Manosphere Marijan Šiklić (ThatIncelBlogger) 2: The Revenge

Status
Not open for further replies.
Holden said:
Hi Humanoid. Thanks for your civility.

Anyway, yeah, the question had already been asked and replied to. I guess I'd go on two axes

1. That rape isn't just a "lack of consent" but a carnal knowledge of a woman against her will. I use the common law definition.

2. That a woman can experience rape and see it as a satisfactory event later. Like if some virginal brainwashed feminist really fears rape but is then raped by a football player and falls in love with him.


Now imagine the insanity of some manginas here ! They claim that I raped some woman who called me on the phone to offer my sex just because I posted her pic on my blog but they can't explain why she wanted a relationship with me afterwards. They tried saying that it's cause she was afraid I'll post her stuff again, but the fact was that I deleted it and that I didn't try to find anything I might had left or tried to bluff. I stuck to our non-contact agreement, and she was the one who broke it.

Of course, I don't think I raped this woman (and neither does she, occasionally calling me "her rapist" to mock the crazies), but please note how these people are contradicting themselves in such a hilarious way. They'd always deny my point 2, yet it is according to their own claims.

My point being - feminists are mental patients.
Click to expand...

Be careful @Humanoid Email Address, he started talking to me with a "Thanks for the civility" line too. It soon broke down into him insulting both me and my wife.

Now for you @Holden.

1: Common-law rape is basically just rape. http://rape.uslegal.com/common-law-or-forcible-rape/

2: It almost sounds like you are describing Stockholm Syndrome.

3: You talk about about us denying you, but you only give your opinion and no proof or citation for anything even when asked.

4: You only hate feminists because they are independent women who don't want you.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: HickoryDickory, supdup, Trombonista and 2 others
Humanoid Email Address said:
Yeah, if he was really honest about it, he'd give me the ideas he wanted for a story about him that I asked for last night.
Click to expand...

Don't get your hopes up about him being honest. Or answering things he doesn't want to. He ignored everything I said to @Cowlick (Who also ignored it...) and ignored most of what I say to him until I point out that he is doing it. You have to keep asking over and over before he will actually give you an answer or insult.
 
Holden said:
They tried saying that it's cause she was afraid I'll post her stuff again, but the fact was that I deleted it and that I didn't try to find anything I might had left
Click to expand...

But did she know that? You could have lied, or known enough code to recover your deleted files, or been motivated to learn enough such code. She's not truly safe from you in a no-contact situation if she can't definitively say your leverage is gone forever. So, to reiterate, did she know this? And Holden, it's a rhetorical question, so don't answer. You can't realistically answer this because you're not a mind reader and lack the social skills necessary to read the cues that allow you to pretend to be one. It's kind of like how you insist we don't know you in real life, so we can't tell which of your personal stories are lies - yet another knife you decided shouldn't cut towards you (lol).

And bear in mind, this assumes you've actually done any of the things you've claimed. I'm still leaning towards the "Holden is a virgin with rage" theory.

flossman said:
It's worth noting that he threatened to call her home phone unless she had sex with him.
Click to expand...

I could have sworn that was a different girl.
 
Last edited:
Holden said:
Hi Humanoid. Thanks for your civility.

Anyway, yeah, the question had already been asked and replied to. I guess I'd go on two axes

1. That rape isn't just a "lack of consent" but a carnal knowledge of a woman against her will. I use the common law definition.

2. That a woman can experience rape and see it as a satisfactory event later. Like if some virginal brainwashed feminist really fears rape but is then raped by a football player and falls in love with him.


Now imagine the insanity of some manginas here ! They claim that I raped some woman who called me on the phone to offer my sex just because I posted her pic on my blog but they can't explain why she wanted a relationship with me afterwards. They tried saying that it's cause she was afraid I'll post her stuff again, but the fact was that I deleted it and that I didn't try to find anything I might had left or tried to bluff. I stuck to our non-contact agreement, and she was the one who broke it.

Of course, I don't think I raped this woman (and neither does she, occasionally calling me "her rapist" to mock the crazies), but please note how these people are contradicting themselves in such a hilarious way. They'd always deny my point 2, yet it is according to their own claims.

My point being - feminists are mental patients.
Click to expand...
Ok let's just put that into simple terms, excluding anything else you've said before and look at this at face value;
You claim that it's ok to rape if a woman enjoys it after the fact. You seem to have this disconnect of logic where if a woman decides it was ok afterwards that makes it ok in the future. The fact of the matter is if you force a woman into having sex against her will YOU HAVE RAPED HER. It doesnt matter what happens after the fact or even bloody during, you're still a creepy asshole who forced a woman into having sex against her will, the initiation of the act is what's important here. Putting that into any other crime context that's like breaking into someones house and stealing their tv only for them to say "Oh well I wanted a new TV anyway so this works for me", it doesn't change the fact that you broke in and stole their shit.

And in the second case even with this leading phrasing what you are saying here is that a woman contacted you after you did something to initiate the contact (aka posting her pic on your blog, assumedly without permission from her) and she offered sex for you to remove the pic. In the very VERY best case scenario you caused a woman to whore herself out for the price of you removing the pic and you're a scumbag for not at least offering to take it down BEFORE she rode your chode. In the worst case scenario, the one we all kinda believe whether you like it or not, you did this specifically to hurt this woman and then used taking down the pic as leverage to get sex. Whether she liked it, wanted a relationship or is currently 'mocking crazies' is irrelevant as her actions aren't on trial here. Its the fact that you took advantage of this situation to get yourself a cheap fuck and yet claim to be this higher male who is better than something so low and dirty. You call the men here rape apes and whatever but having talked to many of them I'm pretty sure they wouldn't post a revenge pic of someone who refused to jump on their boners and then agree to fuck them later in exchange for removing the pic.

If you read nothing else read this; it's not your actions, the actions of these women or what happened after that is making you look bad. It is your INTENTIONS.
 
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Nad, Toasty, Emiya Kiwitsugu and 6 others
Lalala said:
Ok let's just put that into simple terms, excluding anything else you've said before and look at this at face value;
You claim that it's ok to rape if a woman enjoys it after the fact. You seem to have this disconnect of logic where if a woman decides it was ok afterwards that makes it ok in the future. The fact of the matter is if you force a woman into having sex against her will YOU HAVE RAPED HER. It doesnt matter what happens after the fact or even bloody during, you're still a creepy asshole who forced a woman into having sex against her will, the initiation of the act is what's important here. Putting that into any other crime context that's like breaking into someones house and stealing their tv only for them to say "Oh well I wanted a new TV anyway so this works for me", it doesn't change the fact that you broke in and stole their shit.

And in the second case even with this leading phrasing what you are saying here is that a woman contacted you after you did something to initiate the contact (aka posting her pic on your blog, assumedly without permission from her) and she offered sex for you to remove the pic. In the very VERY best case scenario you caused a woman to whore herself out for the price of you removing the pic and you're a scumbag for not at least offering to take it down BEFORE she rode your chode. In the worst case scenario, the one we all kinda believe whether you like it or not, you did this specifically to hurt this woman and then used taking down the pic as leverage to get sex. Whether she liked it, wanted a relationship or is currently 'mocking crazies' is irrelevant as her actions aren't on trial here. Its the fact that you took advantage of this situation to get yourself a cheap fuck and yet claim to be this higher male who is better than something so low and dirty. You call the men here rape apes and whatever but having talked to many of them I'm pretty sure they wouldn't post a revenge pic of someone who refused to jump on their boners and then agree to fuck them later in exchange for removing the pic.

If you read nothing else read this; it's not your actions, the actions of these women or what happened after that is making you look bad. It is your INTENTIONS.
Click to expand...
AND THIS is what I've tried to say before and he called me an insane bitch.

The girl he threatened came to him because he said he would call her HOME PHONE (where her parents were) if she didn't have sex with him. So she said she'd have sex with him. But then, she said she wanted some other items too. Apparently, in Holden's mind, the fact that she requested something else means it wasn't rape or coercion.

1) if we take Holden at face value (which we really shouldn't do ...what will all his lying and exaggeration), at the VERY LEAST he's participated in prostitution.... which he claims he would never do and has never done. If we take Holden's story as truth, he just paid a girl to have sex with him.
2) It's still rape, even if you give the girl something afterwards. It'd be like raping a girl and then throwing money on her and saying "I paid you, now it's not rape". That's not how this works. If she didn't want to have sex with her, and you had to use some force/threat to get her to have sex with you... it's rape; no matter if you pay her with something afterwards.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit, Emiya Kiwitsugu, HickoryDickory and 2 others
4Macie said:
AND THIS is what I've tried to say before and he called me an insane bitch.

The girl he threatened came to him because he said he would call her HOME PHONE (where her parents were) if she didn't have sex with him. So she said she'd have sex with him. But then, she said she wanted some other items too. Apparently, in Holden's mind, the fact that she requested something else means it wasn't rape or coercion.

1) if we take Holden at face value (which we really shouldn't do ...what will all his lying and exaggeration), at the VERY LEAST he's participated in prostitution.... which he claims he would never do and has never done. If we take Holden's story as truth, he just paid a girl to have sex with him.
2) It's still rape, even if you give the girl something afterwards. It'd be like raping a girl and then throwing money on her and saying "I paid you, now it's not rape". That's not how this works. If she didn't want to have sex with her, and you had to use some force/threat to get her to have sex with you... it's rape; no matter if you pay her with something afterwards.
Click to expand...
Here @Holden I'll save you some time since you clearly won't read this;
"Insane feminist ramblings, you secretely love cock, my mother came on to ME, the women love the fact that I have no job and shower less than an ablutophobe, you can't see my dog because you insane people will trace the fibre the colour is made of, time stamped vagina plz."
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Rin, supdup and 4Macie
4Macie said:
1) if we take Holden at face value (which we really shouldn't do ...what will all his lying and exaggeration), at the VERY LEAST he's participated in prostitution.... which he claims he would never do and has never done. If we take Holden's story as truth, he just paid a girl to have sex with him.
Click to expand...
I agree it's like a prostitution deal. (With the unfortunate threat of calling her parents)

What's the lowest number on the scale? Below Beta and Omega because Marijan is certainly not a co-alpha. He's more like one of those little parasites that suckerfish clean off of sharks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emiya Kiwitsugu
So, did he threaten to post her pic and dox and to call her home phone number, or has he coerced two girls into sex?
 
trombonista said:
So, did he threaten to post her pic and dox and to call her home phone number, or has he coerced two girls into sex?
Click to expand...
Two different girls.

One was like 18 and he said he'd call her house until she had sex with him; this means, of course, that she was worried her parents would find out so she did him so she wouldn't get in trouble (grounded). Her asking for something in return AFTER sex doesn't mean it's not coercion or rape. It just means he bribed her to shut up.

The other girl was a girl who didn't date Holden after she told him she would; so he posted her dox/pic on a site or two and then did the whole "I'll take it down if you sex me" thing.

THEN there was the other girl who he posted dox/picture of and then said that he was going to murder/suicide with her.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Scratch This Nut, Emiya Kiwitsugu and Trombonista
deductionotaku said:
But did she know that? You could have lied, or known enough code to recover your deleted files, or been motivated to learn enough such code. She's not truly safe from you in a no-contact situation if she can't definitively say your leverage is gone forever. So, to reiterate, did she know this? And Holden, it's a rhetorical question, so don't answer. You can't realistically answer this because you're not a mind reader and lack the social skills necessary to read the cues that allow you to pretend to be one. It's kind of like how you insist we don't know you in real life, so we can't tell which of your personal stories are lies - yet another knife you decided shouldn't cut towards you (lol).
Click to expand...
You're asking questions for which you've already been laughed at. Yes, of course she couldn't know. Therefore the right thing thing to do is to add me back on FB where I can see all her pics and get them again and, better yet, initiate more contacts and sex !

Why? Because you are deeply, deeply insane, man. Like, fucking mad. You're all a modern quasi-intellectual male is. An insane lunatic. And that's about all you are.

deductionotaku said:
I could have sworn that was a different girl.
Click to expand...
Because you're not only a lazy moron but a stupid moron.

trombonista said:
So he's a double rapist and he still doesn't have a girlfriend/wife. I guess rape isn't that popular after all.
Click to expand...
Did you ever read a single post I made? This is like saying that I don't have a unicorn.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: cromit and Emiya Kiwitsugu
His fascination with unicorns is one of the reasons I brought up him possibly being a furry, not to mention his ideas of beastiality.

Anywho... An apparent tribute to Sluthaters and Marijan. There's even creeping on judges!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fareal
Hickory - a creep is a man who doesn't breed animals like modern Western women to them. Thus, rapists are never creeps to them.

trombonista said:
reasoning that it's impossible to have a girlfriend/wife in the West is pure sour grapes.
Click to expand...
I don't think so. I wouldn't try those grapes even if they were right in front of me. Why? Because they're poison with an insane woman, and every woman in the West today is a mental patient running loose.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Dumb
Reactions: cromit, supdup, Emiya Kiwitsugu and 2 others
Holden said:
I don't think so. I wouldn't try those grapes even if they were right in front of me. Why? Because they're poison with an insane woman, and every woman in the West today is a mental patient running loose.
Click to expand...

Lawl one of the only times you've ever managed to have sex with a woman was due to them being crazy. Don't try and claim you have standards Fuckbot.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cromit and Emiya Kiwitsugu
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back