Dr. Rachel McKinnon / Dr. Veronica Ivy / Rhys McKinnon / Rachel Veronica McKinnon / Foxy Moxy / SportIsARight - failed out of a tenured job,man who competes in womens sports, gained like 100 lbs in 2022 (page 813), comically fell off bike before a race (page 830)

Hey Rhys, did you realize that if you had your neovag surgically turned into a dick, you'd be the single most intersectional person on the planet? You would be double trans! Think about it, nobody could come close to your oppression cred. Well a black trans woman doing the same thing would totes best you but there's no way some stupid nigger (it's okay I said it not you) would be able to afford the second surgery. I'm on your side here bud. You could become something the world has never seen before! Right now you occupy three stripes on the rainbow flag. If you got a second reasignment surgery, you'd OWN that motherfucker.

If you want to get back on television, this is how you do it. Every reputable news organization in the world will be begging you for commentary and OpEds. Fuck being a guest on Maddow! How would you like a permanent seat on The View? It took a big pair of balls to have yours cut off. It will take even bigger ones to have them recreated from your taint and neovag. The price is high but winners never give up! Dr. Rhys Veronica Ivy Smith, the world's first double-trans gender-non-conforming world record holding champion lesbian and polymath has a damn marketable ring to it. I want to see you next to Whoopie and Joy tearing into Meghan McCain! Onward to Thailand, I have faith in you!
 
Hey Rhys, did you realize that if you had your neovag surgically turned into a dick, you'd be the single most intersectional person on the planet? You would be double trans! Think about it, nobody could come close to your oppression cred.
Tumblr already had a name for this years ago. They call it circumgender. No matter how idiotic some potential SJW parody idea is, there is someone out there who takes it seriously.
 
Tumblr already had a name for this years ago. They call it circumgender. No matter how idiotic some potential SJW parody idea is, there is someone out there who takes it seriously.
Somebody's actually done that?? I wonder if they can give you extra foreskin on your fake dick so you can get circumcised once you're circumgender... I guess that leaves the nullos as winner of the Oppression Olympics (tm)
 
"Complete overlap"
4.png
The link he gives is a page of a menu of a biostat (edit) geographical software called BoundarySeer. It does not define anything and sure does not say anything he claims it says.
This fucker is even dumber and more deranged than the average troon.

Then comes the usual spiel about T level. I almost did not cap it because I'm bored to the death, but here you go.,
4.png
I don't think an average troon is a mere 10lb heavier than an average genuine woman.

78.png
If the researcher had defined the categories before collecting the data, and ensured that each category contained enough samples to ensure sufficient statistical power, you cannot accuse him of data-dredging or "p-hacking"; the accusation only sticks when the researcher performs impromptu subgroup analysis that is not in his original study design. The categories in Bermon and Garnier 2017 -- sports type -- are very well defined beforehand. The most Rhys can say is that although T-restriction is called for in certain events, global restriction is unjustified.

5.png
Guess what he made yet another thread on Testosterone. I really am bored.

+ + + +
Rhys's life-partner must be badgering Rhys to start a "family":
5.png

Random access humor:
5.png
 
Last edited:
It's a good thing that academic Philosophy doesn't require a firm understanding of basic statistical analysis, or ol' Troony McTroonface would be shit out of luck.

",,,there is no clear list of biological features that allow us to remotely cleanly separate men from women."

Um, how about being born with a penis? And testicles? Seems to me those would constitute the entirety of the list of "biological features" that need to be considered to separate men from women.

And you just know that he's typing this up and thinking, "HA! Take THAT, transphobes! My rock solid understanding of SCIENCE has got you now!"

Jesus Christ, just when you think this fucking moron can't possibly display his ignorance and abject stupidity any more clearly, he still manages to surprise you.
 
What a fucking retard. He's trying to say that because the range of testosterone levels is similar in males in females in some dataset, you can't set testosterone level cutoffs for sports eligibility.

Anyone who has ever seen a histogram can immediately tell that the male vs female distributions are very different. The long tail for females is made up of outliers. Without knowing more about the source data, we can't make many conclusions about what is going on there.

He's not an intelligent person.

40842_2017_50_Fig10_HTML~2.jpg


Edit: here's a figure from the paper he cites. The line at 10 nmol/L is the lower end of the reference range for normal males and the value the IOC uses to define hyperandrogenism in females. 11 of the 231 females included in this study had levels about 10 nmol/L. Of the 445 men, 332 were above it.

Edit 2: I'm back for more. He says that "in statistics, complete overlap means..." like he knows what he's talking about. I've never heard of "complete overlap" before so I looked into the boundaryseer software and it is for analysis of spatial overlap. Like, for maps and geographic data.
 
Last edited:
He's not an intelligent person.
He really isn't. A lot of his idiotic takes stem from how hard he tries to twist things to fit the narrative that he belongs in women's sport (some women are taller than some men therefore there I am female, ha!) but he is also just really fucking stupid. It is impossible to completely tease apart the willful stupidity that comes from having to maintain his delusions from just plain idiocy, but his inability to grasp statistics and outliers and averages really shows you that even if he wasn't such a delusional narcissist, he still isn't intelligent.
 
"Complete overlap"
View attachment 1899220
The link he gives is a page of a menu of a biostat (edit) geographical software called BoundarySeer. It does not define anything and sure does not say anything he claims it says.
This fucker is even dumber and more deranged than the average troon.

Then comes the usual spiel about T level. I almost did not cap it because I'm bored to the death, but here you go.,
View attachment 1899234
I don't think an average troon is a mere 10lb heavier than an average genuine woman.

View attachment 1899240
If the researcher had defined the categories before collecting the data, and ensured that each category contained enough samples to ensure sufficient statistical power, you cannot accuse him of data-dredging or "p-hacking"; the accusation only sticks when the researcher performs impromptu subgroup analysis that is not in his original study design. The categories in Bermon and Garnier 2017 -- sports type -- are very well defined beforehand. The most Rhys can say is that although T-restriction is called for in certain events, global restriction is unjustified.

View attachment 1899255
Guess what he made yet another thread on Testosterone. I really am bored.

+ + + +
Rhys's life-partner must be badgering Rhys to start a "family":
View attachment 1899261

Random access humor:
View attachment 1899264
I can’t tell how much Rhys makes these bad arguments out of stupidity and how much from disingenuousness. I suspect it’s mostly latter.

Why can’t some reasonable capable person rebut this shit in a public forum where he can’t wiggle away? When he gets the chance to argue he bamboozles people who are ill-prepared or inclined to properly argue against.

It comes down to this. If one accepts that, as a class, it makes sense to separate male and female athletes in the name of fairness and sport then to make Rhys’s arguments that the class of trans women should compete with the females you have to demonstrate that, on average, trans women have similar biological traits and performance levels as biological females.

This difference is average performance and all this nonsense about the overlap in relevant sex based categories is just that.

The very same arguments that Rhys is trying to use to justify trans women competing in women’s sports can be used to justify men competing in women’s sport.

Arguments that currently trans women do not dominate female sports are just inane because there are very few trans women, so far, competing with the females.

His own example is a strong counter-argument. That a middle aged man can transition, pick up a sport he’s never competed in, and then win at high competitive levels shows precisely that the concerns of female athletes being dominated are entirely justified.

The bottom line is that Rhys thinks, and he admits this, that even if it is the case that trans women will start to dominate female sports this should not be a reason to exclude them from female competition categories.

Give him some credit for consistency because he actually argues that he is “female” not just “trans-feminine”.

Which is insane, but consistently so.

Because of current SJW proprieties apparently reasonably capable arguers are not able to mount a proper defense of female sports and this cretin gets far more airtime to make his specious arguments unopposed than he should.
 
I can’t tell how much Rhys makes these bad arguments out of stupidity and how much from disingenuousness. I suspect it’s mostly latter.

Why can’t some reasonable capable person rebut this shit in a public forum where he can’t wiggle away? When he gets the chance to argue he bamboozles people who are ill-prepared or inclined to properly argue against.

It comes down to this. If one accepts that, as a class, it makes sense to separate male and female athletes in the name of fairness and sport then to make Rhys’s arguments that the class of trans women should compete with the females you have to demonstrate that, on average, trans women have similar biological traits and performance levels as biological females.

This difference is average performance and all this nonsense about the overlap in relevant sex based categories is just that.

The very same arguments that Rhys is trying to use to justify trans women competing in women’s sports can be used to justify men competing in women’s sport.

Arguments that currently trans women do not dominate female sports are just inane because there are very few trans women, so far, competing with the females.

His own example is a strong counter-argument. That a middle aged man can transition, pick up a sport he’s never competed in, and then win at high competitive levels shows precisely that the concerns of female athletes being dominated are entirely justified.

The bottom line is that Rhys thinks, and he admits this, that even if it is the case that trans women will start to dominate female sports this should not be a reason to exclude them from female competition categories.

Give him some credit for consistency because he actually argues that he is “female” not just “trans-feminine”.

Which is insane, but consistently so.

Because of current SJW proprieties apparently reasonably capable arguers are not able to mount a proper defense of female sports and this cretin gets far more airtime to make his specious arguments unopposed than he should.
Rhys is always complaining about lack of a platform, and practically salivates at the thought of validation bucks for making his arguments. I‘d pay to see him participate in an online debate : McKinnon v The Farms. He gets paid at the end, no money if he flounces off. Q&A and rebuttal. Held over a few days, Prediction: he’d be a no show or go down in the third.
 
I think about this every time I visit this thread. For an epistemologist, someone whose life is dedicated to the mystery of how we know what we think we know, an awful lot of his arguments boil down to "because someone else said so."
The great victory of postmodernism, Troon ism and all its cancerous tentacles has been redefining ‘how we know what what we know’ as ‘what I tell you, because I’ll hurt you if you don’t agree.’ (Why yes, that is what abusers do.)
testosterone is a red herring, as are all the gish gallop arguments. All the going off on tangents is designed to confuse amd muddy the waters.
Bottom line:
Men and women compete separately because men as a class are physically superior. You’re a man. Compete with the men.
 
"Complete overlap"
View attachment 1899220
The link he gives is a page of a menu of a biostat (edit) geographical software called BoundarySeer. It does not define anything and sure does not say anything he claims it says.
This fucker is even dumber and more deranged than the average troon.

Then comes the usual spiel about T level. I almost did not cap it because I'm bored to the death, but here you go.,
View attachment 1899234
I don't think an average troon is a mere 10lb heavier than an average genuine woman.

View attachment 1899240
If the researcher had defined the categories before collecting the data, and ensured that each category contained enough samples to ensure sufficient statistical power, you cannot accuse him of data-dredging or "p-hacking"; the accusation only sticks when the researcher performs impromptu subgroup analysis that is not in his original study design. The categories in Bermon and Garnier 2017 -- sports type -- are very well defined beforehand. The most Rhys can say is that although T-restriction is called for in certain events, global restriction is unjustified.

View attachment 1899255
Guess what he made yet another thread on Testosterone. I really am bored.

+ + + +
Rhys's life-partner must be badgering Rhys to start a "family":
View attachment 1899261

Random access humor:
View attachment 1899264
> "We have family structures that don't map to cis land"

Anyone else really, really creeped out by this comment?
 
> "We have family structures that don't map to cis land"

Anyone else really, really creeped out by this comment?
And the other person referring to their "trans daughter" as someone who had "glommed onto them"? Really dismissive for a "family member" - even if not bio, people I know who have built family-like connections with friends don't talk about them like that!
 
Back