Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

I'm enjoying the fact that Melinda has placed into the federal record, by her own choice, a post by @Deadpool calling her a retarded whore. As for the motion itself, it's the same kind of word salad homebrew lawyering that's typical of Melinda's filings.

As for being in danger if we know her address, no. Quite a few of us actually know her real address and haven't posted it because it isn't particularly funny or interesting. No one has showed up in Melinda's town, no one is ever going to show up in Melinda's town.
 
Now she's claiming she's still with Manlet Castersen and is lying to us for reasons connected to some "investigation" she's doing. Either she's so desperate for a win she's claiming that she's still fucking an abusive rapist, or she's still fucking an abusive rapist. It's funny because both of those choices makes her look like the utter loser that she is.
Really? To quote Evil Dead: The Musical "What a stupid bitch!"

I'm enjoying the fact that Melinda has placed into the federal record, by her own choice, a post by @Deadpool calling her a retarded whore. As for the motion itself, it's the same kind of word salad homebrew lawyering that's typical of Melinda's filings.

As for being in danger if we know her address, no. Quite a few of us actually know her real address and haven't posted it because it isn't particularly funny or interesting. No one has showed up in Melinda's town, no one is ever going to show up in Melinda's town.
I've been in Melinda's town and the surrounding area during some contract work I was doing a few years ago. It is not a place one visits voluntarily, and if you are required to do so (as I was) you conduct your business and then leave posthaste.
 
I'm enjoying the fact that Melinda has placed into the federal record, by her own choice, a post by @Deadpool calling her a retarded whore. As for the motion itself, it's the same kind of word salad homebrew lawyering that's typical of Melinda's filings.
Lmfao, I hadn't even thought about that.
 
mmyep..
 

Attachments

  • Melinda is a whore.png
    Melinda is a whore.png
    56.9 KB · Views: 73
CourtListener seems to be down right now, so I don't know if RECAP got all of Smelly's new filings. Here they are from PACER.
Did that absolute retard seriously cite an unpublished case? She, of course, must know that they are unbiding(especially in federal courts), and hardly even, if at all, have any precedential value.

Also, she keeps mentioning "standing order permiting discovery". That's a lie. In that order, the judge specifically refused to give her a discovery order(on the grounds that the court didn't need to)
 
She's just trying to waste the real lawyer's time.

It's a good thing she's being evicted.

At first glance, seizing the vehicle of a unemployed mother of six seems pretty fucked up. Otoh, wouldn't it be more fucked up to let her continue on her way, as she is?

She won't learn anything cause she's just too fucking stupid. Whatever helps get her declared an unfit mother the soonest would be best for those poor kids. Taking away the vehicle would help knock her fucked up house of cards down sooner. I realize that the foster care system is a roll of the dice but the chances of those kids ending up in worse places than they already are seems unlikely.

Others have mentioned that she's a possible family annihilator, she might end up killing all those poor kids one day. Something like 'Elohim tole me in muh dreams to sacrifice muh babies like Abraham but the angel didn't stop me' or whatever batshit reasons she'll have for doing such an abominable thing. I don't know if she is or isn't a family annihilator. However, the fact that this thought has crossed more than one of our minds and no one can confidently say she'd never do such a thing underscores that she should not be a parent. She's insane. Absolutely delusional.

No sensible person who understands her situation could argue seriously that those kids are best left in her care.
 
@SIGSEGV
View attachment 1806326
View attachment 1806296
@Deadpool You should be scared EXHIBIT C John Doe 1
View attachment 1806337
View attachment 1806293

She also wants the court to force Null to handover IP's. There are so many grammatical errors in that submission that it's hard to fathom just how she can be so bad with a modern text editor. You're a special kind of stupid Melinda.
True and honest = deeply involved in the site? You get that for tossing Null a 20, right? Gee. I must be deeply involved with every person, business, and website I’ve ever given/lent 20 bucks. That waiter I tipped 20 bucks? Might as well let them move into my place with how deeply involved we are.
 
Here's ECF 44, which is a "reply" to a "combined memorandum"

It's a fucking mess.
'my previous filings have nothing to do with this case, Nulls attorney is wrong to mention them at all, they should be completely ignored'.

Proceeds to explain all about her previous filings.
:story:

Also, if it wasn't for court stuff being talked about, that she initiated, this thread would be slow as fuck now she's stopped posting. Which proves that it's purely because of her reeing that it didn't die off ages ago.

Melinda smert :ow:
 
I particularly love how she feels the need to keep telling the court, indeed the same judge who dismissed the previous cases the real really real reasons why they got dismissed. Even though they all clearly stated that it was for no cause of action, here comes Melinda to make sure that no one is confused by this. Clearly, it was her truthful and factual errors, and if she corrected those, and filed them again, she'd win them all very easily! Why she failed this far to do just that, is anyone's guess.
Her response to Hardin requesting that she be prevented from filing more loony motions until the court could rule on specific motions already awaiting rulings, had a predictable unhinged reaction. She seems to think that it removes her ability to file motions forever, and takes away her rights as a citizen to make use of the courts. Lunacy. The request asked for the restriction in a very limited specific set of circumstances and time. Only this case, only this time, every body but Mel understands this. All she saw was someone trying to tell her no, and she fucking lost it.
 
And that's actually not relevant. How Josh pays his lawyer, or indeed if he pays him at all, is between Josh and his lawyer. It is none of the court's, or Melinda's, concern.

It's rich though that she's complaining about her adversary getting his legal fees paid when she's not paying any legal fees!

It's blatantly obvious at this point that Cousinfucker's flurry of cut and paste word salad filings arguing the same points over and over are intended to drive up Null's legal costs. So of course she's whining about Kiwis donating to help Null pay his lawyer. She is indeed throwing everything she can at the wall to see if anything sticks, and to force Null's lawyer to respond. Cousinfucker likely hopes that she can claim Null's lawyer didn't respond to one frivolous filing out of the last 20 (all using the same language) and therefore she "wins" and should get her way, and even if she doesn't get her way she can still financially punish Null out of pure malice.

Null's lawyer pointed all these same facts out in his request for a protective order against Cousinfucker's vexatious abuse of the legal system. Which of course Cousinfucker responded to by filing half a dozen nonsense documents, thereby immediately proving Null's lawyer's assessment to be accurate and his request for a protective order to be justified. :story:Good going, Clown Car Cunt!
 
Last edited:
Did that absolute retard seriously cite an unpublished case? She, of course, must know that they are unbiding(especially in federal courts), and hardly even, if at all, have any precedential value.
I don't think she has specifically cited an unpublished case--as in a case where the court specifically noted it was unpublished and unprecedential. What she did do was:

1. Cite a district court opinion from another district that concludes opposite of what she wants (Wade ended up with a dismissal of crazy lady's case);
2. Not take the literally ONE MINUTE to look up the Fourth Circuit case quoted by Wade (I've been deliberately using free resources and not WestLaw or Lexis. It literally takes a minute to get these cases for free);
3. Distinguish the sentence following the quote she keeps repeating.

When the law review spergs clerking for Judges Jones and Sargent get around to checking these (and they will check the cites), Smelly is going to look pretty bad. "You're an ignorant bimbo playing at lawyering to make up for some sort of emptiness in your soul," won't be in the Court's final dismissal order, but everybody writing it will have thought something like that.
Also, she keeps mentioning "standing order permiting discovery". That's a lie. In that order, the judge specifically refused to give her a discovery order(on the grounds that the court didn't need to)

She doesn't know what a standing order is.

She has a bunch of other problems with her discovery shit, but I don't want to point them out while she still has a chance of fixing them.
 
I don't think she has specifically cited an unpublished case--as in a case where the court specifically noted it was unpublished and unprecedential. What she did do was cite a district court opinion from another district that:

1. Concludes opposite of what she wants (Wade ended up with a dismissal of crazy lady's case);
2. Not take the literally ONE MINUTE to look up the Fourth Circuit case quoted by Wade (I've been deliberately using free resources and not WestLaw or Lexis. It literally takes a minute to get these cases for free);
3. Distinguish the sentence following the quote she keeps repeating.

When the law review spergs clerking for Judges Jones and Sargent get around to checking these (and they will check the cites), Smelly is going to look pretty bad. "You're an ignorant bimbo playing at lawyering to make up for some sort of emptiness in your soul," won't be in the Court's final dismissal order, but everybody writing it will have thought something like that.


She doesn't know what a standing order is.

She has a bunch of other problems with her discovery shit, but I don't want to point them out while she still has a chance of fixing them.
Bold of you to assume that she would listen and fix it.
 
Bold of you to assume that she would listen and fix it.
I dunno, there's been a couple of times I've skimmed her word salad filings and thought that parts reminded me of posts ragging her ignorance on here.
I'm not saying that she understands what they actually meant, but I'm positive that she's used info posted here on occasion.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: lolwatagain
Back