biscuitscilia
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
Yeah, internal logic has to do with organic narrative flow. There are many characters he recently listed that do things that are not entirely logically sound but emotionally resonant for the characters. A film doesn't need to explain every choice given so that the audience knows what's happening at all times. Withholding information is a valid tactic in story telling, stories do that quite often. It's sometimes called world building but narratively speaking, most films start you off wondering what's happening and reveal what's going on through the course of the narrative through various means. There's not one unified way of doing this but the most universally accepted lazy way is through exposition, because it deprives the audience from learning (with the main character) what's happening through the events of the film. Depriving the audience of that makes it feels like you're being treated like a child. People play with puzzles because they like figuring out where the pieces go, they like engaging with it just like in narratives but being explained where they go isn't fun or engaging.He claims to want characters to follow internal logic of the story. That's usually how he responds to this criticism. But I'm sure his ideal depiction of this would be characters or the story explaining their every action. He might respond to that and say that it is not true (probably calling you dishonest) and that he loves it when a story is able to tell you things without explicitly telling you. However on the other hand, if a movie/tv show did massive infodumps that destroy the pacing, he would be totally fine with it and attack anyone who criticized this way of exposition if it was something he liked.
Last edited: