- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
He has been bouncing and squeaking about totally not dominating:



I swear we met Rachel Domagalski with his broad manly shoulders in these pages before, but search came up with nothing.
"Misogynoir"

Still, gender crits must be very careful with their argument. "We must exclude the trans because they dominate our sports" is NOT a proper argument and indeed smacks of opportunitism. The proper argument should be "We must exclude the trans because they are biological males, and biological males, because of their anatomical and physiological endowment, tend to win when they compete with women,"
If you don't include Roller Derby in your examples, you are making a bad faith argument!

Žižek and... Stock?

You believe it is the right thing to do to support trans rights, so what? People can believe in all sorts of bizarre things and might think all sort of atrocity as "the right thing to do". The big question is: can you justify your version of "trans right"?

Stock, as a senior, recognized figure in Philosophy, has the obligation to encourage and protect juniors to speak up against the trans ideology. She cannot wait until the vileness "blow over"; trans ideology has caught on precisely because senior figures like Stock gambled that it'd never do.
Genocide. Rhys loves fast and loose impromptu re-definitions:

So when Toys R' Us sacked all their workforce, did they eliminate a "socially identifiable group" and thereby committed "genocide"?
"They wrote the definition of 'genocide' in the late 1940s, so it is no surprise they ignored LGBT" -- so Rhys agrees LGBT is a very recent phenomenon?
Genocide:

Show us the death threats man! Not these lame shit!
+ + + +
Rhys demands a female politician to resign for supposedly encouraged transphobia in her party:

The subject naturally leads to his pretend-PTSD:


Can he name the titles he reviewed?
Chase Strangio:




I swear we met Rachel Domagalski with his broad manly shoulders in these pages before, but search came up with nothing.
"Misogynoir"

Still, gender crits must be very careful with their argument. "We must exclude the trans because they dominate our sports" is NOT a proper argument and indeed smacks of opportunitism. The proper argument should be "We must exclude the trans because they are biological males, and biological males, because of their anatomical and physiological endowment, tend to win when they compete with women,"
If you don't include Roller Derby in your examples, you are making a bad faith argument!

Žižek and... Stock?

You believe it is the right thing to do to support trans rights, so what? People can believe in all sorts of bizarre things and might think all sort of atrocity as "the right thing to do". The big question is: can you justify your version of "trans right"?

Stock, as a senior, recognized figure in Philosophy, has the obligation to encourage and protect juniors to speak up against the trans ideology. She cannot wait until the vileness "blow over"; trans ideology has caught on precisely because senior figures like Stock gambled that it'd never do.
Genocide. Rhys loves fast and loose impromptu re-definitions:

So when Toys R' Us sacked all their workforce, did they eliminate a "socially identifiable group" and thereby committed "genocide"?
"They wrote the definition of 'genocide' in the late 1940s, so it is no surprise they ignored LGBT" -- so Rhys agrees LGBT is a very recent phenomenon?
Genocide:

Show us the death threats man! Not these lame shit!
+ + + +
Rhys demands a female politician to resign for supposedly encouraged transphobia in her party:

The subject naturally leads to his pretend-PTSD:


Can he name the titles he reviewed?
Chase Strangio:
