Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%
  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%
  • Null

    Votes: 1,453 55.8%
  • Kanye West

    Votes: 285 11.0%
  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 609 23.4%

  • Total voters
    2,602
When it comes to Rusty, his relationship with his former religion is the most interesting aspect at certain times. He may no longer be in good standing, and at certain times bashes on it, but he certainly still lives by most of the guidelines. It's also ironic that he'll defend it.

My theory is that Russhole clings onto various aspects of Mormonism because it's another way for him to feel superior to other people. Not saying that Mormons as a rule view following their religion's dietary guidelines that way; in my experience, Mormons are generally chill towards non-Mormons. But Russhole is a malignant narcissist. He inherently and unshakably believes he is better than all other human beings. So he'll absolutely use the rules of his upbringing to find fault in others in comparison to himself.

Him using the standards of Mormonism to negatively judge others comes out most strongly in his reaction to seeing people drinking alcohol (especially women). Like how he brought up the fact the prostitute he went on a "date" to the Cheesecake Factory with ordered wine as if she'd done something shameful, something that proved she was a terrible person he was right to slander on the Internet.

As for why he continues to defend Mormons (even ones accused of abusing their power in the church) and Mormonism despite claiming he hates the religion (solely because it frowns on extramarital sex and hiring sex workers), I don't quite get that. It's kinda like how he'd always defend Trump on Facebook--and attack people who said negative things about Trump--while insisting he wasn't a Trump fan and that he was an "independent" voter.

Also, Lutherans get bonuses to stamina and cold resistance.
 
My theory is that Russhole clings onto various aspects of Mormonism because it's another way for him to feel superior to other people. Not saying that Mormons as a rule view following their religion's dietary guidelines that way; in my experience, Mormons are generally chill towards non-Mormons. But Russhole is a malignant narcissist. He inherently and unshakably believes he is better than all other human beings. So he'll absolutely use the rules of his upbringing to find fault in others in comparison to himself.

Him using the standards of Mormonism to negatively judge others comes out most strongly in his reaction to seeing people drinking alcohol (especially women). Like how he brought up the fact the prostitute he went on a "date" to the Cheesecake Factory with ordered wine as if she'd done something shameful, something that proved she was a terrible person he was right to slander on the Internet.

As for why he continues to defend Mormons (even ones accused of abusing their power in the church) and Mormonism despite claiming he hates the religion (solely because it frowns on extramarital sex and hiring sex workers), I don't quite get that. It's kinda like how he'd always defend Trump on Facebook--and attack people who said negative things about Trump--while insisting he wasn't a Trump fan and that he was an "independent" voter.

Also, Lutherans get bonuses to stamina and cold resistance.
I think you're right. He really, really doesn't like people drinking alcohol. He gave up on Trump when he sent a copy of his book to the White House and thought Trump would personally read it. When he didn't get invited to the White House to explain why the First Amendment shouldn't apply to people talking about him, he put Trump in the "not useful" box. He does cling to parts of the religion that don't keep him from doing what he wants to so he can feel superior, like you said. He's also not very creative so I don't think he could come up with a whole new set of ethics to live by. He just discarded the part that kept him from fucking outside of marriage because he feels like he is owed sex for having a visible disability.

Methodists get bonuses to Will saves regarding attempts to make them gamble.
 
As for why he continues to defend Mormons (even ones accused of abusing their power in the church) and Mormonism despite claiming he hates the religion (solely because it frowns on extramarital sex and hiring sex workers), I don't quite get that.
I think he temporarily becomes LDS again when others criticize the religion because it feeds his victim complex.
 
He might as well have said "i like turtles". He has the social graces of an 8 year old sitting at the adult table.
In that same tone "I like hookers"

Edit: posted by @Zombiefaceddwarf Sept 2018
h3.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
View attachment 1910134
Guys, this guy comes up to your girl in da club and says
"I pay hookers" wyd?
My man doesn’t even make it across the floor in time to stop me from wailing on this walking hairball.

Seriously, he looks like if you got some cheese, rolled into a big ball in your hands until it was all soft and greasy, then rolled it about in hair clippings on the floor of a barber shop. Likely smells the same too.
 
New Russ filing in his "lawsuit with" @Null . What an incredible job at formatting.

And such impressive due diligence at attempting to find an address to serve. "I don't know his address and some unnamed blogs (presumably from Samuel Collingwood Smith) don't know either."
ratalt1.pngratalt2.pngratalt3.pngratalt4.pngratalt5.png
 
New Russ filing in his "lawsuit with" @Null . What an incredible job at formatting.

And such impressive due diligence at attempting to find an address to serve. "I don't know his address and some unnamed blogs (presumably from Samuel Collingwood Smith) don't know either."
View attachment 1911198View attachment 1911199View attachment 1911200View attachment 1911201View attachment 1911202
Can't wait for this to get thrown out...and Greer's inevitable reaction to it. "Alternate service should be granted because hurr durr, muh plights make me too dumb to read or understand what I'm writing" is what I got out of all that. Also, maybe I'm also dumb when it comes to law, but....the "evidence" screenshot. What does that specific screenshot have to do with what he's claiming? It's basically just Null stating he's within the law and doesn't prove Russ's point at all, in fact it proves the opposite. Russ never ceases to amaze me, every time I think he can't be THAT dumb he goes and proves he is indeed that dumb.
 
His arguments are not enough according to Utah Gov Website .

Also, BONNEVILLE BILLING v. WHATLEY shows that he needed to:
1. He needed an affidavit showing his attempts to find Null. ( "the party seeking service of process may file a motion supported by affidavit requesting an order allowing service by publication, by mail, or by some other means.", "the supporting affidavit shall set forth the efforts made to identify, locate or serve the party to be served, or the circumstances which make it impracticable to serve all of the individual parties."
2. It needs to be more than just trying to look for address on the Farm's website ("Due diligence requires more than attempting to contact addresses on a single form.")

Because Russel lied, and provided no affidavit, the court has no jurisdiction over Null ("It follows therefore that if a plaintiff falsely avers or intentionally misleads a court to believe that he or she has exercised such diligence when he or she has not done so, the court, although at the time appearing to have jurisdiction, never had jurisdiction because the plaintiff never met the constitutional mandate." )

Tl;Dr: both the Gov Website, and caselaw say Russel did not do enough

EDIT: This is also wrong according to FRCP Rule 4 (h), FRCP Rule 4 (f) (1), (2) (a), (2) (b), (2) (c) (i)

How can one study law and yet know so little about it?
I genuinely don't know. This is basic stuff.
 
Last edited:
His arguments are not enough according to Utah Gov Website .

Also, BONNEVILLE BILLING v. WHATLEY shows that he needed to:
1. He needed an affidavit showing his attempts to find Null. ( "the party seeking service of process may file a motion supported by affidavit requesting an order allowing service by publication, by mail, or by some other means.", "he supporting affidavit shall set forth the efforts made to identify, locate or serve the party to be served, or the circumstances which make it impracticable to serve all of the individual parties."
2. It needs to be more than just trying to look for address on the Farm's website ("Due diligence requires more than attempting to contact addresses on a single form.")

Because Russel lied, and provided no affidavit, the court has no jurisdiction over Null ("It follows therefore that if a plaintiff falsely avers or intentionally misleads a court to believe that he or she has exercised such diligence when he or she has not done so, the court, although at the time appearing to have jurisdiction, never had jurisdiction because the plaintiff never met the constitutional mandate." )

Tl;Dr: both the Gov Website, and caselaw say Russel did not do enough
How can one study law and yet know so little about it?
 
Can't wait for this to get thrown out...and Greer's inevitable reaction to it. "Alternate service should be granted because hurr durr, muh plights make me too dumb to read or understand what I'm writing" is what I got out of all that. Also, maybe I'm also dumb when it comes to law, but....the "evidence" screenshot. What does that specific screenshot have to do with what he's claiming? It's basically just Null stating he's within the law and doesn't prove Russ's point at all, in fact it proves the opposite. Russ never ceases to amaze me, every time I think he can't be THAT dumb he goes and proves he is indeed that dumb.
Russ is using that screenshot to try and convince the court that, since the website says to send legal documents to a particular email address, that the court should do so rather than attempting to serve through regular means.
 
Back