Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

Paul never met The Messiah. He met the devil.


"Yeshua said to them, “I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven" (Luke 10:18)

"He was on the road and nearing Dammesek, when suddenly a light from heaven flashed all around him" (Act 9:3)
To try and distract from your libido for a second:

17 Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows.

I invite you to tell me what book this verse comes from. (Emphasis mine.)
 
I was talking to Baby Yoda, not you. You can mind your own business.





Maybe 😉






You're under 30, makes sense. Your mind is not developed like that yet.
Ah, more autistic ree'ing and oinking from the cousinfucker. I'd say we missed the whore, but we all know that it was wishful thinking that she was laying dead in a ditch somewhere.

Seriously, the only thing you're good for is a hole to fuck, and you obviously weren't good at that, or Marshal would have at least stuck around to have something to put his needle dick in. Fellate a shotgun barrel and do yourself and your children a huge favor. I can't imagine being around you is doing their mental health any favors, and that's assuming you don't get desperate and start looking at the older ones to satisfy your perverse urges.
 
The book says plainly that if you lose in court your foreskin grows back.

You seem so sure of it without even seeing them.

Guess somebody needs to be reported to the BAR association for fraud





You don't have the intellectual skills to decipher distinguishing factors between lawsuits. I don't need to entertain your uneducated ignorance

I was talking to Baby Yoda, not you. You can mind your own business.





Maybe 😉






You're under 30, makes sense. Your mind is not developed like that yet.
Colossians 3:5 - Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry:

What you are doing is wrong. You've castigated others for judging you yet you've dismissed my claims out of hand. Ontop of all that, you're sexually immoral.
 
That's not perjury, moron.

You can't read. Read the last sentence. You gave Melinda Scott misleading and deceptive information about both of their profiles and therefore, the statement saying she didn't believe you weren't a hostile party was retracted. You acted with malice.
What, are you starting to get paranoid delusions that your list of "John does" are some wise county conspiracy cult or whatever the fuck your deluding yourself into? Again?

You still can't find point A
Neither, sadly, can you

What's it going to take, Mel? Proof you're initiating all this with your lol suits is going to court.

You can't even admit you got null's address wrong. You're afraid to admit any fault or wrongdoing guess you're real afraid of being the one who needs forgiving, huh?

Don't know about anyone else, but I forgive you.

That's not The Torah that you are preaching. You are preaching Pauline Christianity. You are trying to impose Paul's words onto The Messiah.

You're lost and blind




well, as much as you're an idiot, at least you finally can accurately describe what I believe. Amazing.




The Messiah came for the people of Elohim, which is not everyone.

Your words show you are a Pauline Christian. Contrary to what you believe, Elohim does not love everyone and could care less about saving the Goyim from the eternal fires of damnation


Posting my tits would actually increase male narcissism and patriarchy. Giving the milk away for free doesn't increase woman's worth.




I think it's safe to say you are an idiot who doesn't understand female anatomy

Breastfeeding doesn't damage your breasts. You're dumb.




I never once said it was wrong to wear tight clothing. I said showing your nakedness was the sin. Don't try to put words in my mouth that I didn't say





There's nothing wrong with wearing tight clothing. It's nowhere written in The Torah.


That is not true. You are projecting yourself and your ideals onto others.

there are tamiym people on this earth.

"How happy are those whose way of life is TAMIYM,
who live by the Torah of Adonai!
How happy are those who observe his instruction,
who seek him wholeheartedly!
They do nothing wrong but live by His ways" (Psalm 119:1-3)

It is in fact a COMMAND to be spiritually perfect: "You shall be TAMIYM before YHWH your Elohim" (Deut. 18:3)

If you aren't TAMIYM, you aren't following Elohim's commands





According to The Hebrew Bible "pride" is unwillingness to submit to Elohim. Pride is not confidence in one's spiritual walk.

You can keep accusing my of having sin BUT IN 800 PAGES you have FAILED to demonstrate that I have committed any sin whatsoever.





Not true at all. Samson was a Judge, and therefore, set the standard of righteousness.




Just because Jacob was displeased doesn't mean it was unrighteous. Jacob was not TAMIYM.

Further, Dinah's brothers did the right thing in killing the man who raped her.

In Deut. 22, a rape of an engaged girl is described. It is described like murder. "The situation is like the case of the man who attacks his neighbor and kills him." (Deut. 22:26). The penalty for rape is murder, according to The Torah.

So you are wrong to say that YHWH is displeased with Dinah's brothers for avenging her.




That is because they slept with their father's concubine's, not because they murdered the man who raped their sister




That is not what I said. I said that I am the first one to create a poem like Prov 31 FOR MEN'S RIGHTEOUSNESS STANDARDS


Not factually accurate
Have you ever considered that by worshipping hatred and revenge you might be worshipping the devil?

Edit: by the by, I hear baby yoda is about fifty. Pretty young in yoda-thingy years
 
Last edited:
Emphatically agree here.

Generally, I try to see the good in people, consider their perspective, and find common ground wherever possible, even in lolcows. But no matter how :optimistic: that is, there are just some people in the world who care for nothing but their own interests, and will burn anything and anyone in their way. Melinda is such a person. She has demonstrated time and again that she has no interest in truth, fairness, or the well-being of any single human being on Earth but herself. Whatever the reasons, it doesn't mean everyone else is beholden to tolerate her.

The single biggest problem with trying to reason with someone like her is, you cannot apply common sense or reason where there is none. If you think what she's doing is pointlessly destructive, incomprehensibly stupid, and catastrophically selfish, then you are mostly sane. She is not. There is no applying reason to a hurricane, it simply is a hurricane. She doesn't listen to anyone because she literally cannot do so. It simply isn't in her wiring to process anything anyone else says as anything other than a grievous offense to her worldview and self. Even though I'm trying to be as clinically bland as possible in saying this, she would take it as a personal attack. She literally can't read it any other way.

Society is neither expected nor required to accept the consequences of the dangerously insane. Sooner or later, she will end up in a legal quagmire she can't climb out of. Being crazy doesn't absolve her actions, nor change the damages they cause. She wants to hurt people, sees nothing wrong with hurting people, and no amount of talking will ever change her course. The absolute best outcome of such efforts is, nothing changes. The worst, you're empowering her to hurt others further, and deeper.

Stop trying to convince a hurricane to be a meadow. You're only going to end up frustrated and angry.
Yeah, there's another one that's, "don't try to teach a pig to sing, you only wear yourself out, and you annoy the pig." So I agree with you both 100%, ( @Deadpool as well that is), with the exception of her ignorance. In my opinion, after speaking with the person I'm closest with, I believe she suffers from at least one serious mental illness and the court system has become a very witty accomplice. Of course Josh gets seriously victimized by this and deserves at least the legal fees he's asking for, and he should have asked for pain and suffering, but I'm not certain that's legally justified in this circumstance, as my training doesn't apply in that area. I only came back to see what was going on in entirely different thread and saw this happening, so thought I'd let you guys know I fully get this and won't be engaging with her. So, I appreciate it, and I'm not upset that you rated me the way you did, because I understand it. Cheers.
 
CourtListener seems to be down right now, so I don't know if RECAP got all of Smelly's new filings. Here they are from PACER.
Here's all the pdf's converted to a series of images to make it view on the forum.
 

Attachments

  • -01.png
    -01.png
    570.1 KB · Views: 64
  • -01.png
    -01.png
    570.1 KB · Views: 55
  • -02.png
    -02.png
    437.5 KB · Views: 54
  • -03.png
    -03.png
    486.9 KB · Views: 59
  • -04.png
    -04.png
    609.8 KB · Views: 49
  • -05.png
    -05.png
    338.9 KB · Views: 51
  • -06.png
    -06.png
    567.8 KB · Views: 47
  • -07.png
    -07.png
    912.5 KB · Views: 42
  • -08.png
    -08.png
    636.9 KB · Views: 46
  • -09.png
    -09.png
    571.1 KB · Views: 46
  • -10.png
    -10.png
    867.6 KB · Views: 43
  • -11.png
    -11.png
    961.2 KB · Views: 44
  • -12.png
    -12.png
    586.6 KB · Views: 40
  • -13.png
    -13.png
    614.5 KB · Views: 45
  • -14.png
    -14.png
    517.8 KB · Views: 41
  • -15.png
    -15.png
    289.9 KB · Views: 38
  • -16.png
    -16.png
    470.5 KB · Views: 39
  • -17.png
    -17.png
    765.6 KB · Views: 35
  • -18.png
    -18.png
    786.3 KB · Views: 34
  • -19.png
    -19.png
    770.5 KB · Views: 45
  • -20.png
    -20.png
    632.8 KB · Views: 40
  • -21.png
    -21.png
    291.4 KB · Views: 34
  • -22.png
    -22.png
    428 KB · Views: 37
  • -23.png
    -23.png
    944.4 KB · Views: 36
  • -24.png
    -24.png
    920.2 KB · Views: 41
  • -25.png
    -25.png
    636.3 KB · Views: 35
  • -26.png
    -26.png
    684.1 KB · Views: 36
  • -27.png
    -27.png
    521.7 KB · Views: 39
  • -28.png
    -28.png
    711.5 KB · Views: 39
  • -29.png
    -29.png
    526.1 KB · Views: 42
  • -30.png
    -30.png
    1 MB · Views: 33
  • -31.png
    -31.png
    708.3 KB · Views: 38
  • -32.png
    -32.png
    577.1 KB · Views: 39
  • -33.png
    -33.png
    546.3 KB · Views: 42
  • -34.png
    -34.png
    555.3 KB · Views: 41
  • -35.png
    -35.png
    292.5 KB · Views: 40
  • -36.png
    -36.png
    121.3 KB · Views: 41
  • -37.png
    -37.png
    117.4 KB · Views: 42
  • -38.png
    -38.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 46
  • -39.png
    -39.png
    1.9 MB · Views: 54
f your argument is that an individual unrelated to the government is violating one of your constitutional rights, your argument is most likely fucked and nothing can save it.
I think she means that if the courts were to do what Null asks, the courts, being somewhat like a goverment, would be akin to a gov violating her rights.
So much for your theory that me not posting silences the thread. Uh-huh.
It's not a theory if it's a fact. Every time you left, the thread died off. The only reason this is an exception is because we got tons of your new filllings to talk about, their lack of quality reminding us of you.
That's not perjury, moron.
Mel: He threatened me! Yeah, I know I said he didn't but I changed my mind

Yeah, I'm sure that will work.
Posting my tits would actually increase male narcissism and patriarchy.
Like always, citacion please.
Didnt read. Not even one word.
Good ol, Yoda, flexing on Mel
Have any specific thoughts?
Wouldn't that require for her to have an ability to read?
I have never lied in any of my filings.
You have lied, misrepresented caselaw, and in general filled bunch of frivolous motions.
THAT SHOWS MALICE and equated to a retraction.
I will need a citacion here.
couldn't even accurately state
As if Mel ever accurately stated anything
That shows your malice
Quick question, you are aware of legal definition of malice, yes?
The legal principle is called "coercion". You tried to coerce a statement out of me with deceit. Makes it nul and void. That's why the last statement says "Any attempt to give misleading or deceitful....retracts this statement"
Cite actual law. Cite where you got that sentance from

Btw, Mel, will you address this? Please look at why your constitutional argument is shit. Also, Mel, why the hell did you cite an unpublished caselaw? They are (by the judges own admission) worth less than the paper they are written on. They have no binding authority or value. Another thing is that in your constitutional 'argument' you mentioned a SCOTUS case, but forgot to cite it. Which case was it?
 
I think she means that if the courts were to do what Null asks, the courts, being somewhat like a goverment, would be akin to a gov violating her rights.

It's not a theory if it's a fact. Every time you left, the thread died off. The only reason this is an exception is because we got tons of your new filllings to talk about, their lack of quality reminding us of you.

Mel: He threatened me! Yeah, I know I said he didn't but I changed my mind

Yeah, I'm sure that will work.

Like always, citacion please.

Good ol, Yoda, flexing on Mel

Wouldn't that require for her to have an ability to read?

You have lied, misrepresented caselaw, and in general filled bunch of frivolous motions.

I will need a citacion here.

As if Mel ever accurately stated anything

Quick question, you are aware of legal definition of malice, yes?

Cite actual law. Cite where you got that sentance from

Btw, Mel, will you address this? Please look at why your constitutional argument is shit. Also, Mel, why the hell did you cite an unpublished caselaw? They are (by the judges own admission) worth less than the paper they are written on. They have no binding authority or value. Another thing is that in your constitutional 'argument' you mentioned a SCOTUS case, but forgot to cite it. Which case was it?
Careful, you're going to fry Melinda's brain. You know she doesn't do too well when there's a bunch of stuff to read, it's even worse when they're questions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Careful, you're going to fry Melinda's brain. You know she doesn't do too well when there's a bunch of stuff to read, it's even worse when they're questions.
Oh, I know. But I am curious as to how she'll attempt to respond to actual caselaw. It's always funny when she does. That, and I am curious about that SCOTUS case she mentioned in her suit that she forgot to cite
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ken Jennings
I was talking to Baby Yoda, not you. You can mind your own business.
If you want to have a private conversation with @Baby Yoda, where no kiwi can comment on it, or have any opinions about it, there are lots of ways to do it.
Posting on a public forum isn't one of them, and tells people that you want them to see and comment on your stumbling flirtation with the small green being.
 
Marshall could get other women.
Marshmallow can't get any other women, that he continues to stick with you proves this. You're the bottom of the barrel. No sensible man would ever want to be stuck with you. You're a miserable harpy, you're trashy af, you need to be minded like a small child. You're easy too, you even give it away to relatives. Didn't you say that he just hangs up on you? Pretty much means he's sick of your shit, I doubt any of us would hang up on a partner that was relaying their concerns. Unless we didn't care if we made things worse. Just shows that he doesn't care about your relationship. He doesn't care, you know he doesn't care, you're only with each other because neither one of you can do any better. Some people actually have self-esteem, the thing about you and Marshmallow is that neither one of you has any spine so you'll be stuck together forever, hating each other. You're the only warm hole that will accept his pathetic beaner penor, you're stretched out and nasty.

Imagine pushing 40 and posting your cheap and trashy fetish gear publicly. It's like the mind of a 10 year old was put into a middle aged woman's body.
 
Back