Hey Len, for Libel cases to be resolved in the plaintiff's favor (i.e. you, since that's a fancy-schmancy legal word you probably don't get) they must be proven
1. Untrue
2. Known to be untrue by the party that printed them at the time
3. Were printed with the express purpose of maliciously harming your reputation
4. Your reputation was, in fact, harmed, in a way that cost you tangible losses (i.e. feels don't count)
Now, nos. 2-4 are all predicated on no. 1 being met.
And since you are, in fact, an enormous loser with wierd sexual predilections, well, sorry, your case doesn't even pass the laugh test. And if that WAS posted by your lawyer, you've found probably the dumbest one in the Commonwealth since even first-year PRE-law students know how libel does (or does not) work.
tl:dr I laugh at you Len, and you are powerless to stop me! Muahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!