Citacion, please.
Oh, boy, you are just repeating your old talking points. For anyone curious, I explained
You are a moron with a memory of a goldfish. Back in October I debunked every single of your First Amendment points. You can see my posts
here, and
here. In those posts, I used SCOTUS rullings to show just how limited the First Amendment is.
Suppose, for a moment, that 1st is as absolute as you think, why do Muslim murderers get arrested in USA? Their religion encourages murder of non-believers. Why satanists are arrested? Their(they have many different sects, but most embrace sacrifices in Lucifer's name) religion encourages murder. Shouldn't 1st make them immune? No, because no one is retarded enough to think that 1st gives a murder immunity, and SCOTUS, on many occations, has limited the first amendment.
If the 1st was as absolute as you think, why couldn't Epstein make up a pedo-loving religion(or just proclaim himself a muslim) and why did he get arrested? Seems like, according to you, he had a easy way to misuse the law.
Everyone is fit to judge you.
Citacion, please. Also, it's weird how us alleged "foreigners" know the constitution better than you, an American.
She can barely read, and thinks everyone hates her for being a woman, so, I'm gonna say no.