Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Something tells me that's exactly what she thinks... for everyone that isn't herself and other fellow "allies".

And this is a very much white Ph.D. we are talking about. What the hell are they teaching to people in academia?
Not hard facts I can tell you that much. The amount of "facts don't real" I've seen in academic settings is mind boggling.
 
To be able to teach economics, you would first have to understand economics, and you're a fucking commie, so there's no danger of that, because "Communist Economic Theory" revolves entirely around establishing the minimum number of calories required for you to do back-breaking, humiliating labour for the good of the Party, unless you happen to be pretty enough that a ranking member of the Party decides you're worth having as a mistress.

And you, dear Bri-the-beekeeper, are definitely not pretty enough to get that lucky. But At least you'll lose some of that pudge your heretofore privileged life has permitted you to pack on, you mediocre hambeast.
That last portion I'm reminded of tha
Stronger? *checks worlds strongest man records for number of joggers that won* zero? Primarily dominated by Scandanavians, Slavs, Britbongs and good ol' Amerimutts?
rus.jpg
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™
These internet commies haven't a clue about any of this and would actually sneer at the people doing this as "rednecks" or "doomsday preppers". They don't realise that if they actually tried to set up their communes or whatever they would end up being squalid homeless encampments with a bunch of neglected animals/crops and the occassional lecture being given about how bad the outside world is.
So, basically, 99% of the communes started in the 60's and 70's then.
 
Wow, some self awareness there. It's like someone suddenly realized 'oh hey, burning shit down just makes us targets'. Impressive.
Sadly it's only partial awareness. There's no principles behind it, and the only reason isn't because it's morally wrong or anything, it's because they'd be stopped and put down.

Their "revolution" doesn't go after anything meaningful that leads to actual change. It's only local businesses and homes and their neighborhoods. It's one thing to burn down politicians homes and their offices, but so far all they do is shit all over their neighborhoods and neighbors.

They always seem to stop short of physically removing politicians, and when they do make actions towards it they get shut down and just roll over.
 

Shoot us down like animals. Yes. If you shoot at people they tend to shoot back.

Lots of people on the right or the left willing to kill people for the revolution. Not too many that are willing to take a bullet for the revolution though. And that's usually what keeps revolutions from happening, Basic human psychology.
 
Something tells me that's exactly what she thinks... for everyone that isn't herself and other fellow "allies".
In the words of George Orwell:
”the animals outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, but they couldn't tell which was which”.
Stronger? *checks worlds strongest man records for number of joggers that won* zero? Primarily dominated by Scandanavians, Slavs, Britbongs and good ol' Amerimutts?
You could make a case for that being down to the lack of gyms in sub-Saharan Africa or whatever, but the point stands that black people did not get superpowers on the 21st.
No, it's because most poor people would rather live in a capitalist country and work their way up than live in the People's Revolutionary Housing Commune, work harder and not get paid.
 
Shoot us down like animals. Yes. If you shoot at people they tend to shoot back.

Lots of people on the right or the left willing to kill people for the revolution. Not too many that are willing to take a bullet for the revolution though. And that's usually what keeps revolutions from happening, Basic human psychology.

Instead of killing, they should shot elsewhere. :story:
 
No company is "in fact woke" - a gentle reminder that huge megacorporations (Apple, Google, Nike) will pretend like they're woke, by grandstanding about how bad slavery was in America and how bad Black People still have it to this day - all while using literal slave labor in third world countries and China.

A lot of the "woke" stuff you're seeing is because while it does decrease profits in many cases - the companies see it as an opportunity to buy "social capital", basically letting them spend money to change their branding and the larger companies have decided that this is worth it on some level.
I seriously doubt that any significant number of corporate executives are True Believers. Their loyalty is only to the balance sheet, they will go along with wokeness to the extend that they can gain from it, or failing that, the absolute minimum necessary to avoid the angry mob.
 
I seriously doubt that any significant number of corporate executives are True Believers. Their loyalty is only to the balance sheet, they will go along with wokeness to the extend that they can gain from it, or failing that, the absolute minimum necessary to avoid the angry mob.
Except the low level employees tend to be believers. Google is full of them, Facebook is, and Twitter seems to be full of them as well with Jack trying to play both sides.
 
It doesn't matter whether the execs are "True Believers", what matters are their orders. If they think pretending to be believers will get them the most capital (including social capital), that's what they'll do. And with the political environment being what it is these days, they think they know which side will be the "winner".
 
I seriously doubt that any significant number of corporate executives are True Believers. Their loyalty is only to the balance sheet, they will go along with wokeness to the extend that they can gain from it, or failing that, the absolute minimum necessary to avoid the angry mob.
Agreed. Many people overlook these are the same businesses that engage in green washing to show how much "environmentalists" they are after Al Gore made it popular and see how little value the title has that anyone can have it and be apart of a movement for change, without doing any real effort to protect the Earth's environment.

Except the low level employees tend to be believers. Google is full of them, Facebook is, and Twitter seems to be full of them as well with Jack trying to play both sides.
I noticed that with the majority of celebrities and I use that word loosely. I guess when your a narcissists who's been pushed so long in the media and social networks, you wouldn't want to same people to see you as akin to the devil. But it's their attitude that tells me it's genuine; not out of attention.

It doesn't matter whether the execs are "True Believers", what matters are their orders. If they think pretending to be believers will get them the most capital (including social capital), that's what they'll do. And with the political environment being what it is these days, they think they know which side will be the "winner".
Money talk, bullshit walks. Companies understand more than anyone that one major fuck up can set them back a long way. You see it with small businesses that have been targeted by SJW for reasons like white owned restaurants appropriating non-white culinary dishes, or another business profiling black shoppers and getting heat. Sure big businesses face the same issues but they can easily bounce back while smaller businesses are usually forced to close.

Come to think of it, I wonder if this is a way for major companies to weed out their smaller competitors. In the past they usually payed them outright to cease operating their business, but it would be insane to pay everyone off. Just use the SJW mob to drive them out of town and you can present yourself as the hero by supporting SJW causes. Hell, it helps discouraging unionizing because workers see each other as enemies rather than comrades.
 
I seriously doubt that any significant number of corporate executives are True Believers. Their loyalty is only to the balance sheet, they will go along with wokeness to the extend that they can gain from it, or failing that, the absolute minimum necessary to avoid the angry mob.
Agreed. If libertarianism was the ideology du jour, then big corporations would be saying the quiet part out loud and screaming ”taxation is theft”.
 
You wouldn’t be shot like an animal, lady. Animals don’t intentionally burn shit down. You’d be shot like an arsonist, not like an animal.

Anyway yeah, it never occurs to them that shooting an arsonist is a response both proportionate and appropriate.
These are the types of people who think whitey should be publicly shamed for even disagreeing with a black person (because doing so perpetuates VIOLENCE brought on by the white ancestors), yet simultaneously believe destroying shit is fine so long as it doesn't belong to them. It's one of those things that really makes you stand back and realize just how retarded the world is and how we shouldn't take it so seriously. Cheers me up a ton, tell you true.:story:
 
That's how it always is. Highly self-conscious blacks who grew up in white suburbs and got nice college educations are the ones crying about privilege, oppression, advocacy, and trying very hard to type in black vernacular because they don't sound like that irl. They're so insecure about their inability to relate to the experiences of most black people that they become obsessed with race. Perceiving persecution everywhere is the only way they can feel authentically black and in touch with their 'community'. It always has to go back to slavery and white supremacists because modern black culture and the black experience in america is alien to them.
 
Back