- Joined
- Jan 10, 2020
Does she still think Josh is a secret Mason? I hope she works that into the lolsuit somehow.
2020-12-07 - Scott v. Moon Mk VI(?)
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
- Status
Feralcheese
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
She's pro se, so she's flicking the bean.
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2018
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2017
Any new filings?
Also, I will admit to being woefully ignorant on how to navigate Pacer. How do I go about finding this case myself?
Also, I will admit to being woefully ignorant on how to navigate Pacer. How do I go about finding this case myself?
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Here's the courtlistener URL.
Docket for Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services, 2:20-cv-00014 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services, 2:20-cv-00014 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Gotta wait for Melinda's snail mail to get to the court since she won't file electronically. She also lied on Rackets about not being allowed to file electronically because she's not a lawyer. She does not file electronically because she doesn't want to pay for it and get the necessary certifications from the court that are required before they let you file that way.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
She filled a motion to ask the court to allow her to file electronically, so hopefully it will all speed up.
Western District of Virginia link, CourtListener link, case name (just in case you want to search somewhere else) 2:20-cv-00014-JPJ-PMS Scott v. Wise County Department of Social Services et al
PACER instructions (made with assumption that you have an account):
Go to this link, type in the case name and or number, and press search.
This is how it should look (name cuts off in the screenshot, write it in full)
This is the result you should get
Hope that helps
Edit, I usually post new fillings in this thread, and Mel's one. Current newest Fillings can be found here
Edit: New filling by Null
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
That woman is proof a little knowledge can be very dangerous.
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
Misplaced knowledge to boot. What a colossal waste of time and money. Courts won't and can't pull new laws out of thin air just because she insists on becoming like a raging case of herpes beating on their doors. She's been barking up the wrong tree for years and revels in it.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
I don't think she lies about this shit, I think she's really that fucking stupid. She's also pedaling the notion that she can't cite case law in the body of her main complaint as a pro se. I used to play with her a few months ago but got bored over trying to teach her how and when to use initial caps, and she's seriously convinced that she uses them properly. I just can't believe that a Trisha Paytas or Dick Masterson level troll would sue Josh and The Farms 5 times. So it's got to be intellectual/mental disability.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It's pretty common not to cite case law in a complaint or in a motion (case law is generally cited in a memorandum in support of a motion). It's not against the rules, but it's only done for a reason, such as a particular case being absolutely central to an argument made in the complaint itself. It's somewhat common to cite a case supporting jurisdiction since it has to be alleged sufficiently in the complaint.
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
Sure, but she emphatically said it was not allowed. I mean as in procedurally and unethical. I, once again, almost choked.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
She's kind of a retard.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2014
That pro se abuse may bite her in the ass.
She'd need an ass to bite. She's being evicted and her sugar daddy left her, and she has 6 gremlins to feed.
I'm also gonna bet she's unemployable so she's sucking her government dry while using her free time and government aid doing litigation abuse against Null.
She's judgement-proof as in she's too poor and already so far in debt that any judgement against her will just cost more money than it may ever bring back, and she owes nothing of value.
She's a sunfish. A braindead, inedible waste of ocean space that just takes ressouces and contributes nothing.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
Just to add in case she's thrown to prison and CSP would take custody of her goblonoids, it would cost federal courts even more more money and long term damage by unleashing equally unhinged hellspawn into custody homes or orphanages.
It's cheaper to let her and her clown car vagina and spawn to starve. Not to mention unleashing her lunatic mongrels on general public
Unless I'm wrong, wouldn't she only be sent to prison for criminal reasons? Packing the court and contempting it might give you massive fines, but I though jail time was for felonies.
I'm not too familiar with the American justice system, but from what I've been exposed, civil cases end in money transfered, not people put in jail.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
This lawsuit won't end with Melinda in jail. This is civil court, not criminal. Melinda has been the subject of at least four investigations by local CPS agencies, but no charges have ever been brought and none of her children have ever been removed.
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2020
Imagine this. She looses her suit and a judgment gets puts against her. The stimulus amount gets increased like Trump wants to $2,000 but Malinda doesn't get it because it gets sent to Josh as payment for the judgement.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
There's no possibility of that, either. That money (and the checks for each of her children), will be instantly converted into cash, plus enforcement of any judgement is probably going to take quite a while. Last stimulus check, much of it went to getting her 84-page book published, this check she'll probably spend a large chunk buying copies of her book from the publisher so she can sell them herself. It's money flushed away, of course.
- Status