Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Or they start babbling about mythical automation that will automagically be deployed worldwide and instantly to do the jobs that get hands dirty.

I can't say much because I don't want to PL, but I have first-hand knowledge about a Japanese company that was trying to automate a very human involved, hands on manufacturing process. Even with all of their money and technological might, the result was disappointing and required technicians having to manually intercede and physically reposition the materials at different stages of the process. If the millions they invested, their team of top level engineers, and their Japanese work ethic couldn't automate a process that seems deceptively simple, I can only imagine how the "communists" ideas would play out.
 
This is completely insane. These people actually live so far divorced from the realities of daily life that nobody is saying they'd be the garbage collectors or plumbers or picking the vegetables (not the same as "foraging in the wilderness", I'm afraid) or construction laborers. Seeing a lot of teachers, storytellers, and cooks though, which is just laughable. They must really live life as though food magically shows up in the supermarkets and electricity just comes out of the plugs without any human labor required. Definition of sheltered.
"Making lattes when needed" for fuck's sake, where is the coffee coming from in this commune? Buying it from the supermarket? Where's the money coming from? Who the hell has the resources to waste on espresso machines and milk frothers when the leftist commune needs someone to shovel the shit where people won't be getting sick and enough calories to keep the workers working?
You are 100% correct. They don't just NOT know about these things, but they don't even know what they don't know. They don't understand things like where electricity comes from or where their poop goes when they flush their toilet, and they don't even think to think about it in the first place.
I take comfort in knowing that at least I try to appreciate just how complex and fragile the chains that deliver food, water, and goods to our nations are. They think it's all magic and thus render it a farce rather than see how impressive all this work is.
 
I watch a lot of videos about off-grid/self reliant lifestyles and the first thing you notice about all the people who choose thar lifestyle is that they are usually very handy to begin with and also they have the kind of work ethic i wish i had. There is a lot of time consuming, back-breaking work involved in rejecting the current systems in society and providing for yourself.

These internet commies haven't a clue about any of this and would actually sneer at the people doing this as "rednecks" or "doomsday preppers". They don't realise that if they actually tried to set up their communes or whatever they would end up being squalid homeless encampments with a bunch of neglected animals/crops and the occassional lecture being given about how bad the outside world is.
 
I watch a lot of videos about off-grid/self reliant lifestyles and the first thing you notice about all the people who choose thar lifestyle is that they are usually very handy to begin with and also they have the kind of work ethic i wish i had. There is a lot of time consuming, back-breaking work involved in rejecting the current systems in society and providing for yourself.

These internet commies haven't a clue about any of this and would actually sneer at the people doing this as "rednecks" or "doomsday preppers". They don't realise that if they actually tried to set up their communes or whatever they would end up being squalid homeless encampments with a bunch of neglected animals/crops and the occassional lecture being given about how bad the outside world is.
Also, why the fuck do they think anyone would be interested in their lectures anyway?
1. Lectures are boring
2. Every politically-motivated speaking event I've ever attended has always reeked of "Just waiting my turn to speak". They're there for the attention. Not to listen to others.
 
38f79db9-ac25-4efd-a0b3-484756272c98.png
https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/education/suffolk-schools-diversity-campaign-6863728 (https://archive.vn/PcpAo)
Excerpt:
"Making your school a diverse and inclusive place to work and study is an ongoing process. It never stops."
 
Are companies going woke because they are in fact woke? Or are they going woke because they’re being told to in an effort to propagate leftist ideas? Or are they going woke because they know organizations will throw money at them to produce projects and they can take that money and pocket it while also taking cuts of profits from idiots who will buy their product even if profits underperform?

No company is "in fact woke" - a gentle reminder that huge megacorporations (Apple, Google, Nike) will pretend like they're woke, by grandstanding about how bad slavery was in America and how bad Black People still have it to this day - all while using literal slave labor in third world countries and China.

A lot of the "woke" stuff you're seeing is because while it does decrease profits in many cases - the companies see it as an opportunity to buy "social capital", basically letting them spend money to change their branding and the larger companies have decided that this is worth it on some level.

Nike - for example - is one of the largest "activewear" makers on the planet and they make huge profits employing sweatshop labor and have done so since like 1980. We're talking billions upon billions of dollars in profit. On occasion, activists and journalists will get on their ass with the thought process of "You made $40 billion dollars in profit, why don't you pay your employees more than $6 a month?" and it will turn into bad press.

To actually pay all of their third-world employees real world money would be a gigantic project that would likely cost billions upon billions per year - so what can Nike do? Donate a vastly smaller portion to some no-name charity and pretend to give a shit about social causes. Specifically, Nike has "committed" (not donated, but future allocated) $10,000,000 a year to Black Lives Matter for the next 4 years, or $40,000,000. For a company that makes Nike money, $40,000,000 (over 4 years) is literally nothing. Not only is it nothing, but they got a gigantic amount of press over it - so they can consider it part of their advertising budget (not literally, but practically). That $40,000,000 has performed so well that if you type "Nike" into a search engine you'd have to go about 7 pages deep to even find a hint of unethical behavior. That's worth $40mil to Nike and I'd have to agree - it's way cheaper to talk about doing something rather than actually doing it.

"Get Woke, Go Broke" is a meme - the companies are sometimes losing profits - but they're definitely gaining something they feel is valuable and they're probably right. Not many people give a shit about Nike's sweatshops and a huge part of the population trust Twitter/Apple/Google/Facebook to not abuse their power despite the fact they do so constantly - and likely tried to sway the 2016 and 2020 elections.
 

View attachment 1804162
View attachment 1804163
View attachment 1804164
View attachment 1804168

Remember when they accused everyone that didn't immediately toe the line on Wu Flu of wanting Grandma dead? This fucker really does want Grandma dead, because she's white.
biden kill whitey covid vaccine.jpg

As if the establishment-approved, establishment-executed anti-white, anti-western riots over the course of this year wasn't indication enough what the establishment would enact once it regained full control of its organs, the Biden admin has explicitly signed on to what literally does amount to white genocide. I think everyone thought they would put the mask back on once Trump was gone, but maybe they've shifted the mindless masses enough that white genocide is welcomed with a ho-hum - even by whites! Maybe, maybe.

p2 Marcella Nunez Smith LL_336410_5_v2.jpg
Marcella Nunez-Smith
Blacker than I expected, though physiognomically in line with her sentiments - you can tell at a glance that she's an atrocious person.

Oddly, photos of her husband are elusive. In one article she had them correct it to remove reference to her husband as 'husband' and replaced his reference with 'spouse'. His name is Jesse. You can find photos of her with her kids, thought no husband in the pictures.

I have hope that maybe he's trooned-out. Her kids are very black, so probably not the stereotypical white/jew-married black that is voraciously anti-white.
 
Last edited:
No company is "in fact woke" - a gentle reminder that huge megacorporations (Apple, Google, Nike) will pretend like they're woke, by grandstanding about how bad slavery was in America and how bad Black People still have it to this day - all while using literal slave labor in third world countries and China.

A lot of the "woke" stuff you're seeing is because while it does decrease profits in many cases - the companies see it as an opportunity to buy "social capital", basically letting them spend money to change their branding and the larger companies have decided that this is worth it on some level.

Nike - for example - is one of the largest "activewear" makers on the planet and they make huge profits employing sweatshop labor and have done so since like 1980. We're talking billions upon billions of dollars in profit. On occasion, activists and journalists will get on their ass with the thought process of "You made $40 billion dollars in profit, why don't you pay your employees more than $6 a month?" and it will turn into bad press.

To actually pay all of their third-world employees real world money would be a gigantic project that would likely cost billions upon billions per year - so what can Nike do? Donate a vastly smaller portion to some no-name charity and pretend to give a shit about social causes. Specifically, Nike has "committed" (not donated, but future allocated) $10,000,000 a year to Black Lives Matter for the next 4 years, or $40,000,000. For a company that makes Nike money, $40,000,000 (over 4 years) is literally nothing. Not only is it nothing, but they got a gigantic amount of press over it - so they can consider it part of their advertising budget (not literally, but practically). That $40,000,000 has performed so well that if you type "Nike" into a search engine you'd have to go about 7 pages deep to even find a hint of unethical behavior. That's worth $40mil to Nike and I'd have to agree - it's way cheaper to talk about doing something rather than actually doing it.

"Get Woke, Go Broke" is a meme - the companies are sometimes losing profits - but they're definitely gaining something they feel is valuable and they're probably right. Not many people give a shit about Nike's sweatshops and a huge part of the population trust Twitter/Apple/Google/Facebook to not abuse their power despite the fact they do so constantly - and likely tried to sway the 2016 and 2020 elections.
Nike having sweatshops is buried because it's old news. Everyone knows that clothes are made by third world borderline slave labour (I was taught this in 7th or 8th grade), but most have accepted that such conditions are a necessary step on the road to industrialisation, much like the dark satanic mills of Dickens' day, and probably better than backbreaking primitive agriculture that serves as the only alternative (as indicated by hordes of rural Chinks illegally swarming into the cities to work in the very same factories that infamously installed suicide nets). Some react to this by blaming capitalism and going full commie of course, but they're to the Left what /pol/ tards are to the Right.
 
1608665218686.png


Wonder if she's considered blowing her brains out to promote equity? I mean think about it, it would do a lot, she could leave her entire estate to black tr*ns w*m*n thus reducing the wealth gap while simultaneously reducing white life expectancy AND reducing the overrepresentation of whitey in the academy. How could she not do it?
 
View attachment 1804294

Wonder if she's considered blowing her brains out to promote equity? I mean think about it, it would do a lot, she could leave her entire estate to black tr*ns w*m*n thus reducing the wealth gap while simultaneously reducing white life expectancy AND reducing the overrepresentation of whitey in the academy. How could she not do it?
So what she's saying is that it's okay if more people die so long as they're white?
 
View attachment 1804294

Wonder if she's considered blowing her brains out to promote equity? I mean think about it, it would do a lot, she could leave her entire estate to black tr*ns w*m*n thus reducing the wealth gap while simultaneously reducing white life expectancy AND reducing the overrepresentation of whitey in the academy. How could she not do it?
Something tells me that's exactly what she thinks... for everyone that isn't herself and other fellow "allies".

And this is a very much white Ph.D. we are talking about. What the hell are they teaching to people in academia?
 
Back