Diseased #Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

Alazmat finishes by saying he "is not done with Comicsgate, but a lot of the criticism is valid." The comment section is graced by @FROG himself in what could've been an interesting conversation if it weren't derailed by some Fandom Reject retard called Sno Dub Entertainment.
I remember Sno Dub. He was likeable at one point from the times I tune into the Trash Compactor Show to see some amusing insanity. I stopped by his channel to see how that was going for him. Over 1k subs and he's monetized, but those views look like a channel crawling out of infancy save for a few vids that have some high numbered views. It appears on his own, he's about as interesting as a wet paper napkin.

SnoDub.PNG


Doesn't look like he was strong enough on his own to attract a crowd. I'm no expert, but at 1k+ subs, shouldn't he be doing a little better? Some of these videos can't even crack 50. Now, if that's all there was too it, I wouldn't even bother bringing him up. See, Sno Dub caught a nasty case of faggotry and is now buddying up with those calling themselves the Fandom Rejects. I haven't paid much attention to them outside of a few instances here and there, my notable contribution was doxing a self proclaimed Fandom Menace tard named Drew Taylor. Now I don't think Drew himself engages with him much, but he's butt buddies with a known sperg named That Nigel Movie Guy. Good ol Nigel also went by the alias Rich Troll and is/was also buddies with Mecha McCheese.

What I find ironic is Sno Dub bitching about the Trash Compactor crew and Testefy being toxic meanie heads or some dumb shit, while hanging out with his current batch of insufferable twats. Nigel is a well known spamfag in live streams and due to his own stupid ass leading people to believe he's Drew is what ultimately lead me to plastering Drew's face on the Farms(Drew's still a retard and deserves his spot here regardless). Nigel is also cool with dem War Campaign boys and more often than not he will hate watch an Etsy stream all the way through. To Nigel's credit, he has ceased being a spammy tard that I'm aware of. He's still incredibly fucking stupid and should be mocked and ridiculed on sight.

If I'm incorrect @TESTEFY-HD can correct me or elaborate more, as I haven't paid a whole lot of attention to Sno Dub aside from here and there.
 
Baby Yoda is beyond retarded. I refuse to subscribe to Disney+ for a variety of reasons but mostly because SJW's annoy the hell out of me with that gay ass yoda thing. Pure merchandising.
My local Family Dollar always has ads proclaiming "The child is back!"

And I'm always like "that's great, but could you concentrate more on having asswipe in stock?"

Priorities. #oldpeopleproblems
 
As the Minister for KGB Rainbow Gay Operations I can confirm that there has been zero sanctioned attacks or anti Piper propaganda coming from our side.

I look forward to any alleged screenshots being shared because I can assure you if there is a saboteur in our ranks they will feel the full wrath of my iron fist. In their anus.
You say this Mark, but it was fully acknowledged in that stream that someone is going through Piper's exhausting six hour drunken copestreams where most of the viewers are on the panel with her with a fine toothed comb to report back anything relevant to this circle you're in. How is that supposed to come across as?

Of course as @Mister Dongs previously pointed out launching 28 Comicsgate books within the space of two months right after Christmas when credit cards are still probably being paid off surely had nothing to do with it at all.

CG in 2019 had 80 projects totaling 4.2 million dollars
CG in 2020 had 126 projects totaling 6.5 million dollars (both numbers including Doug TenNapel)

CG in 2021 has had 28 projects launched by the end of January, which at that rate will total 336 projects by end of year, grossing a projected $1.975 M, barring new campaigns being launched by the top-fifth (of whom only Zack and Graham Nolan have launched a campaign).

This creator glut, without a corresponding increase in customer pool, is a problem of Malthusian proportions barring some innovation regarding crowdfunding or gathering an audience. Personally I don't think this will go on for the full year before this problem "corrects itself", either in gearing back the creation of new projects, someone devising a way to find new backers, but probably in the form of some sort of catastrophic collapse. Trying to replicate past success by building an audience on the mainstream's decline or the lawsuit against Mark Waid as the established CGers did doesn't seem viable either.

Having an audience is a core component of self-marketing (which is essential), but as Frog pointed out with Doug's success, nearly all of the people who have had real success with youtube, whatever they started out as they become youtubers exclusively as the path of least resistance when it comes to enriching themselves.
 
Last edited:
This is most most internal criticism and introspection I've ever witnessed in Comicsgate, aside from possibly late 2018 and during the Fall of Rome saga in 2019. This time without self-appointed larping legionaires to police the Comicsgate community for wrong think, problems are now being openly discussed along with possible solutions. The current sense of impending doom seems to stem from what I believe to be a sense of weariness from a significant portion of the Comicsgate fanbase, enough to warrant discussion across several channels from both fans and creators alike. Key issues seem to include:
  • Unfulfilled books and long wait times, sometimes even years in the case of high profile books like Red Rooster, Brand and Brutas The Badass.​
  • The launching of multiple campaigns before the previous campaigns have fulfilled.​
  • The story and characters are subpar for $25 plus shipping for comic books which are marketed as boutique items.​
  • A sense of fatigue with the "culture war" aspect after Zack cucked out on the lawsuit.​
Couple this with what so far has been a lackluster beginning to CG 2021 in terms of crowdfunding revenue, this might explain some of the friction we previously witnessed between Piper and Mandy Summers as the latter is struggling to explain why Wart the Wizard 2 isn't performing as well as she initially hoped. Of course as @Mister Dongs previously pointed out launching 28 Comicsgate books within the space of two months right after Christmas when credit cards are still probably being paid off surely had nothing to do with it at all.

I wonder if War Campaign hadn't have been as vociferous in their condemnation and punishment of ComicsGate dissidents, maybe many of the problems/concerns outlined above would have been examined and solved well over a year or two ago? That maybe the length of time people have been thinking about these issues compounds the current feelings of dissatisfaction finally being expressed by CGers? Would working this out sooner have maimed CG or made it stronger?
 
With all the big news lately surrounding Zack and his relaunch of Rock N Roll Ninja, Martina Markota and her legal woes over Lady Alchemy, we may not have noticed a general sense of malaise beginning to brew within certain corners of Comicsgate. Murmurs of discontentment, followed by moments of self realization and introspection have began to trickle it's way into my feed. Slowly at first but over the past week the topic of Comicsgate and this general sense of unease has begun to get louder within the current CG zeitgeist. I had planned on addressing the underlying sense of dread spreading throughout Comicsgate like a contagion, however something else always popped up. Now feels like a good time given @Mister Dongs recent writeup on the Mandy v Piper catfight, so in the following post I will do my best to explain the situation and give an assessment on what could be causing it.

Late Night with Comicsgate (4th String): CG Burnout, is it real?


Our story begins in late January CG2021 on an obscure corner of Comicsgate known as Leroi/4th String, Leroi, our host, poses a question in his title "CG Burnout, is it real?" leaving the audience to decide. This title is what first caught my eye since most CG streams involve the drama of the week or book promotion and rarely ask the viewer such an introspective question. Leroi begins the stream and is joined by his two co-hosts Vanessa, Lord Crackhead and special guest Eric Weathers, the latter of which needing no introduction as nearly every Comicsgate book features lettering by Eric and he has crowdfunded his own two books Flying Fortress and Battle Brick Road.

The stream begins with the typical small talk and shilling of Eric's projects when todays topic is finally broached at the 14 minute mark where Leroi states that he knows certain creators come and go, but now he is noticing people slowly start to disappear from the chat due to "burnout." Both the co-hosts chime in and explain their thoughts, with Vanessa explaining that the streams consume too much time and she has her own bills to pay and would prefer to avoid drama. Leroi then goes on to praise Eric's channel as being drama free and a place to avoid it "especially as all that shit with Warcampaign went down" which Eric agrees with. The topic then reverts back to shilling and the upcoming collaboration between Eric and Von Klaus on a sequel to Monster MD upcoming in future, before a question from The Lucent creator Michael Bancroft gets the panel back on topic at the 33 minute mark.


Leroi answers that with so many creators and so many streams, it's near impossible to watch them all and perhaps some people are getting burnt out by trying to. Leroi admits that sometimes he'll go to a certain creators stream, mute it and give it a thumbs up before going to watch tv or do something else entirely. Users from the chat agree with him stating "there's only so much time in a day", "excitement has a shelf life" and "there's very little awesome to be had. imo" showing that this topic is resonating with elements of the CG audience. Leroi goes on to ask Vanessa how she feels and she answers that she feels burnt out after backing too many campaigns and has limited herself to two a month and that "FOMO" (fear of missing out) no longer plays apart in her decision to back as many projects as she can. The second co-host Lord Crackhead agrees with her and states that he has only purchased three books this year and is already feeling the need to "unplug" and go do something else like watch a movie.

The rest of the stream becomes less thrilling and more shilling but offers the first course of what is becoming a trend of serious streams discussing some issues appearing within Comicsgate lately. Of course the comment section offers yet another window into the mind of the everyday CG citizen.

View attachment 1915867

The Chat: Is there a "right" way to do things in CG?


Again coming from Leroi's channel several weeks later would be another discussion on Comicsgate with another introspective clickbait titled question to the viewer. The host is again joined by his two co-hosts from the previous stream, a woman called Amanda and resident Comicsgate maestro Lord Finatra as they go over a series of campaigns that just launched. The entries include Wart the Wizard 2, The Ace Volume One, Shotgun Samurai, Hybrids: The Killing Field, Supervillains Anonymous and Rock N Roll Ninja, the last two being the only books to currently break the five digit threshold and all having launched in January or February of this year.

The stream opens with the panel dunking on Zack and his recent clusterfuck with his Rock N Roll Ninja campaign, something that would have been considered Comicsgate heresy only mere months ago. Most of the criticism seems to stem from Zack's comments on the debacle in addition to several of his comics being overdue while launching multiple new campaigns. The panel then moves on to if there's a correct way for a creator to enter the Comicsgate sphere agreeing that "if someone just shows up with a comic to sell without engaging with the audience first it's a massive turn off." Who the panel is talking about is left ambiguous but appears to stem from the glut of new CG books that have oversaturated the space over the past two months as @Mister Dongs mentioned above.


The stream meanders on and touches on the antics of creators within Comicsgate, honorable mentions to Warcampaign and Liam Gray whom Vanessa admits she refused to back due to their behavior, before a new guest called Hocky states he refuses to back any campaign which doesn't include interior art on the campaign page. The panel then segues into drama and whether or not it is a vehicle that can be utilized to drive views and sales, while all the panelists agree they aren't interested in drama, Amanda points out that the quickest growing channels are usually the ones focusing on it. The entire second half of the livestream turns into a discussion on chat etiquette and can be skipped.

Crowd Funding Slowdown


Perhaps the most interesting and passionate video collected comes from Inch High Comic Guy, who comes across as an angrier and more energetic Comic Book Hut. IHCG who is mostly known for his five part series putting Zack on blast for his book Pandemic, once again doesn't fail to deliver in an explosive tirade. He begins the stream by throwing down three unopened Comicsgate packages and a copy of USAssassin, the latter of which was opened but remains unread. IHCG immediately goes into his reasoning for losing interest in Comicsgate:

2:18 - Mark Waid and the cuckery of Zack in regards to the lawsuit, stating that he joined Comicsgate because he heard about the lawsuit and it was his entry into the movement. He argues that now that the lawsuit is over "Comicsgate will now have to stand on it's merits" rather than blindly receiving support for fighting a culture war.

4:04 - From standing on it's merits, he then goes into his second issue with Comicsgate, which is comparing it to Image Comics when they were first founded. He extrapolates by stating "Cool artwork bro comes first and story isn't even on the agenda" explaining that the artwork in Comicsgate is great, much like early Image, but will fail to have any longevity due to poor writing. He further goes on to criticize the lateness of the books, stating that the creators often fail to deliver on their own self-imposed deadlines.

7:15 - Comicsgate has no characters, at least no memorable characters other than pre-existing legacy characters like Cyberfrog and Shi. He follows up by stating the characters from Graveyard Shift are completely forgettable and over half the Jawbreakers team is dead so why be invested in them.

He then goes on to explain that the best Comicsgate books he has received in terms of writing and story telling haven't come from the Comicsgate Pros, but rather three of the smaller creators namely Stump, Kyrie and Elysian Fields which between the three of them struggled to collectively raise over 25K (not including spin-offs and sequels). IHCG attributes this to getting "no attention or play in the Comicsgate industry because good characters and story comes in a distant last place for the Comicsgate leadership." He claims that Kyrie is the best book in Comicsgate with Elysian Fields coming in a close second place with the two being praised for their story and writing, while Stump is praised for the main protagonist.

The comment section is 50/50 of people agreeing with him and others politely disagreeing with his points and the entire video was efapped by War Party creator Professor Murf on his channel here. What's interesting is previous Comicsgate dissidents were often exiled and purged for their criticisms, normally by Warcampaign, however now there appears to be more understanding when dealing with such individuals. Murf claims that if many backers begin feeling like IHCG then the movement should be concerned at what could become a potential problem moving forward.

After 2 Years, What are My Thoughts on CG?


Our next video comes from Roadwarrior Drake creator Alazmat Films, a regular guest on The Trash Compactor Show along with @TESTEFY-HD and offers an unique opinion from a creator rather than simply the fans from our previous videos. Alazmat begins by updating his backers on the status of his book and announcing that the book will also be launching on Kickstarter, possibly being the first Comicsgate book to utilize both platforms. Alazmat goes into his history of joining CG and rather somberly mentions a list of people he used to enjoy watching who are no longer affiliated with it including; Englentine, Unranked Chevron, Nerdette's NewsStand, Doug TenNapel and Mike S Miller and comments how so much has changed in two years. He continues to explain that CG felt like a bigger circle back then, than it does now even referencing former customers like Bean from PA, Lorenzo Sleestak and Rumble Terrier. Alazmat goes on to claim that "Comicsgate will live and die with Ethan VanSciver and this wasn't true two years ago" he goes onto explain that "this is neither a good or bad thing, just an observation." He compares Ethan to the "life support system of Comicsgate" and the moment he leaves it will probably die, which honestly is an assessment I agree with. Alazmat goes on to say he has many criticisms of CG but one criticism that is false is that it's a hate group, his valid criticisms include:

8:30 - creators that don't update their backers when they're late on their books. Alazmat also claims that it is against Indiegogo's Terms of Service to not update your backers at least once a month.

10:14 - anytime a creator is criticized, sometimes rightly so, they double down and label their critics "anti-CG" despite them expressing pro-CG ideals and beliefs. Alazmat admits this is something he also did previously, but admits he was wrong for doing so.

11:08 - being in it for the money, when looking at creators who set high funding goals and who abuse the backers trust like Mitch Breitweiser and the creators of Galactic Rodents of Mayhem.

Alazmat continues by stating no one has a problem with criticizing Marvel or DC but when it comes to criticizing other Comicsgaters when it comes to doxing, grifting and false flagging channels much of the community remains silent. Alazmat also expresses that criticism of art within CG is to high and he believes that underground, raw indie art styles have a place in Comicsgate as opposed to the Jim Lee and Robert Liefeld homages of the big pros. He cites his own work and the recent drama surrounding @Wenger with Dragoon Knight Aldrake and the fallout afterwards.

Alazmat finishes by saying he "is not done with Comicsgate, but a lot of the criticism is valid." The comment section is graced by @FROG himself in what could've been an interesting conversation if it weren't derailed by some Fandom Reject retard called Sno Dub Entertainment.

View attachment 1915868


What do COMICSGATE FANS expect from CREATORS?


Our final video of the evening (thank God) comes from The Lucent creator Michael Bancroft who hosts "The 4th String" members from our first example, bringing on Leroi, George, Amanda and Lord Crackhead to talk about the issues they had previously brought up. Bancroft opens that he receives DMs constantly from people with criticisms of Comicsgate, most recently someone complaining about subpar writing after just receiving a book in the mail and decrying the lack of editors. The panel agrees that if you are charging $25, plus shipping, with months long waits for it to arrive you better be releasing a quality book. They also discuss how nearly every campaign now is $25 and question whether these books can charge the same amount as Ethan VanSciver and Jon Malin.

The second grumbling Bancroft hears is of certain creators desiring promotion but not "grabbing an oar" to help promote others and the lack of tracking numbers for campaign packages. The panel also shouts out Professor Murf and his recent efap of Inch High Comics Guy's video as another example of growing criticism within Comicsgate, as opposed to outside of it. Bancroft also agrees that if more backers begin to feel like Inch High Comics Guy then the movement might be "in real trouble." A possible remedy the panel suggests is having at least half of the book complete before launching the crowdfunding campaign, to cut down on waiting times.

The stream meanders on for a while until George addresses the elephant in the room of "so many unfulfilled books and launching more" obviously referencing Zack's recent "flood the shelves" strategy without naming him. The panel unanimously agrees that ever having more than two active unfulfilled campaigns is completely unacceptable. Bancroft very insighfully claims at the 38:00 mark that "as we move away from that crazy wild west era of 2018, it does seem like people will be putting up with less" referencing what the backers are willing to tolerate from creators.

It would appear not even deaf, sex perverts are exempt from criticism these days.

This is most most internal criticism and introspection I've ever witnessed in Comicsgate, aside from possibly late 2018 and during the Fall of Rome saga in 2019. This time without self-appointed larping legionaires to police the Comicsgate community for wrong think, problems are now being openly discussed along with possible solutions. The current sense of impending doom seems to stem from what I believe to be a sense of weariness from a significant portion of the Comicsgate fanbase, enough to warrant discussion across several channels from both fans and creators alike. Key issues seem to include:
  • Unfulfilled books and long wait times, sometimes even years in the case of high profile books like Red Rooster, Brand and Brutas The Badass.​
  • The launching of multiple campaigns before the previous campaigns have fulfilled.​
  • The story and characters are subpar for $25 plus shipping for comic books which are marketed as boutique items.​
  • A sense of fatigue with the "culture war" aspect after Zack cucked out on the lawsuit.​
Couple this with what so far has been a lackluster beginning to CG 2021 in terms of crowdfunding revenue, this might explain some of the friction we previously witnessed between Piper and Mandy Summers as the latter is struggling to explain why Wart the Wizard 2 isn't performing as well as she initially hoped. Of course as @Mister Dongs previously pointed out launching 28 Comicsgate books within the space of two months right after Christmas when credit cards are still probably being paid off surely had nothing to do with it at all.
You say this Mark, but it was fully acknowledged in that stream that someone is going through Piper's exhausting six hour drunken copestreams where most of the viewers are on the panel with her with a fine toothed comb to report back anything relevant to this circle you're in. How is that supposed to come across as?



CG in 2019 had 80 projects totaling 4.2 million dollars
CG in 2020 had 126 projects totaling 6.5 million dollars (both numbers including Doug TenNapel)

CG in 2021 has had 28 projects launched by the end of January, which at that rate will total 336 projects by end of year, grossing a projected $1.975 M, barring new campaigns being launched by the top-fifth (of whom only Zack and Graham Nolan have launched a campaign).

This creator glut, without a corresponding increase in customer pool, is a problem of Malthusian proportions barring some innovation regarding crowdfunding or gathering an audience. Personally I don't think this will go on for the full year before this problem "corrects itself", either in gearing back the creation of new projects, someone devising a way to find new backers, but probably in the form of some sort of catastrophic collapse. Trying to replicate past success by building an audience on the mainstream's decline or the lawsuit against Mark Waid as the established CGers did doesn't seem viable either.

Having an audience is a core component of self-marketing (which is essential), but as Frog pointed out with Doug's success, nearly all of the people who have had real success with youtube, whatever they started out as they become youtubers exclusively as the path of least resistance when it comes to enriching themselves.
:popcorn:


So much good stuff. Where to begin?

Stuff that stood out...

>Boy Inch High is bad. Better than Hutt, but his voice/tone is pretentious and forced. If he wants to do the YT thing he needs to get that basic part of broadcasting down, because my head started hurting after five seconds. Despite that, his presentation is better than many "professional" tubers in the CG sphere and if he sharpens his craft and develops his voice, he could actually be a good listen.

>Alazmat Films is referencing some twitter spergs who're like that weirdo with the pug avatar that chimps out at Ethan every five minutes. I agree with Smug that CG has become Ethan and his afterparty tag-a-longs. I just don't know what else Alazwhosit wants? The gate was over more than a year ago and American comics lost. At this point it's simply fighting over pay piggies and that's not changing directions, but bank accounts. He slips up by griefing over sales for indie art styles.

>Taken as a whole I'm hearing allot of wannabes complaining that they can't stand up to the likes of Billy Tucci and Ethan Van Sciver. Absolutely, I'm open to fundraising dropping and I even feel the Farms would be vindicated for pointing out the shit consumer practices of large swathes of CG. But I don't know that we've seen that across the board. What has happened is that there's money for people with established audiences and big names. But a book with artwork that looks like the crayon scribbles of a preschooler will sell like one and even if you bring the goods you actually need pay piggies who know you aren't going to Rooster them...
 
I wonder if War Campaign hadn't have been as vociferous in their condemnation and punishment of ComicsGate dissidents, maybe many of the problems/concerns outlined above would have been examined and solved well over a year or two ago
Possibly, but I remember a lot of the criticisms being of the "Frog is part of a money laundering operation by the Church of Latter Day Saints" variety. I wouldn't even say the worst was the loss of hundreds of thousands of potential customers who were repelled from CG upon seeing the "movement" represented by packs of cretinous sperglords like Mikey Woodz spamming cringe at anyone they disagreed with even mildly, which I'd argue was far more damaging than the criticism itself.

I'd say the real loss was the countless smaller creators (both comics and youtube) who were driven off for failing to show ideological conformity and fealty to the self-appointed representatives of the consumer advocacy movement and simply disengaged and were never heard from again. They would have been the ones to possibly think of some new solution to lower costs, make inroads with the mainstream, improve distribution or expand the current customer base in ways nobody has considered. We'll never know.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if War Campaign hadn't have been as vociferous in their condemnation and punishment of ComicsGate dissidents, maybe many of the problems/concerns outlined above would have been examined and solved well over a year or two ago? That maybe the length of time people have been thinking about these issues compounds the current feelings of dissatisfaction finally being expressed by CGers? Would working this out sooner have maimed CG or made it stronger?

Yes. Almost everyone's contention stemmed from their actions. They attacked Tim Lim. They went so ballistic on me it's shocking I still decided to stay in comics. They attacked Mike Miller. It went down the line, and over the line in all of the cases. After awhile they just attacked each other and purity tested out half of their own group (the nice people who were caught up in it).

There's still a few good folk who have the name in their profiles still, not sure why.

Now there's like 5-10 of the sperg patrol campaign and they're really reaching hard for clout today. I've got like 10+ posts in my mentions from Pan flipping out like it's 2018 again. Just this time there's not a huge mob behind him, it's just him. It's pretty sad, but it's also funny.
 
You say this Mark, but it was fully acknowledged in that stream that someone is going through Piper's exhausting six hour drunken copestreams where most of the viewers are on the panel with her with a fine toothed comb to report back anything relevant to this circle you're in. How is that supposed to come across as?

Thats why I like it here, for the zoomed out view. The birdseye view of comicsgate vs the worms eye view on the inside. I really wanted to reply to this earlier when you said it but I didn't want to give away the surprise.

CG Ladies Night is back.

 
You say this Mark, but it was fully acknowledged in that stream that someone is going through Piper's exhausting six hour drunken copestreams where most of the viewers are on the panel with her with a fine toothed comb to report back anything relevant to this circle you're in. How is that supposed to come across as?



CG in 2019 had 80 projects totaling 4.2 million dollars
CG in 2020 had 126 projects totaling 6.5 million dollars (both numbers including Doug TenNapel)

CG in 2021 has had 28 projects launched by the end of January, which at that rate will total 336 projects by end of year, grossing a projected $1.975 M, barring new campaigns being launched by the top-fifth (of whom only Zack and Graham Nolan have launched a campaign).

This creator glut, without a corresponding increase in customer pool, is a problem of Malthusian proportions barring some innovation regarding crowdfunding or gathering an audience. Personally I don't think this will go on for the full year before this problem "corrects itself", either in gearing back the creation of new projects, someone devising a way to find new backers, but probably in the form of some sort of catastrophic collapse. Trying to replicate past success by building an audience on the mainstream's decline or the lawsuit against Mark Waid as the established CGers did doesn't seem viable either.

Having an audience is a core component of self-marketing (which is essential), but as Frog pointed out with Doug's success, nearly all of the people who have had real success with youtube, whatever they started out as they become youtubers exclusively as the path of least resistance when it comes to enriching themselves.
If CG were to “survive” in any possible sense of the word, it needs to drop the stigma they have surrounding two particular things: Kickstarter and... well, not explicitly digital, moreso making your finished projects actually accessible to newcomers.

Absolutely, Kickstarter did a really shitty thing disallowing the original Jawbreakers onto their service.

But it’s been like half a fucking decade. Things have changed. Kamen America #3 got a hand-picked “Project We Love” tag. You can’t go ten projects without stumbling upon a comic with nude cover variants making thousands and thousands of dollars. Sure, that ever-present BlackLivesMatter tag at the top certainly might scare a few of the more hard-right-leaners off, but for everyone else, it’s genuinely such a better platform with a noticeably larger audience thanks to significantly better discoverability tools, that doesn’t give nearly as much of a shit about who you are and what your project is as people like Zack might have you believe.

They also recently added built-in add-on functionality like IGG has, so even that’s not an excuse anymore.

I know I’m absolutely 100% sounding like a shill here, and it’s because I just fucking hate IGG’s search function that much. KS actually lets you sort projects by how soon they’re ending, a functionality effectively missing from IGG almost entirely. (I only say “almost” because the closest thing they have is the exact same algorithm sort, except limited to projects ending in the next two weeks. There is no way to actually sort by time.)

Honestly, though, they wouldn’t even need to consider a move over to KS if they weren’t, at the exact same time, also failing spectacularly in making the finished projects actually accessible to newcomers. I explained this better in one of my other posts, so I’ll just quote that here:

This (specifically, the recognizability thing) is what happens when you immediately kneecap any franchise or audience acquisition potential by not actually releasing your 100% finished products anywhere outside of time-limited campaign runs. Hell, it isn’t even just Frog who has this issue, Zack and Doug (with BFB) do it as well.

Trying to increase perceived value through self-imposed rarity can only go so far. You might end up with a successful campaign, however what you won’t get is a popular comic.

For example, let’s take Cyberfrog. Combining the backer counts for every single Cyberfrog comic campaign (as in, no coins or Dynamite variants), you get... 36,720.

Now, that does not mean that nearly 40K people have bought Cyberfrog comics. The actual number would be significantly less by an unknown margin because of repeat backers over the nine total campaigns, that 36K number is just the highest possible that it could be. I’d guess it’s closer to 12-15K, though that’s just an estimate.

In that sort of light, it makes perfect sense as to why Google shows none of these three series as specific trend results, not enough individual people actually give a shit about them.
As much as quite a few people in CG talk about making comics in general accessible to more people, (and not in the diversity way, before someone jumps at me for that, in the “anyone can make one” way), it’s actually quite the difficult thing to get into CG comics, because most of the big figureheads of the “movement” consider their books as treasures that should be coveted instead of comics to actually read and enjoy.
 
Last edited:
If CG were to “survive” in any possible sense of the word, it needs to drop the stigma they have surrounding two particular things: Kickstarter and... well, not explicitly digital, moreso making your finished projects actually accessible to newcomers.

Absolutely, Kickstarter did a really shitty thing disallowing the original Jawbreakers onto their service.

But it’s been like half a fucking decade. Things have changed. Kamen America #3 got a hand-picked “Project We Love” tag. You can’t go ten projects without stumbling upon a comic with nude cover variants making thousands and thousands of dollars. Sure, that ever-present BlackLivesMatter tag at the top certainly might scare a few of the more hard-right-leaners off, but for everyone else, it’s genuinely such a better platform with a noticeably larger audience thanks to significantly better discoverability tools, that doesn’t give nearly as much of a shit about who you are and what your project is as people like Zack might have you believe.

They also recently added built-in add-on functionality like IGG has, so even that’s not an excuse anymore.

I know I’m absolutely 100% sounding like a shill here, and it’s because I just fucking hate IGG’s search function that much. KS actually lets you sort projects by how soon they’re ending, a functionality effectively missing from IGG almost entirely. (I only say “almost” because the closest thing they have is the exact same algorithm sort, except limited to projects ending in the next two weeks. There is no way to actually sort by time.)

Honestly, though, they wouldn’t even need to consider a move over to KS if they weren’t, at the exact same time, also failing spectacularly in making the finished projects actually accessible to newcomers. I explained this better in one of my other posts, so I’ll just quote that here:


As much as quite a few people in CG talk about making comics in general accessible to more people, (and not in the diversity way, before someone jumps at me for that, in the “anyone can make one” way), it’s actually quite the difficult thing to get into CG comics, because most of the big figureheads of the “movement” consider their books as treasures that should be coveted instead of comics to actually read and enjoy.
Completely agree. IGG is a horribly designed platform and its highly autistic. Kickstarter is much more user friendly.
 
If CG were to “survive” in any possible sense of the word, it needs to drop the stigma they have surrounding two particular things: Kickstarter and... well, not explicitly digital, moreso making your finished projects actually accessible to newcomers.

Absolutely, Kickstarter did a really shitty thing disallowing the original Jawbreakers onto their service.

But it’s been like half a fucking decade. Things have changed. Kamen America #3 got a hand-picked “Project We Love” tag. You can’t go ten projects without stumbling upon a comic with nude cover variants making thousands and thousands of dollars. Sure, that ever-present BlackLivesMatter tag at the top certainly might scare a few of the more hard-right-leaners off, but for everyone else, it’s genuinely such a better platform with a noticeably larger audience thanks to significantly better discoverability tools, that doesn’t give nearly as much of a shit about who you are and what your project is as people like Zack might have you believe.

They also recently added built-in add-on functionality like IGG has, so even that’s not an excuse anymore.

I know I’m absolutely 100% sounding like a shill here, and it’s because I just fucking hate IGG’s search function that much. KS actually lets you sort projects by how soon they’re ending, a functionality effectively missing from IGG almost entirely. (I only say “almost” because the closest thing they have is the exact same algorithm sort, except limited to projects ending in the next two weeks. There is no way to actually sort by time.)

Honestly, though, they wouldn’t even need to consider a move over to KS if they weren’t, at the exact same time, also failing spectacularly in making the finished projects actually accessible to newcomers. I explained this better in one of my other posts, so I’ll just quote that here:


As much as quite a few people in CG talk about making comics in general accessible to more people, (and not in the diversity way, before someone jumps at me for that, in the “anyone can make one” way), it’s actually quite the difficult thing to get into CG comics, because most of the big figureheads of the “movement” consider their books as treasures that should be coveted instead of comics to actually read and enjoy.

I imagine backers have objected to someone buying these comics at a reasonable price. Honestly, as far as accessibility/price the quality of the book varies greatly.

Dongs did a good write up on page per cent.

I personally see value as two fold. The first is quality. Bigfoot Bill is only 48 pages. But! It's 48 pages inside a hardcover! Conversely, Blood honey was over 60 pages! Which when you consider the average indie comic book is 22 pages at 4/5 bucks a pops, leaves it ten dollars pricier than the market at large. Oh and fucking chromium. *sigh* :roll:

Compare that to Jon Malin's Graveyard Shift at forty-six square bound pages for the same price.



On the other hand, there is 499, which is 72 pages. But...


1613193462256.png


And it's not as if Ethan is perfect either. Rekt planet is forty eight pages and is the same price as Blood Honey. Art's still good though.

1613193584730.png


As to digital, I dunno. I kindof assume people who will buy your stuff will buy, pirates gonna pirate. But. I will note that after a brief rash of piracy at the start, I haven't seen these books online. Draw your own conclusions.

My own take? Ethan needs to hook up with Ben Shapiro and get a Cyberfrog series to introduce the millions of people who don't read books. He needs to focus on the games and toys. Same with the others. Because its a "grow or die bitch" world.
 
The first is quality. Bigfoot Bill is only 48 pages. But! It's 48 pages inside a hardcover.
I think the first printing of BFB was 96 pages and then Doug added more pages in the second printing? I think Doug was talking about going to Japan to try to get a Netflix series of BFB pitched but that was before the coff hit. So the books would be a collectors item if the show got on Netflix.
Art's still good though.
Frog's art lives and dies by the colorist. Though because of that, Ritter still hasn't gotten his stupid book out. Even with getting the coff "twice" or whatever.

Now the question I have for the CGers that lurk the thread. Is it fair for the "head" of CG to promote somebody else's comic on his own Indiegogo?
sn.png



Frog is doing nothing but publishing it, not even a cover for it. Does this Matthew Martin guy even fly the CG flag? Did he speak up against the cancel culture or is he getting a free pass cause he's Frog's old Hall of Heros days? How much is going to the crew? How much is going to Frog? Who knows?
 
With all the big news lately surrounding Zack and his relaunch of Rock N Roll Ninja, Martina Markota and her legal woes over Lady Alchemy, we may not have noticed a general sense of malaise beginning to brew within certain corners of Comicsgate. Murmurs of discontentment, followed by moments of self realization and introspection have began to trickle it's way into my feed. Slowly at first but over the past week the topic of Comicsgate and this general sense of unease has begun to get louder within the current CG zeitgeist. I had planned on addressing the underlying sense of dread spreading throughout Comicsgate like a contagion, however something else always popped up. Now feels like a good time given @Mister Dongs recent writeup on the Mandy v Piper catfight, so in the following post I will do my best to explain the situation and give an assessment on what could be causing it.

Late Night with Comicsgate (4th String): CG Burnout, is it real?


Our story begins in late January CG2021 on an obscure corner of Comicsgate known as Leroi/4th String, Leroi, our host, poses a question in his title "CG Burnout, is it real?" leaving the audience to decide. This title is what first caught my eye since most CG streams involve the drama of the week or book promotion and rarely ask the viewer such an introspective question. Leroi begins the stream and is joined by his two co-hosts Vanessa, Lord Crackhead and special guest Eric Weathers, the latter of which needing no introduction as nearly every Comicsgate book features lettering by Eric and he has crowdfunded his own two books Flying Fortress and Battle Brick Road.

The stream begins with the typical small talk and shilling of Eric's projects when todays topic is finally broached at the 14 minute mark where Leroi states that he knows certain creators come and go, but now he is noticing people slowly start to disappear from the chat due to "burnout." Both the co-hosts chime in and explain their thoughts, with Vanessa explaining that the streams consume too much time and she has her own bills to pay and would prefer to avoid drama. Leroi then goes on to praise Eric's channel as being drama free and a place to avoid it "especially as all that shit with Warcampaign went down" which Eric agrees with. The topic then reverts back to shilling and the upcoming collaboration between Eric and Von Klaus on a sequel to Monster MD upcoming in future, before a question from The Lucent creator Michael Bancroft gets the panel back on topic at the 33 minute mark.


Leroi answers that with so many creators and so many streams, it's near impossible to watch them all and perhaps some people are getting burnt out by trying to. Leroi admits that sometimes he'll go to a certain creators stream, mute it and give it a thumbs up before going to watch tv or do something else entirely. Users from the chat agree with him stating "there's only so much time in a day", "excitement has a shelf life" and "there's very little awesome to be had. imo" showing that this topic is resonating with elements of the CG audience. Leroi goes on to ask Vanessa how she feels and she answers that she feels burnt out after backing too many campaigns and has limited herself to two a month and that "FOMO" (fear of missing out) no longer plays apart in her decision to back as many projects as she can. The second co-host Lord Crackhead agrees with her and states that he has only purchased three books this year and is already feeling the need to "unplug" and go do something else like watch a movie.

The rest of the stream becomes less thrilling and more shilling but offers the first course of what is becoming a trend of serious streams discussing some issues appearing within Comicsgate lately. Of course the comment section offers yet another window into the mind of the everyday CG citizen.

View attachment 1915867

The Chat: Is there a "right" way to do things in CG?


Again coming from Leroi's channel several weeks later would be another discussion on Comicsgate with another introspective clickbait titled question to the viewer. The host is again joined by his two co-hosts from the previous stream, a woman called Amanda and resident Comicsgate maestro Lord Finatra as they go over a series of campaigns that just launched. The entries include Wart the Wizard 2, The Ace Volume One, Shotgun Samurai, Hybrids: The Killing Field, Supervillains Anonymous and Rock N Roll Ninja, the last two being the only books to currently break the five digit threshold and all having launched in January or February of this year.

The stream opens with the panel dunking on Zack and his recent clusterfuck with his Rock N Roll Ninja campaign, something that would have been considered Comicsgate heresy only mere months ago. Most of the criticism seems to stem from Zack's comments on the debacle in addition to several of his comics being overdue while launching multiple new campaigns. The panel then moves on to if there's a correct way for a creator to enter the Comicsgate sphere agreeing that "if someone just shows up with a comic to sell without engaging with the audience first it's a massive turn off." Who the panel is talking about is left ambiguous but appears to stem from the glut of new CG books that have oversaturated the space over the past two months as @Mister Dongs mentioned above.


The stream meanders on and touches on the antics of creators within Comicsgate, honorable mentions to Warcampaign and Liam Gray whom Vanessa admits she refused to back due to their behavior, before a new guest called Hocky states he refuses to back any campaign which doesn't include interior art on the campaign page. The panel then segues into drama and whether or not it is a vehicle that can be utilized to drive views and sales, while all the panelists agree they aren't interested in drama, Amanda points out that the quickest growing channels are usually the ones focusing on it. The entire second half of the livestream turns into a discussion on chat etiquette and can be skipped.

Crowd Funding Slowdown


Perhaps the most interesting and passionate video collected comes from Inch High Comic Guy, who comes across as an angrier and more energetic Comic Book Hut. IHCG who is mostly known for his five part series putting Zack on blast for his book Pandemic, once again doesn't fail to deliver in an explosive tirade. He begins the stream by throwing down three unopened Comicsgate packages and a copy of USAssassin, the latter of which was opened but remains unread. IHCG immediately goes into his reasoning for losing interest in Comicsgate:

2:18 - Mark Waid and the cuckery of Zack in regards to the lawsuit, stating that he joined Comicsgate because he heard about the lawsuit and it was his entry into the movement. He argues that now that the lawsuit is over "Comicsgate will now have to stand on it's merits" rather than blindly receiving support for fighting a culture war.

4:04 - From standing on it's merits, he then goes into his second issue with Comicsgate, which is comparing it to Image Comics when they were first founded. He extrapolates by stating "Cool artwork bro comes first and story isn't even on the agenda" explaining that the artwork in Comicsgate is great, much like early Image, but will fail to have any longevity due to poor writing. He further goes on to criticize the lateness of the books, stating that the creators often fail to deliver on their own self-imposed deadlines.

7:15 - Comicsgate has no characters, at least no memorable characters other than pre-existing legacy characters like Cyberfrog and Shi. He follows up by stating the characters from Graveyard Shift are completely forgettable and over half the Jawbreakers team is dead so why be invested in them.

He then goes on to explain that the best Comicsgate books he has received in terms of writing and story telling haven't come from the Comicsgate Pros, but rather three of the smaller creators namely Stump, Kyrie and Elysian Fields which between the three of them struggled to collectively raise over 25K (not including spin-offs and sequels). IHCG attributes this to getting "no attention or play in the Comicsgate industry because good characters and story comes in a distant last place for the Comicsgate leadership." He claims that Kyrie is the best book in Comicsgate with Elysian Fields coming in a close second place with the two being praised for their story and writing, while Stump is praised for the main protagonist.

The comment section is 50/50 of people agreeing with him and others politely disagreeing with his points and the entire video was efapped by War Party creator Professor Murf on his channel here. What's interesting is previous Comicsgate dissidents were often exiled and purged for their criticisms, normally by Warcampaign, however now there appears to be more understanding when dealing with such individuals. Murf claims that if many backers begin feeling like IHCG then the movement should be concerned at what could become a potential problem moving forward.

After 2 Years, What are My Thoughts on CG?


Our next video comes from Roadwarrior Drake creator Alazmat Films, a regular guest on The Trash Compactor Show along with @TESTEFY-HD and offers an unique opinion from a creator rather than simply the fans from our previous videos. Alazmat begins by updating his backers on the status of his book and announcing that the book will also be launching on Kickstarter, possibly being the first Comicsgate book to utilize both platforms. Alazmat goes into his history of joining CG and rather somberly mentions a list of people he used to enjoy watching who are no longer affiliated with it including; Englentine, Unranked Chevron, Nerdette's NewsStand, Doug TenNapel and Mike S Miller and comments how so much has changed in two years. He continues to explain that CG felt like a bigger circle back then, than it does now even referencing former customers like Bean from PA, Lorenzo Sleestak and Rumble Terrier. Alazmat goes on to claim that "Comicsgate will live and die with Ethan VanSciver and this wasn't true two years ago" he goes onto explain that "this is neither a good or bad thing, just an observation." He compares Ethan to the "life support system of Comicsgate" and the moment he leaves it will probably die, which honestly is an assessment I agree with. Alazmat goes on to say he has many criticisms of CG but one criticism that is false is that it's a hate group, his valid criticisms include:

8:30 - creators that don't update their backers when they're late on their books. Alazmat also claims that it is against Indiegogo's Terms of Service to not update your backers at least once a month.

10:14 - anytime a creator is criticized, sometimes rightly so, they double down and label their critics "anti-CG" despite them expressing pro-CG ideals and beliefs. Alazmat admits this is something he also did previously, but admits he was wrong for doing so.

11:08 - being in it for the money, when looking at creators who set high funding goals and who abuse the backers trust like Mitch Breitweiser and the creators of Galactic Rodents of Mayhem.

Alazmat continues by stating no one has a problem with criticizing Marvel or DC but when it comes to criticizing other Comicsgaters when it comes to doxing, grifting and false flagging channels much of the community remains silent. Alazmat also expresses that criticism of art within CG is to high and he believes that underground, raw indie art styles have a place in Comicsgate as opposed to the Jim Lee and Robert Liefeld homages of the big pros. He cites his own work and the recent drama surrounding @Wenger with Dragoon Knight Aldrake and the fallout afterwards.

Alazmat finishes by saying he "is not done with Comicsgate, but a lot of the criticism is valid." The comment section is graced by @FROG himself in what could've been an interesting conversation if it weren't derailed by some Fandom Reject retard called Sno Dub Entertainment.

View attachment 1915868


What do COMICSGATE FANS expect from CREATORS?


Our final video of the evening (thank God) comes from The Lucent creator Michael Bancroft who hosts "The 4th String" members from our first example, bringing on Leroi, George, Amanda and Lord Crackhead to talk about the issues they had previously brought up. Bancroft opens that he receives DMs constantly from people with criticisms of Comicsgate, most recently someone complaining about subpar writing after just receiving a book in the mail and decrying the lack of editors. The panel agrees that if you are charging $25, plus shipping, with months long waits for it to arrive you better be releasing a quality book. They also discuss how nearly every campaign now is $25 and question whether these books can charge the same amount as Ethan VanSciver and Jon Malin.

The second grumbling Bancroft hears is of certain creators desiring promotion but not "grabbing an oar" to help promote others and the lack of tracking numbers for campaign packages. The panel also shouts out Professor Murf and his recent efap of Inch High Comics Guy's video as another example of growing criticism within Comicsgate, as opposed to outside of it. Bancroft also agrees that if more backers begin to feel like Inch High Comics Guy then the movement might be "in real trouble." A possible remedy the panel suggests is having at least half of the book complete before launching the crowdfunding campaign, to cut down on waiting times.

The stream meanders on for a while until George addresses the elephant in the room of "so many unfulfilled books and launching more" obviously referencing Zack's recent "flood the shelves" strategy without naming him. The panel unanimously agrees that ever having more than two active unfulfilled campaigns is completely unacceptable. Bancroft very insighfully claims at the 38:00 mark that "as we move away from that crazy wild west era of 2018, it does seem like people will be putting up with less" referencing what the backers are willing to tolerate from creators.

It would appear not even deaf, sex perverts are exempt from criticism these days.

This is most most internal criticism and introspection I've ever witnessed in Comicsgate, aside from possibly late 2018 and during the Fall of Rome saga in 2019. This time without self-appointed larping legionaires to police the Comicsgate community for wrong think, problems are now being openly discussed along with possible solutions. The current sense of impending doom seems to stem from what I believe to be a sense of weariness from a significant portion of the Comicsgate fanbase, enough to warrant discussion across several channels from both fans and creators alike. Key issues seem to include:
  • Unfulfilled books and long wait times, sometimes even years in the case of high profile books like Red Rooster, Brand and Brutas The Badass.​
  • The launching of multiple campaigns before the previous campaigns have fulfilled.​
  • The story and characters are subpar for $25 plus shipping for comic books which are marketed as boutique items.​
  • A sense of fatigue with the "culture war" aspect after Zack cucked out on the lawsuit.​
Couple this with what so far has been a lackluster beginning to CG 2021 in terms of crowdfunding revenue, this might explain some of the friction we previously witnessed between Piper and Mandy Summers as the latter is struggling to explain why Wart the Wizard 2 isn't performing as well as she initially hoped. Of course as @Mister Dongs previously pointed out launching 28 Comicsgate books within the space of two months right after Christmas when credit cards are still probably being paid off surely had nothing to do with it at all.
Another issue which Frog also seems to be catching on to is difficulty of striking a balance between good streams and good books. As CG quality standards slowly tighten we're seeing the average level of professionalism rise among the panels of most streams. A stream that would have featured Wenger, Micah Curtis and Sketch Therapy a year ago will now be populated by Patrick Parnell, Shane Davis and Kenneth Rocafort. While this is a positive for the end product, it's also made it blatantly clear that Frog is an anomaly and most talented comic artists don't happen to also be naturally charismatic entertainers. The result is that while product quality goes up, advertisement quality goes down, with a surprising degree of correlation.
 
C c a
I imagine backers have objected to someone buying these comics at a reasonable price. Honestly, as far as accessibility/price the quality of the book varies greatly.

Dongs did a good write up on page per cent.

I personally see value as two fold. The first is quality. Bigfoot Bill is only 48 pages. But! It's 48 pages inside a hardcover! Conversely, Blood honey was over 60 pages! Which when you consider the average indie comic book is 22 pages at 4/5 bucks a pops, leaves it ten dollars pricier than the market at large. Oh and fucking chromium. *sigh* :roll:

Compare that to Jon Malin's Graveyard Shift at forty-six square bound pages for the same price.



On the other hand, there is 499, which is 72 pages. But...


View attachment 1917057

And it's not as if Ethan is perfect either. Rekt planet is forty eight pages and is the same price as Blood Honey. Art's still good though.

View attachment 1917061

As to digital, I dunno. I kindof assume people who will buy your stuff will buy, pirates gonna pirate. But. I will note that after a brief rash of piracy at the start, I haven't seen these books online. Draw your own conclusions.

My own take? Ethan needs to hook up with Ben Shapiro and get a Cyberfrog series to introduce the millions of people who don't read books. He needs to focus on the games and toys. Same with the others. Because its a "grow or die bitch" world.

What do you mean, "get a Cyberfrog series" to millions of people who don't read books? Do you mean to convince non-book readers to read CYBERFROG? Or did you mean a series of animated shorts? Joining up with Ben Shapiro might be okay. We've spoken.

I'm focused on toys now. We do have one toy retailer website that wants to stock CYBERFROG merchandise. I'm slightly interested, but have reservations. No plans for games yet, but I guess that will happen soon.

When it comes to the comics, I'm selling the installment books via IGG and eBay, and plan on collecting everything into a trade and hardcover to sell thru bookstores and the direct market when it's finished. Offering the entire thing digitally will make more sense to me at that time as well.

I disagree that Kickstarter is a better platform than IndieGoGo for selling CYBERFROG. It seems to be working pretty well, and I haven't seen any convincing evidence that people who use both platforms at once aren't simply splitting their audience. The examples I've witnessed:

Doug TenNapel: His follow ups to the enormously successful EARTHWORM JIM, funded only on IGG, have used both platforms and haven't been able to add up to or surpass that original total.

Tim Lim: An honest to god hit book with KAMEN AMERICA, it has ONLY funded on both platforms as far as I know. It'd be interesting to see him fund an issue exclusively on either platform for comparison.

Mike S Miller: His latest campaigns funded poorly on IGG and then earn a meager percentage of those earnings on KS.

So I don't feel the need to put a CYBERFROG campaign into the hands of Kickstarter, yet another organization that has overt radical leftist political ties, and employees that would like to hurt my business. It just doesn't seem like a good gamble, and I don't think they deserve to profit from my work.

Regarding lowering prices of my books, I think we're getting pretty close to the point where ALL CAPS can accept advertisements in the back of the comic. Since we don't ship Media Mail anyhow, that's definitely an option for us.
 
So I don't feel the need to put a CYBERFROG campaign into the hands of Kickstarter, yet another organization that has overt radical leftist political ties, and employees that would like to hurt my business. It just doesn't seem like a good gamble, and I don't think they deserve to profit from my work.

I don't disagree with most of what you wrote, but in terms of 'reputation management', you don't do yourself any-favours. You do have a long history of attaching yourself to wingnut commentators /creators like Vox Day, Doug T, Ethan Ralph, and Lady A. In a world of simple explanations that makes you a 'Nazi Sympathiser' (where as everyone here knows it's just a combination of naivety, cockiness, and dollar-chasing.)

So yes it is stupid and uninformed for people and groups not to want to do business with you on political grounds, but you do give them lots of opportunities to jump to the wrong conclusion.
 
C c a


What do you mean, "get a Cyberfrog series" to millions of people who don't read books? Do you mean to convince non-book readers to read CYBERFROG? Or did you mean a series of animated shorts? Joining up with Ben Shapiro might be okay. We've spoken.

I'm focused on toys now. We do have one toy retailer website that wants to stock CYBERFROG merchandise. I'm slightly interested, but have reservations. No plans for games yet, but I guess that will happen soon.

When it comes to the comics, I'm selling the installment books via IGG and eBay, and plan on collecting everything into a trade and hardcover to sell thru bookstores and the direct market when it's finished. Offering the entire thing digitally will make more sense to me at that time as well.

I disagree that Kickstarter is a better platform than IndieGoGo for selling CYBERFROG. It seems to be working pretty well, and I haven't seen any convincing evidence that people who use both platforms at once aren't simply splitting their audience. The examples I've witnessed:

Doug TenNapel: His follow ups to the enormously successful EARTHWORM JIM, funded only on IGG, have used both platforms and haven't been able to add up to or surpass that original total.

Tim Lim: An honest to god hit book with KAMEN AMERICA, it has ONLY funded on both platforms as far as I know. It'd be interesting to see him fund an issue exclusively on either platform for comparison.

Mike S Miller: His latest campaigns funded poorly on IGG and then earn a meager percentage of those earnings on KS.

So I don't feel the need to put a CYBERFROG campaign into the hands of Kickstarter, yet another organization that has overt radical leftist political ties, and employees that would like to hurt my business. It just doesn't seem like a good gamble, and I don't think they deserve to profit from my work.

Regarding lowering prices of my books, I think we're getting pretty close to the point where ALL CAPS can accept advertisements in the back of the comic. Since we don't ship Media Mail anyhow, that's definitely an option for us.

IGG is basically your brand now, it would be weird for you to move to KS, especially because IGG always puts you at the top no matter what.

With that being said, unless you already have a built-in audience and the kind of momentum that can get you to that top, then IGG would appear to be significantly worse funding-wise than KS when comparing the projects currently on both, especially with the ridiculous explosion in CG titles this year.

IGG’s discoverability is so goddamn bad that streams and Superchats effectively turn into the main means of promotion for these smaller campaigns, which suddenly becomes a problem if the amount of competing projects were to abruptly explode in number... which they have.

KS does certainly have a human element with their Projects We Love tag, however that’s not nearly as exclusive of a club as it sounds and as long as a project meets a very, very basic standard of quality it’ll join those ranks almost immediately.

Moreover, though, the thing that I always come back to that makes me prefer it over IGG is their Newest/Ending Soon lists, making it far easier to find even the non-“loved” campaigns. Especially when compared to trying to find anything on IGG that didn’t quite manage to “win” the algorithm, which also includes entirely finished campaigns that you have no way of removing from your search for some goddamn reason.

(Also, as an aside, this is the first I’ve heard of you actually mentioning an eventual digital release, which is a significant improvement from previous stances of yours. I’d actually suggest testing the waters of such a thing with Unfrogettable Tales, which is sort of the odd one out of your collection now that Warts and All is a thing. Throw that up on a few digital storefronts as an introduction to the character, sell them the full books afterwards, you could have an easy start point for people to actually get into CG products without resorting to eBay.)
 
Last edited:
Yes. Almost everyone's contention stemmed from their actions. They attacked Tim Lim. They went so ballistic on me it's shocking I still decided to stay in comics. They attacked Mike Miller. It went down the line, and over the line in all of the cases. After awhile they just attacked each other and purity tested out half of their own group (the nice people who were caught up in it).

There's still a few good folk who have the name in their profiles still, not sure why.

Now there's like 5-10 of the sperg patrol campaign and they're really reaching hard for clout today. I've got like 10+ posts in my mentions from Pan flipping out like it's 2018 again. Just this time there's not a huge mob behind him, it's just him. It's pretty sad, but it's also funny.
Last night they sent Cheatch onto the Trash Compactor, to talk about the Holocaust, in a pathetic attempt to get the channel struck.

In typical WC fashion, it didn't work out so well. We had fun.

I was worried there for a while, because it was Friday and we hadn't had our weekly pathetic gay op yet. Glad WC is still alive and kicking failing.

Tim Lim: An honest to god hit book with KAMEN AMERICA, it has ONLY funded on both platforms as far as I know. It'd be interesting to see him fund an issue exclusively on either platform for comparison.
Well, KA3 just finished on KS, and hasn't hit IGG yet. It's earned about 88k. It gets more each issue. I think they can hit six figures with KA4.

IIRC, it always does better on KS than IGG. This led to the hilarious video from Liam, where he was only looking at IGG numbers, and made an ass out of himself.
 
Last edited:
What do you mean, "get a Cyberfrog series" to millions of people who don't read books? Do you mean to convince non-book readers to read CYBERFROG?
Have Jeff Hicks explain what Lucasfilm did with Shadows of the Empire in the 90s. They aren't going to read Cyberfrog, just like they won't read Iron Man.
Or did you mean a series of animated shorts? Joining up with Ben Shapiro might be okay. We've spoken.
Multimedia. Cross platforms. That game, tied to an animation, tied to toys, that yes, ties to the comics.
I'm focused on toys now. We do have one toy retailer website that wants to stock CYBERFROG merchandise. I'm slightly interested, but have reservations. No plans for games yet, but I guess that will happen soon.
You should have reservations. It's a huge leap, from the minors to the majors and could see you fall flat on your face. But, that's how you grow the Cyberfrog brand beyond its current limits.
When it comes to the comics, I'm selling the installment books via IGG and eBay, and plan on collecting everything into a trade and hardcover to sell thru bookstores and the direct market when it's finished. Offering the entire thing digitally will make more sense to me at that time as well.
Well, you could have done that with Warts and All. It's hard to break free of the no risk all reward format of IndieGoGo. And why should you? You're the provider for your family. Safe is good, except when it comes to bubbles that inevitably burst. You remember the 90s. The guys that were fine diversified. McFarlane and his toy company.
I disagree that Kickstarter is a better platform than IndieGoGo for selling CYBERFROG.
I've only used IndieGoGo personally so no opinion.
Regarding lowering prices of my books, I think we're getting pretty close to the point where ALL CAPS can accept advertisements in the back of the comic. Since we don't ship Media Mail anyhow, that's definitely an option for us.

Good for you. Maybe use that as a door to get your foot in with this new media company?

I think the first printing of BFB was 96 pages and then Doug added more pages in the second printing? I think Doug was talking about going to Japan to try to get a Netflix series of BFB pitched but that was before the coff hit. So the books would be a collectors item if the show got on Netflix.
Stretch goals. That's right. Either way. 48 pages hardbound is a good deal, though it's still pricy. I put it in the slightly pricy stack against the egregious ones like Graveyard Shift.
Frog's art lives and dies by the colorist. Though because of that, Ritter still hasn't gotten his stupid book out. Even with getting the coff "twice" or whatever.

Maybe? I think he still has good line work and coloring is an under appreciated part of all art. Take Jim Lee and Alex Sinclair.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: TESTEFY-HD
Frog's art lives and dies by the colorist. Though because of that, Ritter still hasn't gotten his stupid book out. Even with getting the coff "twice" or whatever.

Agree to disagree. Kyle is fantastic, and we've figured out how to work together excellently, but my art looks great in black and white too.
55D958B4-6D33-4E1C-B018-336FB909D751.jpeg

View attachment 1917134
Now the question I have for the CGers that lurk the thread. Is it fair for the "head" of CG to promote somebody else's comic on his own Indiegogo?

Frog is doing nothing but publishing it, not even a cover for it. Does this Matthew Martin guy even fly the CG flag? Did he speak up against the cancel culture or is he getting a free pass cause he's Frog's old Hall of Heros days? How much is going to the crew? How much is going to Frog? Who knows?

Explain more about the rules that would make this "not fair."
 
Last edited:
Back