Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Apparently there will be a Gender Swapped Zorro fighting for Social Justice
"New Gender-Swapped Zorro Series With Focus On Social Justice Announced"

I found a few interesting quote in one of the comments:
"I struggle with this whole “Go woke, go broke” mentality that’s shared, just because I never see these companies go “broke” or learn from the unpopularity these drivel bring in. It seems to me like they’ve got the money to toss, and all they care about is pushing this agenda filled nonsense. You would think that a companies number one interest would be money, right? So wouldn’t you want to appeal to your largest demographic? I keep being told that the SocJus crowd is the vocal minority, yet time and time again companies (seemingly) burn more money to continue with this crap.

Either, in reality, we’re the minority here, or the majority of companies nowadays do not care about money, and just look to push their agendas. I dunno, I guess I come across as a doomer, but I have yet to really see some of these repeated statements (such as the go woke go broke) actually have effect in reality. Take Star Wars for example. Sequels weren’t very popular, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. And people keep telling me all Disney cares about is money, right? So if that is the case then, why in the world do they keep doubling down on their garbage? If the majority of their consumers don’t like the sequel crap, wouldn’t it be more beneficial for Disney to outright decanonize and distance themselves from the sequels in an attempt to garner back more goodwill from the (supposed) majority of fans who care? Yet look at their showcase the other day: lots of more tv series with the same nonsense. Kk’s still head, and actual fans still relegated to the dumpster."

"I think the truth of the matter is that neither we nor the SJW crowd are the majority. We're both just the very tips of the horseshoe, with our voices magnified by the power of the internet and social media. The true majority is the silent majority, the ones who just don't care enough to even pay attention to these issues. They don't visit Kotaku, nor do they visit KotakuInAction. They just see a new piece of media announced and judge it on their own personal tastes, never really caring for politics or the Culture War."
 
View attachment 1789061

Even if his name wasn't Noah or Berlatsky, even if he didn't mention 'white people', you could identify his jewness by that sentence alone.
EpQOBALXcAISBDQ.jpg
EpQOBJrWEAAkCIw.jpg
EpQOBVRXYAElGd7.jpg
 
View attachment 1789061

Even if his name wasn't Noah or Berlatsky, even if he didn't mention 'white people', you could identify his jewness by that sentence alone.

Noah's quite the scamp and he has a remarkable footprint online, he used to be a writter for escapist where he wrote really bad rage bait articles even by the low standards of woke clickbait.

1608030110870.png


1608031274773.png

He also has a habit of talking over women when it comes to Femminism:
1608030577428.png


He's a pretty much a standard sjw in that he's dumb hypocrite and something of an embarisment to even obserb. Honestly fast food staff, door salesmen and call centre temps outrank these sort of people on the social hierachy.

Reddit stupidpol summerized him perfectly:
]He's a person who will spend 5,000 words saying nothing of value.......He's Armond White with none of the redeeming qualities
 
Last edited:
Noah's quite the scamp and he has a remarkable footprint online, he used to be a writter for escapist where he wrote really bad rage bait articles even by the low standards of woke clickbait.

View attachment 1790002
Rate me autistic or dumb or whatever, but what’s wrong with Booker T Washington? Wasn’t he a major part of the Harlem Renaissance, or am I confusing him with someone else?
 
Rate me autistic or dumb or whatever, but what’s wrong with Booker T Washington? Wasn’t he a major part of the Harlem Renaissance, or am I confusing him with someone else?
Booker T. Washington is considered a race traitor/house negro/etc. for his moderate views, rejection of separatism and violet revolution, support of capitalism, the Atlanta Compromise, etc.

You're supposed to prefer Du Bois because he was a socialist. Although at the time, Du Bois fully supported Washington's efforts even if they didn't go as far as he wanted.
 
.I think what's interesting about the Dark phoenix article are four things

1)Dark phoenix was shit.
2) Noah Berlatsky is a middle class white dude with no actual experiance of the black civil rights movement, he just writes bad reviews so is in no way an authority on the subject.
3)Noah fails to establish a viable alternative which either implies he's stupid or he's concluded their is no solution. He also never considers that Respectability Politics isnt the be all and end all of strategy and can be combined with grassroots political campaigning to great effect.
4)X-men as an ongoing series has to continue perpetual conflict between humans and mutants, ergo any strategy employed to resolve things has to fail due to the central conflict of the work. It might be able to provide critique but it will never provide solutions.
 
Last edited:
I like how white silence and white savior complex are both on there. Racist if you do, racist if you don't.
Remember, if you're white and you move into a neighborhood, it's gentrification and you're racist, but if you move out, it's white flight and you're racist.
 
Last edited:
Back