2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[Zero Day Defense]

No, because I have conviction that fraud did actually occur, regardless of how SCOTUS rules.

It should depend on what's ruled on. You can't say that a court case proved or disproved fraud when it concluded with a dismissal due to standing.

 

[DeadFish]

This is just...not good. For the last 4 years, the only "TV" I've watched is about 30 minutes or so of youtube while eating a light snack before bed. Originally, I only watched educational programming tutorials, but the recommendations slowly lead me down a Jordan Peterson and Joe Rogan rat hole for years which I'd blast through at 2x. What I watch now is quite random, but still directed and a very hard habit to break. Most of the other "free" video sites have crappy apps and even crappier recommendations. I really don't want to go to youtube anymore. Is there any legit alternative? (and as a bonus, are any of them looking for a freelance python/postgresql developer lol)

In the old days there were no video websites.

Each creator had to make their own website and own embedded video service for their own stuff.

Way things got curated was via email through web rings. one link would take you to another and so on.

Forming bbs boards and asking around was another.

AOL chat was another.

It wasnt centralized.

Searching for info was like searching for a good bar.

The word of mouth is the oldest and easiest alternative to aggregate sites like google and youtube.

Dont fear. Theres always hope.

 

[I-chi]

"Every other lawsuit was laughed out of court. This one will be different! Just as Q predicted!"

Bookmarked this to laugh at your retard ass when this is thrown out.

Lol calm down retard, but then you get assmad at people negrating you so I don't know how your miserable ass is gonna keep up the momentum. Like I can't even read you with hulk voice anymore with all of that establishment cock pushing through the slit in your mask; this is why Panther was a professional.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Lol calm down retard, but then you get assmad at people negrating you so I don't know how your miserable ass is gonna keep up the momentum. Like I can't even read you with hulk voice anymore with all of that establishment cock pushing through the slit in your mask; this is why Panther was a professional.

Calm down, little guy. I know you're upset that your daddy lost, but you'll get over it.

 

[Meat Target]

Response

"UmM ThIS Is WhAT DeMoCrAcY LoOKs LiKe?!? We HaD tO BrEAk AliTo'S OrDeRs aND puLl OuT BaLlOtS UNdEr ThE TaBlE?!?"

The Cathedral is so irrefutably, unimpeachably right that anything that casts doubt on their infallibility must be squelched.

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

That doesn't take into account how vote counting works.

States have different jurisdictions, each of which does the counting. The areas then report the numbers. The ones that had higher Democratic turnout (i.e. Wayne County) were reporting their numbers when that "jump" occurred. The areas with more people generally take longer to count votes because there's more numbers. Is this your first election?


There's a significant amount that are totally fine with removing Section 230 because he wants to. But again, I will ask you... If the SC laughs this lawsuit out of court, will you stop with the "fraud" stuff?

I wonder if dedicated shitposting to such a degree makes complex and inquisitive thought nigh impossible. You are like an autistic case study in the damages being obsessed with two giant orange wrestling faggots can cause on the psyche.

Have you considered being evaluated by a psychiatrist?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

I wonder if dedicated shitposting to such a degree makes complex and inquisitive thought nigh impossible. You are like an autistic case study in the damages being obsessed with two giant orange wrestling faggots can cause on the psyche.

Have you considered being evaluated by a psychiatrist?

Sorry that understanding how vote counting works is beyond your comprehension. Is this your first election, too?

 

[JambledUpWords]

Jesus Christ himself could tell you that fraud didn't occur and you still would insist on it. Trump's own lawyers, under oath, said there's no evidence of voting fraud, yet you still sperg on that there was all because your cult leader said so.

Using the Jesus angle to change my mind is pathetic. Also, the specific cases Trump has don’t say fraud because that’s harder to prove in court. Going under whether or not the Constitution was followed with the election is a much smarter move, which is what the Texas case is arguing. Yes, Trump is pushing the fraud angle, but in the courts, the angles they are using are lack of procedures followed, which can be seen with the affidavits (such as not allowing observers).

 

[the fall of man]

You see this woman. Would you bang?

No, but I’m asian and know their lies

 

[Fanatical Pragmatist]

SCOTUS: "Pennsylvania, keep those ballots separate"
Pennsylvania election workers; "Lol no haha watcha gonna do about it!?!"
Texas et al.: "Hey! They can't do that!"
SCOTUS: "Haha stupid Texas, expecting us to punish PA for openly defying us!"

But then again it is 2020 so with police protecting #ACAB from BackTheBlue, who fucking knows...?

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Using the Jesus angle to change my mind is pathetic. Also, the specific cases Trump has don’t say fraud because that’s harder to prove in court. Going under whether or not the Constitution was followed with the election is a much smarter move, which is what the Texas case is arguing. Yes, Trump is pushing the fraud angle, but in the courts, the angles they are using are lack of procedures followed, which can be seen with the affidavits (such as not allowing observers).

It's not pathetic, it's true. There's nothing that could possibly change your mind about it. The lack of evidence of fraud should be enough, but your cult leader has spoken so thus it's gotta be true in your mind. It's a trait of autism, so I should expect that.

 

[Übertroon]

This entire mess is an direct result of this very mindset. The method by which we elect the President has deviated from it's original intent for centuries and now in glorious 2020 the powers that be took it one step too far. The only question is whether they will be allowed to get away with it. That is the general thrust of Texas' lawsuit. Either we follow constitutional law or we dont.

If the Supreme Court does not address this and tries to duck the issue, then the Union will be dealt a crushing blow it may not recover from.

Honestly the whole system needs a rework. Everything else moved on with technology, but we're still reliant on this 19th century compromise that people mostly just accepted because of the limitations of the time.

Now I'm not advocating voting machines. Anyone who knows how modern technology works knows how vulnerable such a system becomes. But here are some options I think are rational and would help regain trust in the system.

Firstly you have surveillance cameras in all vote counting locales. In fact you should give a camera to each vote counter. This eliminates the need for on site challengers that during the current election where held back 20 feet because of the Covid panic.

Secondly all ballot boxes should be marked and put in a digital database available to the public, even the mail in ballots. This lets the public see exactly what came from each county and when. No more late night ballot boxes of unknown origin. No more mail in ballots coming in four days later.

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

Sorry that understanding how vote counting works is beyond your comprehension. Is this your first election, too?

See what I mean? A claim to mastery of the issue but doesn't understand the simple constitutional issue brought forth by the Texas case or that only the state legislature can change election rules.

So dedicated to sweaty and oily images of homosexual orange wrestling icons that lazy shitposts is all he can manage. I do enjoy that he's found Jesus, argumentatively. First it was obsessing with the term "daddy" and asking everyone about how much "Trump is their daddy". Now it's all being saved by the Lord and "Jesus Christ is the ultimate authority".

You're really not as entertaining or intellectually challenging as you think you are.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

See what I mean? A claim to mastery of the issue but doesn't understand the simple constitutional issue brought forth by the Texas case or that only the state legislature can change election rules.

So dedicated to sweaty and oily images of homosexual orange wrestling icons that lazy shitposts is all he can manage. I do enjoy that he's found Jesus, argumentatively. First it was obsessing with the term "daddy" and asking everyone about how much "Trump is their daddy". Now it's all being saved by the Lord and "Jesus Christ is the ultimate authority".

You're really not as entertaining or intellectually challenging as you think you are.

So when the Texas case gets laughed out of court, will you admit I am right? I know you won't, but I can try

 

[Marchesa of the Vast]

Firstly you have surveillance cameras in all vote counting locales. In fact you should give a camera to each vote counter. This eliminates the need for on site challengers that during the current election where held back 20 feet because of the Covid panic.

No. We all know what would happen. "Oh no, the footage was accidentally wiped! But you can't throw out those votes because of disenfranchisement teehee!".

Paper ballots, multiple watchers. What's important isn't even just watching the vote counting, it's being able to challenge the votes as they are counted. You're not doing that with a camera.

So when the Texas case gets laughed out of court, will you admit I am right? I know you won't, but I can try

I don't think you've been right on anything yet unless you've blatantly misrepresented the situation to call it a win. There's no point in coming to any "agreement" or "bet" with someone as weaselly dishonest and autistically incapable of understanding words as you.

 

[MrJokerRager]

He is for only another 6 weeks or so. Then you get to live with President Biden. There will be no malarkey.

I think California should sue Texas for their voter suppression techniques

Given how the Democrats in California did a full 180 on legalized ballot harvesting and tried and failed to stop the GOP using it here.

They not suing unless they want open pandora box that will led to it being used against them.

 

[JambledUpWords]

It's not pathetic, it's true. There's nothing that could possibly change your mind about it. The lack of evidence of fraud should be enough, but your cult leader has spoken so thus it's gotta be true in your mind. It's a trait of autism, so I should expect that.

You say it like it’s a bad thing. You have just as many convictions as me and are just as stubborn. Also, there is plenty of evidence, more so than there ever was for the Russian collusion case that’s been pushed by the media for years. If Democrats were able to find as much evidence as Republicans have for the fraudulent election, I’d be more inclined to believe them.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

So when the Texas case gets laughed out of court, will you admit I am right? I know you won't, but I can try

And what will you do if we are right?

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

Jesus Christ himself could tell you that fraud didn't occur and you still would insist on it. Trump's own lawyers, under oath, said there's no evidence of voting fraud, yet you still sperg on that there was all because your cult leader said so.

I thought you said the lawyers under oath said there's no widespread voter fraud, not that there is no voter fraud? There's a clear distinction between the two, and even if the lawyers said that (let's say that's hypothetically true) that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Let's ask a simple question, is one case of voter fraud proof voter fraud exists? If yes, than almost anyone could attest that voter fraud does indeed exist, whether it's duplicate votes, double voting (as in moving from one state to vote in two different states), or even error-based fraud. Almost every election of every country I've ever seen has admitted to having some voter fraud, the distinction is that usually it's so small that it makes no difference to the real result. Heck even those Japanese Super Smash Bros. character polls had proof of voter fraud (alt accounts/repeat voting) from Sakurai.

From my own experience when voting this year, the pollsters didn't even ask for my id, or prove I was who I said I was when voting in my district. Most of the people in my district don't even know me which is heavily questionable in its own merits and against standard protocol. I could have easily had someone else claim to be me to vote under my name on the voter roll. Now imagine not knowing what protocols are being followed precisely and correct across the USA, and then tell me there are virtually 0 cases of voter fraud, and I'd argue you're being extremely naive.

It has nothing to do with believing or not believing Trump but understanding reality or that the system doesn't work as flawlessly as you'd think. Heck, I can't get the BBB and OSHA to preform their duties correctly and by the book, and you think any elections are running without shenanigans behinds the scenes?

Democrats often argue cops don't do their job correctly, businesses don't follow proper protocol, our legislators are corrupt, but somehow our voting system is squeaky clean? Something something X to doubt.

 

[dorxter¼]

If conservatives ever want a chance, that parallel web infrastructure needs to be built starting now.

As a linux admin and software dev of 10+ years, I've always wanted to do this. But I admit, I have no idea where to start. And even now as google shadow bans so many sites in their searches, it gets harder and harder to even be able to get the word out for a new service. Any attempts in the past at making a truly "free" platform have just failed rather quickly it seems.