2020 U.S. Presidential Election - Took place November 3, 2020. Former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden assumed office January 20, 2021.

[DeadFish]

we had zero trouble here in the suburbs with a lot of peaceful blm marches with police escorts. the city was fucked up beyond repair, in a single week reversed 10-12 years of hard economic, political and social work to make downtown commercially viable. liberals are out here talking about how the city is fine, and nothing is wrong while they're paying 100k-250k more than the assessed value for homes in the suburbs.

kenosha blocked the hi ways to prevent outsiders coming in.

So in a civil war oh shit things have collapsed scenario Im guessing that will be done except with armed check points.

There was also that video of activists marching peacefully by an Indiana neighborhood. What protesters saw was every resident armed and watching them.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

I actually hate that acronym.

Give us the source for the SCOTUS ruling in Biden's favor tomorrow, or we will rightfully mock you if it doesn't happen.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

Then what was the point in even taking it up and just dismissing it? Why even make the states waste their time writing a rebuttal? Why even let it come to a point where we have 40 fucking states threatening to knife each other over this? Why risk bad blood if you're just going to humor Texas by taking it up and then just dismissing it? Why not fucking dismiss it outright?

uh. did you miss the PA one earlier in the week? This tends to be how the court decides to hear every case - the litigation is made, a response is given, and then the court considers both of those things before it hands down its decision on whether to hear it/arguments. People have been warning that things getting docketed aren't necessarily a sign of anything - especially given that the docket is now a clown car.

 

[HumanHive]

Give us the source for the SCOTUS ruling in Biden's favor tomorrow, or we will rightfully mock you if it doesn't happen.

Okay. I guess we'll have to see.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

uh. did you miss the PA one earlier in the week? This tends to be how the court decides to hear every case - the litigation is made, a response is given, and then the court considers both of those things before it hands down its decision on whether to hear it/arguments. People have been warning that things getting docketed aren't necessarily a sign of anything - especially given that the docket is now a clown car.

From what I've read, the "evidence" that Texas gives isn't really evidence but circumstantial stuff (i.e. "bellweather counties") and incorrect stuff (i.e. the "Ohio + Florida since 1960" thing)

 

[Secret Asshole]

Okay. I guess we'll have to see.

You just going to leave us hanging and do us dirty like that? Cold.

 

[GuntPunt]

Okay. I guess we'll have to see.

Okay, so where's that proof?
All you have to do is post where you heard that.

 

[Rich Evans Apologist]

From what I've read, the "evidence" that Texas gives isn't really evidence but circumstantial stuff (i.e. "bellweather counties") and incorrect stuff (i.e. the "Ohio + Florida since 1960" thing)

So long as texas is making a claim other than 'pee pee poo poo fart' to the court, the accused parties are accorded the ability to submit a response. So it really doesn't matter -what- it is that they're claiming; they could have submitted something ironclad and you'd still have that deadline for response. If the defendants didn't submit, the court then just considers the case WITHOUT the defendants' response (which obviously tends to favor hearing it).

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

So long as texas is making a claim other than 'pee pee poo poo fart' to the court, the accused parties are accorded the ability to submit a response. So it really doesn't matter -what- it is that they're claiming; they could have submitted something ironclad and you'd still have that deadline for response. If the defendants didn't submit, the court then just considers the case WITHOUT the defendants' response (which obviously tends to favor hearing it).

Oh, I know. I just think that saying "Every time since 1960, these counties have predicted the winner!" in court is really, really stupid. That's like asking the NFL to overturn a football game because every game these two teams played since 1980 in a temperature above 70 degrees Fahrenheit, team A won, so thus, team A couldn't have lost!

 

[Epsteindidnothingwrong]

And I find it funny how the media is just "catching up" on all of the Hunter Biden shit during all of this.

Clown World, honk honk.

Wait until you find out that CNN made the groundbreaking discovery of the WuFlu coming from a little place called Wuhan, China after calling Donald Trump and others racist for saying it did.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Okay. I guess we'll have to see.

I'm not doubting that it could happen, just that you still haven't given a source on the SC intimidation, and them doing this will cause a shit storm of epic proportions.

 

[Blake Chortles]

From what I've read, the "evidence" that Texas gives isn't really evidence but circumstantial stuff (i.e. "bellweather counties") and incorrect stuff (i.e. the "Ohio + Florida since 1960" thing)

The issue is that these states blatantly broke their own election laws and usurped power from the legislature right before an election that demonstrably made their elections less secure. This isn’t up for debate.

the evidence of fraud is actually secondary here.

 

[Secret Asshole]

I'm not doubting that it could happen, just that you still haven't given a source on the SC intimidation, and them doing this will cause a shit storm of epic proportions.

I mean, it is 2020, the SC taking the absolute fucking worst route is entirely possible. I mean the only thing worse is the SC going full Lemonparty while ACB hides in the corner, but this is close.

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

Okay, so where's that proof?
All you have to do is post where you heard that.

Unless it's somehow a top secret source that he's for whatever reason sharing on a forum dedicated to mocking stupid people, I'm at the point were I think he's just saying this stuff to laugh at the flipout.

I mean, it is 2020, the SC taking the absolute fucking worst route is entirely possible. I mean the only thing worse is the SC going full Lemonparty while ACB hides in the corner, but this is close.

Again, I don't doubt that they'd be that dumb, just that this is the second time he's said something big like this then dipped with no further explanation.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

The issue is that these states blatantly broke their own election laws and usurped power from the legislature right before an election that demonstrably made their elections less secure. This isn’t up for debate.

the evidence of fraud is actually secondary here.

Except the issue with that is that the state's supreme court, at the time, said it was okay, so it's not fair to throw out the hundreds of thousands of votes. And if you do that, you also gotta invalidate every election in those states, including their congress, state legislature, and governor races. I don't see Texas and the Trump cult throwing a hissy fit about the congress races that happened under these issues, do you?

 

[GuntPunt]

Unless it's somehow a top secret source that he's for whatever reason sharing on a forum dedicated to mocking stupid people, I'm at the point were I think he's just saying this stuff to laugh at the flipout.

Again, I don't doubt that they'd be that dumb, just that this is the second time he's said something big like this then dipped with no further explanation.

I'm for the path that its complete bullshit because the usual suspects on Twitter or otherwise would've commented on it in smug satisfaction.

 

[AMHOLIO]

only thing worse is the SC going full Lemonparty while ACB hides in the corner, but this is close.

Why must you hurt me in this way?

 

[Zero Day Defense]

I actually hate that acronym.

I can sympathize. It's one letter off from "SCROTUS", which is either an accidental and mildly hilarious derogation or some fancy nu-Latin term for "scrotum".

 

[A_Callow_Youth]

Well, I mean, they already do. People generally are easily manipulated, and if they're being told that the enemy are eebil racists who want to murder them or put them in chains, they'll willingly go and fight. They might not be good fighters or particularly well-disciplined, but they will be fanatical. I would not be surprised if the majority of black people today would willingly take up arms to kill some rednecks if they were told they're fighting against racism and the fourth coming of the Klan.

Poorly-trained fanatics are good for three things: war crimes, human waves, and holding static defenses. The first turns the people against them, the second turns them against their leaders, and the third turns them into sitting ducks.

If somebody actually tries to turn AntiFa into the new NKVD, I give them 6 months, maybe a year until 90+% of them are dead or wounded for life and the remainder get reformed into extermination teams, following behind the front and doing the heinous shit that the regulars can't be trusted to.

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

Except the issue with that is that the state's supreme court, at the time, said it was okay, so it's not fair to throw out the hundreds of thousands of votes. And if you do that, you also gotta invalidate every election in those states, including their congress, state legislature, and governor races. I don't see Texas and the Trump cult throwing a hissy fit about the congress races that happened under these issues, do you?

Presidency effects other states unrelated to these states themselves. Sure you can make a case for the house and senate but the presidential vote basically has a direct effect on everyone where who they voted for governor won't effect me miles away. It's a context of magnitude.