Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

I honestly want to know how fat drug addicted and shutin you look considering you're here whining about the shitlibs and troons up until 3 am on here almost every single day and apparently get up at noon.
Who cares?
 
View attachment 1866510
View attachment 1866511
View attachment 1866513

This is singularly wrong in almost every way imaginable. "Name one technology in history that has successfully been redistributed equitably", how about basically all of them for the most part..? Global internet access is >50% of world population.

Redistribution isn't a binary variable and I'm fairly convinced that a lack of it isn't grounds for considering this the optimal society:
While I'm very strongly opposed to any form of artificial intelligence (I'll explain why in a spoiler so people who don't want to read my sperging don't have to), ”muh Jeff Bezos” is not a good argument for AI being bad.
People love to say that AI will replace manual labour and create a utopian world of fully automated luxury gay space communism where everyone sits at home scrounging off the dole and making their robot butlers get them a drink. In reality, it's going to create levels of inequality in society that we haven't seen since the feudal era.

Because humans have only been doing white-collar work for 2000 years at most while we're the result of millions of years of evolutionary processes which made us good at doing manual work, it's obvious that any AI will replace white-collar jobs (stuff like accountancy, translation) before it does the same with blue-collar jobs (stuff like moving Amazon boxes around), and that AI will therefore remove any opportunities for ordinary people to get a job that isn't basically working as a peon in Jeff Bezos' empire. In short, AI will break society into a 0.1% of people who own the machines and a 99.4% of people who work for those people, with a small percentage of jobs (stuff like priests and creative workers) that can't easily be automated away.

If that doesn't seem like feudalism on speed, I don't know what does.
View attachment 1866880
They've been using black people for decades.
Two quick questions:
1) which political party supported slavery and Jim Crow?
2) fill in the blank:
”We'll have those niggers voting -------- for 200 years”
View attachment 1868452

She's since privated her Twitter. Play with matches, get burned....
Why does Bernie have to look cheerful when a person he probably despises is being inaugurated?
1611510051919.png

1611510065276.png
Gamergate was 7 years ago. There are people in school today who weren't born when Gamergate happened. Shut up about it already.
It's qwhite interesting.
Ignoring the fact that medical care is a human right and should not be denied to anyone because of their politics, what about black people with diabetes? Should they have their rights trampled because some of their fellow diabetics are allegedly white supremacists?
Repeat after me.
Alexandria. Ocasio-Cortez. Is. Not. Going. To. Fuck. You.
I honestly want to know how fat drug addicted and shutin you look considering you're here whining about the shitlibs and troons up until 3 am on here almost every single day and apparently get up at noon.
who-the-fuck-xwptk1.jpg
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hog On Ice
The Overton window’s been dragged to the extreme right by centrist leftists looking for compromise?
You fucking WHAT?
Mainstream media has been sucking commie cock since the first wave of fully indoctrinated ‘journalists’ left college in the 90’s.
It‘s the reason there are hundreds of conservative, right-wing and/or nationalist news sites out there, because even moderately conservative viewpoints are treated like turbonazism by mainstream journalism. If conservatives had equal representation in conventional media you wouldn’t have Fox or Breitbart.
All I can say is ‘mostly peaceful protests’, holy shit.
 
View attachment 1873235


Why do they have to bring a business man down? He just wants to sell shrunken heads to the masses.
Probably cultural appropriation, as shrunken heads were a South American practice, not African (not sure the sub-equatorial Africans ever reached that level of technological advancement).

It was a bunch of speds arguing about whether video games were sexist or not. Not worth anyone's time.
Going to have to disagree there, champ. The fact that you think that's what it was about tells me you bought the spin.
One thing it did really well was rip the scab off a maggoty, infected journalistic wound full of corruption, collusion, propagandising, sex-for-favours, cronyism, awards rigging, opinion manipulation and shady links between bodies like DiGRA and weird, consent-manufacturing Federal Government agencies.
I closely followed events like Candace Owens' 'Social Autopsy' being murdered in the cradle by Zoe Quinn for fear of its ability to prove Ms Quinn was as bad, if not worse, than her 'harassers', an event which has been totally memory-holed by non-fringe media.
We saw the same kind of behind-the-scenes collusion in the treatment of Trump. Ignore things like his middle-east peace deal and winding down pointless wars. Instead focus on blaming him for Democrat mishandling of the COVID crisis. Obama air-struck a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital in Kunduz, killing 40+ patients and medical staff, offered the survivors $6000 each, and got a Nobel Peace Prize. Trump got nominated for the NPP all four years of his presidency and was excluded from consideration each time. That's the power of the elites and a corrupt media working together to manipulate opinion and manufacture consensus.
Gamergate showed that mainstream media was rotten to the core (and the fact that there has been no reform of the journalistic profession shows nobody's learned much).
Even the fact that the gamergate article on wikipedia solely focuses on the legally-unactioned allegations of sexist harassment tells a story.
Sexism was the spin that the colluding mainstream journos put on it so that people wouldn't demand the media do its fucking job, which is to report facts in an impartial and thorough manner.
YMMV (and if you don't understand why a corrupt, colluding media answering the beck and call of an unseen elite is a problem, I can't help you).
 
Last edited:
There's a bit of dark humor and irony over that Bernie mittens meme.

It seems the lady who was making them can't -- because of high taxes on independent crafters.

Shot:
"I don't have much of a mitten business anymore because it really wasn't worth it," Ellis said. "Independent crafters get really taken for a ride by the federal government. We get taxed to the nth degree, and it wasn't really worth it pursuing that as a business, even as a side hustle. I mostly just make them as gifts."

Chaser:
Ellis supported Sanders in 2020 but conceded in the interview that "Biden is pretty great," even though she wished Kamala Harris were president instead. All three politicians—two Democrats and one socialist—are outspoken advocates for higher taxes.
 
Probably cultural appropriation, as shrunken heads were a South American practice, not African (not sure the sub-equatorial Africans ever reached that level of technological advancement).

It'll be a shame if they take that down. That part was always entertaining.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™
Back