The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

Because, as we all know, unborn babies are so threatening that they have to be killed in self-defence.

Why do I have a feeling you were the sort of person who attacked Kenosha Kyle last summer?

This is called a strawman. Don't do it.

Yay, you got something right!
An unborn baby can kill the mom. Domestic violence also has a chance to kill. Who the fuck is Kenosha Kyle and why should I care. Yes, it's a strawman, and I'm in every right to do it because you're pretty funny honestly. You don't even try and just keep playing semantics and twisting words and reaching, you're gonna set a new standard for mental gymnastics.

Lol you think calling someone (even oneself) a faggot is rude to them on a shitposting forum. Welcome to the internet.
 
Please stop excusing murder :)
Please stop excusing the entire burden of pregnancy and childbirth :biggrin: Just because you won't experience it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

Here, I'll link you everything I gave you earlier to refute. Just a few pieces of published* work could help you, but that's a lot of work! Don't tell someone to Google when you won't do it yourself. Sad!


*I should probably make that part clear as I have to for everything else: published studies, research, scientific journal articles, etc. "MommyWith10Kids.org" is not a reputable source.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Android raptor
Please stop excusing the entire burden of pregnancy and childbirth :biggrin: Just because you won't experience it doesn't mean it doesn't happen.

Here, I'll link you everything I gave you earlier to refute. Just a few pieces of published work could help you, but that's a lot of work! Don't tell someone to Google when you won't do it yourself. Sad!

Your arguments are:
• life might or might not begin at conception but we don't know for sure
• abortion makes it less likely for the woman to die
• abortions stop poverty so they're good
1) is a milquetoast response that solves nothing, 2) ignores the fact that an innocent person died and 3) is eugenics.
 
Last I checked slaves weren't inside the bodies of other people who didn't want them there.
"didn't want them there", and yet put them there.

The unborn baby had no choice in the matter - it shares zero culpability for ending up in its mother's womb.
The mother, on the other hand, usually did have a choice in making that happen.

---

And if the slavery analogy is too Goodwin for you, maybe consider this one:

* You own a private island.
* You force someone else to visit your island (giving them no choice).
* Then you decide you actually don't want them there, so you kick them off the cliff to their death.
* When you rightfully get called a murderer for that, you put on your pink volcano-hat and scream "MY ISLAND, MY CHOICE!!! MY ISLAND, MY CHOICE!!!".
 
Disagree that fetus is innocent. It is a constant threat. Ripping open a vagina and causing long-term incontinence is the 'normal' end of pregnancy
Yep, and sometimes it straight up kills you. A fetus is definitely a threat.

Eugenics involves both forced abortion and forced pregnancy. Neither of which allow a woman to choose what she wants to do, and neither of which are what me or any of the other non-neckbeards itt want.
 
"didn't want them there", and yet put them there.

The unborn baby had no choice in the matter - it shares zero culpability for ending up in its mother's womb.
The mother, on the other hand, usually did have a choice in making that happen.

---

And if the slavery analogy is too Goodwin for you, maybe consider this one:

* You own a private island.
* You force someone else to visit your island (giving them no choice).
* Then you decide you actually don't want them there, so you kick them off the cliff to their death.
* When you rightfully get called a murderer for that, you put on your pink volcano-hat and scream "MY ISLAND, MY CHOICE!!! MY ISLAND, MY CHOICE!!!".
It would be more like you invite someone to the island for a few days but then they overstay and start poisoning all your food, making you sick as hell, beat you up, and in general hold you hostage. You understandibly get sick of this shit and fear they might straight up murder you, so you shoot the fucker in self defense.

Or it would be like you donate blood and then wake up the next day to find your kidney removed, because clearly consenting to letting others use one type of tissue from your body means you consent to letting them take anything, and if you try to fight it everyone tells you you made the choice to donate blood so now you have to live with one kidney.
 
Yep, and sometimes it straight up kills you. A fetus is definitely a threat.

Eugenics involves both forced abortion and forced pregnancy. Neither of which allow a woman to choose what she wants to do, and neither of which are what me or any of the other non-neckbeards itt want.
It would be more like you invite someone to the island for a few days but then they overstay and start poisoning all your food, making you sick as hell, beat you up, and in general hold you hostage. You understandibly get sick of this shit and fear they might straight up murder you, so you shoot the fucker in self defense.

Or it would be like you donate blood and then wake up the next day to find your kidney removed, because clearly consenting to letting others use one type of tissue from your body means you consent to letting them take anything, and if you try to fight it everyone tells you you made the choice to donate blood so now you have to live with one kidney.
Welcome to Kiwifarms. Don't double post.
 
Your arguments are:
• life might or might not begin at conception but we don't know for sure
• abortion makes it less likely for the woman to die
• abortions stop poverty so they're good
1) is a milquetoast response that solves nothing, 2) ignores the fact that an innocent person died and 3) is eugenics.
Do I really need to make a bot asking people every time they post for a study? Because every time I get a response it's always "ur mean". Literally sterilize yourselves if you manage to ever fuck and the other person really, really doesn't want a mini-you growing in them.

Your arguments are: but murder :(
"innocent person" bruh, you wouldn't give a shit if they die once they become a teenager and call you a faggot when you're old.

So, annoying bot on galaxy-brained, no evidence, pro-life posts I guess. Don't call it a grave.
 
Dealing with you is like talking to a brick wall.

I'm going to log off. Please find someone else to justify mass murder to.
Because you cannot follow logic and how your entire argument is flawed. You're being a child plugging your ears.

Enjoy your outdated views that are now shit on by science-based evidence. Getting an education would have helped you.

Edit: keep negrating, I need to know how angry you are you can't convince all women to be as retarded as you while you suffer zero of that outcome.
 
Because you cannot follow logic and how your entire argument is flawed. You're being a child plugging your ears.

Enjoy your outdated views that are now shit on by science-based evidence. Getting an education would have helped you.
Are you seriously trying to OWN me with FACTS and LOGIC?
 
It would be more like you invite someone to the island for a few days but then they overstay and start poisoning all your food, making you sick as hell, beat you up, and in general hold you hostage. You understandibly get sick of this shit and fear they might straight up murder you, so you shoot the fucker in self defense.
The change you've made to my analogy is to add malice, violence, and moral culpability to the visitor, which is exactly what an innocent baby can not exhibit.

So how the heck would it "be more like" that?
 
Back