2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
And finally, Georgia and Wisconsin:
1607631203657.png


1607631248086.png
 

Attachments

  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Nguyen Van Phuoc, Yamma Damma, CrystalHead and 7 others
Alec Benson Leary said:
-Harris will be the chosen one. She's clintonian enough, plus she's the safe kind of non-white, like that black guy who runs the restaurant where you like to eat but it's in a different neighborhood than where you live so no worries about too many boundaries being crossed.
Click to expand...
Ho boy, how innocent we all were over a year ago...
 
  • Feels
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: the fall of man, Nguyen Van Phuoc, spiritofamermaid and 7 others
20 State's Arguments:
1607631023742.png


  • Texas has no right to second guess courts who are blatantly violating the constitution and go to the SCOTUS, the place that literally exists for this purpose
  • Also, COVID COVID COVID and here, have a Strawman Argument about what Texas ISN'T arguing.
Not sending their best.

MI response...

1607631125256.png

1607631132960.png


  • SCOTUS shouldn't take this up.
    • Because SCOTUS doesn't have the ability to intervene in... inter... state... disputes.
      • Because there's totally not a case here!
      • And SCOTUS doesn't have the authority anyway
    • MOTHERFUCKING MUH LACHES
  • And even if they do take this up, there's no actual relief possible
    • Because, uh, the Electors Clause isn't a thing
      • No standing no standing no standing
      • And we didn't violate nuffin!
    • And the Equal Protection Clause isn't a thing
    • Nor is Due Process
  • Texas doesn't qualify for relief
    • Because Texas can't win this! Please agree before we actually have a trial
    • And even if we did rig the election in MI for Biden, it's not like Texas is HARMED by it.
    • And if you DO stop us from stealing elections, we WILL be harmed!
    • Won't someone think of the children?
 
  • Winner
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: GrayWater, the fall of man, Esophagus and 31 others
Zero Day Defense said:
Didn't that have more to do with the small timeline they were given to respond?
Click to expand...

I'd be more charitable on that interpretation, although - yes, everyone should have known the states were going to respond. It's more a rag on the small handful of people who interpret their cereal as eminent proof of victory.
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Autistic
Reactions: Esophagus, Vyse Inglebard, Hollywood Hulk Hogan and 1 other person
Jarolleon said:
When your political position is "If it ain't broke don't fix it" then a high tolerance for stupid bullshit is to be expected.
Click to expand...
Now let’s see what they do now that they know it’s not just broken, it’s been graded into a fine powder and snorted by Biden off a little girls shoulder.
 
  • Feels
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Esophagus, Confused Doggo, spiritofamermaid and 5 others
The High Prophet of Truth said:
Now let’s see what they do now that they know it’s not just broken, it’s been graded into a fine powder and snorted by Biden off a little girls shoulder.
Click to expand...
The next's generation's picture of "broken" will adjust to "Literally Zimbabwe" , and Gilded Age level corruption will seem fine.

It's a matter of comparison, you think it's been ground into fine powder because you're comparing it to the halycon days when Congress still declared wars, there was no income tax, and Wounded Knee was the worst thing the Feds had done in decades.
 
Last edited:
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
  • Agree
Reactions: the fall of man, spiritofamermaid, Livecorpse and 5 others
I know there is tons of other shit going on right now but Biden told black Civil Rights leaders "I'm not going to do anything about Police Reform" if he can't do it through the Congress.

Here’s what Biden told the civil rights leaders:


So there’s some things that I’m going to be able to do by executive order. I’m not going to hesitate to do it, but what I’m not going to do is I’m not going to do what used to — Vanita [Gupta], you probably used to get angry with me during the debates, when you’d have some of the people you were supporting saying, ‘On Day 1, I’m gonna have an executive order to do this!’ Not within the constitutional authority. I am not going to violate the Constitution. Executive authority that my progressive friends talk about is way beyond the bounds. And as one of you said, maybe it was you, Reverend Al [Sharpton], whether it’s far left or far right, there is a Constitution. It’s our only hope. Our only hope and the way to deal with it is, where I have executive authority, I will use it to undo every single damn thing this guy has done by executive authority, but I’m not going to exercise executive authority where it’s a question, where I can come along and say, ‘I can do away with assault weapons.’ There’s no executive authority to do away that. And no one has fought harder to get rid of assault weapons than me, me, but you can’t do it by executive order. We do that, next guy comes along and says, Well, guess what? By executive order, I guess everybody can have machine guns again. So we gotta be careful.
Click to expand...

Biden also warned the civil rights leaders that pressure on the incoming administration around police reform could hurt the party’s chances in the Georgia Senate runoffs, claiming that the Republicans’ ability to define that party as in favor of defunding the police is “how they beat the living hell out of us across the country.”
Click to expand...

So first progressives got BTFO'd and now BLM. MMMMM.... God. Can't you smell that.

Normalcy.

Article: https://theintercept.com/2020/12/10/biden-audio-meeting-civil-rights-leaders/
(Archive)
Esophagus said:
Nah he'll get some disease and hand the reigns over to Kamala. She'll be remembered as the first black female president* in American history.
Click to expand...
I'm half thinking they will deep fake Biden until Kamala can take over. Like they will have some motherfucker with a 3D capture suit shaking hands with world leaders so they can paste Biden over it for the media.

Ironically, "Biden" will probably use Twitter more than Trump ever did.

"Joe is still alive! He tweeted a dozen times today!"
 
  • Winner
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Nguyen Van Phuoc, Shroom King, Esophagus and 11 others
Georgia phoned it in.

1607631560113.png


Badly.

  • Texas lacks standing
    • Texas was not injured by a stolen national election
    • Texas cannot speak on behalf of it's electors, who are the only people who could be harmed, but are specifically prohibited from suing about this
    • Texas claims to speak for it's citizens which are third parties and thus they can't actually sue for a third party
  • This is political and messy, so the SCOTUS should refuse to do anything
    • Texas is demanding we adhere to the Constitution and we'd rather do our own thing, ergo Texas should just shut up
  • This isn't a big enough thing to justify a state suing another state
    • One state rigging it's local election and causing a national election to swing another way is not, in fact, controversial
    • Texas totally could do something other than a Lawsuit, ergo, they shouldn't be allowed to sue
  • Texas hasn't proven it's case yet so the case should be thrown out
    • Because we think Texas will lose
    • And because Texas wasn't harmed by us stealing an election
    • And anyway the media and popular vote agree with us so shut up
  • Texas isn't entitled to a fair national election, anyway

Wisconson at least tried a little better.

1607631987289.png

1607631995844.png

1607632002862.png


  • SCOTUS shouldn't hear this case
    • Because Texas has no interest in us violating the constitution and stealing an election
    • And besides, our local courts already said everything was fine
    • And if you don't throw this out, we'll say mean things about the SCOTUS and it'll harm democracy
  • MOTHERFUCKING MUH LACHES. BITCHES LOVE MUH LACHES
    • Texas waited too long to sue, they should have sued the picosecond the election started and not after actually creating a case
    • Our voters (including the fake ones) have due process rights and Texas is trying to violate them
      • Also, the plain text part of the constitution that says we can't do this doesn't exist, so please stop looking at it
  • Texas doesn't actually make a claim other than the claims we already tried to shoot down but those don't exist, so please ignore them.
    • We might have unconstitutionally changed our laws but that doesn't mean it's a constitutional violation
    • Texas can't sue on behalf of it's voters, therefore it can't claim due process or equal protection
    • Also, Texas's claims (that don't exist, remember) are meritless
      • Because the WI Supreme Court changed the law, which they're allowed to do, even though they're actually not
  • And besides, Texas can't justify stopping the election from being stolen to actually sue, so we shouldn't stop the stolen election to do this
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: GrayWater, PepsiVanilla, the fall of man and 40 others
Jarolleon said:
The next's generation's picture of "broken" will adjust to "Literally Zimbabwe" , and Gilded Age level corruption will seem fine.

It's a matter of comparison, you think it's been ground into fine powder because you're comparing it to the halycon days when Congress still declared wars, there was no income tax, and Wounded Knee was the worst thing the Feds had done in decades.
Click to expand...
It’s always sucked, it’s just fully in the open now and it’s so blatant there’s no denying it.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: the fall of man and Aaa0aaa0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back