Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'

FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

 

[christie]

Paris Green is a rat poison.

yeah it was used to replace scheele's green (which was even more arsenic-y and poisoning the shit out of people) as a dye for fabrics, toys, food, etc. still incredibly toxic. how fitting.

"my shitty childhood and gender dysphoria made me do it" nigga, please. what a waste of money, for what? so he can sit in a prison cell for the rest of his life with a festering crotch wound he probably won't be able to take proper care of? like it'd help him pass anyway:

 

[axfaxf]

“I’m struggling. It’s getting harder and harder. I’m not suicidal. I don’t think I could do that. But sometimes I find myself praying for death.”

Even God hates you. Good. .

 

[Baroque]

Paris Green is serving a life sentence for a torturing and beating a man lured to her flat with two accomplices.

She began to identify as female in 2011. In 2013 she and two accomplices were jailed for killing Robert Shankland, 45. He had been tied up, kicked and attacked with a rolling pin. A ligature was also tied around his neck and a plastic bag pulled over his head.

So reading this and knowing the usual suspects as we all do, I knew there would be an anti gay angle to this, and here we are:

Miss Shields went on to say the violence had erupted after a row about buying a bag of chips.

But the three killers concocted a story claiming Mr Shankland had made sexual advances to each of them. The witness said she fled the flat terrified and contacted the police.

McDonagh later told officers who arrested him: “He tried to fight back. After that it was just disgusting.”

Spoiler: Article on the crime

54 years for trio who tortured victim to death
THREE killers who tortured their innocent victim to death have been jailed for a total of 54 years.
By GRANT MCCABE
Saturday, 9th November 2013, 12:08 am

Paris Green, Kevin McDonagh and Dean Smith
Paris Green, Kevin McDonagh and Dean Smith
Paris Green – who was born a man but now lives as a woman – Kevin McDonagh and Dean Smith brutally attacked their victim and then sat eating ham sandwiches as he lay dying in his flat.

A jury heard how the reason for the killing could have been a row over a bag of chips.


Green, 22, McDonagh, 23, and Smith, 20, yesterday returned to the dock after being convicted of murder earlier this year.


Murder victim Robert Shankland
Murder victim Robert Shankland

At the High Court in Glasgow, Judge John Morris QC locked each of them up for a minimum 18 years.

He told the trio: “This was a particularly gruesome murder which effectively involved the torture of your victim over many hours.

“It beggars belief that you could act towards another human being in this way.”

The judge added: “Your conduct was utterly depraved. You left Mr Shankland – even in death – without any dignity whatsoever.”


Green, who was born Peter Laing, will serve the life sentence in Cornton Vale prison for women.

The court was told Green is to receive what was described as “gender realignment surgery” which has to take place in England.

The brutal murder took place at Green’s flat in Glenrothes, Fife, in March this year.

Their victim was lured to the property after an alleged incident with Smith two weeks earlier.


The jury heard how Mr Shankland was tied up with torn bedding, battered, kicked and attacked with a rolling pin.

A ligature was also tied around his neck and a plastic bag pulled over his head. Mr Shankland, who suffered from a heart disease, was killed either by suffocation or blunt force injuries the court heard.

The killers ate ham sandwiches which had been paid for after selling their victim’s mobile phone, it emerged.

Green’s friend Maggie Shields told the trial she visited the flat and learned about the death, before recalling how the trio boasted about the beating.


The 31-year-old explained: “Dean jumped up quite excitedly and said: ‘I will show you the body’. I still did not think that they had killed him.”

Miss Shields went on to say the violence had erupted after a row about buying a bag of chips.

But the three killers concocted a story claiming Mr Shankland had made sexual advances to each of them. The witness said she fled the flat terrified and contacted the police.

McDonagh later told officers who arrested him: “He tried to fight back. After that it was just disgusting.”


The court heard the victim had no record of any sexual convictions at all and his family were distraught at claims he was involved in such behaviour.

The court was told co-accused Smith had served in Afghanistan

lgbTTTT T = Time to leave

 

[Inventor of the Telephone]

https://twitter.com/SecDef/status/1353765057243582466

Our Armed Forces are at their best when they represent the talents of our entire population, regardless of gender identity. I fully support @POTUS's direction today that all transgender individuals who wish to serve and can meet the appropriate standards shall be able to do so.

Even normal women are in general incapable of achieving and maintaining basic physical standards, besides being a liability in any kind of battle scenario, there's no way even a single tranny of any sex could be anything but detrimental.

Full text:

Executive Order on Enabling All Qualified Americans to Serve Their Country in Uniform | The White House

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as

www.whitehouse.gov

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Policy. All Americans who are qualified to serve in the Armed Forces of the United States (“Armed Forces”) should be able to serve. The All-Volunteer Force thrives when it is composed of diverse Americans who can meet the rigorous standards for military service, and an inclusive military strengthens our national security.
It is my conviction as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces that gender identity should not be a bar to military service. Moreover, there is substantial evidence that allowing transgender individuals to serve in the military does not have any meaningful negative impact on the Armed Forces. To that end, in 2016, a meticulous, comprehensive study requested by the Department of Defense found that enabling transgender individuals to serve openly in the United States military would have only a minimal impact on military readiness and healthcare costs. The study also concluded that open transgender service has had no significant impact on operational effectiveness or unit cohesion in foreign militaries.
On the basis of this information, the Secretary of Defense concluded in 2016 that permitting transgender individuals to serve openly in the military was consistent with military readiness and with strength through diversity, such that transgender service members who could meet the required standards and procedures should be permitted to serve openly. The Secretary of Defense also concluded that it was appropriate to create a process that would enable service members to take steps to transition gender while serving.
The previous administration chose to alter that policy to bar transgender persons, in almost all circumstances, from joining the Armed Forces and from being able to take steps to transition gender while serving. Rather than relying on the comprehensive study by a nonpartisan federally funded research center, the previous administration relied on a review that resulted in a policy that set unnecessary barriers to military service. It is my judgment that the Secretary of Defense’s 2016 conclusions remain valid, as further demonstrated by the fact that, in 2018, the then-serving Chief of Staff of the Army, Chief of Naval Operations, Commandant of the Marine Corps, and Chief of Staff of the Air Force all testified publicly to the Congress that they were not aware of any issues of unit cohesion, disciplinary problems, or issues of morale resulting from open transgender service. A group of former United States Surgeons General, who collectively served under Democratic and Republican Presidents, echoed this point, stating in 2018 that “transgender troops are as medically fit as their non‑transgender peers and that there is no medically valid reason — including a diagnosis of gender dysphoria — to exclude them from military service or to limit their access to medically necessary care.”
Therefore, it shall be the policy of the United States to ensure that all transgender individuals who wish to serve in the United States military and can meet the appropriate standards shall be able to do so openly and free from discrimination.
Sec. 2. Revocation. The Presidential Memorandum of March 23, 2018 (Military Service by Transgender Individuals), is hereby revoked, and the Presidential Memorandum of August 25, 2017 (Military Service by Transgender Individuals), remains revoked.
Sec. 3. Agency Roles and Responsibilities. In furtherance of the policy described in section 1 of this order, I hereby direct the following:
(a) The Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard, shall, after consultation with the Joint Chiefs of Staff about how best to implement this policy and consistent with applicable law, take all necessary steps to ensure that all directives, orders, regulations, and policies of their respective departments are consistent with this order. These steps shall include establishing a process by which transgender service members may transition gender while serving, along with any further steps that the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security deem appropriate to advance the policy described in section 1 of this order.
(b) The Secretary of Defense shall:
(i) immediately prohibit involuntary separations, discharges, and denials of reenlistment or continuation of service on the basis of gender identity or under circumstances relating to their gender identity;
(ii) identify and examine the records of service members who have been involuntarily separated, discharged, or denied reenlistment or continuation of service on the basis of gender identity or under circumstances relating to their gender identity;
(iii) issue guidance to the Secretaries of each military department regarding the correction of the military records of individuals described in subsection (b)(ii) of this section as necessary to remove an injustice, pursuant to section 1552(a) of title 10, United States Code, to the extent permitted by law; and
(iv) direct the Secretaries of each military department to provide supplemental guidance, subject to the approval of the Secretary, to the boards for the correction of military records, instructing such boards on how to review applications for the correction of records of individuals described in subsection (b)(ii) of this section. Where appropriate, the department concerned shall offer such individuals an opportunity to rejoin the military should they wish to do so and meet the current entry standards.
(c) The Secretary of Homeland Security with respect to the Coast Guard shall:
(i) immediately prohibit involuntary separations, discharges, and denials of reenlistment or continuation of service, on the basis of gender identity or under circumstances relating to their gender identity;
(ii) identify and examine the records of service members who have been involuntarily separated, discharged, or denied reenlistment or continuation of service, on the basis of gender identity or under circumstances relating to their gender identity;
(iii) issue guidance regarding the correction of the military records of individuals described in subsection (c)(ii) of this section as necessary to remove an injustice, pursuant to section 1552(a) of title 10, United States Code, to the extent permitted by law; and
(iv) provide supplemental guidance to the Board for Correction of Military Records of the Coast Guard, instructing the Board on how to review applications for the correction of records of individuals described in subsection (c)(ii) of this section. Where appropriate, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall offer such individuals an opportunity to rejoin the Coast Guard should they wish to do so and meet the current entry standards.
(d) The Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall report to me within 60 days of the date of this order on their progress in implementing the directives in this order and the policy described in section 1 of this order.
Sec. 4. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

I'm glad some trolls are stalking the replies:

 

[Treasure Champs]

Even normal women are in general incapable of achieving and maintaining basic physical standards, besides being a liability in any kind of battle scenario, there's no way even a single tranny of any sex could be anything but detrimental.

Nah. Only 10% of troops ever go to a war zone, and of those, only a miniscule amount would ever physically be a part of a "battle scenario", and even then mostly by accident. The incels who whine on about "how is the little lady soldier going to carry a man off the battlefield" as a reason for the whole army not to employ women are just misogynists who don't have a clue what "battle" looks like in the 21st century. Hint: it's more likely to involve a button than a gun.

That said, you can't be in the army if you're dependent on medications or asthmatic or have depression or any one of many, many common things that the general population suffer from. Troons dilating is just off the charts of things the army doesn't need or want. Also: major surgeries, and the kind of debilitating mental illness that makes you convinced you are something which you objectively physically are not.

Anyway, enjoy this snippet of nonsense from the utterly cucked Washington post, about poor stealth trannies who have not been able to "come out" in the army. LOL. I assume they mean that Lt. Jones will now be encouraged to tell all his mates about his enthusiasm for wearing lacy women's panties.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

Even normal women are in general incapable of achieving and maintaining basic physical standards, besides being a liability in any kind of battle scenario, there's no way even a single tranny of any sex could be anything but detrimental.

Which barracks are the troons gonna sleep in? Where are they gonna be sorted for boot camp? (Or whatever they call it.) I can see this being a big negative for women looking to serve, but I guess I'm just a cynic.

Hell, if a troon recruit is actually female will "he" be held to the male standards for physical fitness? Viz:

All recruits arriving at the Navy's boot-camp will complete an initial 1.5 mile run. Male recruits must complete the run in 16 minutes 10 seconds or less, the female recruits in 18 minutes 37 seconds or less. If a recruit fails the first attempt, then they must retest within 48 hours. If a recruit fails the retest, the recruit will be discharged with an entry level separation.

As in, what happens to an FTM who does it 17 minutes? Does "he" wash out on the first day?

Alternatively, can a male recruit who does it in 17 minutes suddenly declare his new name is Flower Destiny, don't you dare call "her" Harold any more and suddenly qualify? Note that "good" pushups (24) for a female are below the probationary level (42) for a male...which is also the same number as "excellent" pushups for a female.

 

[WinchesterPremium]

Which barracks are the troons gonna sleep in? Where are they gonna be sorted for boot camp? (Or whatever they call it.) I can see this being a big negative for women looking to serve, but I guess I'm just a cynic.

Hell, if a troon recruit is actually female will "he" be held to the male standards for physical fitness? Viz:



As in, what happens to an FTM who does it 17 minutes? Does "he" wash out on the first day?

Alternatively, can a male recruit who does it in 17 minutes suddenly declare his new name is Flower Destiny, don't you dare call "her" Harold any more and suddenly qualify? Note that "good" pushups (24) for a female are below the probationary level (42) for a male...which is also the same number as "excellent" pushups for a female.

To be fair what is the point of having different standards in the first place?

 

[Putin Bot]

We don't really have to worry about FTMs in military because most don't meet the men's height requirement for the military, and the fact the military absolutely won't lower their physical standards for men just so some manlet can get validation.

 

[A Grey Cat]

Nah. Only 10% of troops ever go to a war zone, and of those, only a miniscule amount would ever physically be a part of a "battle scenario", and even then mostly by accident. The incels who whine on about "how is the little lady soldier going to carry a man off the battlefield" as a reason for the whole army not to employ women are just misogynists who don't have a clue what "battle" looks like in the 21st century. Hint: it's more likely to involve a button than a gun.

That said, you can't be in the army if you're dependent on medications or asthmatic or have depression or any one of many, many common things that the general population suffer from. Troons dilating is just off the charts of things the army doesn't need or want. Also: major surgeries, and the kind of debilitating mental illness that makes you convinced you are something which you objectively physically are not.

Anyway, enjoy this snippet of nonsense from the utterly cucked Washington post, about poor stealth trannies who have not been able to "come out" in the army. LOL. I assume they mean that Lt. Jones will now be encouraged to tell all his mates about his enthusiasm for wearing lacy women's panties.

View attachment 1871474

Greatest fighting Force on God's green earth everyone...God I'm partly glad R Lee ermey isn't here to see whats about to happen to his "beloved Marine Corps."


Also some clown on twitter said "if you hate trans people than you hate american." If that's true than slap a Stahlhelm on my head and call me col klink

 

[christie]

To be fair what is the point of having different standards in the first place?

because men and women are anatomically different.

women's bodies are anatomically set up to be smaller, have less testosterone, higher body fat, and less muscle than men's because we're the incubators. men are built to be the more physically imposing sex by default so they can go hunt for food and flex on each other. it's just science.

so with all that being said, if you want to give women their fair shakes in the military, sports, etc., you have to have different standards than men. a female athlete is still an athlete, and definitely faster and stronger than the average joe/joelene, but she's still generally not going to be as strong or as fast as a male athlete in that same realm.

 

[Syntaxion]

because men and women are anatomically different.

women's bodies are anatomically set up to be smaller, have less testosterone, higher body fat, and less muscle than men's because we're the incubators. men are built to be the more physically imposing sex by default so they can go hunt for food and flex on each other. it's just science.

so with all that being said, if you want to give women their fair shakes in the military, sports, etc., you have to have different standards than men. a female athlete is still an athlete, and definitely faster and stronger than the average joe/joelene, but she's still generally not going to be as strong or as fast as a male athlete in that same realm.

Personally I feel like that is a liability but IDK, if they don't see combat, it matters less.

Take firefighters for example, obviously we can't make it easier for women to become firefighters just so they can get a fair shot, that would be insane as firefighters need to be in great shape to save people.

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

and the fact the military absolutely won't lower their physical standards for men just so some manlet can get validation.

I think you're being unduly optimistic, but we shall see.

Take firefighters for example, obviously we can't make it easier for women to become firefighters just so they can get a fair shot, that would be insane as firefighters need to be in great shape to save people.

LOL.

Woman to become NY firefighter despite failing crucial fitness test​

 

[OttoWest]

We don't really have to worry about FTMs in military because most don't meet the men's height requirement for the military, and the fact the military absolutely won't lower their physical standards for men just so some manlet can get validation.

Then they’ll just enlist as women and later troon out. That’s what the majority of both FTMs and MTFs do so they can get the military and the VA to pay for everything.

 

[remiem]

Personally I feel like that is a liability but IDK, if they don't see combat, it matters less.

Take firefighters for example, obviously we can't make it easier for women to become firefighters just so they can get a fair shot, that would be insane as firefighters need to be in great shape to save people.

That's already a problem. I've literally seen a barely 5'5" female paramedic struggling to carry the stretcher with nothing on it. If her partner hasn't been a huge guy she'd never manage, even with him being there it was obvious he was doing most of the work and having to watch to make sure nothing else happened because she was not able to complete the tasks. The idea that women 'can do anything' is a dangerous narrative too because you now have women taking on roles that they are physically unsuited for and that endanger other people by doing so.

Lowering the physical standards of people in roles that require physical ability in the name of diversity is a net negative for everyone.

 

[Putin Bot]

I think you're being unduly optimistic, but we shall see.

It hasn't happened in sports when FTMs want to compete with men. I have heard of some FTMs getting pissed when they come dead last in sports like swimming or track (despite having great times when they competed on the females team), and they cry about how it's unfair and they deserve special treatment and accommodations, they just get ignored or told to go back on the women's team. And if sports doesn't want to be accommodating to them, why the hell would the military?

I mean, I can see the military allowing the ones who do pass the height requirement to initially join, but they'll quickly wash out once they're unable to keep up with the men.

 

[trent]

The US military is going to become a bunch of women and trannies staying at home whilst dirt poor actual men (a good chunk of them being black guys) go do the actual fighting and getting maimed/killed.

The Russians and/or Chinese must be fucking delighted. The greatest military in the world is being turned into a dick-girl freakshow.

 

[christie]

Personally I feel like that is a liability but IDK, if they don't see combat, it matters less.

Take firefighters for example, obviously we can't make it easier for women to become firefighters just so they can get a fair shot, that would be insane as firefighters need to be in great shape to save people.

when i say "get their fair shakes", i don't mean "let them do it because they want to, even if they're not technically qualified". i wholeheartedly agree that it's dangerous for everyone involves, and also a huge disservice to women. this is my assumption of how it works, or at least how it SHOULD work:

let's say a woman who can finish the navy's 1.5 mile run in 18 min is in the 80th percentile when it comes to women's run times, while a man who can do the run in 16 min is in the 60th percentile for men's. if there was one set time, it would be the bare minimum 16 min, which may mean that a woman would have to be in the 95th percentile and be exceptionally athletic just to compete. if it can be observed that women and men who meet the 80th and 60th percentiles respectively are found to be physically capable enough for the job, then those time limits are the ones set for each sex. ideally, it's not meant to make it "easier" for women to get in in the sense that they don't have to be as fit as the job really demands-- but rather so those women in the 80th-94th percentile don't get dismissed even though they're just as or more fit than men in the 60th percentile and technically qualify.

i hope that makes sense. i could be completely wrong, but that what seems logical to me.

 

[Unpaid Emotional Labourer]

Trooning out in the military will make the women more useful (if their periods stop that’s an improvement, if they get more aggressive due to the T that is too, and if they get their tits hacked off it can do nothing but improve their physical performance, true a fleshtube would be a negative but almost none of them go that far...) and the men less useful (they’ll whinge for their hormones but unlike with T for the girls it’ll do nothing but be a burden to continue logistically when trying to work, they all like to LARP like they’ve lost the ability to open jars after a few weeks on HRT lol so they’ll be faking weakness all the time, and god forbid they actually get a stink ditch, then they can’t even be relied upon to sit at a desk and work, and they will never be able to go into the field again).

However my understanding is that being say an insulin dependent diabetic precludes you from military service since you cannot go into the field with that sort of medical condition, so I don’t get how anyone whose condition requires maintenance can serve. I consider hormones to be optional nonsense but trannies do not.

 

[Windows XP Home Edition]

Girls are brought up to "be kind" while boys are just left "to be boys". Girls also are constantly told by society to follow a lot more restrictions around how they should look, act, dress, etc and that they should be submissive and that men are more intelligent. It makes sense that young women are going along with "positivity", "being your authentic self" and as part of a movement where the loudest voices are male.

In general, women face much worse social repercussions if they disagree with something than if men do. There's also the issue that trans women overwhelming still look and act like men and instinctively women fear men's violence and anger and so are more likely to agree with whatever they want.

I don't 100% agree. It depends on the culture and how misogynistic it is. For example, in Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries, women and girls are controlled in every aspect of their lives from what they wear to where they sit in public places. I've heard stories about Saudi and other Muslim elites in the UK having very well-behaved girls who are polite and kind but then the boys are horrendously rude and entitled spoilt brats who can do whatever they please. There are a lot of cases of honour killings and femicides documented in the UK within Muslim families such as the case with Banaz Mahmod as well. If you see the number of women killed in the UK by men, a good portion of the perpetrators and victims have origins from countries where Islam is the dominant religion.

 

[Collections Agent]

It hasn't happened in sports when FTMs want to compete with men.

Meanwhile the women's volleyball team be like