Politisperg safe space PM chain leak - Also known as the autism holocaust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Truthboi said:
I'm pretty sure someone ITT said a few pages ago that it's a rule for a user getting a thread made on them be informed that their information is being mined.
Click to expand...
That's very contextually sensitive and largely up to the discretion of the moderator. I would say that it only really applies if a user is doing it implicitly to "attack" another user, especially if the information that the person is digging up isn't funny and just steers them towards a completely regular person, but the only situation I know of where this happened is when someone tried to dox Hollywood and wound up digging out a completely normal, unrelated person.

Basically there's not really a defined rule for it other than don't be a dick and try to dox users just because they made you ass-blasted, and if you absolutely have to, only do it if the user has lots of funny skeletons in their closet, with bonus points awarded for irony or hypocrisy. IE: If someone on here spent all of their time in the Zoosadism threads lambasting the POIs in the thread, and then it turned out they're a degenerate dog-fucker, that's probably going to pique the forum's interest.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: secret watcher, Brigada, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 17 others
It's HK-47 said:
That's very contextually sensitive and largely up to the discretion of the moderator. I would say that it only really applies if a user is doing it implicitly to "attack" another user, especially if the information that the person is digging up isn't funny and just steers them towards a completely regular person, but the only situation I know of where this happened is when someone tried to dox Hollywood and wound up digging out a completely normal, unrelated person.

Basically there's not really a defined rule for it other than don't be a dick and try to dox users just because they made you ass-blasted, and if you absolutely have to, only do it if the user has lots of funny skeletons in their closet, with bonus points awarded for irony or hypocrisy. IE: If someone on here spent all of their time in the Zoosadism threads lambasting the POIs in the thread, and then it turned out they're a degenerate dog-fucker, that's probably going to pique the forum's interest.
Click to expand...
You mean like if a very conservative user who almost exclusively posts about politics wrote a bunch of incest chastity fetish stories?
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher, Leslie Nielsen, Brigada and 36 others
It's HK-47 said:
That's very contextually sensitive and largely up to the discretion of the moderator. I would say that it only really applies if a user is doing it implicitly to "attack" another user, especially if the information that the person is digging up isn't funny and just steers them towards a completely regular person, but the only situation I know of where this happened is when someone tried to dox Hollywood and wound up digging out a completely normal, unrelated person.

Basically there's not really a defined rule for it other than don't be a dick and try to dox users just because they made you ass-blasted, and if you absolutely have to, only do it if the user has lots of funny skeletons in their closet, with bonus points awarded for irony or hypocrisy. IE: If someone on here spent all of their time in the Zoosadism threads lambasting the POIs in the thread, and then it turned out they're a degenerate dog-fucker, that's probably going to pique the forum's interest.
Click to expand...
Alright I was sort of confused since I know jackshit about how halal threads are made and whatnot. But I guess I was proven wrong, but damn someone really tried to dox HHH, damn going to bet it was because he triggered them.
 
  • Agree
  • Autistic
  • Feels
Reactions: secret watcher, Ira the Weatherman, cuddle striker and 4 others
AnOminous said:
All you have to do is not be an absolute retard in every single post. You have to be @BoxerShorts47 level full retard in pretty much 100% of your posts to have an overall negative rating.
Click to expand...
My real reaction rating is closer to 50%, maybe 66% if I'm being unoptimistic. The only reason I have such a low rating is because I've developed a cult of haters, including you, who MATI/DUMB all my posts.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Tablet County, secret watcher, Brigada and 42 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
My real reaction rating is closer to 50%, maybe 66% if I'm being unoptimistic. The only reason I have such a low rating is because I've developed a cult of haters, including you, who MATI/DUMB all my posts.
Click to expand...
That's a lie you subhuman monkey. Usually I rate you Deviant.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • DRINK!
Reactions: secret watcher, Canned Bread, The Un-Clit and 10 others
AnOminous said:
I am more or less reminded of an old quote from random_text.txt: "So he's into weird, depraved shit. That's pretty much half our userbase. Where is the funny stuff?" I mean it's funny on some level that he's been as ridiculous about the porn shit as he has but so what? It's more report for power leveling than halal shit anyway.
Click to expand...
lol no he’s a cow
 
  • Agree
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: secret watcher, BSC, KimCoppolaAficionado and 1 other person
AnOminous said:
I am more or less reminded of an old quote from random_text.txt: "So he's into weird, depraved shit. That's pretty much half our userbase. Where is the funny stuff?" I mean it's funny on some level that he's been as ridiculous about the porn shit as he has but so what? It's more report for power leveling than halal shit anyway.
Click to expand...
I think the issue with him in particular is that he is into that weird shit while preaching about how degeneracy is ruining the west, acting incredibly racist/sexist (his rants on his hatred of black and women because of their political affiliations, even wishing the 19th amendment was banned), and generally acting like a sperg.

Having weird kinks/fetishes is one thing, but acting like a sperg while trying to preach against moral degeneracy on top of that is crazy

The cherry on top is him denying some of his kinks are degenerate since he had a post saying how pure chastity is.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: secret watcher, Brigada, Fromtheblackdepths and 11 others
Superman93 said:
lol no he’s a cow
Click to expand...
Despite how funny his porn selection and political spergs are I can't really see a thread on him having more than a few pages of actual content.
He really isn't threadworthy and couldn't be milked long term. He's good for an evening of chuckles only to be forgotten until you run across him again in a thread.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: secret watcher, Brigada, Devyn and 3 others
Satan said:
You mean like if a very conservative user who almost exclusively posts about politics wrote a bunch of incest chastity fetish stories?
Click to expand...
Honestly dude reminds me of Homer who was also a porn addict that couldn't shut up about the evil feminazis.

Atleast he didn't get busted having a stash of gay incest bondage porn though.
 
  • Informative
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher, Leslie Nielsen, MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and 3 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back