Insurrection 2021

What's going to happen on January 6th?

  • TRUMP JUNTA GOVERNMENT

    Votes: 40 10.1%
  • CHICOM BIDEN ROUNDUP

    Votes: 18 4.5%
  • BOOMERS STANDING AROUND IN Q MERCH ACCOMPLISHING NOTHING

    Votes: 340 85.4%

  • Total voters
    398
  • Poll closed .
I guess I'll go back to hanging out for Sunday brunch
Mhmm I see you're defending the last implicit stand of white identity, how Jupitarian
2j4oowoxr0241.jpg
 
That's a good point.

I guess I'll go back to just going to concerts and shows and living life

I guess I'll go back to traveling

I guess I'll go back to hanging out for Sunday brunch

I guess I'll go back to investing in my local economy

Guess what fuck face, you have my full undivided attention.
Are you blaming Biden and the Democrats for a pandemic that started under Trump?
 
That's a good point.

I guess I'll go back to just going to concerts and shows and living life

I guess I'll go back to traveling

I guess I'll go back to hanging out for Sunday brunch

I guess I'll go back to investing in my local economy

Guess what fuck face, you have my full undivided attention.

2 weeks from now: "I thought it was a hoax but it's not." (Beep beep beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep)
 
Are you blaming Biden and the Democrats for a pandemic that started under Trump?
Oh yes. Biden, who's not even president and according to the tards in this thread never will be, created the pandemic. He's both too senile to be president, while able to create a pandemic to torpedo Trump.

@revmoo no. I will not have sex with you. I understand you're obsessed with me, but it won't happen. Sorry :(
 
Oh no they are going to try to pass a bill to do a study that may one day make RECOMMENDATIONS for state laws regarding HIV. Why don't they just inject me with HIV now and get it over with?
Because saying HIV prevention laws are unscientific makes a lot of sense, right? I'd love to hear your recommendation on how it's discrimination to not allow people to just spread HIV to random participants.
Are you blaming Biden and the Democrats for a pandemic that started under Trump?

In response:


So democrats called it racist and xenophobic and shouted it down as bigoted, but it's Trump fault, right?

Let's not forget the media:

 
Oh yes. Biden, who's not even president and according to the tards in this thread never will be, created the pandemic. He's both too senile to be president, while able to create a pandemic to torpedo Trump.

I wish people talking about Biden and Trump would stop oversimplifying things to the US President has dictatorial powers. And then in the same breath complain they didn't declare themselves Emperor and dissolve congress. Especially when the Governors over the past 8 months are causing most of the crap. Obama couldn't even close Guantanemo like he said he would because the establishment said "lol no.". Trump even had to wrangle funds out of the Pentagon to get the wall built.
 
Then make a halal about me, nigger. I have enough people on this site that agree that you could probably scrape up something that looks like a thread, and Gustav will probably stamp the seal himself if he can.
I don't think we literally get to eat people who get declared Halal. I think it's like a metaphor or something. I could be wrong though.

I think you should make a thread in Talk to Staff and ask for clarification.
 
Oh yes. Biden, who's not even president and according to the tards in this thread never will be, created the pandemic. He's both too senile to be president, while able to create a pandemic to torpedo Trump.

@revmoo no. I will not have sex with you. I understand you're obsessed with me, but it won't happen. Sorry :(
Maybe if Trump had taken this shit seriously from the start half the country still wouldn't be in lockdown.

But "muh election optics". Now even the vaccine rollout's apparently fucked up too.

Because saying HIV prevention laws are unscientific makes a lot of sense, right? I'd love to hear your recommendation on how it's discrimination to not allow people to just spread HIV to random participants.


In response:


So democrats called it racist and xenophobic and shouted it down as bigoted, but it's Trump fault, right?

Let's not forget the media:

The difference is the Democrats realized they were wrong and started taking the virus seriously * maybe too seriously in California's case * while Trump to this day still cries that it's a hoax * even after getting it himself * and tells his followers to not do even basic bitch shit like wearing a mask.
 
Because saying HIV prevention laws are unscientific makes a lot of sense, right? I'd love to hear your recommendation on how it's discrimination to not allow people to just spread HIV to random participants.
If they aren't actually preventing the spread of HIV they might not be but I'm sure you came prepared with lots of very scientific data to back up your concerns so let's see that. For the record I'm not claiming to be an expert on this I'm just saying doomering over a bill that has no real effect beyond gathering data and making it publicly available is just looking for shit to get mad over, the states could look at the data say "fuck off" and still do whatever they want.
 
Maybe if Trump had taken this shit seriously from the start half the country still wouldn't be in lockdown.

But "muh election optics". Now even the vaccine rollout's apparently fucked up too.


The difference is the Democrats realized they were wrong and started taking the virus seriously * maybe too seriously in California's case * while Trump to this day still cries that it's a hoax * even after getting it himself * and tells his followers to not do even basic bitch shit like wearing a mask.
Yet, the democrats shouted down the early caution signs, and the fact is the Covid case is not as ridiculous as they make it out to be by factual data from the CDC itself.

So instead their new option is to destroy the economy over a virus that's being overblown. Amazing. I hope a democrat's house never catches fire, their option to resolve the fire would probably be to flood the neighborhood.
 
Meanwhile, Trump is the biggest faggot to ever be President. Even faggier than Lincoln
1609288603700.png

If they aren't actually preventing the spread of HIV they might not be but I'm sure you came prepared with lots of very scientific data to back up your concerns so let's see that. For the record I'm not claiming to be an expert on this I'm just saying doomering over a bill that has no real effect beyond gathering data and making it publicly available is just looking for shit to get mad over, the states could look at the data say "fuck off" and still do whatever they want.
I doubt these 'intentional transmission' laws have any effect at all. 'The Gift' documented homosexual men doing homosexual things in California in a time that such laws were in effect. The laws didn't stop them bugchasing. The real victims of this sort of stuff are black women who get infected by downlow niggas, and prosecutors aren't going to bother chasing up such cases.

The way to stamp out HIV is simple. Build sanitoriums to hold these people in as Cuba did, don't let them out. Simple as
 
If they aren't actually preventing the spread of HIV they might not be but I'm sure you came prepared with lots of very scientific data to back up your concerns so let's see that. For the record I'm not claiming to be an expert on this I'm just saying doomering over a bill that has no real effect beyond gathering data and making it publicly available is just looking for shit to get mad over, the states could look at the data say "fuck off" and still do whatever they want.
How do you have to require scientific data to understand having to tell your partner you have HIV before having sex with them potentially limits the spread of HIV. The whole purposes of those specific laws is to limit the spread rate, or stop people from spreading those specific diseases to sexual partners who may be unaware.

Next, I'm sure Biden could make the claim arresting people for drinking and driving is discrimination too, and I'm sure you'd want the data to show that drinking and driving while impaired may potentially lead to more deaths than if you took the precaution to laws preventing that exact scenario. All dry sarcasm aside, you don't need to be a professional to understand basic cause and effect and potential.
 
ATLANTA (WALB) - A ballot signature match audit in Cobb County found “no fraudulent absentee ballots,” and confirmed the “original outcome” of the November 2020 presidential race, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said in a Tuesday release.
Raffensperger said this audit came after a hand recount and then a subsequent machine recount requested by the Trump campaign.
“The secretary of state’s office has always been focused on calling balls and strikes in elections and, in this case, three strikes against the voter fraud claims and they’re out,” said Raffensperger. “We conducted a statewide hand recount that reaffirmed the initial tally, and a machine recount at the request of the Trump campaign that also reaffirmed the original tally. This audit disproves the only credible allegations the Trump campaign had against the strength of Georgia’s signature match processes.”
On Dec. 14, Raffensperger announced a signature match audit in Cobb County following credible allegations that the process was not followed in the June primaries. Raffensperger’s office partnered with the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to conduct the audit.
“Of the 150,431 absentee ballots received by Cobb County elections officials during the November elections, the audit ‘reviewed 15,118 ABM ballot oath envelopes from randomly selected boxes,’ or around 10% of the total,” the release states. “The sample size was originally chosen to meet the 99 percent confidence threshold.”
The audit found “no fraudulent absentee ballots” with a 99 percent confidence threshold, the release states.
The audit found that only two ballots should have been identified by Cobb County elections officials for cure notification that weren’t.

“In one case, the ballot was ‘mistakenly signed by the elector’s spouse,’ and in the other, the voter ‘reported signing the front of the envelope only,’” the release states. “In both cases, the identified voters filled out the ballots themselves.”
 
Back