Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Massive systematic genocide is very unusual, especially those cases where all the killing happened in a few years or even months in the case of Rwanda. If you look at the mediaeval pariod in Europe for example there was a lot of fighting but it was mostly pretty small scale and didn't involve flat out extermination except when the Mongols and Timurids got involved. The Crusaders killed a load of people when they sacked Jerusalem, but that was unusually bloody and most of the time captives just got enslaved or sold for ransom instead.
This is just plain wrong. Campaigns of deliberate extermination were bread and butter in medieval Europe. Just off the top of my head there was the anglo-saxon extermination of the norse settlers, Richard the Lionheart's 'harrying of the north', Charlemagne's exterminations of the Saxons, the campaigns of extermination around English Gascoigne in the 100 years war, the French extermination of Occitans in the Albigensian crusade, the Flemish extermination of the French in the Bruges Matins, Vlad Tepes' extermination of Muslims in Bulgaria and Wallachia, the extermination of pagans in baltic crusades, the extermination of conversos as a demographic in Spain, the uncountable mass killings and entire major cities being deleted during the thirty years war, and hundreds of Jewish pogroms in major cities all over Europe, all throughout the period.

There are entire textbooks dedicated to European medieval genocide, and it was absolutely as massive and systemic as the people of the times could manage.
 
"bullshit conspiracy theories about global pedophile rings..." So, you're just gonna memory hole Jeff Epstein? What, a billionaire with ties to high ranking politicians, and celebrities around the world that got busted for trafficking underage girls, who owned a private island where an untold number of shady things occurred? Sounds like bullshit to me lmao
 
  • Like
Reactions: chickenbutt
The list of people gotten rid of just by the Hebrews in the Old Testament is pretty intense. The Canaanites and Amalekites stand out. What Rome did to Carthage was brutal. There were certainly conflicts that more or less ended a tribe even if that wasn't the actual purpose behind the conflict. It generally takes actual effort not to end up in wars.

I guess if you have INT as a dump stat, you can dump more into CHA.
Antiquity is a bit different because there were massive empires like the Romans who could send a 100,000 man army storming through their enemy's land to wipe them out. In the mediaeval period most armies and kingdoms were pretty small and couldn't do that - Mongols excluded, hence why they did.

This is just plain wrong. Campaigns of deliberate extermination were bread and butter in medieval Europe. Just off the top of my head there was the anglo-saxon extermination of the norse settlers, Richard the Lionheart's 'harrying of the north', Charlemagne's exterminations of the Saxons, the campaigns of extermination around English Gascoigne in the 100 years war, the French extermination of Occitans in the Albigensian crusade, the Flemish extermination of the French in the Bruges Matins, Vlad Tepes' extermination of Muslims in Bulgaria and Wallachia, the extermination of pagans in baltic crusades, the extermination of conversos as a demographic in Spain, the uncountable mass killings and entire major cities being deleted during the thirty years war, and hundreds of Jewish pogroms in major cities all over Europe, all throughout the period.

There are entire textbooks dedicated to European medieval genocide, and it was absolutely as massive and systemic as the people of the times could manage.
The harrying of the north was William the Conqueror and was an attempt to massacre rebels rather than literally erase the northern English from existence. The 30 years' war was genuinely massive in scale with 8 million dead but it happened in the 17th century long after the end of the middle ages, by which time big powerful modern states with colonial empires and massive armies existed which could exert violence on a much bigger scale than a small mediaeval kingdom. Compare Castile to the Habsburg Spanish Empire for state capacity. I'm not aware of anything not Mongol related in the European mediaeval period (500-1500) which got anywhere near the 30 years' war in size. Even the Albigensian Crusade only killed a few hundred thousand people. Genocides got more common after the middle ages with increased state military power and imperialism in the Americas.
 
"bullshit conspiracy theories about global pedophile rings..." So, you're just gonna memory hole Jeff Epstein? What, a billionaire with ties to high ranking politicians, and celebrities around the world that got busted for trafficking underage girls, who owned a private island where an untold number of shady things occurred? Sounds like bullshit to me lmao

They mean bullshit conspiracy theories about *Dems* running pedo rings. They fully believe Republicans do.

Each side thinks the other side is the one that has to explain their Epstein connections, and they themselves do not.
 
The harrying of the north was William the Conqueror and was an attempt to massacre rebels rather than literally erase the northern English from existence.
Oh right, misremembered that one. But I do remember he wiped out well over 50% of the entire civilian population because he was aiming to utterly destroy a demographic that leaned towards opposing him. This, and the other instances I listed, and the hundreds or thousands more that also happened that I don't know about, are absolutely genocides. Just because they don't have cattle trucks and gas chambers to make a better job of it doesn't change that.
 
Oh right, misremembered that one. But I do remember he wiped out well over 50% of the entire civilian population because he was aiming to utterly destroy a demographic that leaned towards opposing him. This, and the other instances I listed, and the hundreds or thousands more that also happened that I don't know about, are absolutely genocides. Just because they don't have cattle trucks and gas chambers to make a better job of it doesn't change that.
Definitions are variable. Half of Paraguay got slaughtered in the war of the triple alliance but it wasn't really an intentional genocide, unlike when the Romans destroyed Carthage and enslaved everyone who was left.
 
And what a surprise, it's a white girl.

If the first thing you assume when your shit gets stolen is ”blacks did this” you're probably the racist one.
Wouldn't these people be considered Nazi sympathizers? I'm just saying.
Intrestingly enough, some Jews consider comparing minor shit to the Holocaust to be the same as Holocaust denial.
She also speaks in dumb-white-bitch-appropriating-other-culture's-spirituality ebonics
I have never seen an actual Indian talk like that.

This is the same as Chris Chan's ”parody of the current young black dude”.
Dogs are already transphobic. That's why they are our best friends.
I'd like to make that dog a member of the Most Honourable Order of the Golden Kiwi.
 
Blacktwitter hates white people. Whitetwitter hates white people. Almost like the default stance on race is hate the white no matter what.
it's kind of funny how black people twitter doesn't mock the retared things they screenshot and post to the subreddit

triggered.png


he is still triggered that the woman he harassed is getting support after he and his friends got her forced out of her job. This is a man who calls fans to dislike the sequel trilogy "toxic". strange how there labels always fit them better
 
Last edited:
I had to do some diversity, equity, and inclusion training for my graduate program. Most of it was the standard shit you would find in a program like this, but I found these to be particularly bad.

nice sources.PNG
Hate speech is not covered under free speech according to these sources, let's just disregard Matal v. Tam decades of precedent.

no fun allowed.PNG
1613237508523.png
 
it's kind of funny how black people twitter doesn't mock the retared things they screenshot and post to the subreddit

View attachment 1917842

he is still triggered that the woman he harassed is getting support after he and his friends got her forced out of her job. This is a man who calls fans to dislike the sequel trilogy "toxic". strange how there labels always fit them better
1. I think it's because one she had loyal fans.
2. They were hoping her cancelation would leave not only her forgotten, but her conservative fans upset and butthart.

But after Ben Shapiro announced that she would be producing and staring in daily wires second movie and they will be help by a producer who has actually worked with known actors before. If you go on social media, there are are alot of right wingers happy about this. Hell right wingers are legit asking Hollywood to cancel more actors just so they can have their own line up.

This isn't want the SJWs wanted.
 
the French extermination of Occitans in the Albigensian crusade
I'd argue that the Albigensian crusade was directed, as the name would suggest, against the followers of the Albigensian heresy (ie Cathars) as opposed to Occitans generally. After all, many Occitans sided with the French crown.

You could call it a genocide against the Cathars, but since Cathars weren't an ethnoreligious group I wouldn't even use that word.
 
I had to do some diversity, equity, and inclusion training for my graduate program. Most of it was the standard shit you would find in a program like this, but I found these to be particularly bad.

View attachment 1917838
Hate speech is not covered under free speech according to these sources, let's just disregard Matal v. Tam decades of precedent.

View attachment 1917841
View attachment 1917844
There is literally no such thing as hate speech. It's not a concept in American law. It's like trying to define a flying pig.
 
There is literally no such thing as hate speech. It's not a concept in American law. It's like trying to define a flying pig.
Yeah. The First Amendment exists for a reason and political speech can't be banned because you dislike it. Brandenburg v. Ohio and Yates v. United States are a testament to that.
 
1. I think it's because one she had loyal fans.
2. They were hoping her cancelation would leave not only her forgotten, but her conservative fans upset and butthart.

But after Ben Shapiro announced that she would be producing and staring in daily wires second movie and they will be help by a producer who has actually worked with known actors before. If you go on social media, there are are alot of right wingers happy about this. Hell right wingers are legit asking Hollywood to cancel more actors just so they can have their own line up.

This isn't want the SJWs wanted.
lackofselfawarness.png

it's just so funny to see them like this, i can't see how they lack any ability to self reflect on their own behaviors. Everything they bitch about the other side doing, they do more.
 
View attachment 1918030
it's just so funny to see them like this, i can't see how they lack any ability to self reflect on their own behaviors. Everything they bitch about the other side doing, they do more.
Says the person who political views is shared by most mainstream entertainment, corporations and who's political party now has control of congress and the executive branch. And who literally booting conservatives or anyone with a different opinions off the internet. Man the irony.
 
And here I was thinking white silence is violence.
That changes every five minutes. I've missed too many morning meetings on what butthurt to seek out and jam up their own asses.

I'm seeing a whole lot of blind and other disabled malingerers absolutely demanding that everyone change everything and include them. You have to add "alt text" to photos and screenshots or you're "ableist" and other three and four syllable made up bullshit words. Eat my fuck, blindy.
When did the disabled become insolent fucks like this? Things just have to get worse and nobody is going to have the resources to take care of these useless people.
 
Back