Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...school-attack-caught-camera-says-bullied.html

5412086-6317165-image-m-70_1540490802441.jpg

A transgender girl accused of assaulting two students at a Texas high school alleges that she was being bullied and was merely fighting back

Shocking video shows a student identified by police as Travez Perry violently punching, kicking and stomping on a girl in the hallway of Tomball High School.

The female student was transported to the hospital along with a male student, whom Perry allegedly kicked in the face and knocked unconscious.

According to the police report, Perry - who goes by 'Millie' - told officers that the victim has been bullying her and had posted a photo of her on social media with a negative comment.

One Tomball High School parent whose daughter knows Perry said that the 18-year-old had been the target of a death threat.

'From what my daughter has said that the girl that was the bully had posted a picture of Millie saying people like this should die,' the mother, who asked not to be identified by name, told DailyMail.com.

When Perry appeared in court on assault charges, her attorney told a judge that the teen has been undergoing a difficult transition from male to female and that: 'There's more to this story than meets the eye.'

Perry is currently out on bond, according to authorities.

The video of the altercation sparked a widespread debate on social media as some claim Perry was justified in standing up to her alleged bullies and others condemn her use of violence.

The mother who spoke with DailyMail.com has been one of Millie's most ardent defenders on Facebook.

'I do not condone violence at all. But situations like this show that people now a days, not just kids, think they can post what they want. Or say what they want without thinking of who they are hurting,' she said.

'Nobody knows what Millie has gone through, and this could have just been a final straw for her. That is all speculation of course because I don't personally know her or her family, but as a parent and someone who is part of the LGBTQ community this girl needs help and support, not grown men online talking about her private parts and shaming and mocking her.'

One Facebook commenter summed up the views of many, writing: 'This was brutal, and severe! I was bullied for years and never attacked anyone!'

Multiple commenters rejected the gender transition defense and classified the attack as a male senselessly beating a female.

One woman wrote on Facebook: 'This person will get off because they're transitioning. This is an animal. She kicked, and stomped, and beat...not okay. Bullying is not acceptable, but kicking someone in the head. Punishment doesn't fit the crime.'
Click to expand...


FB https://www.facebook.com/travez.perry http://archive.is/mnEmm

FB_IMG_1540539738552.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Islamic Content
  • Informative
  • Winner
Reactions: Kaiba Cuqk63, Sgt. Bidwell_9, William Tyndale and 66 others
Click to expand...
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: GenderCop, ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ, TheBlackVolga and 7 others
CrippleThreat said:
Transgender Navy SEAL: Biden order 'going to give a lot of other individuals that chance to finally be themselves'
When Navy SEAL Ashley Nefzger heard rumblings that President Joe Biden could sign an executive order to repeal a Trump-era ban on most transgender Americans joining the military, she was cautiously hopeful.

View attachment 1901001

"I didn't necessarily want to get my hopes up," she told CNN's Anderson Cooper on "Full Circle" Friday. "I was hopeful for it, but I also wanted to keep my expectations at bay on what exactly it was going to mean."

Nefzger has both lived through and written transgender military history since the Supreme Court allowed Trump's ban on transgender people in the military to go into effect in January 2019. The year the ban took effect, Nefzger -- who had already been serving in the military since 2002 -- officially transitioned and became the first active-duty Navy SEAL in history to identify as transgender. Last week, Biden signed an executive order to repeal the ban.

"That's a weight lifted not only off of my shoulders, but off of so many transgender individuals that are serving right now, but also all of those who are not open and who are still unsure if they want to come out or unsure of themselves," she said. "That's allowing everybody to continue to be themselves without having to worry of any adverse effects from their command or being pushed out. And it allows them to serve with freedom in order to do their job."

Nefzger continued, "So I think it's amazing and I'm happy that it happened, so I think it's going to give a lot of other individuals that chance to finally be themselves while not having to worry about anything else, and hiding."

SPART*A, the Service Members, Partners, Allies for Respect and Tolerance for All, estimates there are 15,000 transgender service members, and the organization is in contact with more than 300 other transgender individuals who are ready to enlist.

Speaking from the Oval Office just before signing the executive order last week, Biden said the order "is reinstating a position that the previous commanders and, as well as the secretaries, have supported. And what I'm doing is enabling all qualified Americans to serve their country in uniform."

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said during a White House briefing that "no one will be separated or discharged from the military or denied reenlistment on the basis of gender identity, and for those transgender service members who were discharged or separated because of gender identity, their cases will be reexamined."

Then-President Donald Trump first announced the ban on Twitter in July 2017, which was rebuked by the Democratic-led House of Representatives and condemned by LGBTQ activists as discriminatory. Trump argued that transgender people in the military would lead to "tremendous medical costs and disruption."

The policy, later officially released by then-Secretary of Defense James Mattis in 2018, blocked individuals who have been diagnosed with a condition known as gender dysphoria from serving, with limited exceptions. The policy specified that individuals without the condition can serve, but only if they do so according to the sex they were assigned at birth.

Trump's ban reversed a policy initially approved by the Defense Department under then-President Barack Obama that was still under final review and that would have allowed transgender individuals to serve in the military.

This is going to be their year, boys!
Click to expand...
We should put all the trannys in war zones, but give them blank rounds.
 
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: Chapstick4Lyfe, chickenbutt, Constellationzero and 4 others
Treasure Champs said:
I have questions.

Is this dude still in the military? Does he just wear bad pink make-up now and call himself a lady name and that's his 'transition'? If there was a ban, how come he wasn't discharged? Is Biden paying for his stink-ditch? Can you be a Navy-SEAL with a stink ditch these days?

I need more hard-hitting journalism than these tranny-panderers, honestly.
Click to expand...

Trump's rule change didn't require kicking trannies out. It just prevented recruiting more or allowing transition in the middle of service, and I think might have kept them out of women's facilities as well.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: Xiphias, ExsanguinateHorizon, Devyn and 5 others
SojuDrnkr said:
We should put all the trannys in war zones, but give them blank rounds.
Click to expand...
No reason to gimp them unnecessarily. Give them live rounds and just see what happens. If they can survive they deserve to.
queue-anon said:
Trump's rule change didn't require kicking trannies out. It just prevented recruiting more or allowing transition in the middle of service, and I think might have kept them out of women's facilities as well.
Click to expand...
From all the fucking bullshit and shrieking of trannies about Druaumph, you'd think he'd ordered all of them gassed instead of making a pretty minor correction in policy.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: TheBlackVolga, queue-anon, CrippleThreat and 3 others


James Caspian, a psychotherapist who was stopped from studying “transregret” as part of his master’s degree is taking his case to the European Court of Human Rights​

Caspian wanted to write his thesis on “trans regret” and “detransition” as part of his MA degree in counselling and psychotherapy at Bath Spa University.



He said it was rejected by the university’s ethics committee in 2017 because it could be deemed “politically incorrect”, and because “attacks on social media may not be confined to the researcher but may involve the university”.
Bath Spa University told PinkNews that James Caspian’s research proposal was not refused because of the subject matter, but “rather because of his proposed methodological approach”.
A spokesperson added: “The university was not satisfied this approach would guarantee the anonymity of his participants or the confidentiality of the data.”
Dean professor for Bath Spa University Kate Reynolds was among those to reject James Caspian’s proposal. She said this was after a discussion with the dean of the institute of education.
According to SomersetLive, Reynolds said: “This is a complex project, and the risks are too great to the university and the university.
“Working on a less ethically complex piece of research to complete the masters would be more appropriate.”
Caspian’s case against the decision reached the Royal Courts of Justice in 2019, but a judge did not permit him to continue with his bid for judicial review.
He told The Telegraph he has “been faced with no alternative” but to take the case to the European Court of Human Rights (EHRC), having exhausted all other options.
His lawyers will argue that Caspian, a counsellor who says he has a decade of experience specialising in therapy for trans people, has seen his right to access the court violated, his freedom to pursue legitimate academic research breached, and that the basis of the decision to interfere with his academic freedom discriminated against him.
He is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre.

Psychotherapist says ‘much is at stake’ for academic freedom.​

Caspian claims 50 people who wanted to reverse their transition had contacted him expressing their regret. Caspian said the individuals “felt too traumatised to talk about it, which made me think we really need to do the research”.
He told The Telegraph that “too much is at stake” for academic freedom and for the “hundreds, if not thousands” of young people “who are saying they are being harmed and often silenced by a rigid view that has become a kind of transgender ideology and permits no discussion”.
He added: “My preliminary research had revealed a growing controversial schism in transgender politics and inpatient experiences which greatly concerned me and confirmed the need for this research.”
Caspian argued people are “self-censoring, not only speech but their thoughts on this issue”.
His legal battle comes in the wake of the landmark High Court ruling in which judges said transgender under-16s must understand the implications both of puberty blockers and of potentially moving on to hormone therapy to consent to the medication.
This judgement is anticipated to have global ramifications, including in the US where trans teenagers’ access to healthcare is under threat in several states from Republican-backed bills.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Hildergarda Binging, Azovka, Yamma Damma and 40 others
"According to SomersetLive, Reynolds said: “This is a complex project, and the risks are too great to the university and the university."

Probably a typo, but this sums up their argument. They don't care how academically valid the study is, they just don't want the name of their university attached to the paper.

It makes sense in a way. If the school let that paper go out to print, in a week there would be rabid hordes of social justice wackos and trans allies pounding down the doors of the university and trying to burn down the library because they printed "Nazi propaganda" and "hate speech" that is "literally killing trans people." And all of this while demanding the resignation of half the staff and the expulsion of anyone who did nothing to stop it being published.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Nebula Slasher, NoSpiceLife, Bibendum and 25 others
This goes beyond just the university wanting to protect itself, the entire field is full of gays and lefties who make sure that crazy ideas like studying what actually makes people gay or why trannies end up regretting their irreversible and destructive surgeries never get funding or publishing
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Nebula Slasher, Bibendum, The Valeyard and 13 others
So I guess trannies truly only mean jack to the left until they decide that they would rather be their birth gender.
"Guys, I think this was a mistake. I had time to reflect and I think I want to be a man. Still, I thank you all for helping me in this journey of self di- wait, where is everyone?"
They left because you arent useful anymore.

Trans regret is an actual thing and pretending otherwise because of the elite's feefees is intellectual dishonesty.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: Nebula Slasher, Hildergarda Binging, Bibendum and 17 others
I was 100% willing to accept there was a valid reason for blocking this. Research methods in psych and other social sciences have become both increasingly stringent and increasingly loose over the last decade or so. What I mean by that is that proposals have become so paint-by-numbers, adequately describing just how data will be collected must be described according to specific sections, and its created a square-peg, round-hole situation where if you're doing your proposal or sending it to the internal review board, the school could require great detail about things that aren't applicable to your study, while at the same time, not have any room for novel elements of your research. Now, that can be good for situations where its a Master's or Doctoral student because they will likely not have the chops to be inventive with their methods yet, but still, IRB and proposal templates cannot account for all common possibilities.

That said, the rationale here is really flimsy.
CatParty said:
A spokesperson added: “The university was not satisfied this approach would guarantee the anonymity of his participants or the confidentiality of the data.”
Dean professor for Bath Spa University Kate Reynolds was among those to reject James Caspian’s proposal. She said this was after a discussion with the dean of the institute of education.
According to SomersetLive, Reynolds said: “This is a complex project, and the risks are too great to the university and the university.
“Working on a less ethically complex piece of research to complete the masters would be more appropriate.”
Click to expand...
That's kinda clear bullshit. Because if the student's method is only creating risks to anonymity and confidentiality, that can be worked with. If the student is a Master's student, then the chair is completely within their scope of responsibility to step in and give guidance. This is a pretty simple problem to overcome. Also its kinda weasel words and talking to different audiences when you say "working on a less ethically complex piece of research" because people less familiar will assume the ethical problem of investigating tranny regret, but people who have done scholastic research projects understand it as meaning the ethical considerations of privacy and anonymity.

At the end of the day though, its kinda shitty to pull this number. If the committee were smart, they would read through the document and find conflicting studies and argue that there is a lack of support to follow this stream of research, especially since a lot of programs are getting on board with the "WHERE'S THE GAP?!" bullshit to hold people back, where some schools are now requiring 3-6 studies where its explicitly stated that further research that precisely matches the purpose of the study is needed. This is becoming common protocol at the online schools to hold people up for more money.

Sorry for the longpost!
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Bibendum, Literally Murdered, Next Task and 8 others
Jimjamflimflam said:
As though this ever stopped them before for any of their faggy pet projects at uni
Click to expand...
Because conservatives, the main group who think "queer studies" are a bag of shit, just roll their eyes and ignore it. They've got jobs and lives and better things to do than go chimp out in front of some university's front gate.
Unemployed troons and their blue haired groupies on the other hand....
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Jann_Hörn, Next Task, Pomme Poire Peche and 11 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back