Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Kosher Salt]

Worth a laugh that Mel's little fantasy about "I could file a writ a mandamus" is wrong in two separate ways. First, it's a "writ of mandamus," and second, you don't file it, you file a request for it; the higher court issues the mandamus (or, more likely in her case, it doesn't).

 

[talk talk talk]

Worth a laugh that Mel's little fantasy about "I could file a writ a mandamus" is wrong in two separate ways. First, it's a "writ of mandamus," and second, you don't file it, you file a request for it; the higher court issues the mandamus (or, more likely in her case, it doesn't).

I'm gonna say that the chance of the Fourth Circuit issuing a writ of mandamus to compel the District Court to issue an Order to Compel answers to interrogatories when there hasn't been a Rule 26 Conference is somewhere less than zero.

But I do look forward to Smelly getting out her Big Chief Tablet and Number Two pencil and requesting one.

 

[redcent]

Coming from you. You are a woman who has major issues because you sexually repress. I can see how twisted your head is because you don't have enough sex to maintain a healthy body and mind

How am I twisted?

How would sex improve body and mind?

I asked you this before mel: just how do you think sex is necessary for mental health. You never answered

And yes, you have issues because you are a KF Troll

I do not dispute this in the slightest

Hm, maybe that's all of your guys' issue. You need to get laid more often, then maybe you would be so psycho

Incel talk. That what misogynic guys say to excuse their bad behaviour : "it's all the women's fault for not providing sex, it is necessary for me to not be a psycho therefore if a woman doesn't provide sex it's woman's fault for my behaviour. The fact I drove a van into a crowd of people and became a murderer totes not my fault! "

See how terrible that line of thinking is?

But hey if you want to blame behaviour on lack of sex why don't you start fucking the guys on this thread?

No?

Then shut up. And quit virgin shaming people. It's idiots like you that give psycho incels and misogynic men reason to slut shame.

Because I don't have trust issues and no one has hurt me and my exes' past actions have nothing to do with my belief in gender equality

Moral principles. Too big a thought for you, eh?

Pot calling the kettle black here

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I do not dispute this in the slightest

Incel talk. That what misogynic guys say to excuse their bad behaviour : "it's all the women's fault for not providing sex, it is necessary for me to not be a psycho therefore if a woman doesn't provide sex it's woman's fault for my behaviour. The fact I drove a van into a crowd of people and became a murderer totes not my fault! "

See how terrible that line of thinking is?

But hey if you want to blame behaviour on lack of sex why don't you start fucking the guys on this thread?

No?

Then shut up. And quit virgin shaming people. It's idiots like you that give psycho incels and misogynic men reason to slut shame.

I don't think anyone here wants the diseases she's carrying.

 

[ConSluttant]

Moon only got off the hook by Section 230. And we can all see what Trump said about that








Yes? So do I. 7 years of it. I gave you a nice list of all the cases I have won in my Motion to Strike. Look for it






Section 230 is the only reason Moon didn't get fried. And as soon as Trump fixes that, Null is toast.






Try again.

"Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f) provides that, on its own or upon a litigant’s motion before responding to a pleading, “[t]he court may strike from a pleading . . . any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” This rule has not been amended since 1946."

That includes FALSE statements.
Immoral ones too

His Motion/pleading can be gutted

Pro-se litigants cannot upload to Pacer. Look for it. It's on its way

You don't know anything about 230, the reasons why it Should or should not apply in this case and you know NOTHING about the purpose of a motion to strike.

Yes, the Motion to Strike is only part 1. Part 2 will be my Answer/Response to their Motions




I'm not. Those were the Appropriation and Defamation cases. Not this one.

In this case....well, wait for the Motion to Strike, I said it there





Wait for the Motion to Strike, it's all theYes I released you. But then I saw you guys discussing the lawsuit

But hurt is not, but IIED sure is




That was the risk I took when I filed the lawsuit. You can laugh, but I still maintain my dignified posture. Don't forget, any one of your lolcows that have suffered social harm and other injuries could have just beat the shit out of Joshua Moon. That's why he's afraid to pick on people raised around violence.

Apparently he is not afraid to bully breastfeeding mothers. How dignified and decent.




Breastfeeding is a beautiful thing.

Many women can breastfeed, but the art of breastfeeding is a lot like any other art form. I focus on breastfeeding as one of the primary activities of my day because that is my technique. I personally believe holding children longer hours makes children more gentle. It's why I believe most children have ADD and ADHD: too little mothering.




It's because they don't know what they are doing and need proper education and advice from women who have successfully breastfed many children themselves




I have never had a baby have a nursing strike. Because like I said....I know what I'm doing.




It wasn't denied, the judge extended the deadline




You live in Australia. I speak for what it's like in the USA



I didn't say "gain custody". I said ADOPTION




"Promotes the health and wellbeing of....kids"?

Teaching children that women are inferior to men is not promoting their well being. It's teaching them sexism. That's NOT a successful marriage, that's a marriage modeling dysfunction. Unfit parents.

It is WRONG to allow the man to control the house because it's inherently wrong to create gender inequalities, even in the home. It is WRONG to model that gender inequality behavior to children.

Wow, women like you are the reason patriarchy lives. Your mind is cursed.






Where did I ever say I was looking for a man to provide for me and my children? I never made any such claim.

The Torah is not patriarchal. Have you ever actually tried thinking for yourself and not just regurgitate what pastors say?
(PDF) Gender Equality in The Torah | Tamar Yael BatYah - Academia.edu

FYIA--- I am not a member of any religion.

Gender equality was a condition of marrying me that I always put out in front. Reason I turned down several men over the years. If Marshall didn't believe in gender equality, he could have kept on going and looking for someone else. So there's no "wanting me to act like a traditional wife". I set my standards BEFORE I marry a guy. He can accept them or he can look for someone else.

Too big a thought for you, eh?

You don't plead anything that even vaguely resembles IIED. You are pleading nothing BUT butt hurt.

And I find your platitudes about breastfeeding to be patently offensive to ALL women. Both those who can successfully breastfeed and those who can't. You are so misogynistic to those women who don't have the exact same experience you think they should have that it's a nasty ichor that drips from everything you say.

Your purile attempts to join codependency and sexism show just how stupid you are. You didn't even know that impotent had meanings outside of the sexual realm. You are quite possibly the dumbest self-reported smart person I have ever come across. And that's saying a lot. I was sued by a lolcow that was smarter than you. He at least knew that he appealed to the lowest common denominator. You seem to think you soar in some stratosphere above mere mortals. Too bad you are more like a stone sinking in a pool of water.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing healthy about an arrangement like that. It's CODEPENDENCY. It's sexism.

And most of all it just confirms what I've seen about you this whole time: internalized misogyny. Your mind is cursed.





You can say whatever you want in a document that you deem in relevant. I've seen lawyers put some creative things in pleadings all the time.

But in the meantime I have to many others things to file. Need to get them in the mail.


.

First I need to identify whether or not they did this Order before or after receiving my Motion to Dismiss the Request for Extension of Time.

Otherwise, I'm going to appeal it to the higher court because I clearly stated in the Motion to Compel what discovery requests he didn't respond to ("Request for Production of Documents"). I may file a Writ of Mandamus on this one.






Now you're advocating people be Codependents. Wowzers




You're just promoting Talmudic garbage over and over. PASS

Honey it doesn't matter if they received your documents or not. Judges can issue things sua sponte. And do. When they feel it's necessary of course. And you get to just deal with it. Lol. Go ahead with that Writ request. Ain't gonna be granted.

I hope they approve this one. She seems to feel this need to file a motion the very second a motion is filled by opposing counsel, or a motion is ruled upon by a judge in the case. She just does it like bouncing a ping pong ball back, with even less thought.
With her spelling and grammatical errors in general when she can just hit "post" on the internet, I think electronic filing is a great idea for such a sad little victim of the patriarchy.

Obesessive filings like this from a pro se plaintiff is one of the surest signs of a lolcow. All is proceeding as I have foreseen.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Yeah, have fun with that, you see, it's actually the offender who's supposed to turn the other cheek, so that the offended person, rather than forgiving, can hit them back twice. Jesus, being a good jew, would know that the Torah requires eye for eye, and would never ever tell people to forgive those who trespass against them.

Despite the fact that I know you are being sarcastic, you actually said something in line with The Torah for once.

You said you filed a Motion to Dismiss, not a motion to vacate or quash.

The Motion to Dismiss included a request to Vacate any previous Order (because attorneys have the advantage of speed via filing to Pacer, I do not as a pro-se litigant). So I knew by the time my Motion to Dismiss arrived by snail mail, they may ruled on it and issued an Order. I think the Motion to Dimiss arrived and that is what prompted the judge to dismiss my Motion to Compel.

Well, I just need to file a more detailed Motion to Compel.

Melinda's uncanny ability to understand almost the exact opposite meaning of plain text instructions is one of her funnier elements. Alongside her complete lack of scientific understanding.

Here's some plain text for ya, MORON

"If someone injures his neighbor, what he did is to be done to him — break for break, eye for eye, tooth for tooth — whatever injury he has caused the other person is to be rendered to him in return." (Lev. 24:19-20)

That's actually the foundation of American Tort law. Made possible by all the good ol' Jews in America.

You don't know anything about 230, the reasons why it Should or should not apply in this case and you know NOTHING about the purpose of a motion to strike.

My responses on the way to the courthouse answer that.

You don't plead anything that even vaguely resembles IIED. You are pleading nothing BUT butt hurt.

My responses on the way to the courthouse answer that.

You are so misogynistic to those women who don't have the exact same experience you think they should have that it's a nasty ichor that drips from everything you say.

Actually what I said was that they need education and guidance and that breastfeeding was a basic human right.

Again, you make up fantasies to try to put me in a negative light.

Your purile attempts to join codependency and sexism show just how stupid you are.

Meh, you're mind is cursed and you're blind. Which is what you deserve anyway: spiritual blindness.

 

[lolwatagain]

The Motion to Dismiss included a request to Vacate any previous Order (because attorneys have the advantage of speed via filing to Pacer, I do not as a pro-se litigant). So I knew by the time my Motion to Dismiss arrived by snail mail, they may ruled on it and issued an Order. I think the Motion to Dimiss arrived and that is what prompted the judge to dismiss my Motion to Compel.

Well, I just need to file a more detailed Motion to Compel.

Wait, you filed a Motion to Dismiss? Not a response to Null's Motion to Dismiss?

What would you even file the motion to dismiss on? There is no countercomplaint.

 

[redcent]

Despite the fact that I know you are being sarcastic, you actually said something in line with The Torah for once.

Disturrbing

Seriously tho, who hurt you?

Here's some plain text for ya, MORON

"If someone injures his neighbor, what he did is to be done to him — break for break, eye for eye, tooth for tooth — whatever injury he has caused the other person is to be rendered to him in return." (Lev. 24:19-20)

That's actually the foundation of American Tort law. Made possible by all the good ol' Jews in America.

So, who sued you then?

If it's eye for eye, and your suing shouldn't the equal punishment be as a result of getting sued yourself?

People here have said bad words. You want eye for eye just say some bad words back and call it a day.

Really though who hurt you that you feel so riled up over what idiots say online? Wasn't it your sister? Did she do something to tip you over the edge?

People say terrible things - that's life- but if you can get away do so and your life will be refreshed and happier as a result. If you can't get away - then that legit is on them

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

If it's eye for eye, and your suing shouldn't the equal punishment be as a result of getting sued yourself?

"Eye for eye" is on the *injury*, not the method of inflicting the injury (sin)

If person A does action B, resulting in injury C to person D, then person D retains the moral right to do C. But no "B". So if Jane kicks John in the shin and causes pain in his leg, then John can cause Jane physical pain of the same degree in some way.

A lot of people miss that. That's the *injury* that you are allowed to inflict back, not the sin.

What would you even file the motion to dismiss on? There is no countercomplaint.

Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time

People here have said bad words. You want eye for eye just say some bad words back and call it a day.

People say terrible things - that's life- but if you can get away do so and your life will be refreshed and happier as a result. If you can't get away - then that legit is on them

You will see in my responses that it goes way deeper than some basic insults

Really though who hurt you that you feel so riled up over what idiots say online? Wasn't it your sister? Did she do something to tip you over the edge?

Seriously tho, who hurt you?

I actually never held anything against my sister that she did in childhood because I knew she grew up in hard circumstances. It's a myth that I held the lake incident over her head, I really never did.

I don't have emotional baggage from being hurt by anyone. I just don't believe in "peace, love and harmony" bullshit that Ghandi promoted.

 

[redcent]

"Eye for eye" is on the *injury*, not the method of inflicting the injury (sin)

If person A does action B, resulting in injury C to person D, then person D retains the moral right to do C. But no "B". So if Jane kicks John in the shin and causes pain in his leg, then John can cause Jane physical pain of the same degree in some way.

A lot of people miss that. That's the *injury* that you are allowed to inflict back, not the sin.




Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time





You will see in my responses that it goes way deeper than some basic insults





I actually never held anything against my sister that she did in childhood because I knew she grew up in hard circumstances. It's a myth that I held the lake incident over her head, I really never did.

Lake incident? What happened there?

I don't have emotional baggage from being hurt by anyone. I just don't believe in "peace, love and harmony" bullshit that Ghandi promoted.

Why though?

Why is it so offensive to you?

 

[lolwatagain]

Defendant's Motion for an Extension of Time

Fucking hell. That poor fucking clerk, having to deal with someone filing a fucking motion to dismiss on a fucking motion for an extension of time. I can only imagine their expression when they read this bullshit.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Fucking hell. That poor fucking clerk, having to deal with someone filing a fucking motion to dismiss on a fucking motion for an extension of time. I can only imagine their expression when they read this bullshit.

Clerks' opinions are irrelevant in a court of law. They are required to file regardless of the litigant. They only work for the government, which existed before any Clerk ever got hired and will exist even after they retire. Government jobs aren't the place for personal bias. Their personal opinions are appropriate for when they go home.

 

[lolwatagain]

Clerks' opinions are irrelevant in a court of law. They are required to file regardless of the litigant. They only work for the government, which existed before any Clerk ever got hired and will exist even after they retire. Government jobs aren't the place for personal bias. Their personal opinions are appropriate for when they go home.

The clerk can file it, but it's a meaningless motion because it is deficient. You can't file a fucking motion to dismiss on a filing that isn't a complaint. A motion to dismiss is a motion to dismiss a complaint or countercomplaint, not a motion to dismiss a fucking extension of time that was already granted. All you've done is waste the Court's time.

 

[super thug]

You look like such a fool. To everyone.

Don't you have any dignity? Doesn't any part of you wish that you did have some dignity?

 

[ConSluttant]

The Motion to Dismiss included a request to Vacate any previous Order (because attorneys have the advantage of speed via filing to Pacer, I do not as a pro-se litigant). So I knew by the time my Motion to Dismiss arrived by snail mail, they may ruled on it and issued an Order. I think the Motion to Dimiss arrived and that is what prompted the judge to dismiss my Motion to Compel.

Well, I just need to file a more detailed Motion to Compel.

Lol it will just fail. Again. Knock yourself out though. You need to learn to pick your battles. Sperging out every five seconds thinking you have to drop filling after filing is only going to make the judge mad.

But don't stop. Truly. It makes this all the better to watch.

Actually what I said was that they need education and guidance and that breastfeeding was a basic human right.

Again, you make up fantasies to try to put me in a negative light.




Meh, you're mind is cursed and you're blind. Which is what you deserve anyway: spiritual blindness.

Lol my mind is open to the certainty that others will think differently than me and the possibility that they could be correct and I could be wrong. You are the blind one. Because you believe only you know the truth. But you couldn't be more wrong.

And no fantasies are necessary. You demonstrate every time you post that you hold everyone but yourself in contempt. You can't understand that what is possible for one woman may be impossible for another. You think the one who actually can't just needs to learn more or try harder or simply won't - with the implication that they are lazy or stupid or some combination thereof. But the real problem is that they CAN'T. What you are doing is misogyny.

BRB. Moar popcorn to make!

 

[talk talk talk]

Clerks' opinions are irrelevant in a court of law. They are required to file regardless of the litigant. They only work for the government, which existed before any Clerk ever got hired and will exist even after they retire. Government jobs aren't the place for personal bias. Their personal opinions are appropriate for when they go home.

One difference between a professional and a pro se dropout is that professionals know better than to denigrate the clerks and make their lives difficult. The time may come when you need some slack or some off-the-record assistance. They are much more likely to give you that if you treat them decently and don't make their jobs any harder than they already are.

Even more important if you are in court to actually win things is that judges are very protective of their staff. If the gossip around the courthouse is that someone is difficult, that will color judge's perception of that person. Since a huge percentage of decisions are "committed to the sound discretion of the trial court" you may need the edge of not being known as a difficult person around the courthouse.

 

[Toasty]

Despite the fact that I know you are being sarcastic, you actually said something in line with The Torah for once.

Holy shit, nearly 800 pages later, she FINALLY identifies sarcasm. She CAN learn.

John can cause Jane physical pain of the same degree in some way.

Yes, but you see, he doesn't need to. The Torah eye for eye thing was a restriction on response to a wrong, not a requirement for a response. As in, don't hang a hungry child for stealing bread. And according to Jesus, people had the CHOICE to forgive. Eye for eye is the limit of retaliation, not what someone is required to retaliate. What kind of messed up society tells it's people that it's people are never ever allowed to forgive each other? That if someone cuts them off in traffic, that they MUST retaliate equal and up to the level of offense given, if it be codified in a bronze age book? This is so unbelievably stupid, and you are not only stupid for believing it, you are the only person on earth that does ( other than indoctrinated children)

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Holy shit, nearly 800 pages later, she FINALLY identifies sarcasm. She CAN learn.

We have koi fish that learned quicker than she dioes.

 

[Mr. Faget]

Too bad you are more like a stone sinking in a pool of liquid shit.

FTFY friend

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

If the gossip around the courthouse is that someone is difficult, that will color judge's perception of that person

That's illegal. Sorry, not buying it. You're trying to make a system that is supposed to be objective into a system that is subjective.

Since a huge percentage of decisions are "committed to the sound discretion of the trial court" you may need the edge of not being known as a difficult person around the courthouse.

"Discretion" doesn't mean "I can decide the merits if I like you are not". "Discretion" means, they have to look at everything very carefully.

What kind of messed up society tells it's people that it's people are never ever allowed to forgive each other?

Show me one place in The Torah that says humans can forgive another human's sin.

(HINT: Don't hold your breath, you won't find it)

You demonstrate every time you post that you hold everyone but yourself in contempt

Not supported by the facts

ou look like such a fool. To everyone.

KF is not "everyone" and the fact that you view the world like that shows just how messed up your head is

People in other cultures don't display the level of narcissistic scapegoating that most of you English speaking people aim for. Anglos, so typical.