Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

They would no doubt think of them as being something Hitler would admire, never mind the fact no one gets to choose their own genetics. They would probably think white-skinned Hispanics/Latinos are more privileged, never-mind that even they too get screwed over.

Basically, SJWs are the new racists, only replace racism with "privilege".
 
How to be a good ally:

9OtXs5Y.jpg
No, Michael Brown rests about 45 min from where I'm currently seated, while his supporters attempt to start another riot over it. Policing the tone around here is sort of necessary, given that the local police are about this close to taking off the kid gloves. I understand the issues at play, but the decision has been made that there will be no more dead cops over this. If more shit breaks out, it's going to get ugly, so quelling the anger should be top priority.
 
Bullet sponges maybe?

At this point I don't understand why they even bother inviting people they so obviously hate these rallies. Is it really just to see all these white people bowing their heads submissively like beaten dogs? They don't want allies at all. They want slaves.
And I bet those who have no self-respect and only imaginary friends will be more than gladly to attend this kind of events filled with such hateful people. Apologizing for stuff that has nothing to do with them.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: An Ounce of Vagina
I fucking hate the concept of 'tone policing'. It's the fancy term for "I can scream at you, but you can't say anything back! That's harassment!" Anyone who likes that concept is incapable of acting like a fucking adult.
there are a lot of phrases SJWs use that basically mean "i don't want you to talk"
it's almost as if they collapse if placed outside of their echochambers.
 
I wonder if they'll meet another white SJW there with the same mindset? They'll be yelling at eachother to shut up and it would get hillarious. Even though they both share many common beliefs, they would hate eachother and become enemies solely because of their skin colour... a bit ironic.
I like to think that since most Tumblrinas are so delicate and get "triggered" by everything, they would all have a huge fight if they met in person.
 
I like to think that since most Tumblrinas are so delicate and get "triggered" by everything, they would all have a huge fight if they met in person.

More like they'd be so afraid of each other they'd just get mad and crawl off and cry and then write nasty callout posts at each other once they got home.
 
Ally is such a weird term. In normal life it means being on the same team. Part of that could be drawing attacks from opponents because it would do less damage to them. A tank, basically. But it isn't even that. Most of the attacks come from the SJWs themselves, so it's more like "be my punching bag".

There's also a bit of the same dynamic that happens on this forum when a lolcow enters his own thread. It's like "Do you really want to do this? You're only making things worse for yourself." It's legitimate advice that, if followed, would unquestionably go a lot better for them than not following it. But they'll just scream and rage, and call you a troll or a "problematic ally". It's "tone policing". It's the same exact thing (whether SJW or lolcow) of "I feel angry" with no examination whatsoever of whether that anger is rational, and more importantly, whether throwing a tantrum is a productive use of energy.
 
Ally is such a weird term. In normal life it means being on the same team. Part of that could be drawing attacks from opponents because it would do less damage to them. A tank, basically. But it isn't even that. Most of the attacks come from the SJWs themselves, so it's more like "be my punching bag".

There's also a bit of the same dynamic that happens on this forum when a lolcow enters his own thread. It's like "Do you really want to do this? You're only making things worse for yourself." It's legitimate advice that, if followed, would unquestionably go a lot better for them than not following it. But they'll just scream and rage, and call you a troll or a "problematic ally". It's "tone policing". It's the same exact thing (whether SJW or lolcow) of "I feel angry" with no examination whatsoever of whether that anger is rational, and more importantly, whether throwing a tantrum is a productive use of energy.
"Ally" also tends to mean "someone who helps you". In the SJW context, the highest compliment an "ally" can get is to be told they aren't actively hurting anyone.
 
Well it finally happened. After attempting to ruin movies, books, cartoons, and video games SJWs are trying to ruin sex.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420870/college-affirmative-consent-contract

“yes means yes” advocacy group, the Affirmative Consent Project, is instructing college students to take a picture with a contract before they have sex with each other just to make absolutely sure both parties are officially consenting. In fact, the group has been distributing contracts to schools nationwide as part of its Consent Conscious Kit, according to an article in the Washington Examiner. If no camera is available, students are encouraged to fill out the form on the back of the contract which states, “On this date [fill in the blank], we agree to have consensual sex with one another” followed by a space for students’ printed names and signatures. The kit also also includes breath mints and a condom. The state of California passed a law requiring all colleges that accept state funding to adopt policies requiring all students to obtain affirmative consent — which it defines as “affirmative, conscious, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity” that is “ongoing” and not given when too drunk — before engaging in sexual activity, or else risk punishment for sexual assault. (The University of Minnesota also plans to adopt a similar policy later this month.) Now, in case you think taking a photo with a contract before having sex would be going a bit far with the whole make-sure-you-have-proof-of-affirmative-consent thing – you’re wrong. In fact, it’s not going far enough. After all, affirmative consent policies demand that consent be given repeatedly throughout the entire encounter and that both parties be sober enough to do so. So, just because someone consented when they signed the contract doesn’t necessarily mean that they were consenting the entire time. And, as Ashe Schow points out in the Examiner, a student could always claim she was too drunk to know what she was doing when she signed it.
 
Well it finally happened. After attempting to ruin movies, books, cartoons, and video games SJWs are trying to ruin sex.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/420870/college-affirmative-consent-contract
i dunno, this seems to be more in line with putting up with SJWs
SJWs like to keep certain things nebulous so they can change it later on.
they are especially okay with retroactively saying something is rape.
but now you have a contract.
it wont be long until SJWs bitch about this
"I WAS RAPED INTO SIGNING THE CONTRACT!!!"
"HE WOULDNT HAVE SEX WITH ME UNLESS I SIGNED IT TOO, WHAT AN ABLEIST SHITLORD!!"
and if this is what SJWs want, then fine, they get it.
in fact, let's ramp this shit up.
i say, SJWs should be considerate with others and sign contracts for every fucking little thing now.
as a way of forewarning so as not to alarm anyone (or else someone might get the ptsd triggers and crytype)
 
Back