I actually like this tweet. It is a racial stereotype for black people that they're angry all the time, and that they read as angry when they're not. And sure, some of them are, but I feel it can be valid for a black person to be upset that unless they maintain Prince Valium levels of cool at all times, and no matter how much provocation it takes for them to lose their temper, that they do it once and it's assumed that anger is their default state.
There's a whole thing I've been thinking about, how female rage is being celebrated while male anger is being demonised. And it ties into the fundamental attribution error beloved of SJWs, where
their anger is morally justified and overcoming oppression, while
your anger is mindless rage that's childish, uncalled for and yet dangerously violent. So I feel like I get where she's coming from, where no matter how much her anger might be an aberration, it's still used by others to define her - and that this perception, left and right, is often applied to black people, justified or not.
Of course this would all be undercut if it turns out she flies into rages at the drop of a hat, but even so I feel like I get, and sympathise with, her larger point. And, as
@AnOminous points out, humans in general and over social media in particular are very quick to define you by your worst moments, which isn't fair to anybody but people whose while lives are a series of terrible moments, like a great many of our cows.
