American Impeachment/25th Amendment Watch 2021 - If, at first, you don't convict, try, try again

What will happen to Donald Trump in the next two weeks?

  • The House of Representatives impeaches and the Senate convicts

    Votes: 23 8.6%

  • The House of Representatives impeaches and the Senate acquits

    Votes: 17 6.3%

  • The US Cabinet invokes the 25th amendment

    Votes: 11 4.1%

  • House of Representative and/or Senate censures the President

    Votes: 14 5.2%

  • President Trump resigns

    Votes: 11 4.1%

  • Trump continues as President until Jan. 20, with Biden becoming President afterwards

    Votes: 165 61.3%

  • Trump finds a way to continue being President after Jan. 20

    Votes: 28 10.4%
  • Total voters
    269
  • Poll closed .
Figured y'all would like the dems' senate kvetching. They're never going to be able to change that function of the senate short of a civil war, which most of you seem to think would be just like your japanese animes.
Sekirodiealot said:
This on is unraveling
View attachment 1918498
Punkass indeed.
Click to expand...
19 followers, real big fish there. Get some of the blue check marks, they're being just as fucking absurd and ridiculous.
LullerDerbyRollin said:
Do you also support that the ID must be sent in when sending Mail-In votes? To clarify, that you would need to send in your ID for your vote to be counted?
Click to expand...
What country on the planet does something to that effect? That's what the signature on the outer envelope is used for.
ID verification primarily occurs when requesting a ballot. You're asking it to uniquely in the world be double-checked, which is perhaps a reasonable request if you could provide evidence of statistically significant instances of voter impersonation.
 
  • Dislike
  • Like
Reactions: secret watcher, Suburban Bastard and Fanatical Pragmatist
1613259316569.png


Here we have an error in an NPC's programming. They literally cannot compute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uranus Pink, CarlosDanger, AnitaSarsleezian and 7 others
Titos said:
That confused the hell out of me for a second, then I realized I was mixing her up with Alyssa Milano and remembered she was on Brett Easton-Ellis' podcast. Always nice to see a celebrity who isn't completely braindead, though she did defend a pedo at one point if I remember.
Click to expand...

wasn't that alyssa milano too? pretty sure rosie made a stink how everyone tried to memoryhole the tara reade thing.
which still doesn't make her less crazy but at least consistent, which I can respect (as in she wasn't dogpiling on weinstein just for twitter asspats).
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li, CarlosDanger, Bethesda's Todd Howard and 1 other person
Extreme Aneurysm said:
SHOW THE FULL POST.

Simply stating what a woman said on C-SPAN with no opinion about said absurd statement doesn't make me a simp!
Cleary :feels: was connected to ^that sentence you fat fuck.
Click to expand...
99.9999% of people do the heart after the thing they get feels from. You were using it to say that Trump being a godly man gave you feels.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: Syaoran Li, Aidan and Bethesda's Todd Howard
Rich Evans Apologist said:
Figured y'all would like the dems' senate kvetching. They're never going to be able to change that function of the senate short of a civil war, which most of you seem to think would be just like your japanese animes.

19 followers, real big fish there. Get some of the blue check marks, they're being just as fucking absurd and ridiculous.

What country on the planet does something to that effect? That's what the signature on the outer envelope is used for.
ID verification primarily occurs when requesting a ballot. You're asking it to uniquely in the world be double-checked, which is perhaps a reasonable request if you could provide evidence of statistically significant instances of voter impersonation.
Click to expand...
I think it we're increasing registration it's fine to increase the ability to accurately record who's voting and when. Why does it need to be "statistically significant instances"? Wouldn't preventing it be worth the trouble?
 
Rich Evans Apologist said:
Figured y'all would like the dems' senate kvetching. They're never going to be able to change that function of the senate short of a civil war, which most of you seem to think would be just like your japanese animes.

19 followers, real big fish there. Get some of the blue check marks, they're being just as fucking absurd and ridiculous.

What country on the planet does something to that effect? That's what the signature on the outer envelope is used for.
ID verification primarily occurs when requesting a ballot. You're asking it to uniquely in the world be double-checked, which is perhaps a reasonable request if you could provide evidence of statistically significant instances of voter impersonation.
Click to expand...
Alright alright. Here's one:
Screenshot_20210213-172839_Chrome.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: TerribleIdeas™, Yamma Damma, Lodoss Warrior and 2 others
Hollywood Hulk Hogan said:
99.9999% of people do the heart after the thing they get feels from. You were using it to say that Trump being a godly man gave you feels.
Click to expand...
Your assumptions are delusions of great grandeur, Hogan! I'm the 0.1%. Just like that you just ruined your faggot argument.
Cope, sneed, and dilate.
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
  • Informative
Reactions: Sneed's Feed And Seed, Fanatical Pragmatist, Bethesda's Todd Howard and 4 others
What gets me is the people who don't comprehend why we have a House and Senate the way they're set up to be.

The population representation is in the House, just like they cry they want.

The STATE representation is in the Senate, and they STILL cry that they want it to be population representation like the House.

I'm not sure if it's crying because they didn't get their way, they don't understand the concept of States having a say regardless of population in order to stop the tyranny of the majority from eliminating smaller state's rights, or if they're just too fucking stupid to understand they already have population representation.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li, Standardized Profile, Every Crook and Nanny and 4 others
Jump said:
The mortgage/rent thing is a known and its a massive timebomb.
Click to expand...
This is the big one, but even then, we know that the Obama/Biden admin had no issue buying toxic loans through the issuing of new currency after 2008's crash. An economic leap as lockdowns ease plus more Yellen-led QE could survive even an asset bubble burst, and people real concerned about inflation should look to the US's trend over the last 20-30 years to realize that's not really a concern.
Jump said:
Maybe that could happen. Or the vax rollout can continue to snowball in to shitshow. The maskwars/lockdowns could continue. The stockmarket could melt down. Lots of unkonwns.
Click to expand...
There weren't really anti-lockdown riots to a remarkable scale until now. If they tried to keep it going in the spring, no, I think you'll see actual riots. There is verymuch a limit to peoples' patience, especially as the vaccine is administered to the people that actually could use it, the at-risk.
LullerDerbyRollin said:
I think it we're increasing registration it's fine to increase the ability to accurately record who's voting and when. Why does it need to be "statistically significant instances"? Wouldn't preventing it be worth the trouble?
Click to expand...
I don't know if you actually realize this, but we already have extensive records of voter roll registrations and when a vote is actually submitted and tabulated. States differ in how they do it, but yes, we record this stuff. You're really new to politics, I see.

And yes, "statistically significant instances" means that you can prove it exists to a degree for which you could reasonably mitigate it. If you can't so much as prove it exists outside of ancillary or anecdotal instances, you're suggesting we clog the process up and make it less efficient for no benefit. Not a high hurdle to jump.
Sekirodiealot said:
Alright alright. Here's one:
Click to expand...
Now that's more like it. Abrams is genuinely a cow, and I hope she continues to sperg for many years to come.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Syaoran Li, Lodoss Warrior and Suburban Bastard
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back