- Joined
- Jan 19, 2020
That is, if the suit isn't dismissed with prejudice lol
Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
Yeah, that's when some of my facts came across somewhat muddled.
live and learn
I can still re-open the case against him for Appropriation. Why shouldn't I?
Even if the IIED claim is dismissed with prejudice, that doesn't ban me from an Appropriation case
that's your hypothesis
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2019
So you've gone from "just leaving a sticker on it" to "using it is fine as long as I don't obsess over it". The refs already banned you from the field, you need to stop moving the goalposts.I can VISIT a BaMaH[בָּמָה] temporarily for self defense. Visiting is not making it a way of life. Like Elijah who temporarily visited the altars of sinners to engage them in a duel between their fake elohims (1 Kings 1
It's only a sin to make a בָּמָה a way of life that you look to for your focus and meditation
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
That still shows that your claim today of Pro Se litigants only getting formatting leeway is incorrect. Unless by your reply you meant that my citation proved you wrong? Your reply is a bit open to interpretation.
For anyone curious, I edited my last reply to also include a quote from SCOTUS, just to show it applies everywhere.
Of what?
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2019
Shame, waste of time, and to save yourself from further legal embarrassment. Nothing you concern yourself with really.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Hey Melinda, youre so rude. @Mushroom Tip asked you a question. Who gave you the right to ignore him?
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2020
Indeed I did. Why won't you answer me Melinda? I literally gave you my name, my face, and my jurisdiction.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Actually that's one of the many things we have here making up a synthesis. Do you know what a synthesis is Melinda? Of course you don't because your understanding of science or anything in general is terrible. A synthesis is a combination of ideas to form a theory.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Inb4 "it's just a theory!"
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2016
I've breastfed six children. It wasn't my life. You are retarded.
And your astonishment over Rackets having five Racketlings was so telling. It's as if no one but the righteous (who you determine is righteous that is) can have many children.
Rackets is right. Your lawsuit is trash and you are trash for using the courts to punish people for something the law does not punish people for. BUTT HURT IS NOT A TORT.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Aren't his kids also adopted?
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
New filling! It's a win for Null!
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Is there a motion for Melinda to suck Null's dick too?
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
Come on now, like any other outcome was possible.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
True. Still, it's fun seeing Null score victories.
Eighth Amendment forbids this,
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
I don't know, we'd have to check the Jewish court system.
Edit: Nope afraid not. Also forced/ arranged marriages are also against Jewish Law.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2020
You haven't breastfed 6 children, you're making up stories to try to power level.
Rekeita can say whatever, my response hasn't even been filed yet
Ah, exactly what I thought
My Motion to Dismiss and vacate the Order was already sent. We shall see.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
How do you know that?
Well, if you can't make prima facie claims in the original petition, and you never amended it, then it's clear he has all the info he needs, no?
Btw, your response should be up tomorrow, right?
Well, the judge has already ruled on this motion, so yours is likely to get dismissed, imo
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
The dismissive tone of this is setting me off. If his children were adopted, what difference would that make?