Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

1612662553396.png
1612662581312.png
1612662558240.png
1612663651249.png
 

Attachments

  • 1612662685951.png
    1612662685951.png
    81 KB · Views: 78
And I'm not sure Marvel ever did anything as retarded as Snowflake and Safespace.
Marvel did Snowflake and Safespace. Marvel also did that America Chavez run and a whole lot more, so they have been demonstrably worse than DC on the woke scale. And I say that as someone who always preferred Marvel to DC.

The amount of terrible they have published over the last few years is insane, and the people responsible still get work despite the lack of sales. The cancer is terminal, and when there's funding that prevents something woke from going broke, it can't ever be excised.
 
Last edited:
Got a souce on that one? Looks like it would be a riot of a read.
Plain text is in the spoiler below.


Billionaires have everything, but not yet quite everything. Possibly the one thing they don’t have is victim status. So they want that. And they’re working on it.
Billionaires cannot fathom why, although some people idolize them, not everyone does. This is nearly as intolerable as it is perplexing. What is this CRITICISM all of a sudden? How can being the obvious winner in our new winner-take-all game not inspire universal admiration from all the losers? Don’t they see how badly they were beaten? So where’s the love? There simply must be a way for a billionaire’s money to buy him love. Or at least peace and quiet!

It was a straightforward deal. Let the rich become richer and everybody would become richer. Whose fault is it that it didn’t quite work out that way? Don’t people see that was really part of the deal? The unwritten part! The unwritten part said, “It’s every person for themselves.” It goes on to say, “Be careful whom you trust to make this kind of deal with.” Don’t forget how Mark Zuckerberg once characterized people who trusted him.


But it’s too late now. Or is it? It seems that some people who are not billionaires still think they may have something to say about how society apportions benefits. Some even have the crazy idea that a billion dollars is more than anybody possibly needs, and is ipso facto a bad thing. BAD thing! What is going on here?
The only reasonable response is for billionaires to redefine billionaires as the real victims. Even calling them billionaires should be considered a slur. Howard Schultz thinks so. He thinks that billionaires should be called “people of means.” Because in the end, he’s a billionaire and you’re not, and the end justifies the man of means.
If money can’t buy a billionaire love, it can certainly at least buy him power. So it follows that Schultz thinks that having billions means he is qualified to run for president. He is so qualified that it doesn’t even matter that his presence in the race makes it more likely that President Trump will get reelected. Now, mind you, Schultz says that he doesn’t like Trump. But like Trump or don’t like him, you have to admit that he is a billionaire. Maybe. He SAYS so! Trust him!
 
Plain text is in the spoiler below.


Billionaires have everything, but not yet quite everything. Possibly the one thing they don’t have is victim status. So they want that. And they’re working on it.
Billionaires cannot fathom why, although some people idolize them, not everyone does. This is nearly as intolerable as it is perplexing. What is this CRITICISM all of a sudden? How can being the obvious winner in our new winner-take-all game not inspire universal admiration from all the losers? Don’t they see how badly they were beaten? So where’s the love? There simply must be a way for a billionaire’s money to buy him love. Or at least peace and quiet!

It was a straightforward deal. Let the rich become richer and everybody would become richer. Whose fault is it that it didn’t quite work out that way? Don’t people see that was really part of the deal? The unwritten part! The unwritten part said, “It’s every person for themselves.” It goes on to say, “Be careful whom you trust to make this kind of deal with.” Don’t forget how Mark Zuckerberg once characterized people who trusted him.


But it’s too late now. Or is it? It seems that some people who are not billionaires still think they may have something to say about how society apportions benefits. Some even have the crazy idea that a billion dollars is more than anybody possibly needs, and is ipso facto a bad thing. BAD thing! What is going on here?
The only reasonable response is for billionaires to redefine billionaires as the real victims. Even calling them billionaires should be considered a slur. Howard Schultz thinks so. He thinks that billionaires should be called “people of means.” Because in the end, he’s a billionaire and you’re not, and the end justifies the man of means.
If money can’t buy a billionaire love, it can certainly at least buy him power. So it follows that Schultz thinks that having billions means he is qualified to run for president. He is so qualified that it doesn’t even matter that his presence in the race makes it more likely that President Trump will get reelected. Now, mind you, Schultz says that he doesn’t like Trump. But like Trump or don’t like him, you have to admit that he is a billionaire. Maybe. He SAYS so! Trust him!
That's only a two year old opinion piece, yet I have this strange feeling that it would not be published today. Clown World has become so much stronger since 2019...
 
Marvel did Snowflake and Safespace. Marvel also did that America Chavez run and a whole lot more, so they have been demonstrably worse than DC on the woke scale. And I say that as someone who always preferred Marvel to DC.

The amount of terrible they have published over the last few years is insane, and the people responsible still get work despite the lack of sales. The cancer is terminal, and when there's funding that prevents something woke from going broke, it can't ever be excised.
Ah, shows how long I've been out of the fandom. America Chavez...I remember that being a thing and my reaction was basically "Oh, they're making new characters with their own titles instead of making Tony Stark troon out? Right on, I guess." Of course the sales were shit because most white American men aren't going to buy a book dedicated to how much they suck just for existing and since that makes up about 85% of the comics fandom so...yeah. At this point, the only thing keeping Marvel from being the avatar of the sunk-cost fallacy is the MCU, and people are more or less getting done with that too.

Plain text is in the spoiler below.


Billionaires have everything, but not yet quite everything. Possibly the one thing they don’t have is victim status. So they want that. And they’re working on it.
Billionaires cannot fathom why, although some people idolize them, not everyone does. This is nearly as intolerable as it is perplexing. What is this CRITICISM all of a sudden? How can being the obvious winner in our new winner-take-all game not inspire universal admiration from all the losers? Don’t they see how badly they were beaten? So where’s the love? There simply must be a way for a billionaire’s money to buy him love. Or at least peace and quiet!

It was a straightforward deal. Let the rich become richer and everybody would become richer. Whose fault is it that it didn’t quite work out that way? Don’t people see that was really part of the deal? The unwritten part! The unwritten part said, “It’s every person for themselves.” It goes on to say, “Be careful whom you trust to make this kind of deal with.” Don’t forget how Mark Zuckerberg once characterized people who trusted him.


But it’s too late now. Or is it? It seems that some people who are not billionaires still think they may have something to say about how society apportions benefits. Some even have the crazy idea that a billion dollars is more than anybody possibly needs, and is ipso facto a bad thing. BAD thing! What is going on here?
The only reasonable response is for billionaires to redefine billionaires as the real victims. Even calling them billionaires should be considered a slur. Howard Schultz thinks so. He thinks that billionaires should be called “people of means.” Because in the end, he’s a billionaire and you’re not, and the end justifies the man of means.
If money can’t buy a billionaire love, it can certainly at least buy him power. So it follows that Schultz thinks that having billions means he is qualified to run for president. He is so qualified that it doesn’t even matter that his presence in the race makes it more likely that President Trump will get reelected. Now, mind you, Schultz says that he doesn’t like Trump. But like Trump or don’t like him, you have to admit that he is a billionaire. Maybe. He SAYS so! Trust him!
Late. I thought this would be a Gamestop hedgie white knight I could laugh at, but it's just an old spergout.
 
Let me remind you that these people hate KF because we doxx [sic] people.
I'm not one for conspiracies about the Jews - as I've said on some other threads, the fight isn't between the Jews and Gentiles but between the 1% and the 99%, and the fact Jews are overrepresented in that 1% doesn't mean we should throw the baby out with the bathwater and go after a whole religion.

That said, when it comes to shit like this, I can understand why things like the Protocols of the Elders of Zion became so popular.
 
the fight isn't between the Jews and Gentiles but between the 1% and the 99%
I also find it hilarious that in the article they say the old adage of "Let people be" as a way of letting things run its course and eventually, things will sort themselves out. But people forget that this mentality comes from an age where a rich guy usually set up his factory in your city and create a truckload of jobs out of it, therefore creating a lot of wealth not only for himself, but those around him. Now instead that sucker outsources his company to 11 sweatshops in china while everyone back at home is peniless and try to scrounge for a job that barely pays their rent. And then they wonder why suddenly, a lot of destitute people that see the rich become ever richer by using slave labour (as we have seen constantly through the last years) while they become more poor by the day hate them. And it's not that people want to go and sieze their fucking bank accounts and string them from trees, they just want them to pay decent wages for their workers and respect their rights, even if we see that these rights get infringed constantly in this day and age and people put up with it constantly because the other option is to go back to the never ending task of looking for another job in an already saturated market where prospects are beyond grim.

Their detachment is astounding but pieces like this still remind me that maybe, even with all they have, they are still afraid of all these disgruntled people.
 
My opinion, and I know this is controversial, is that both men and women have a part to play in stopping rape. If you walk down a dark alley wearing a low-cut dress, bad things may well happen to you in the same way you shouldn't walk down a dark alley waving a wad of cash and a new mobile around.

This doesn't excuse rape or theft, but it means that people who do downright stupid things shouldn't be surprised when they're taken advantage of.
 
Back