Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I download lower quality versions of the videos and just post them directly here on the thread.
You can't archive videos the same way you do web pages.


View attachment 1920701
8928923.png
Gotta love the way he is completely incapable of giving any credit to historical figures who don't match-up with modern ideologies or aren't morally upstanding 100% of the time. I doubt Pixar was thinking about Gandhi being an anti-semite when they selected him or chose Carl Yung for anything other than a famous name in psychology.

I do actually hear a lot of self-conscious people try to lift Pixar up as making movies that are "really for adults" to justify going to see them alone, but I can't say I've met anyone who thinks that Inside Out or Soul are "too intense" for children.
 
Last edited:
Lily's got this bad habit of pretending that there's some kind of problem and making an entire video about the paranoid delusion she created for herself. No one made Game Freak created a boy version of Gardevoir because they hated having an """over-powered""" womanly pokemon, and no one really thinks that Pixar doesn't make movies for kids. That's because they make family movies that a wide audience can enjoy.

Honestly, I really got to hand it to the people in this thread that sit through Lily's videos. Not because it's painful or awful or anything, but it's becoming clear her videos are just semi-coherent regurgitations of shit she's already said. She seems to only know how to talk about the same 4-5 topics in regards to media, and if anything, I hope that's the heat-death of Lily Orchards channel. Not people learning she wrote Stockholm, not her ex's getting her cancelled, just the rest of her subscribers catching on that she's redundant and the well of video topics dried up ages ago.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1921357
Gotta love the way he is completely incapable of giving any credit to historical figures who don't match-up with modern ideologies or aren't morally upstanding 100% of the time. I doubt Pixar was thinking about Gandhi being an anti-semite when they selected him or chose Carl Yung for anything other than a famous name in psychology.

I do actually hear a lot of self-conscious people try to lift Pixar up as making movies that are "really for adults" to justify going to see them alone, but I can't say I've met anyone who thinks that Inside Out or Soul are "too intense" for children.
Carl Gustav Jung is known for being the founder of analytical psychology, developing concepts such as extroversion, introversion, ego, persona archetypes etc, things that still have use even after 80 years

At the time of Mother Teresa’s death, her order included hundreds of centers in more than 90 countries with some 4,000 nuns and hundreds of thousands of lay workers to serve the sick, the old, the disabled and the poor.

people who sympathize with Marie Antoinette interpret her story as if she had been used as a scapegoat, put in her position to fail and be caught in a political storm without experience, doomed no matter what course she followed.

Gandhi advocated for non-violent protest and wrote letters to Hitler condemning his practices, but not him as a person and spoke to him as if he were a friend because he believed that aggression did not lead to the best outcome in a conflict.

and George Orwell is the famous writer from 1984 who redefined the concept of dystopia and inspires analyzes, interpretations and discussions to this day.

and the point is that these people, despite their contributions, are not perfect and have the answers to all the problems in the world or only had kindness and virtue in their hearts, but that does not mean that their contributions have to be canceled

Marie Antoinette can still be used as a cautionary tale
Ghandi's philosophy may not be universally applicable, but it is a valid alternative
Carl Jung started the conversation and died leaving his legacy for future generations to build on, as well as Orwell

Lily does not offer anything interesting to the world despite believing that she is a perfectly moral, pure and intelligent person, and thereforeshe cannot stand the fact that these sinners are more relevant than she is.

Lily has such a shallow and banal view about this discussion that I believe she thinks "adult themes" are just sex, drugs and violence and everything else is "child friendly".
except that she also pleads for killing cartoon villains because children will end up hugging Nazis in the future if they don't.

this is why it is difficult to believe that she believes in something or that she has a moral standard of thought, she supports whatever can make her win the discussion at the moment even if it contradicts what she says in the past
 
her evidence of this behavior is 5 random screenshots of tumblr posts. Infallible, Socrates himself couldn't do better.
Anyone looking at those caps would sus out instantly that those tumblr users were at worst complaining about crying babies in theatres just hyping up their own nostalgia for the incredibles sequel as tumblr want to do.

Does Lily think her audience can’t read?

Can she read?

The world may never know.

In other news: Irish Orbiter PyraBlueArts is still gnawing away hoping Lily will let him touch her dick.
DED24E93-C31F-4AB4-9195-97AF74EA21BD.jpeg

Swing and a miss, mate. She’ll never like you.

Orbiter/Discord Mod Nellie Dritz is being cringe sappy on main and no one notices her.

 
Last edited:
View attachment 1921357
Gotta love the way he is completely incapable of giving any credit to historical figures who don't match-up with modern ideologies or aren't morally upstanding 100% of the time. I doubt Pixar was thinking about Gandhi being an anti-semite when they selected him or chose Carl Yung for anything other than a famous name in psychology.

I do actually hear a lot of self-conscious people try to lift Pixar up as making movies that are "really for adults" to justify going to see them alone, but I can't say I've met anyone who thinks that Inside Out or Soul are "too intense" for children.
Really makes you think, huh? What would Jerry, or any of the terminally woke for that matter, say was the best human being born before the year 1900? Can he list a single human being that comes close to his "bare minimum" of doing literally nothing wrong ever?
 
You can't change your gender. Jerry is a pervert who gets off on the idea of being dominated by chicks and being a transtrender is an easy way to find other sex deviants who are into that. Transgender people are mentally ill and the body mutilation and chemical damage of the body should not be encouraged in any capacity.

He's a pervert. A sex obsessed, maladjusted pervert.
While you have a point, you're in the wrong thread to be discussing this.

Besides, the more terrible Transgenders you see on this site are the troons like Jerry, Yaniv and so on. The more "sane" transgenders (or at least as sane as you can get when you have gender dysphoria) are way more rare and usually don't bring it up unless asked.
 
Can he list a single human being that comes close to his "bare minimum" of doing literally nothing wrong ever?
Marx.

Never mind that he was a racist, anti-semitic, homophobic misogynist who wanted to subjugate the inferior races, he invented gib me dats, so he can literally do no wrong.
 
"Not unlike the fascist in leftist clothing currently overtaking Breadtube."

Sometimes watching one of Liliana's videos is like listening in to a meeting inside a cult. The person speaking just says things that any rational person thinking person could see as outlandish, but instead of being questioned or confronted about it you only have an entire room of people nodding their heads off as if it was meant to make sense only for them. This's why nobody outside of your little sphere can take you seriously, Liliana.

Besides that, those "characters" were on the movie for literal seconds as a side gag to show case how the little soul had all the opportunities in the world to learn from the most remarkable people in history and still failed. They appearing at all has to do with the little soul not being able to understand the appeal for living on Earth and nothing with any kind of judgement from the producers. That was for the kids, Liliana, you know, the demographic you're arguing are the target for those movies? Kids are probably not going to have a deep knowledge of history and the nuances of many historical figures, but at least will recognize them on cartoon form to get the idea. For you to be all "actually these figures were not perfect either" is no different than a brony barging in to a little girl with a Fluttershy toy to tell her how Fluttershy and Discord are best ship. You're missing the point and contradicting your own. Or do you seriously expect any small reference to those figures to be an entire history class on itself, even if the joke is entirely lost?

You could argue that by the end of the movie all those historical figures are shown to be a bunch of assholes too wrapped up on their own self-importance and closed minded views that they failed to help the little soul first. They might even be the only villains of the story. Instead of helping her see the beauty of life were reprimending her and making her feel inadequate for living at all. Even the protagonist of the movie was like exactly like that until he realized his mistake by the end.
 
Last edited:
I'll make a note of it.
Anyway the crux of the video is that people keep saying that Pixar isn't for kids, her evidence of this behavior is 5 random screenshots of tumblr posts. Infallible, Socrates himself couldn't do better.
View attachment 1921084
The video is mostly about people not understanding the complexity of Soul, in regards to Soul I've heard people say it's for kids but it has adult moments and depth, so both kids and adults can enjoy it. That's what I've heard at least.

Who besides planted asks on tumblr is saying Pixar isn't for kids? She just mockingly says that people are using Pixar's emotional depth as proof that animation can be for adults. And I ask, what's wrong with that? They're right.
I've yet to see people who aren't pearl-clutchers say that Pixar isn't for kids. She references Cell-Spex making a similar video so maybe they elaborate on it more.

At the end of the video she finds a way to tie it back to killing villains and MLP becoming too dark, we should really have a bingo card for this shit. It's become so obvious that she's the only one who's hung up on these points and she has to connect it to something big and important, because it can't just be down to taste...

Also Lily is really angry about all the thicc female characters in Pixar movies. In fairness, the joke of Elastigirl having a big ass is just because she's in her 40s and let herself go. Like that happens to women when they get older you know.
Lily also seems to neglect to acknowledge that all 5 of those quotes revolve around Incredibles 2: a sequel that came out nearly 15 years after the first one. So while those randos are clearly autistic manchildren for wanting to punt kids in a theater for a PG-13 superhero cartoon, it’s not a stretch to think the fact that kids who’d seen and loved the original when it first came out would now be nostalgic young adults who could also potentially want to see the sequel wasn’t something that the creators kept in mind.

Then again Lily seems to be of the mind that animation should be a strict binary where can only be for children or for adults, with no overlap or acknowledgement that there’s several developmental steps in between. Nevermind all the animation eras and other countries that don’t pigeonhole animation as being only for kids either.
 
Is PhantomStrider not a lolcow? He's now on Peet's shit list.
View attachment 1919457View attachment 1919458View attachment 1919459View attachment 1919460
View attachment 1919461View attachment 1919462

Skip to 40 seconds.



View attachment 1919468

This commentary was from 2017, and from what I can see in the Discord chat logs, he was active in Peet's Discord server until at least March of 2020.
View attachment 1919474
Screen Shot 2021-02-15 at 11.09.57 AM.png
Story arc over.

Screen Shot 2021-02-15 at 11.04.50 AM.png
You serious?

Screen Shot 2021-02-15 at 11.10.16 AM.png
I laughed. :hah:
 
View attachment 1922552
Story arc over.

View attachment 1922551
You serious?

View attachment 1922554
I laughed. :hah:
Oh, you want us to criticize fanfiction Lily? Cool, cool. I have the perfect one to test this out on :)
 
"right-wing harassing mob"?
Lily most people who disagree with you are left wing, and no matter how much you want to pretend that all of your critics are actually double agents of the Nazi far-right wanting to destroy you because of your "controversial opinions" and identity, no one will fall for that

take the "101 Writing Tips" event as an example, everyone criticized Lily's reasoning and standards and then laughed at discovering that they came from a children's cartoon critic who took herself way too seriously, and most didn't even know who Lily Orchard was before receiving a note saying "check this asshole thinking she is a professional critic and writer"

hell, I found Lily through the Aeron Tempest video that led me to watch Josh's video and when I went to see Lily's videos I thought "yeah, they were very kind to her"
 
Carl Gustav Jung is known for being the founder of analytical psychology, developing concepts such as extroversion, introversion, ego, persona archetypes etc, things that still have use even after 80 years

At the time of Mother Teresa’s death, her order included hundreds of centers in more than 90 countries with some 4,000 nuns and hundreds of thousands of lay workers to serve the sick, the old, the disabled and the poor.

people who sympathize with Marie Antoinette interpret her story as if she had been used as a scapegoat, put in her position to fail and be caught in a political storm without experience, doomed no matter what course she followed.

Gandhi advocated for non-violent protest and wrote letters to Hitler condemning his practices, but not him as a person and spoke to him as if he were a friend because he believed that aggression did not lead to the best outcome in a conflict.

and George Orwell is the famous writer from 1984 who redefined the concept of dystopia and inspires analyzes, interpretations and discussions to this day.

and the point is that these people, despite their contributions, are not perfect and have the answers to all the problems in the world or only had kindness and virtue in their hearts, but that does not mean that their contributions have to be canceled

Marie Antoinette can still be used as a cautionary tale
Ghandi's philosophy may not be universally applicable, but it is a valid alternative
Carl Jung started the conversation and died leaving his legacy for future generations to build on, as well as Orwell

Lily does not offer anything interesting to the world despite believing that she is a perfectly moral, pure and intelligent person, and thereforeshe cannot stand the fact that these sinners are more relevant than she is.

Lily has such a shallow and banal view about this discussion that I believe she thinks "adult themes" are just sex, drugs and violence and everything else is "child friendly".
except that she also pleads for killing cartoon villains because children will end up hugging Nazis in the future if they don't.

this is why it is difficult to believe that she believes in something or that she has a moral standard of thought, she supports whatever can make her win the discussion at the moment even if it contradicts what she says in the past
On Antoinette:
Her whole thing was kinda complicated in that while she was known for lavish spending and desire to protect Austrian interests because of her Austrian heritage, she was relatively more frugal than a lot of the other nobles in the royal court (not to mention France’s money problems stemmed from bigger issues like being involved in multiple wars in a short period of time and deep seated corruption at every level) and a lot more of her patronage went to funding the public arts and sciences while her personal spending on fancy dresses was mostly because her marriage at 14 started off a rather miserable political affair (allegedly her husband, King Louis XVI, confided that he‘d thought the proper way to have sex was to stick his dick in her dry, lie motionless on top of her for 2-3 minutes, then roll off her and immediately fall asleep without even ejaculating, hence why it wasn’t until 7 years after their marriage that Antoinette first fell pregnant) and because she had few friends within court. She was just a really easy target for the "not quite as rich as the royal family but still definitely well off" nobles that actually made up the leaders of The French Revolution to make her the poster figure for everything that was wrong with France at the time - many of the most infamous transgressions credited to her being based either on unfounded rumors or straight up slander - when stirring up the lower classes for a revolution that ultimately turned out to accomplish little outside of the personal gains of said leaders (incidentally this is why I always side-eye any SJW who ever unironically quotes Robespierre) because Antoinette was already pretty hated by the general public for being a foreign princess, for havung most of her reform proposals center around keeping a monarchy that went against the increasingly popular calls for democracy, and because she supported unpopular concepts like women owning property. Hell, by the time of the French Revolution she’d already been cutting back on personal expenses and some of the attempts to reform France’s budget - some of which were spearheaded by Antoinette herself - were blocked by other corrupt nobles and sometimes just to spite her.

TL;DR the modern consensus of Antoinette was that most of her character flaws stemmed from starting off being Queen of France as a lonely and bored teenager who’s expensive tastes were because for much of those early years she had no other means of killing time outside of shopping and partying, but was by no means a malicious or even uncaring person as there were many instances where she minded the woes of the French people who by that point loathed her - most exemplified by how she allegedly apologized to her own executioner for accidentally stepping on his foot when being led up to the guillotine.
Of course, I doubt Soul had all that in mind when they picked Antoinette as one of 22’s mentors. I’m willing to bet she was included only for the sight gag of having a G-rated beheaded ghost, and Antoinette is the most famous example while being more palatable than her husband or any of the French revolutionaries that shared this same fate.

But of course this being Lily I assume she thinks the "let them eat cake" quote is actually true.
 
https://archive.md/vkueR
View attachment 1923235
Theres a lot to unpack in this one but the biggest thing to me is she doesn't seem to know how absurd some of the things she talks about in her videos are. "oh its just a normal youtuber" is not what I thought even when I liked her videos.

Edit: wow what timing
I don't even know what this ask is talking about.

I mean even here in the rancid kiwi fields we use screenshots and archives. And if you really wanna go extra, in-text links to specific examples. Ironically enough this ask practices what it's complaining about by not referencing anything specific and just making vague complaints without context.

Although let's be honest this is just Lily sockpuppeting, I don't even think anonymous Tumblr asks can be this long, unless it's a screenshot of multiple ones stitched together.
 
View attachment 1921357
Gotta love the way he is completely incapable of giving any credit to historical figures who don't match-up with modern ideologies or aren't morally upstanding 100% of the time. I doubt Pixar was thinking about Gandhi being an anti-semite when they selected him or chose Carl Yung for anything other than a famous name in psychology.

I do actually hear a lot of self-conscious people try to lift Pixar up as making movies that are "really for adults" to justify going to see them alone, but I can't say I've met anyone who thinks that Inside Out or Soul are "too intense" for children.
inb4 Lily hates Christopher Hitchens, one of Mother Theresa's biggest bashers, for not dedicating his life to troon issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grumpy Pickle Rick
https://archive.md/bf3xD
1613458506733.png

https://archive.md/1znm2
1613458576856.png

I love how she acts like queer isnt a widespread word used by a majority of LGBT people for many different reasons. In fact I never heard of anyone trying to say queer is a slur/at all bad until I started looking into Lily.

Just like with covid Lily lies to herself and makes up her own reality. Then she gets pissed when someone points out that her fabricated reality is wrong.
 
https://archive.md/bf3xD
View attachment 1924317
https://archive.md/1znm2
View attachment 1924318
I love how she acts like queer isnt a widespread word used by a majority of LGBT people for many different reasons. In fact I never heard of anyone trying to say queer is a slur/at all bad until I started looking into Lily.

Just like with covid Lily lies to herself and makes up her own reality. Then she gets pissed when someone points out that her fabricated reality is wrong.
queer is still considered a slur to some lgbt+ people, but the more qidely accepted acronym, lgbtq+ literally has the letter for queer in it. this acronym is just as popular as lgbt/lgbt+.

if she personally doesnt like the word queer, good on her but there are plenty who identify with it, it's literally a gender also, queergender, and some people use it because their identity is something they quite dont have a full grasp of yet or the lables that suit them are either not well known or they have yet to find a lable that suits them, so queer is a good catch all term for any gender, sexuality or romantic identities. Anybody can use the queer tag, from a person who may simply be just Gay+cisgender to someone who might have like 5+ timblr identities, so what, it's an all inclusive word according to the lgbtq+ community.

The general sense is use it as a self identifyer and dont call people who dont like the word queer. all you need is a monkey brain to grasp that consept but i'm guessing lily is as stupid as a brick.
 
Back