Official Election 2020 Doomsday Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who wins on November 3rd? (Zeitgeist, not who you're voting for)

  • Expecting a Trump win.

    Votes: 978 45.7%

  • Expecting a Biden win.

    Votes: 277 12.9%

  • Expecting no clear winner on November 3rd.

    Votes: 885 41.4%
  • Total voters
    2,140
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gorillad Cheese said:
Again, please check yourself into a mental hospital and get your paranoid schizophrenia treated. No one who has even the slightest bit of power has talked about "camps for Trump supporters." Right-wingers have talked about locking up/executing liberals before, but no one takes them seriously because they have no power.
Click to expand...
Except AOC has some kind of power to make it happen, and why haven’t people like Pelosi, Biden, or Harris talked about it? Is it because they’re not as impulsive and quick to tweet as AOC is? The left has talked about their plans for when they take power from Trump for the last four years, and they’ve made no secret about their hatred for Donald Trump and his supporters. When someone says they hate you, I’m inclined to believe them. And they’ve made no secrets of their plans even if they’re influenced by that hatred.
 
  • Lunacy
  • Autistic
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco and Mrs Paul
Andrew Neiman said:
These things don't exist outside of your head. "Every leftist in the world" is not plotting to capture and execute Donald Trump. No one is going to put you in a concentration camp just because you, along with 74 million other Americans, supported a terrible president.
Click to expand...
In certain professions it can get you in trouble. If you were at a large law firm, for example, or working in woketech, it would be viewed as the Mark of Cain. The professor who did something as basic as calculate a confidence interval for the Matt Braynard analysis got attacked publicly by his colleagues until he issued a grovelling apology.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛
3119967d0c said:
Do you _not_ believe in putting Mike Pompeo and John Bolton in a gulag?
Click to expand...
I think Trump should be kept in an enclosure with a staff of people who constantly reassure him of how impressive and successful he is. It would be the most humane thing for him, really.
Affluent Reptilian said:
In certain professions it can get you in trouble.
Click to expand...
I'm definitely not disputing the existence of left-idpol censoriousness; I'm disputing the claim that there's a plot underway to drag Trump supporters into concentration camps and murder them.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: AmateurComedicTaxidermist and ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛
Andrew Neiman said:
I'm not really an AOC follower. Can you direct me to where she said this?
Click to expand...
Here you go.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter: "Is anyone archiving these Trump sycophants for when they try to downplay or deny their complicity in the future? I foresee decent probability of many deleted Tweets, writings, photos in the future" / Twitter


AOC suggests supporters make list of posts from 'Trump sycophants'; faces backlash (republicworld.com)

Andrew Neiman said:
I'm definitely not disputing the existence of left-idpol censoriousness; I'm disputing the claim that there's a plot underway to drag Trump supporters into concentration camps and murder them.
Click to expand...
Honestly, what's to say that's because some know how to actually keep their mouths shut?
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Feels
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco, Mrs Paul, Gorillad Cheese and 3 others
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyNugget, Mrs Paul, Gorillad Cheese and 1 other person
Affluent Reptilian said:
In certain professions it can get you in trouble. If you were at a large law firm, for example, or working in woketech, it would be viewed as the Mark of Cain. The professor who did something as basic as calculate a confidence interval for the Matt Braynard analysis got attacked publicly by his colleagues until he issued a grovelling apology.
Click to expand...
The Matt Braynard 'analysis' is also a total joke that was readily rebutted by one gook state senator just going out and making a few calls to people she knew who were on the list 'in error' (if you can consider Braynard's absolutely shit analytical work an honest but flawed attempt to do science, which I don't).
Anyone involved with that crap who lent it any credibility deserves to be shamed for it.
 
Maradontia said:
He won by 7 million votes. 70 electoral votes.
Click to expand...
And? The popular vote is completely meaningless. If you're bringing that up it immediately shows you're an idiot as it has absolutely nothing to do with the electoral process (not to mention it's only a 5% difference, which isn't "overwhelming", which would be around 65%+)

The 70 electoral votes are by thin margins (< 1 to2 %). Again, not overwhelming.

He won, but just like Trump in 2016 he barely won because of how close the margins are.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
Reactions: Mrs Paul and another idiot
Trumptarts, it's over. You've put up an incredibly austic fight, you lost, you were laughed at, but at least you struggled your way up on those seldom used basement stairs and you did it.

America heard your autistic pleas, but that time is over. You lost. Your leader, Donald Trump lost. It's okay. Now you can to back to your video games and bitch about Joe Biden online.

The natural progression returns.
 
  • Winner
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyNugget, GenericReviewerDraco, Mrs Paul and 8 others
ZeroCool said:
Trumptarts, it's over. You've put up an incredibly austic fight, you lost, you were laughed at, but at least you struggled your way up on those seldom used basement stairs and you did it.

America heard your autistic pleas, but that time is over. You lost. Your leader, Donald Trump lost. It's okay. Now you can to back to your video games and bitch about Joe Biden online.

The natural progression returns.
Click to expand...

We have to wait until January 20 for him to be physically removed from office, but it is inevitable now.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: GenericReviewerDraco, Mrs Paul, ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛ and 4 others
Random Internet Person said:
It's the setup for it. The long term extrapolation.
Click to expand...
What if I pointed to a hostile tweet by a Republican and said, "This is a setup for eventually putting all Biden voters in concentration camps and killing them"? Would you think that was a reasonable inference to draw?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛ and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Their latest bombshell, that "forensic audit" that they're sperging about, links to a C: \ and interprets the error "There is no permission to {0}" as "a user attempting to zero out election results."
The smoking gun is a tech-illiterate boomer who doesn't understand what he's reading or pulling up spouting a bunch of nonsense in the hope that he judge is also tech-illiterate and doesn't notice that he's comparing election results from 6:38 on November 3rd to the completed results as of November 6th.

If you have a minute, give the thing a leaf-through. There are some redactions down at the bottom, but I want to make this clear. This is the kind of "report" and "evidence" that goes above and beyond the normal standards that have been leveraged at courts and committees across the country. There are a lot of claims that don't appear to be substantiated by the tables and "evidence" that are presented in tandem with them, a handful of contradicting claims, and a bunch of completely useless images. Lacking any actual airing out of those forensic "findings," the only thing to draw from this report is that its author is not well-versed in tech and largely isn't sure what he's looking for and what he's looking at.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: ⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛, Norvic, AmateurComedicTaxidermist and 3 others
No disloyal electors in PA.
1607968314150.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: ConfederateIrishman and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Null said:
yo the EC is voting today innit


what's the chance of Trump getting significant disloyal delegates
Click to expand...

Given what year it is and how everything has gone thusfar, I would not at all be surprised if some number tried to do it. Here's a handy-dandy reference for the times that it has happened and related rulings on the topic for anyone curious: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_elector

I am not familiar with which of the "contested" states have laws that either expressly forbid or outright punish faithless electors, but those would be the only places to really keep an eye on.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Terrifik and AmateurComedicTaxidermist
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back