Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Neither of these are criticism, they are insults. Criticism would be telling someone who is careless with money, "hey, you're careless with money". Constructive criticism would be, " hey, I've noticed that you frequently spend beyond your means, here's some budgeting suggestions." Insulting verbal abuse would be "You fucking greedy bitch. How dare you buy tampons and food for yourself and the kidswhen you got your paycheck? I wanted that money for weed because yahoohey knows I need it to put up with you."
Or for your second example, criticism would be, "wow, your skin looks really unhealthy" constructive criticism would be, "I've noticed that you have a lot of break outs. Do you think you might be over washing? Here's what I tried when I had that problem"
Insults and verbal abuse would be "Ugh your skin looks sallow and prematurely aged, like Melinda's. It's complete garbage. Sucks for you that instagram filters aren't real life."
But for real, your lack of understanding of the differences between these things, and that criticism is in fact neutral, just really drives home how damaged, skewed, and out of touch your thought processes are. Have you only ever been exposed to abusive language or kind gentle kid glove constructive criticism? You went to college, have they all become such hugboxes? So you're home with an asshole who hypothetically is incapable of saying, " hey, I wish you wouldn't leave your bras all over the bathroom, it makes it hard for me to shower," but instead says " I'm sick of your nasty tit slings in my way whenever I take a piss, next time I see them in there, I'll miss the toilet, you lazy messy sperm bank"
Or you're at college where every paper, no matter how garbage is talked up and praised. Oooh, look at you, you're a single mom in college! Sure, there are thousands upon thousands of women who do it, but Melinda deserves a special martyr medal for it.

Yes, I went to college and no Professor would promote all the trash that you just wrote. I grew up in a highly educated area where I NEVER heard people talk to each other the way you KF trolls do. You're completely wrong what about what criticism is. But ultimately, I don't care what you believe. You can take your beliefs and defile yourself.

Me, I'm pure. I WOULD NEVER, absolutely never talk to someone in a close relationship the way you define criticism and I WOULD NEVER talk to my peers the way you guys talk to people. (Unless it's "eye for eye", I have NEVER talked to people like that in my entire life).

The fact that you think criticism the way you defined it is justified, healthy and even "normal" says a lot about you, sir Atheist. You must think that form of abuse (criticism) is normal because of how you were raised and reared in whatever culture you grew up.

Thanks for validating my decision to steer clear of atheist men and never befriend one or marry one.

you failed to follow the judge's orders.

You must be drunk

Criticism Is The Toxic Habit That Can Slowly Ruin Your Relationship

Experts say this common communication issue can push couples apart.

www.huffpost.com

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Criticism Is The Toxic Habit That Can Slowly Ruin Your Relationship

Experts say this common communication issue can push couples apart.

www.huffpost.com

View attachment 1781581

When will you cite a credible source?

 

[PomegranateKing]

More wishy washy nonsense about criticism being abuse.

In a world where the only "constructive criticism" was accepted:

People who don't respond to such critiques would walk rough-shod over the rest of the world. Remember all that alpha male crap you were spewing back when Marshall was around? Can you imagine an alpha male talking in only constructive criticism? There's word for that, and that's BETA.

Sometimes you need bite to what you say to get your point across. In the military, it's not just a tool, it's a way of life. But even outside the military, people need to feel motivated to live up to a higher standard. Sometimes constructive criticism cannot offer that toughened edge that is needed.

If constructive criticism was the only allowed criticism, that'd be a world where men wore dresses, and we all had tea parties.

And a little hint for you: I don't like tea nor dresses.

 

[CyrusKissFanClub]

Your other haters agree with me. We talk about you all in email threads. They are rooting for me

That's nice. Pretty much everyone that has a thread here is a "hater" so I doubt they are all corresponding with you. Can you at the least share which lolcows you are chatting with? It would add a ripple of additional flavour to your thread.

I'm not feeding you spiritually ill and derranged Trolls anything. I'm not going to argue about anything else because it's all already been said.

Trolls is a plural common noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

You have elsewhere capitalised co-dependent, which is an adjective.

The USA is trillions of dollars in debt to foreign countries. How do they get to borrow all that money? POPULATION count.

That's why they let in 11 million illegal hispanic immigrants from Mexico and Central America. Because most white women don't breed. The US birth rate fell to 1.8/births per woman.

This is a fallacy which I believe originated from the sovereign citizen movement.

The US government--like the government of other capitalist states--raises funds through taxation and through the debt market. The debt market that it is engaged with is that of Treasury instruments which are also known as Treasury securities. These instruments have a number of types based on their time to maturity: Treasury bills, Treasury notes, Treasury bonds, and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities.

On behalf of the Federal Government the Federal Reserve Bank of New York sells these securities to investors who have a view to earning interest at some time in the future. These investors can be literally anyone or anything, even federal government agencies (which hold $5.9 trillion of securities debt). The total Treasury securities debt held by foreign entities, governments and individuals is approximately $6.6 trillion.

Population count has nothing to do with borrowing money. By what possible mechanism could it? The government just borrows money--from whomever--and pays it back with interest to the lender. It's as simple as that, there is nothing spooky or conspiratorial going on.

Read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Treasury_security

If Wikipedia isn't enough for you I have university textbooks on the topic which I can excerpt for you.

There is only one thing I want but don't have: a farm.

Upon which you plan to use your sons as a source of free labour? Do they get any say in the matter? How do you know that when they reach age of majority they will want to be serfs? As a mother your job is to prepare your children for their future, not exploit them as a source of labour in some strange, romanticised bucolic fantasy.

Your sons have zero chance of getting into a college. The least you could do for them is make it possible for them to enter an apprenticeship for an in-demand trade. And it will be one of the less technical trades, not machining or CNC operating for example. Even for the less technical of trades they will at least need to be able to read, write and do arithmetic.

Neither you nor your sons know anything about running a productive farm. What will you be eating until the first harvest is produced? Do you know anything about animal husbandry? Have you ever even grown a culinary herb garden?

How many of your children are developmentally challenged or have a learning disorder? These will be unlikely to be able to learn a trade and may need close supervision to perform unskilled manual labour depending on the extent of their impairment.

Intelligent women don't fear pregnancy. They have enough dignity to stand up in the face of male narcissism (Patriarchy) and love their children no matter how those children come into the world

Patriarchy isn't a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

You're a Capitalistic brainwashed terd bragging about being free when all you are is a slave on some fat rich man's hamster wheel

Capitalistic is an adjective so it shouldn't be capitalised.

It's turd not terd.

And yet I'm not a Troll on a website trying to feed my sadism through narcissistically abusing designated Scapegoats called "lolcow"s

Troll is not a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

Scapegoats is not a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

Your lack of morality is the sign of your stupidity. While my Perfection at the soul level is because I have a Genius IQ.

Since you raised the topic: tamiym is an adjective so you shouldn't be capitalising that either.

Your outcomes don't indicate a "Genius IQ" and genius isn't a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

Unless you've been tested formally by a psychologist that specialises in administering IQ tests and have achieved a score of over 150 then stop talking about your "Genius IQ". I feel second-hand embarrassment when you do. And IQ has very little to do with reading speed, there are IQ tests that have no words. Also, all the IQ tests on the Internet or in puzzle-type books are crap.

Perfection isn't a proper noun so that too shouldn't be capitalised.

It's funny how Elohim punishes people for their evil with arrogance and stupidity, you being the prime example here

I think any outside, cool-headed observer would conclude that you are being punished.

Fact 1: you have said that you're tamyim. You hold yourself as superior to all non-Jews and all gentile Christians. You hold yourself superior to any Jew who does not compliment you. You often rejoice at the suffering of those who hold beliefs different than you.

I never made any such statement

You've made these sort of statements throughout your thread. Your claim is that your own personal religion is the One True Religion. You are a fruit cake like @Brad Watson_Miami who believes he is the reincarnation of Jesus and Einstein.

Melinda's thinking:

"Mainstream Judaism? No, don't like the Talmud. Karaite Judaism? No, that won't do either. I want something like Karaite Judaism but with Christian scripture. Judaism with Christian scripture, that's daring, I know! Messianic Judaism? Maybe, but not sufficiently special. Not all Christian scripture, I want all of the New Testament except the bits written by Paul because I don't like him and I want to be special. And just to be super special I also want to include the Pseudepigrapha. Look how special I am. This is actually the One True Religion and I am the One to find it. Aren't I great!"

Criticism is abuse. Field of psychology states that.

I think you are oversimplifying and conflating here like you usually do.

Criticism and abuse I would say lie on a continuum with criticism on the far-left and abuse on the far-right and lots of space in between.

They are by no means the same thing and psychology does not say that they are. If you disagree provide citations.

The Torah calls it "unrighteous judgment"

In the Torah righteous/unrighteous judgement isn't about interpersonal abuse, it's either about the judgement of a court or the judgement of Yahweh.

“You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor. (Leviticus 19:15)

"Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure. 36 Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt. 37 Therefore shall ye observe all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: I am the LORD." (Leviticus 19:35)

The Adam Clarke Commentary (https://www.studylight.org/commentary/leviticus/19-35.html) interprets judgement as referring to that of a court.

"He shall judge the world in righteousness, and he shall administer judgments for the people in uprightness." (Psalm 9:

"Let the heavens declare His righteousness, for God himself is Judge. Selah" (Psalm 50:6)

The idea of interpersonal righteous/unrighteous judgement appears in the New Testament but only in the context of moral judgement.

If Marshall wanted a crumb of coochie he could have gotten plenty back in California. He could have found a Sugar Momma.

I don't believe he was using me for sex. I just think he has an issue many men have in relationships: the need to control the woman in the relationship.

This is just you tending to your personal mythology. You described him as a "Noah of his generation". You refuse to accept that your delusional beliefs leave you open to being deceived.

Earlier you said that Marshall had to read your essays and agree with their content before you would marry (or whatever) him. Did you have to accept that the Earth was flat and that gravity is a myth? That would have been fair. In fairness you would have also had to accept his sovereign citizen movement beliefs. Or did you both just mutually bullshit each other?

He just picked the wrong woman to marry. I'm a Jewish Feminist.

You are neither Jewish nor feminist. You are more goy than Jewish and you hate women. Accept that and a huge sense of relief will come to you.

I screenshots a video because that was the only place to access the information

Doesn't mean YouTube is pure.

They hold a monopoly on hosting many videos. If it was available on another platform, I'd post it

This is just Melinda-brand silliness in a concentrate. How is YouTube a bamah or place of worship? So if a student watches MIT videos on linear algebra (s)he is committing idolatry or pagan worship? Please enlighten us Melinda. What if you watch videos on performing first-aid, English grammar, Szechuan cooking or correct squatting form? Are you destined for Gehinnom?

That's great, but even scholars on Elohim CAN'T AGREE ON THE WORDS OF ELOHIM.

There isn't agreement on how many mitzvot (commandments) there are.

 

[Mushroom Tip]

MELINDA JERKS OFF PIGS. SHE GETS DOWN ON HER KNEES AND CRAWLS THROUGH THE PIGPISS MUD SLOP AND SNUGGLES UP TO THE PIG, HER FINGERS TRACING ALONG IT’S BELLY UNTIL SHE FINDS IT’S COCK. SHE BEGINS TUGGING AND STROKING AS HER TWAT MOISTENS, HER BREASTS SWELLING AND HER NIPPLES BEGIN TO STICK OUT LIKE ERASERS ON A FRESH #2 PENCIL. SHE GRUNTS WITH SATISFACTION AS THE PIG BEGINS EAGERLY THRUSTING INTO HER HAND, HER GRIP NOW TIGHTENING TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE PIG’S GREASY CORKSCREW COCK. SHE LOWERS HER HEAD TO WATCH THE COCK WORK IN HER HAND, GROANS WITH SATISFACTION AND BEGINS WORKING HER CLIT WITH HER OTHER MUDDY HAND, HER HIPS GYRATING WITH THE RHYTHM OF THE PIG’S THRUSTING. “OH FUCKING JESUS GOD YES..” SHE GASPS. SHE CHANGES POSITIONS, STILL MAINTAINING CONTROL OF THE FEVERISHLY THRUSTING COCK AS THE PIG’S SQUEALING INTENSIFIES. SHE LEANS FORWARD AND WITH HER LIPS ALMOST TOUCHING THE PIG’S EAR, SHE WHISPERS MARSHALL'S NAME AND BEGINS TO SHUDDER. SHE TURNS HER ATTENTION AGAIN TO THE PIGS SWOLLEN MEMBER ROCKING IN HER HAND. SHE PRESSES IT BETWEEN HER HAND AND HER FACE, THE PIG THRUSTING IT AGAINST HER CHEEKS AS SHE DROOLS. WITH A MASSIVE GRUNT AND A HIGH PITCHED SQUEAL, THE PIG’S BALLS EXPLODE, BEGINNING A MASSIVE SHOWER OF HOT, SOUR PIG JIZZ. MELINDA CUPS ONE HAND UNDER THE FOUNTAIN OF STEAMING GENETIC MATERIAL GATHERING IT IN HER HAND AS THE THRUSTING COMES TO AN END. THE PIG SHUDDERS AND BEGINS TO WALK TO THE TROUGH OF SLOP IN THE CORNER OF IT’S PEN, BUT MELINDA TACKLES IT TO THE GROUND. SHE LIFTS IT’S TAIL AND SMEARS THE HANDFUL OF PIG LOAD INTO THE PIG’S OWN FETID BUTTHOLE, TURNING FLAKES OF CRUSTY PIG SHIT INTO A PIGSHIT-PIGJIZZ MUD SLOP ON THE PIGS ASS. NOW SHE TILTS HER HEAD TO THE SKY AND SCREAMS MARSHALL'S FULL NAME, NOT ONCE, NOT TWICE, BUT THREE TIMES. SHE SLAMS HER FACE FULL FORCE INTO THE PIG’S BUTTHOLE AND IT’S WREATH OF SHITSEMEN PUDDING, HER TONGUE MACHINE GUN FLICKING THE RIM AND THEN BURYING ITSELF TO THE HILT INSIDE THE PIG’S HOT COLON. MELINDA WORKS HER TONGUE AROUND THE INSIDE OF THE PIGS ASS, AND THEN AS A FEW INCOHERENT SYLLABLES ESCAPED HER NOW BROWN LIPS, SPURTS OF FEMALE EJACULATE SPURT FROM HER MASSIVR PULSATING CUNT. EXHAUSTED, SHE COLLAPSES IN THE MUD, ROLLS OVER ONTO HER BACK, AND LIGHTS A CIGARETTE. SHE TAKES ONE LONG DRAG, LOOKS AGAIN TO THE SKY, AND SPEAKS HER NAME ONE LAST TIME BEFORE SHE DRIFTS OFF TO SLEEP. THAT’S MELINDA. MELINDA DOES THAT.
This is a true story. Marshall sent me the video and everything.

Is humanity capable of creating a flawless set of moral rules apart from Elohim?

Elohim does not exist. Only insane people believe in that crap

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You must be dru

No, you just suck at law.

Criticism Is The Toxic Habit That Can Slowly Ruin Your Relationship

Experts say this common communication issue can push couples apart.

www.huffpost.com

View attachment 1781581

Yes, cite the website that is going bankrupt, nobody wants to buy, and has never once cared about facts (elevator story, anyone?)

New filling by Null. His lawyer points out something we all did, that motions like that are unlikely to be granted. He further rips apart her motion.

Few laughs by the lawyer

Moon's lawyer agrees with me that Mel can't read her own citacions

Null's lawyer explained how Mel misrepressented her caselaw, but did not harshy call out her on that. Sad.

 

[PomegranateKing]

No, you just suck at law.

Yes, cite the website that is going bankrupt, nobody wants to buy, and has never once cared about facts (elevator story, anyone?)

New filling by Null. His lawyer points out something we all did, that motions like that are unlikely to be granted. He further rips apart her motion.

Few laughs by the lawyer

There are very few things in this world as great as my joy in waking up to this. Thanks for the reading.

Put on your ponchos, everyone. You're in the splash zone.

 

[Toasty]

The fact that you think criticism the way you defined it is justified, healthy and even "normal" says a lot about you, sir Atheist. You must think that form of abuse (criticism) is normal because of how you were raised and reared in whatever culture you grew up.

Heh. I'm neither a sir, nor an atheist. I grew up in a strongly matriarchal culture which I can only compare to an elephant herd, with a powerful woman at the head, daughters and sisters caring for each other and children, and the understanding that men are only good for one thing, and not even reliable at that.
Telling someone factual statements that are critical is not abusive. For example, currently, my cat litter is dirty. If you popped by my house, and I considered you worthy of inviting in, and you said " toasty your cat litter is dirty, you should clean it" I would consider this as possibly overstepping boundaries, but not factually incorrect or abusive or anything. Now if you said, "toasty, you are a horrible cat mother and your whole house smells like shit all the time and I hope you die from ammonia fumes" THAT would be insulting and abusive. If you came over and said "hiya toast, I heard about this new corn based litter, let's wash out your litter box, make sure the area is nice and clean and see if this works better to keep your home and your cat happy and fresh and healthy" this would be constructive criticism. Are you starting to grasp the point? Should I use pictograms?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

There are very few things in this world as great as my joy in waking up to this. Thanks for the reading

Happy to help a fellow kiwi!

 

[Not Really Here]

I guess I was in thinking she would take Hanukkah off after she released the Farms.

 

[Mushroom Tip]

Sometimes you need bite to what you say to get your point across. In the military, it's not just a tool, it's a way of life. But even outside the military, people need to feel motivated to live up to a higher standard. Sometimes constructive criticism cannot offer that toughened edge that is needed.

Oh GOD I would love to send this bitch to Depot with no way to quit. Imagine her with 3 greenbelt DSs chimping out within a quater inch of her face... That would prove to me that Elhomo really existed if that happened.

 

[PomegranateKing]

Guys, the best part is: We got this before Melinda did. She's getting it via mail, today or tomorrow. She'll probably find out by viewing the site. That means we get front row seats to the newest meltdown.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Marshall is in no way as Righteous as me.

Accurate. You come in a fairly close second, though.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Guys, the best part is: We got this before Melinda did. She's getting it via mail, today or tomorrow. She'll probably find out by viewing the site. That means we get front row seats to the newest meltdown.

That's true. The meltdown will be glorious.

 

[Kosher Salt]

New filling by Null. His lawyer points out something we all did, that motions like that are unlikely to be granted. He further rips apart her motion.

Images

Spoiler: Joshua Moon’s Combined Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Strike and in Support of Motion to Set Aside Default

Null's lawyer explained how Mel misrepressented her caselaw, but did not harshy call out her on that. Sad.

There's a fine line between thoroughly dismantling an exceptional individual's arguments and coming across as a bully while doing it. The court's already likely to give her more benefit of the doubt than she deserves, because she's an idiot pro se.

In particular, her inability to comprehend written English, i.e. the caselaw that she cites, is likely to be chalked up as her being too retarded to understand it, not as her purposely misrepresenting it.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Accurate. You come in a fairly close second, though.

Second to who?

Heh. I'm neither a sir, nor an atheist. I grew up in a strongly matriarchal culture which I can only compare to an elephant herd, with a powerful woman at the head, daughters and sisters caring for each other and children, and the understanding that men are only good for one thing, and not even reliable at that.
Telling someone factual statements that are critical is not abusive. For example, currently, my cat litter is dirty. If you popped by my house, and I considered you worthy of inviting in, and you said " toasty your cat litter is dirty, you should clean it" I would consider this as possibly overstepping boundaries, but not factually incorrect or abusive or anything. Now if you said, "toasty, you are a horrible cat mother and your whole house smells like shit all the time and I hope you die from ammonia fumes" THAT would be insulting and abusive. If you came over and said "hiya toast, I heard about this new corn based litter, let's wash out your litter box, make sure the area is nice and clean and see if this works better to keep your home and your cat happy and fresh and healthy" this would be constructive criticism. Are you starting to grasp the point? Should I use pictograms?

You're not making a point. You're copying what I said. "Telling someone factual statements...".

Wowzers

That's nice. Pretty much everyone that has a thread here is a "hater" so I doubt they are all corresponding with you. Can you at the least share which lolcows you are chatting with? It would add a ripple of additional flavour to your thread.



Trolls is a plural common noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

You have elsewhere capitalised co-dependent, which is an adjective.



This is a fallacy which I believe originated from the sovereign citizen movement.

The US government--like the government of other capitalist states--raises funds through taxation and through the debt market. The debt market that it is engaged with is that of Treasury instruments which are also known as Treasury securities. These instruments have a number of types based on their time to maturity: Treasury bills, Treasury notes, Treasury bonds, and Treasury Inflation Protected Securities.

On behalf of the Federal Government the Federal Reserve Bank of New York sells these securities to investors who have a view to earning interest at some time in the future. These investors can be literally anyone or anything, even federal government agencies (which hold $5.9 trillion of securities debt). The total Treasury securities debt held by foreign entities, governments and individuals is approximately $6.6 trillion.

Population count has nothing to do with borrowing money. By what possible mechanism could it? The government just borrows money--from whomever--and pays it back with interest to the lender. It's as simple as that, there is nothing spooky or conspiratorial going on.

Read more here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Treasury_security

If Wikipedia isn't enough for you I have university textbooks on the topic which I can excerpt for you.



Upon which you plan to use your sons as a source of free labour? Do they get any say in the matter? How do you know that when they reach age of majority they will want to be serfs? As a mother your job is to prepare your children for their future, not exploit them as a source of labour in some strange, romanticised bucolic fantasy.

Your sons have zero chance of getting into a college. The least you could do for them is make it possible for them to enter an apprenticeship for an in-demand trade. And it will be one of the less technical trades, not machining or CNC operating for example. Even for the less technical of trades they will at least need to be able to read, write and do arithmetic.

Neither you nor your sons know anything about running a productive farm. What will you be eating until the first harvest is produced? Do you know anything about animal husbandry? Have you ever even grown a culinary herb garden?

How many of your children are developmentally challenged or have a learning disorder? These will be unlikely to be able to learn a trade and may need close supervision to perform unskilled manual labour depending on the extent of their impairment.



Patriarchy isn't a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.



Capitalistic is an adjective so it shouldn't be capitalised.

It's turd not terd.



Troll is not a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

Scapegoats is not a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.



Since you raised the topic: tamiym is an adjective so you shouldn't be capitalising that either.

Your outcomes don't indicate a "Genius IQ" and genius isn't a proper noun so it shouldn't be capitalised.

Unless you've been tested formally by a psychologist that specialises in administering IQ tests and have achieved a score of over 150 then stop talking about your "Genius IQ". I feel second-hand embarrassment when you do. And IQ has very little to do with reading speed, there are IQ tests that have no words. Also, all the IQ tests on the Internet or in puzzle-type books are crap.

Perfection isn't a proper noun so that too shouldn't be capitalised.



I think any outside, cool-headed observer would conclude that you are being punished.


You've made these sort of statements throughout your thread. Your claim is that your own personal religion is the One True Religion. You are a fruit cake like @Brad Watson_Miami who believes he is the reincarnation of Jesus and Einstein.

Melinda's thinking:

"Mainstream Judaism? No, don't like the Talmud. Karaite Judaism? No, that won't do either. I want something like Karaite Judaism but with Christian scripture. Judaism with Christian scripture, that's daring, I know! Messianic Judaism? Maybe, but not sufficiently special. Not all Christian scripture, I want all of the New Testament except the bits written by Paul because I don't like him and I want to be special. And just to be super special I also want to include the Pseudepigrapha. Look how special I am. This is actually the One True Religion and I am the One to find it. Aren't I great!"



I think you are oversimplifying and conflating here like you usually do.

Criticism and abuse I would say lie on a continuum with criticism on the far-left and abuse on the far-right and lots of space in between.

They are by no means the same thing and psychology does not say that they are. If you disagree provide citations.



In the Torah righteous/unrighteous judgement isn't about interpersonal abuse, it's either about the judgement of a court or the judgement of Yahweh.

“You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor. (Leviticus 19:15)

"Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment, in meteyard, in weight, or in measure. 36 Just balances, just weights, a just ephah, and a just hin, shall ye have: I am the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt. 37 Therefore shall ye observe all my statutes, and all my judgments, and do them: I am the LORD." (Leviticus 19:35)

The Adam Clarke Commentary (https://www.studylight.org/commentary/leviticus/19-35.html) interprets judgement as referring to that of a court.

"He shall judge the world in righteousness, and he shall administer judgments for the people in uprightness." (Psalm 9:

"Let the heavens declare His righteousness, for God himself is Judge. Selah" (Psalm 50:6)

The idea of interpersonal righteous/unrighteous judgement appears in the New Testament but only in the context of moral judgement.



This is just you tending to your personal mythology. You described him as a "Noah of his generation". You refuse to accept that your delusional beliefs leave you open to being deceived.

Earlier you said that Marshall had to read your essays and agree with their content before you would marry (or whatever) him. Did you have to accept that the Earth was flat and that gravity is a myth? That would have been fair. In fairness you would have also had to accept his sovereign citizen movement beliefs. Or did you both just mutually bullshit each other?



You are neither Jewish nor feminist. You are more goy than Jewish and you hate women. Accept that and a huge sense of relief will come to you.



This is just Melinda-brand silliness in a concentrate. How is YouTube a bamah or place of worship? So if a student watches MIT videos on linear algebra (s)he is committing idolatry or pagan worship? Please enlighten us Melinda. What if you watch videos on performing first-aid, English grammar, Szechuan cooking or correct squatting form? Are you destined for Gehinnom?



There isn't agreement on how many mitzvot (commandments) there are.

That's a bunch of rambling at a stranger and I literally disagree with every single thing you said except one thing:

"There isn't agreement on how many mitzvot (commandments) there are."

No, you just suck at law.

Yes, cite the website that is going bankrupt, nobody wants to buy, and has never once cared about facts (elevator story, anyone?)

New filling by Null. His lawyer points out something we all did, that motions like that are unlikely to be granted. He further rips apart her motion.

Few laughs by the lawyer

View attachment 1781638
View attachment 1781639
View attachment 1781651
Moon's lawyer agrees with me that Mel can't read her own citacions
View attachment 1781644
Null's lawyer explained how Mel misrepressented her caselaw, but did not harshy call out her on that. Sad.

Time to reply to that one now

 

[artilleryfroth]

What a ride this thread has been (I just caught up). Her filings are gloriously incompetent! Personally, I love how she stepped it out for the judge how she had already tried to bring essentially the same case under different causes of action. What an idiot. Also, does she really think shitting out multiple oxygen thieves is what her country wants? Unless they actually *work and pay tax* one day, she’s just making where she lives even more of a shithole. This is a total train wreck and I love it.

 

[Mushroom Tip]

That's true. The meltdown will be glorious.

There will be no meltdown until the gavel sounds. In Moons favour. She will just smugly say we:ll see

 

[Useful_Mistake]

There's a fine line between thoroughly dismantling an exceptional individual's arguments and coming across as a bully while doing it. The court's already likely to give her more benefit of the doubt than she deserves, because she's an idiot pro se.

But I want my laughs, damn it!

is likely to be chalked up as her being too retarded to understand it, not as her purposely misrepresenting it.

While I agree that that is the likely outcome, I am still a tad annoyed. It's basic english, in very simple words. It's almost impossible to not understand, provided you passed elementary school, or a kindergarten even.

Second to who?

Basic english, Mel. Second to the beforementioned person.

You're not making a point. You're copying what I said. "Telling someone factual statements...".

If you knew how to read, you'd understand that the point was "criticism is not abuse"

Time to reply to that one now

Good luck.

Also, fun fact, every single thing I said was wrong with your motions, the lawyer agreed with. Seems like I was right all along.

Also, does she really think shitting out multiple oxygen thieves is what her country wants?

She genuinly thinks that more people = more profit. She believes it's that simple, and refuses to look at masive poverty in China (~50% can't afford to rent a room, or eat properly), and problems with Africa, which uses the exact same mentality as she does.

(I just caught up).

Congrats! I hope you enjoyed this wild ride.

There will be no meltdown until the gavel sounds. In Moons favour. She will just smugly say we:ll see

Perhaps. Although she is very prone to constant meltdowns

 

[Mushroom Tip]

“You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor. (Leviticus 19:15)

So she expects the Judge to go against her beloved storybook because shes poor, retarded, unwanted (fostercare) etc etc ad nauseum.
There is a word for someone like that @TamarYaelBatYah . The word is HYPOCRITE

In before: ¨'that only applies to a Jewish religious court!'