Snowflake shoe0nhead / June Lapine / June La Porta & Armoured Skeptic / Gregory "Greg" Fluhrer - A poor man's Boxxy: rejected by Vaush, disowned by /pol/ for burning coal, sleeps in a dog's bed surrounded by trash, and her ex-boyfriend.

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
If politics get in the way of you and your loved one then you're destined to fail anyways.
The notion that you have to have exact or very similar viewpoints on how to run a country/society you will never actually run or have any real say is stupid.
I'd wager that by having a marital hugbox, you're only making an eventual disagreement all the more bitter. "How could you disagree with me!!??? You're my spouse!!"

Compromise is the key to any lasting relation. If you're able to work things out with your partner and establish accords where both have to give and yield in some way to the other in order to keep the peace and happiness, you can survive anything with that person.
 
Compromise is the key to any lasting relation. If you're able to work things out with your partner and establish accords where both have to give and yield in some way to the other in order to keep the peace and happiness, you can survive anything with that person.
How do you compromise with someone who doesn't even accept your values as valid or reasonable?

And what you have to build up some sort of tolerance or resistance to disagreement? What the fuck is that? Any properly adjusted adult doesn't fucking sperg out over disagreement no matter how out of the blue it is.

Compromise lets be real fucking sucks and if your whole realtionship is based on compromise then you are losing yourself. The point isn't that such a relationship isn't possible but that both parties would have to bend their values so far for it to work that it's probably just a LARP anyway if it does work.

Relationships do take a lot of work but they really shouldn't take more work than necessary. This is a big mistake people make these days and their relationships become just that "work".
 
Last edited:
1611934688303.png
 
The notion that you have to have exact or very similar viewpoints on how to run a country/society you will never actually run or have any real say is stupid.
Society is literally everything that you deal with day to day. There is nothing more important than opinions on how a society would function, it has nothing to do with whether you think you can become King one day. You saying right now that everyone is just an aimless peasant is a good example of something that could cause a schism in a relationship.
 
Huey is a very interesting character. For a while, he was exalted by Lefty types like Randy Newman. However, he's seen a resurgence in popularity among the remnants of the Alt-right as well, given his more isolationist and anti-Wall Street tendencies. One of his lieutenants Gerald L.K. Smith went on to become a wignat leader in his own right.

Personally, I'm a fan. However, he really can't be fit into traditional categories. As the quote you mentioned suggests, he was no friend of the Klan nor was he an anti-Semite. On the other hand, Communists and socialists hated him, probably because he was steeling their thunder. Huey was accused of being a fascist by lefties and communists by reactionaries. In reality, he was just Huey.

If Wig0nHead dons a boater hat, we'll know she's a Longist

View attachment 1880406
Could he be called a radical centrist then?
double digit iq
Now that's just being generous.
 
Because we don't live in a society where if a woman behaves this way we throw them in a special asylum until they regain their composure.
lol No need to go that far. A healthy society is a one where the people (not the government playing god-daddy over all facets of life) collectively and without targeted malice shame misbehavior.
Thanks to the sexual revolution, sexual liberalism and coomers that's not the case. Supposedly according to one study guys have a natural revulsion to seeing gay men kiss, the same as seeing maggots, and yet the primary demographic of lesbian porn is dudes. The trick isn't to encourage guys to not be repulsed by two mustaches kissing it's to discourage being horny for lipstick smacking together (reminding them that porn is psychological cuckoldry works on those not too far gone). Same goes for simps and e-sluts like June. In a proper society she'd be shamed/shunned, then she'd feel ashamed and stop doing this, thereafter being welcomed back into the fold. Instead she posts her ass online.

I like that you had to add "Crikey". Brings the whole piece together.
This contrast though. Man... Goes to show that accepting your age really isn't all that bad after all.

She doesn't look aroused in those she looks like she has blunt force trauma to the brain.
She was clearly going for the Bell Delphine irl ahegao look but she kept looking at herself on the phone or something. She's so obsessed with herself she can't even do something this stupid correctly.
 
Last edited:
How does someone like Shoe, who's been on the internet for at least 15 years, not know how to do a simple reverse image search?
Holy shit, was my post back in October coming true this early?

Will her level of desperation grow slowly and reach critical mass when she turns 40? Are we going to find out in 10 years that she had been cat fished by someone using DarksydePhil pics and Bernie Sanders' talking points? The future looks so grim but I'm morbidly curious how hard she can fall before she realizes it's time to go offline and fade from her internet fame.
 
How does someone like Shoe, who's been on the internet for at least 15 years, not know how to do a simple reverse image search?
The days of being on the internet and being smart having a rough correlation died in one very long September, if not before. Today, you may well find someone who brags about being "always connected" wondering how someone linked her personal I-used-a-fake-name-and-everything Twitter to her corporate stuff, only to realize she used her professionally-done corpo headshot as her Twitter avatar because "I look so good in that picture!"
 
The days of being on the internet and being smart having a rough correlation died in one very long September, if not before. Today, you may well find someone who brags about being "always connected" wondering how someone linked her personal I-used-a-fake-name-and-everything Twitter to her corporate stuff, only to realize she used her professionally-done corpo headshot as her Twitter avatar because "I look so good in that picture!"
To be fair though, she might well know how to do an image search, it's more likely she was horny and didn't consider that she might be getting catfished. I've been scammed before even though I should know better, I'm guessing something like this feels similar.
 
To be fair though, she might well know how to do an image search, it's more likely she was horny and didn't consider that she might be getting catfished. I've been scammed before even though I should know better, I'm guessing something like this feels similar.
Hell, China has recruited real women to make videos and take photos as proof the person you are talking to is real only to try to scam you in a BS investment deal.
 
How do you compromise with someone who doesn't even accept your values as valid or reasonable?
What kind of extremists are you in a relationship with?

Short of autism, there is no reason a standard Dem/Rep shouldn't get along. You're moderates with varying degrees of what constitutes proper immigration reform, taxes, public spending, etc.

I have never seen an antifag wife a wignat or a neo-nazi wife a tankie for one person to think their spouse's ideas are invalid or unreasonable. If you're that extreme, you've almost definitely already showcased your ideals to your partner and a split was announced immediately afterwards.
Compromise lets be real fucking sucks and if your whole realtionship is based on compromise then you are losing yourself.
You and I may have different concepts of compromise.
Compromise is listening to your husband drone on about X topic while you couldn't give a damn but smile and pretend to listen anyway. Compromise is wanting to stay at home and watch TV but your spouse wants you to accompany them outside to run errand somewhere. Compromise is knowing you can shut your wife's argument up but stay silent because it's less stressful than the alternative.
Compromise is not saying anything when Y political candidate is on TV and your spouse beams with glee about how right they are about everything. You won't care or get mad if you voted Trump but they rode with Biden.
Compromise is letting them choose the music for the ride home, even if what they'll pick is boring music, jogger anthems, or satanic edgelord cringe.

I've seen so many divorced couples who doomed themselves by refusing to compromise anything. Food, entertainment, political discussion, etc. If you want someone who agrees 24/7, stay single.

I don't see any of these compromises as radical or so far gone that you cease to be you just to please someone else.
And wanting a Yes-Man of a partner who parrots you and never doubts or challenges you gets old real fucking quick.
You saying right now that everyone is just an aimless peasant is a good example of something that could cause a schism in a relationship.
Let me try this again.

Don't get uncontrollably mad in the event your spouse doesn't think N political topic should be addressed in X or Y manner and thinks that the solution is Z. Politisperging is not worth losing someone over, considering that as far as federal elections go, your vote matters very little in this uniparty clown show we have going on right now.
Trump didn't save you, AOC is not going to save you, Bernie is a grifter, Cruz is only looking out for a future presidential run. It's not worth getting mad fighting over these people or the politics they represent. Focus instead on your local politics which I can guarantee affect your daily lives more and are probably a fusion of both your ideals and beliefs.
 
You and I may have different concepts of compromise.
Compromise is listening to your husband drone on about X topic while you couldn't give a damn but smile and pretend to listen anyway. Compromise is wanting to stay at home and watch TV but your spouse wants you to accompany them outside to run errand somewhere. Compromise is knowing you can shut your wife's argument up but stay silent because it's less stressful than the alternative.
Compromise is not saying anything when Y political candidate is on TV and your spouse beams with glee about how right they are about everything. You won't care or get mad if you voted Trump but they rode with Biden.
Compromise is letting them choose the music for the ride home, even if what they'll pick is boring music, jogger anthems, or satanic edgelord cringe.
3 out of 4 of these examples are bullshit everyday stuff that has nothing to do with politics. Complete goalpost move trying to tone down your argument. You're trying to tie together not minding your spouses favorite cooking show to political disagreements which are much more serious and actually tied to real beliefs.

Me turning over as my wife tries to watch 'the view' is not at all the same as having disagreements on whether kids should be on hormone blockers or whether borders should exist at all or not and these discussions don't just happen within an extremist milieu what a dumb argument.

Don't get uncontrollably mad in the event your spouse doesn't think N political topic should be addressed in X or Y manner and thinks that the solution is Z. Politisperging is not worth losing someone over, considering that as far as federal elections go, your vote matters very little in this uniparty clown show we have going on right now.
Trump didn't save you, AOC is not going to save you, Bernie is a grifter, Cruz is only looking out for a future presidential run. It's not worth getting mad fighting over these people or the politics they represent. Focus instead on your local politics which I can guarantee affect your daily lives more and are probably a fusion of both your ideals and beliefs.
Another dumb argument with nothing to do with the point. Whether or not we have any political power has no connection to what we are talking about and yeah it would be great if we could just let the system die on the vine but that has not effect on what people believe.


In any relationship you are going to have arguments about all kinds of things why on earth would you want politics to be one of those?

The absolute hilarity in thinking that the compromise between two politcally different people would start and end at just shutting up while their "guy" is on the tube is absolutely ludicrous. You know as well as I do that even completely non-autistic people can't STFU about politics these days.
 
Back