“I don't think you realize how offensive calling something like this "conversion therapy" is, to begin with.”
“There’s all kinds of subtle and not-so-subtle transphobia and homophobia here.”
“I'm also very, very concerned with the amount of attention you give to making sure we know that your main character is attracted to, and attractive to women. It's…offputting so early in the story, I guess?”
“For one, you've definitely offended me, straight up.”
(A marvelous repudiation, then immediately an appeal to ruling-class bias and group-think: )
“Implying my actions (since I am part of the chat and site disc staff) aren't objective is pretty wack. For two, just because you see something as trivial doesn't mean it is to staff. Opinions are subjective, and discipline is
undertaken by consensus on both chat and site.”
(Emphasis mine)
“Frankly, what you consider "stupid shit" and what staff believes are non-trivial issues are obviously very different.”
“Insinuating staff ban people based on personal feelings and not site rules is pretty wack.”
“no backseat modding please.”
“this is definitely not a good look, and against the rules.”
“This thread is marked closed. Do not respond to this thread unless you are staff. Failure to follow this directive may be met with disciplinary action.”
“Lemme be clear about this: Freedom of Speech is a right granted to US citizens under the first amendment, providing freedom from oppression by the government. We are under no obligation to provide the same rights, which is why we have rules against things like flamebait and overly political talk on the forums.”
“This post is locked, as nothing valuable has been added to this thread.”
“As Tuomey mentioned, a significant amount of staff are neurodivergent”
“This is completely unprompted transphobia, which has nothing to do with SCP in any way.”
“Underage people should not be joining the site. Please don't expose yourself and us to risk by doing so.”
“You don't get to choose whether or not your stuff gets a content warning, if staff feels it deserves a content warning. Is this harsh? Maybe. But
my hard, and unbending line is "I am not willing to expose minors to adult content any longer on our website."
(Emphasis mine)
“Please don't abbreviate ConProcs as "CP" for obvious reasons.”
“I'd downvote in a heartbeat if you made a "lol ur gay" joke on the wiki.”
“Also, as one of the authors who does write quite a bit of comedy on this site, you still need a narrative to make it work.”
“Secondly, are you aware of Haiti's past? And why this is extremely problematic in that regard, re: revolutions?”
“What a wonderful suggestion.
Thread locked.”
“I'm not sure we have an literal rule against parodying disciplinary matters, but it won't be viewed positively.”
“Said an ableist slur today, which is directly mentioned in the chat guide as a "thing not to say"
4:31:16 PM <Jak> TRutherford: pft, I wish I could do that. I'm too much of a fucking spazz to forget.
Escalating to a month per policy.”
“Hi there. Dr. Magnus here, resident expert in hand-to-hand combat, swordplay, combat in general.”
“I am objectively a
really dangerous person in close quarters. But three guys could take me pretty easily, and I know exactly what I'm doing.”
“This is the same problem as using historic tragedies as an SCP, it's ascribing anomalous means to human actions.”
(Is also ok with SCP-4911 and defends criticisms of it as ‘personal attacks’.)
“Yeah, no. You don't get to play the "I'm being mistreated by critters because I'm a girl" card then brush off when people call you out for bullshit.”
(Replace “girl” with “trans” or “gay” and see how he feels then. Sorry women, not enough oppression-wealth anymore, that stock has dropped.)
“This post is not going to win me any friends…
I strongly, vehemently disagree with this course of action.
Our Russian fundraiser was using our platform, to support the defense of our platform, and is wholeheartedly something the entire community would rally behind.
DrGears, who I love dearly and consider a friend, is an individual.
It's unethical, and wrong to use our platform to fundraise for an individual, no matter how worthy the cause.
...
To be even more clear, I am not opposed to a gofundme for gears. What I am majorly opposed to is using our platform to promote an individual's gofundme for something like this as
it crosses a boundary between the personal and the professional.”
(But it is ok to put the pride flag atop the site?)
“Objectively, I think you're wrong.
This article has excellent comedic timing, narrative pacing, and subject matter development.”
“One, I'm not your buddy, pal.”
“Also. This is a closed staff post. Do not respond to closed staff posts, period end of story.”
“Edit: Scratch that. Thread locked.
Everyone calm the hell down.
LordGoopy, not only was RBG never called "Grand Wizard" you have violated a stop order.
I am escalating this behavior to disciplinary staff.”
“I can't help but feel like most of your complaints is projected bias.”
This doozy:
...and so so many more hits.