March for Trump (1/6) - (1/5-1/6), 18 NAKED PROUD BOYS IN THE SHOWER AT RAM RANCH

Was this a terrorist incident?

  • Yes

    Votes: 514 24.4%
  • No

    Votes: 543 25.8%
  • There were bad people(terrorists) involved, but that shouldn't reflect on everybody else

    Votes: 260 12.4%
  • It was the state who created terror

    Votes: 788 37.4%

  • Total voters
    2,105
Hulk, you really are making a mistake here. They're gonna come after the Boomers, obviously, you won't give a shit because you're not one of them. Then they come after the alt-right, then they start coming after the libertarians, then the centrists... Then they're gonna come after you. And you won't be able to complain to anybody, because there's nobody left to complain to about. No more farms and no more you.
You are spend way too much time on /pol/ if you really believe this shit
 
So, we're in the era of unironic corporation worship, huh?

Screenshot_20210107-221251~2.png
Screenshot_20210107-222114~2.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, who all has quit, supposedly over Trumptards wandering into the building?

Elaine Chao, wife of Mitch McConnell and sister of Angela Chao (CEO of Foremost Group)

Betsy DeVos, wife of Dick DeVos (Amway company, Windquest Group)

There are others but the booze is kicking in. If these people liked their jobs but hate Trump, couldn't they just wait another 2 weeks until he leaves? Seems sus.
They want to be seen as 'taking a stand' to save their own future careers and lobbying opportunities now that Trump's brand has become absolutely radioactive. It's rats fleeing a sinking ship.
 
Isn't there some Buddhist sect like that, when having sex with women ensures you reach Nirvana or something?
Theres a bunch of retarded sex cults thought history, the rasputin situation was just the first thing that came to my mind due to me reading a bunch of slav history recently
 
You know what I really want? I want to find out who Qanon was all along. It was clearly a LARP but who was the person behind it and what was their real intent? Qanon is one of the big puzzle pieces in all this that I hope we get answers to. Until then, I'm putting my bets on it being an elaborate troll from an anon that just wanted to fuck with Boomers.
Jim Watkins seems the most likely candidate for many reasons, but the fact he’s the stereotypical right wing conspiracy boomer and retired serviceman with a fetish for “security clearance” clout and knowledge of network security/anonymity (esp for a boomer) makes it seem almost obvious. Q seems to line up perfectly with his worldview and age.

You’d expect a weird old pig farmer in the Philippines that’s worked in Asian porn circles for decades to be obsessed with pedophile rings.
 
Yes. Because none of those rituals or trappings actually serve God.
And if you disagree, do tell me how many sheep you’ve slaughtered in sacrifice. None? Oh, well I guess that wasn’t necessary, and just a nomadic shepherd thing.
Did you celebrate the Feast of St Hywyn yesterday? Hmmm, odd. What about the Feast of St Gelarc? Feast of St Basil?

Well, you seem to be very selective about the rituals you observe. Perhaps you’d prefer a philosophy? Might I recommend the works of Liebniz, I do enjoy his theodicy.
Kiwi Farms: the only place to have serious discussion about religion without 15 fedoras screaming about how God doesn't exist/hackneyed spaghetti monster garbage. It's kinda heartwarming to see that on the internet.
 
Why do boomers always fall for outlandish conspiracy theories? Satanic Panic in the 80s, pizzagate, qanon ect
because they grew up in and spent most of their lives living as middle class in 1950s to 1990s america, which was the easiest, safest and most comfortable time period in history, in what was during that time the undisputed number one most wealthy and most powerful country on the planet.

a life like that makes you complacent, arrogant and decadent, and at the same time also naive, gullible, and easily manipulated. that's boomers in a nutshell.
 
Last edited:
So what are the predictions for a Biden presidency? I'm curious what you guys all think he'll do once he's sworn in.
 
Well you're delusional if you truly believe that.
People are literally being purged as we speak. You just saw it with the attendees of that little capitol LARP. It's not supposed to be the obvious soviet-style stereotype. These days people have it all, smartphones, social media, and big tech. So now, it only takes a minute until your name is blacklisted by some twitter troon and you're doomed to live like a hermit for the rest of your life.
 
According to some 8chan logs I saw on /cow/ which are likely bullshit. Qanon was nothing more than a ploy by Jim Watkins for the 8chan owner to get ad revenue from boomers. Qanon is not some secret identity. In fact his identity was rather someone obvious, a site administrator from 8kun/8chan.

There were a lot of those types going around at the time. Q somehow struck a nerve, maybe? I never found it compelling nor believable, but I always did ridicule those larpanon posters.

Jim Watkins seems the most likely candidate for many reasons, but the fact he’s the stereotypical right wing conspiracy boomer and retired serviceman with a fetish for “security clearance” clout and knowledge of network security/anonymity (esp for a boomer) makes it seem almost obvious. Q seems to line up perfectly with his worldview and age.

You’d expect a weird old pig farmer in the Philippines that’s worked in Asian porn circles for decades to be obsessed with pedophile rings.
Going to be funny if Qanon does transform from Boomer delusion cult into a schizophrenic religious insurgency. I don't think the diehards will give it up. Be appropriate if the fallout of this is a 100 year struggle between Q and Woke believers for control of America's spirit.
 
Yes. Because none of those rituals or trappings actually serve God.
How would you know? You don't believe in them in the first place so there's no point convincing you.
And if you disagree, do tell me how many sheep you’ve slaughtered in sacrifice. None? Oh, well I guess that wasn’t necessary, and just a nomadic shepherd thing.
Did you celebrate the Feast of St Hywyn yesterday? Hmmm, odd. What about the Feast of St Gelarc? Feast of St Basil?
You do realize that the Mass is a sacrifice in Catholic (and Orthodox (albeit under the he name of Divine Liturgy)) theology right? As in, by recreating the Last Supper, we believe Jesus Christ becomes present in the bread and wine and makes it his Body and Blood, which he sacrificed for us on Calvary. If you took 10 seconds to look this up on Wikipedia this would be readily apparent. It just shows your lack of interest in learning anything that makes a religion a religion, namely ritual. A religion without any rituals is just a philosophy, so that's why I'm recommending you some.
Odd, you seem to be very selective about the rituals you observe. Perhaps you’d prefer a philosophy? Might I recommend the works of Liebniz, I do enjoy his theodicy.
I don't really care for Liebniz or really any Enlightenment philosopher. Frankly, I only like the various Ancient virtue ethicist schools of philosophy (Aristotelianism, (Neo)Platonism, Stoicism), Scholasticism, the Phenomenological School of Germany (specifically Heidegger and Husserl and their students Edith Stein and Hannah Arendt) and a few English Analytic philosophers like G.E.M. Anscombe, Roger Scruton, Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael Dummett (my user-namesake). I feel like they have a better conception of reality than most Enlightenment philosophers ever did, as evidenced by the fact that institutions based on Enlightenment principles are currently crumbling before our eyes at record pace.
 
So what happens if you use those facilities anyway? The implicit threat of violence, use of force, is still going to be there. At the end of the day it's force which such decrees ultimately rest on, if you threaten a fine and they don't pay, what do you think happens? There's a reason the word "force" is part of the word "enforce", so yes, it's contradictory. It's implicit rather than explicit, but that doesn't change it's inherent nature.
I see your words but all I read is "blah blah blah I'm a dipshit libertarian".
 
Back