Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
guys, its okay. he took a political compass test.
polit.PNG
 
That's interesting for speed-dating and short interactions but I doubt it's applicable here. Women naturally follow a man's lead if they truly desire him in a relationship (not just sexually). It's part of the assumed prerequisites for a man in being a provider: have a career, have his own place, have his own transportation, etc.
There's also universal expectations with sexual attraction, behavior etc. but that's besides the point.

These prerequisites for men are tested in the practically universal expectations of the man approaching the woman first, the man picking up the woman (in his own vehicle), the man having planned out where they were going and of course the man paying for the night out. If a man fails any of these or expects compensation in any way he is either a "no good man" or a "creep", depending on what the guy wanted in return.

Women in relationships with men weaker than them (not disabled, just weak or pudgy), poorer than them (or jobless), younger than them are rare and rarely last, whereas relationships tend to continue if the man is fit/stronger, pays the bills and, often, is older than her by some moderate margin.

This is also part of why the old trio of "tall, dark haired and handsome" still rings true; younger and older women always prefer tall men.
Why taller? No, not because it's porn logic of "hur bigger dick" but because height is instinctively tied to implications of authority and power, hence why leaders speak from platforms and podiums above crowds, only ever speaking among crowds when trying to give the impression of familiarity.

Note: Everything I just said above is really basic and not bad at all. It's natural and healthy. The minute a woman bends any of these expectations she's setting herself up for potentially disasterous results with either a lay-about for a man or even an abuser who would use them for their money or worse. See, the prerequisites show not just that a man is a provider, capable of leading the woman as a man, but also that the man has principals, and if he has principals he likely won't act against them. These are then tested, too.

In light of these natural desires and expectations of a man by women, women will naturally follow the one providing for them. This is why a woman can be a staunch diehard bisexual feminist but suddenly turn around 180 once she finds a good man who meets the aforementioned causalities.

This doesn't mean women are naturally malleable or they are stupid or child-brained. It's just natural behavior, like how people universally desire and follow charismatic men as leaders, even if said leaders have grave faults--hence why so many women still fawn over the imprisoned leader of the NXIVM cult and why so many men still think of Trump as a golden boy. They follow their ideal of them.

TL;DR All that to say neither the study you linked nor any of the fundamentals I wrote apply to June. The real reason for her behavior is that she's an infantilized co-dependant woman with daddy issues.
 
Hello... Lurker here for a while. I just wanted to share this post I found on Reddit.
Peak parasocial relationship.

This mentality that dating someone with different political leanings is, somehow, a betrayal to your beliefs, is ridiculous. Politics should not be the only thing to base your relationships of. And there is also zero proof that the guy is a nazi.
 

Attachments

  • Parasocial relationship.PNG
    Parasocial relationship.PNG
    118.8 KB · Views: 261
She's a 30-year-old e-girl and she looks just like every other 30-year-old woman without the makeup and filter magic.
She looks more like a sleepless mental patient trying to seduce her guard so she can escape. Man, this woman has issues that desperately need to be addressed. You can't "smol bean uwu" your way to mental balance, June.
But if I keep thinking like that I won't be able to laugh at her.

Your commentary made everything else worth it. Thanks for posting it between the spoiler marks and sparing us the risk of having to look at her naked. Shame the reply box didn't have as much mercy
Shockingly vanilla given how Shoe and Greg spoke about their sex life in public. Where's all the bdsm stuff?
Probably not actually into it anymore since he's gone. I imagine they'd be doing something like this in twenty years if they had remained together:
But instead of it being kinky it'd just be his way of getting her out of his hair
 
Currently trying to archive this thread, but he wrote an explanation about how he's not a nationalist socialist.
View attachment 1880135
An actual Longist? You don't see that much anymore. What really sets Long apart from today's Social Democracy or other Authoritarian-Left ideologies is that he believes that the use of corruption and intimidation to undermine opponents are valid ways to achieve reform.

The Long Plan had a wealth tax too, although how you tax fortune when its invested or at least not held in cash is still too vague for me. He wanted no one to have more than 50 million dollars (worth 1 billion today) or inherit more than 5 million (worth 100 million today) The resulting funds would be used to guarantee every family a basic household grant, or "household estate" as Long called it, of $5,000 (worth 100 thousand today) and a minimum annual income of $2,000–3,000 (worth 40–60 thousand today), or one-third of the average family homestead value and income. Long supplemented his plan with proposals for free college education, with admission based on an IQ test, a $30 ($600 or about 7000 yearly) monthly pension for those over the age of 65, a month's vacation for every worker, and limiting the work week to thirty hours to boost employment.

NEET bux, no billionaires, College is for smart-folks not folx, & 30 hour work weeks. If you can trust the man, he supposedly got shot by his own bodyguard while they emptied 60 rounds into an ousted Judge's son-in-law.

That this dude thought The Kingfish would label himself a socialist or a lefty bothers me, like Bismarck's 'Practical Christianity' or 'State Socialism' it was a stop-gap against further Communal Property Communisms/Socialisms which would come about if FDR let the situation get worse or helped the Reds. Long hated socialists and the welfare state's collectivism probably so his wealthy friends could hide their money in property and elsewhere but that's Long for you.

wmqknv1waen11.jpg
 
Last edited:
i'm actually more interested in how she is able to have a following of leftists when there are videos of her saying using the hard r on twitter
There's a sort of new edgy leftism that cropped up as a result of the alt-right made up of people like Vaush and groups like Bunkerchan (formerly /leftypol/) who don't really care about that stuff
 
This mentality that dating someone with different political leanings is, somehow, a betrayal to your beliefs, is ridiculous. Politics should not be the only thing to base your relationships of. And there is also zero proof that the guy is a nazi.
I agree with this on principle but June is someone who's career is milking retards trying to fuck her, and she always bends towards the person she's with. So whoever is fucking her is going to be her baseline political perspective to gravitate to. It's not that "people" cant date outside of their political circles, it's that June can't without changing her beliefs all over again because she's a spineless doormat pick-me with no convictions. Even that kind of personality is less remarkable when you aren't specifically making your money as a "political" "commentator".
 
guys, its okay. he took a political compass test.
View attachment 1880157
So some sort of queer Minarcho-Armchair Theorist with Labor theory characteristics? Why would someone so economically left choose an ideology based on Long? Wait, no. Nevermind, he's perfect for June. He's retarded.

You know this man wants to be a nu-male anarcho-commie but he sees why we all laugh. He knows too much about the laughter. It bothered him so much he tries to seem Auth-Right, when he'll give June a Pinworm Infection from his early years experimenting. Quite the ideology.
 
And there is also zero proof that the guy is a nazi.
He is literally calling himself a national socialist. You don't get to reinvent the tag unless you embrace it first then showcase why you're different from the funny mustachioed man from 80 years ago.

I will never understand the faggots who shun Nazism because of Hitler while praising Communism and Lenin/Stalin/Mao.
You're both retards and functional society rightfully shuns you.

Edit: WTF is with all these new accounts? June, tell your simps to fuck off.
 
Last edited:
An actual Longist? You don't see that much anymore. What really sets Long apart from today's Social Democracy or other Authoritarian-Left ideologies is that he believes that the use of corruption and intimidation to undermine opponents are valid ways to achieve reform.

The Long Plan had a wealth tax too, although how you tax fortune when its invested or at least not held in cash is still too vague for me. He wanted no one to have more than 50 million dollars (worth 1 billion today) or inherit more than 5 million (worth 100 million today) The resulting funds would be used to guarantee every family a basic household grant, or "household estate" as Long called it, of $5,000 (worth 100 thousand today) and a minimum annual income of $2,000–3,000 (worth 40–60 thousand today), or one-third of the average family homestead value and income. Long supplemented his plan with proposals for free college education, with admission based on an IQ test, a $30 ($600 or about 7000 yearly) monthly pension for those over the age of 65, a month's vacation for every worker, and limiting the work week to thirty hours to boost employment.

NEET bux, no billionaires, College is for smart-folks not folx, & 30 hour work weeks. If you can trust the man, he supposedly got shot by his own bodyguard while they emptied 60 rounds into an ousted Judge's son-in-law.

That this dude thought The Kingfish would label himself a socialist or a lefty bothers me, like Bismarck's 'Practical Christianity' or 'State Socialism' it was a stop-gap against further Communal Property Communisms/Socialisms which would come about if FDR let the situation get worse or helped the Reds. Long hated socialists and the welfare state's collectivism probably so his wealthy friends could hide their money in property and elsewhere but that's Long for you.

View attachment 1880275
Huey is a very interesting character. For a while, he was exalted by Lefty types like Randy Newman. However, he's seen a resurgence in popularity among the remnants of the Alt-right as well, given his more isolationist and anti-Wall Street tendencies. One of his lieutenants Gerald L.K. Smith went on to become a wignat leader in his own right.

Personally, I'm a fan. However, he really can't be fit into traditional categories. As the quote you mentioned suggests, he was no friend of the Klan nor was he an anti-Semite. On the other hand, Communists and socialists hated him, probably because he was steeling their thunder. Huey was accused of being a fascist by lefties and communists by reactionaries. In reality, he was just Huey.

If Wig0nHead dons a boater hat, we'll know she's a Longist

AP_392848380581 (1).jpg
 
Why are so many e-thots like this?
Maladjusted female NEETs are still NEETs.
June might not be as fat as the average neckbeard, but she's mentally as stable as one and just as hygienic.
People rag on Venti for living in cat piss, but at least Venti has pictures her friends take of her doing the dishes. June uses disposable plates (while whining about climate change and the environment) and throws em on the ground.
How anyone got a hard-on with those nudes while seeing the absolute state of that room. You can smell her old tampons and encrusted food on her dirty carpeting.
 
This mentality that dating someone with different political leanings is, somehow, a betrayal to your beliefs, is ridiculous. Politics should not be the only thing to base your relationships of. And there is also zero proof that the guy is a nazi.
This is centrist retardation, if your political beliefs are at all meaningful they absolutely should influence who you have a sexual relationship with because if you have children (although I guess this probably isn't a concern for June given she doesn't seem to be in a rush to have any) you'll need to raise them with the same worldview, and for that to work you both need to be approximately on the same page.
 
If Wig0nHead dons a boater hat, we'll know she's a Longist

View attachment 1880406
No, we'll know her boyfriend is. As to huey's politics? I don't hate'em but I just don't see a wealth tax working. Strikes me as somewhere between MAGA and Francoism which ultimately can mean anything and as we never got the Kingfish in Federal Office probably accurate. He used the radio like twitter, and did call out the 'lying press' starting The American Progress which advertised as being for the 99% and against the 1%. So he actually did things instead of eat cheeseburgers and watch Tucker.

He'd have my vote, but I'm desperate for a new order against where we're going..
 
Back