Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Out of the 15 pages of Smelly's memo, nine of them are mostly whining about how she is totes authorized to file a motion to strike instead of just responding to the motion to set aside default. Two pages address what looks like the core issue of whether she got good service on Dear Leader.

I don't know if Hardin intentionally trolled the fuck out of my second-favorite Mountain Jew (Mighty Mighty Marshall and his curses from a car vidoes still holds a special place in my heart), but it looks like it's been effective.
 
In Christianity you aren't allowed to express any negative emotions, especially if you are a woman.
Are you kidding me
Theotokion in spoiler
Standing by the Cross, O Jesus, She Who gave birth to Thee, wept lamenting and cried out: “I cannot bear this, to see Thee to Whom I gave birth nailed on the wood. I escaped the pain of childbirth since I never knew a husband, so how am I now gripped with pain, and wounded in heart. Now is fulfilled the saying which Symeon uttered, ‘A sword shall pierce thy heart O undefiled One.’”

“O my Son”, the Virgin cried out with tears, “Now hath a sword of sorrow hast rent my heart in that the assembly of lawbreakers with nails hath nailed Thee to the Cross.”
 
Melinda thinks that the Scots are actually the descendants of Jews banished from Palestine when Titus sacked Jerusalem in 70 AD and destroyed the Second Temple. Yes, this is exactly as dumb as it sounds.
I can cite more legitimate reasons why my fatherland is legitimate heir of the roman empire, right here:
finlandromanempire.png
 
It doesn't say "forgive us our trespasses....". It saya "forgive us OUR DEBTS". Why? Because the only thing a human can release ("forgive" if you want) another person from is their restitution debt (Numb. 5:5-8)

In every place that The Messiah speaks about what is translated in English as "forgiveness", it is always in the context of financial debts:
Ding dong wrong again. Matthew 23-24 is a parable designed to make the concept of forgiveness accessible to the peasant Israelite, which as usual you have misunderstood to mean that the only thing that can be forgiven is a debt. Matthew 18:35 uses G3900 which does not preclude the meaning applying to all scenarios. Matthew 6 uses G3781 which does mean debtor but also translates to a looser sense.

You've also forgotten Matthew 6:14, Luke 17:3, Mark 11:25 and Luke 6:37. All of these are very obviously phrased as forgiving your fellow believer for his sins outside of just debts.
 
If you've looked at your marriage history you'd know that a woman like you is just assumed by men--rightly, of course--to be worth nothing more than pushing out their spawn and getting their rocks off. They might give you the impression they give a shit about you but that's only to have a steady hole. The fact this has happened to you ten times now is proof-positive you need to lose access to those children, because--and I can't stress this enough--you will never be able to raise them properly. You won't fill them with any sense of self-worth. They will see the revolving door of men fucking you and your daughters will assume that is their lot in life, and your boys will assume that is how they will be expected to treat women. You are raising those children to fail in a very real, meaningful way that will be hard to undo, if not impossible.

Also if you look in a mirror hags like you who even consider AI are doing it because men have soundly rejected you as a potential life mate. Because you're an ugly person, inside and out.

That's a whole lot of reframing there. A bunch of made up BS to cast me in a negative and false light.

Obviously me mentioning the idea of a woman doing AI caused you a narcissistic injury so you're raging.


Docs in the latest filing are now available on RECAP, too.


I don't work on the Shabbat but this certainly gives me more to answer to on Monday
Ding dong wrong again. Matthew 23-24 is a parable designed to make the concept of forgiveness accessible to the peasant Israelite, which as usual you have misunderstood to mean that the only thing that can be forgiven is a debt. Matthew 18:35 uses G3900 which does not preclude the meaning applying to all scenarios. Matthew 6 uses G3781 which does mean debtor but also translates to a looser sense.

You've also forgotten Matthew 6:14, Luke 17:3, Mark 11:25 and Luke 6:37. All of these are very obviously phrased as forgiving your fellow believer for his sins outside of just debts.

You clearly didn't read the screenshot that I included which includes Matthew 6:14, Luke 17:3, Mark 11:25 and Luke 6:37.

Either way, I'm not interested in your Pauline Christian view of The Messiah's words. You don't follow The Torah and therefore, you do not understand The Messiah's words. You're trying to impose Paul onto The Messiah. WRONG ORDER OF BUSINESS. It's like trying to build a house with the attic on the bottom.
 
Either way, I'm not interested in your Pauline Christian view of The Messiah's words. You don't follow The Torah and therefore, you do not understand The Messiah's words. You're trying to impose Paul onto The Messiah. WRONG ORDER OF BUSINESS. It's like trying to build a house with the attic on the bottom.
I very specifically avoid using any verses from paul because I know you don't like that Paul actually holds people accountable for sinning against their family. If you're cranky about the verses I've included I suggest you take the time to actually Strong's them and see if I'm right that they're referring to all sin or not. You have a basis of sand for your belief and it's one of the many reasons why your life sucks.

The forgiveness of debt is a basic opener to a complex concept, which is often repeated throughout the Messiah's parables. Like so many concepts, you've gotten stuck on the interpretation you want in a childlike fashion.
 
That's a whole lot of reframing there. A bunch of made up BS to cast me in a negative and false light.

Obviously me mentioning the idea of a woman doing AI caused you a narcissistic injury so you're raging.
Far from it, actually. I'm in a stable relationship, something you are singularly unable to do. You love brandying about words like "narcissist" as adjectives to attach to other people, when your own posting history shows that they only malignant narcissist involved in this is you. I'll pray for your kids, because they're going to need all the help they can get (which, by the way, a mother who cared about her children would have focused on me saying you're an unfit mother setting her children up for failure, and not focused on the AI argument I made).
 
I don't know if Hardin intentionally trolled the fuck out of my second-favorite Mountain Jew (Mighty Mighty Marshall and his curses from a car vidoes still holds a special place in my heart), but it looks like it's been effective.
I don't necessarily think it's intentional trolling, I just think that he is more than happy to take advantage of her absolutely unprofessional communications and manic filing of motions.
I love how she blames this thread for somehow effecting her earning abilities. All of her previous legal actions not involving kiwi farms were filled ifp, did Josh force her to file ifp those times too?She was earning nothing before it existed, and will most likely continue much as she has for her entire adult life to be a non- earner. She's just loves that poor me, victim status shit.
 
Where? Please cite a law, rule, caselaw, etc.

She can't afford an attorney

New fillings! Null asks for vacation of order 17, partial stay in the case, protective order.


They never waived the motion to extend time, IIRC. Proof?

See highlighted part

2020-12-19 (16).png


I'm looking forward to it. I am sure the arguments about why a stay on other proceedings is not appropriate while a dispositive motion is pending will be quite interesting.

The court granted me leave last Thursday to re-file the Motion to Compel ("without prejudice"). But it's my Shabbat so I don't want to get into work mode and so I won't say much more.

I very specifically avoid using any verses from paul because I know you don't like that Paul actually holds people accountable for sinning against their family. If you're cranky about the verses I've included I suggest you take the time to actually Strong's them and see if I'm right that they're referring to all sin or not. You have a basis of sand for your belief and it's one of the many reasons why your life sucks.

The forgiveness of debt is a basic opener to a complex concept, which is often repeated throughout the Messiah's parables. Like so many concepts, you've gotten stuck on the interpretation you want in a childlike fashion.

I just answered your verses and you didn't bother reading my answer.

My life doesn't suck but I know that's why you come here to pretend it does. You're really only projecting yourself. Otherwise you wouldn't come here to feed off of others to compensate for that big hole in your life. Typical spiritually diseased person.


Far from it, actually. I'm in a stable relationship, something you are singularly unable to do. You love brandying about words like "narcissist" as adjectives to attach to other people, when your own posting history shows that they only malignant narcissist involved in this is you. I'll pray for your kids, because they're going to need all the help they can get (which, by the way, a mother who cared about her children would have focused on me saying you're an unfit mother setting her children up for failure, and not focused on the AI argument I made).

"Stable relationship". Bahahaha. Sounds like code for puppy love. No experience in marriage whatsoever. good luck with that
 
I just answered your verses and you didn't bother reading my answer.
Because it's wrong and I'm learning that your misogyny and pig headedness makes it difficult to change your mind.
My life doesn't suck but I know that's why you come here to pretend it does. You're really only projecting yourself. Otherwise you wouldn't come here to feed off of others to compensate for that big hole in your life. Typical spiritually diseased person.

"Stable relationship". Bahahaha. Sounds like code for puppy love. No experience in marriage whatsoever. good luck with that
You shouldn't be smoking copium on Shabbos, Mel.
 
If you've looked at your marriage history you'd know that a woman like you is just assumed by men--rightly, of course--to be worth nothing more than pushing out their spawn and getting their rocks off. They might give you the impression they give a shit about you but that's only to have a steady hole. The fact this has happened to you ten times now is proof-positive you need to lose access to those children, because--and I can't stress this enough--you will never be able to raise them properly. You won't fill them with any sense of self-worth. They will see the revolving door of men fucking you and your daughters will assume that is their lot in life, and your boys will assume that is how they will be expected to treat women. You are raising those children to fail in a very real, meaningful way that will be hard to undo, if not impossible.
This is well said. Too bad she'll use plenty of mental gymnastics to wriggle out of taking any of it to heart.
 
The court granted me leave last Thursday to re-file the Motion to Compel ("without prejudice"). But it's my Shabbat so I don't want to get into work mode and so I won't say much more.
Yes, your penchant for filing lots of motions for free is the reason why Mr. Hardin is requesting the court limit that while the dispositive motion is pending.

I look forward to reading your arguments on that matter.
 
"Stable relationship". Bahahaha. Sounds like code for puppy love. No experience in marriage whatsoever. good luck with that
Yes. A relationship going on six years now is "puppy love". That sounds about right. I get you don't understand a concept like "I love you" when said to someone you actually love, but some of us do. Then again, I guess you've never heard those words.
 
Where? Please cite a law, rule, caselaw, etc.

She can't afford an attorney

New fillings! Null asks for vacation of order 17, partial stay in the case, protective order.


They never waived the motion to extend time, IIRC. Proof?

I just realized he cut out some of the emails when we emailed. I'm going to have to contact him about that. There are some exhibits missing.

Because it's wrong and I'm learning that your misogyny and pig headedness makes it difficult to change your mind.

No, you just don't read stuff and then you never have a response to actual verses presented to you.

Doesn't matter to me anyway. Be blind and sick. It's what you deserve.

Yes, your penchant for filing lots of motions for free is the reason why Mr. Hardin is requesting the court limit that while the dispositive motion is pending.

I look forward to reading your arguments on that matter.

Nice try at taking my quote out of context. And also the fact that he chopped out the email in the middle. First I have to find out if that was an accident or intentional. Then I can state my opinion on what to do about that.


Yes. A relationship going on six years now is "puppy love". That sounds about right. I get you don't understand a concept like "I love you" when said to someone you actually love, but some of us do. Then again, I guess you've never heard those words.

You're dumb and talk like an airhead.
 
Melinda thinks that the Scots are actually the descendants of Jews banished from Palestine when Titus sacked Jerusalem in 70 AD and destroyed the Second Temple. Yes, this is exactly as dumb as it sounds.
British Israelism and the loyalist Tara movement espoused such nonsense long before Mel did.
 
Back