works.
That's not a fact. Again, that's an allegation.

Do you know what a FACT is?
That's not an allegation. That is, by definition, a fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: super thug
Haha, you try so hard when you clearly just proved my point: you dump your children off on other people to take care of them.

Enough said!
Do explain, how do I drop my children off for others to look after? I understand that you don't want your retards to have an education but I spend a good amount of money to make sure they have the best education they can get. Are you upset that I have a nanny? She currently doesn't do a whole lot and when she was working she just picked up my kids from school while I was at school. and dusted the place Is it my fault that I'm a responsible parent? Hate to break it to you Melinda, but that's how I was raised. Take responsibilities for your actions and be responsible for the life you give.

That's not a fact. Again, that's an allegation.

Do you know what a FACT is?
Not a allegation, it's a statement of fact. We now have 732 pages showing people that you're a narc.
 
We now have 732 pages showing people that you're a narc

You have 732 pages is the FACT

"Showing people you are a narc" is still an allegation

Do you know what a FACT is?



Do explain, how do I drop my children off for others to look after? I understand that you don't want your retards to have an education but I spend a good amount of money to make sure they have the best education they can get. Are you upset that I have a nanny? She currently doesn't do a whole lot and when she was working she just picked up my kids from school while I was at school. and dusted the place Is it my fault that I'm a responsible parent? Hate to break it to you Melinda, but that's how I was raised. Take responsibilities for your actions and be responsible for the life you give.

No need to explain. You just said it again. You dump your children off on other people to take care of them so you can do whatever you want

You're a bad parent


The fact that you think yourself to have "genius IQ" and "that you are perfect". Since we know neither is true, for you to have such thoughts is, as you yourself admitted, signs of NPD

Here is where you fail to distinguish between having narcissistic traits and actual NPD

I have no problem admitting that I have a narcissistic TRAIT: I believe my soul is perfect and that I never sin.

But this is a narcissistic TRAIT actually commanded by The Torah

I do not have NPD though. In order to have NPD you have to be actively narcissistically abusing another person. Or your encounters with others include instigating narcissistic abuse. Neither apply to me
 
Just because Psychologists says thinking you are Perfect is "narcissitic" doesn't mean it overrides Elohim's Torah

Too big a thought for you?

You use the torah as a talisman to avoid admitting fault because you have NPD. There's no question that that's too big a thought for you because admitting it would probably destroy your incredibly fragile ego.

ANYWAYS Who are you reporting to the Bar association and which one are you reporting them to?

That's not a fact. Again, that's an allegation.

No, that we have Over 730 pages of you demonstrating NPD traits is a fact.

Do you know what a FACT is?

Yes. You have NPD. Fact. You are suing a man because a website hurt your feelings. Fact. You are going to lose. Not yet a fact, but it will be. When you lose you will blame anything but yourself. prediction. You are incapable of admitting fault in any meaningful way. Fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Assman
You use the torah as a talisman to avoid admitting fault because you have NPD.

I don't need to admit error where The Torah doesn't say there is error


No, that we have Over 730 pages of you demonstrating NPD traits is a fact.

That's a hypothesis.

Do you have supporting FACTS?

You have NPD. Fact.

"You have NPD" is again your theory/allegation/hypothesis.

Do you have supporting FACTS?



You are suing a man because a website hurt your feelings. Fact.

More accurately it's called IIED



You are incapable of admitting fault in any meaningful way. Fact.

Again, this is a theory/hypothesis/allegation.

Supporting FACTS available?
 
Back