The Twitter Pedo Hunter / Loli Crusader Community

Did you all know that there was a time when child pornography was so widely accepted that it was being printed in newspapers coast-to-coast and nobody had a problem with it? It wasn't that long ago, actually; in fact, I distinctly remember seeing it and, I'm ashamed to say, enjoying it frequently when I was young. I've attached a sample below - for research purposes only, of course. Don't reveal it if you're of the faint of heart.

2bcdbe60deba01317193005056a9545d.jpeg

Thank goodness we now live in more enlightened times.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Casca Enjoyed It, Negotiator, Mussi and 18 others
So I found this post someone wrote sperging out and doxing some loli fan on Twitter. Apparently this happened because he shared some unsolicited opinion about anime on Twitter and then got all surprised when weebs started atting him to defend their hobby and glorious Nippon-sama, so he ran to an unrelated forum and wrote this missive about how one of them is a pedophile because he writes blog posts about anime (sometimes pornographic, sometimes not). Here's the post: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/benjamin-hyde-jekojeko-unnecessary-exclamation-mark.82810/

Clearly OP is a giant faggot.

Jokes aside, Null is probably sperging out about this guy more than is warranted. I don't see any evidence in his post the guy is anything more than a dime-a-dozen weeb. That said, while there's certainly a place for academic discussion of child exploitation and sexuality in the culture, I'm not sure I'd turn to someone who goes by "Loliconnoseur" to find it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pita Chips, WalterPresson96, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz and 5 others
Something I've been thinking about. How would all those furries who lambast loli/shota feel if their favorite fetishes were banned? Like inflation, vore, and diapers? I'd imagine if some out of touch politician saw some of the freaky furry porn online they'd probably go out of their way to ban it (like how Australia banned hentai products).

They'd say something like,"Vore is disgusting and should be banned because it promotes cannibalism" or "adults wearing baby clothes promotes pedophilia"

It sounds ridiculous, but considering how ignorant a lot of these politicians are I wouldn't put it past them. Plus I don't think furries would have a lot of support regarding it because...y'know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalterPresson96 and Trapitalism
Saffronette said:
Something I've been thinking about. How would all those furries who lambast loli/shota feel if their favorite fetishes were banned? Like inflation, vore, and diapers? I'd imagine if some out of touch politician saw some of the freaky furry porn online they'd probably go out of their way to ban it (like how Australia banned hentai products).

They'd say something like,"Vore is disgusting and should be banned because it promotes cannibalism" or "adults wearing baby clothes promotes pedophilia"

It sounds ridiculous, but considering how ignorant a lot of these politicians are I wouldn't put it past them. Plus I don't think furries would have a lot of support regarding it because...y'know.
Click to expand...
Furries are zoophiles so they are worse than pedos.
 
  • Like
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Donutcapybara, Toolbox, rsrerer53%%t4rt5454rEDRSD and 1 other person
Saffronette said:
Something I've been thinking about. How would all those furries who lambast loli/shota feel if their favorite fetishes were banned? Like inflation, vore, and diapers? I'd imagine if some out of touch politician saw some of the freaky furry porn online they'd probably go out of their way to ban it (like how Australia banned hentai products).

They'd say something like,"Vore is disgusting and should be banned because it promotes cannibalism" or "adults wearing baby clothes promotes pedophilia"

It sounds ridiculous, but considering how ignorant a lot of these politicians are I wouldn't put it past them. Plus I don't think furries would have a lot of support regarding it because...y'know.
Click to expand...
The funnier thing is that if lolishit gets banned, then there is a guaranteed chance of furshit getting banned next for promoting beasting. Their zoophile scandals don't help a lot either. All it takes is several vindictive weebs to show up in court and explain who Kero the wolf is to their local legistators.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Optimistic
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Toolbox, Wowzer9088 and 2 others
The argument I've seen from furries when someone points out the valid argument that liking furry porn would make you a zoophile if you follow the same line of logic as liking loli shit makes you a pedophile usually goes like this:

"No they TECHNICALLY aren't animals because these characters are anthropomorphic therefore it's not actual animal porn."

Which begs the question, why bother jerking it to furry porn if the anthropomorphism is what interests them? If that were the case, they could just jack off to regular porn instead since anthropomorphism is applying human characteristics to non-human creatures or animals.

It's almost as if it's not the human characteristics that interest them, it's the animal features, kind of like ZOOPHILES.

Both are bad but furries really shouldn't be talking shit about lolicons if they have furry porn in their likes, the shit they like would still be illegal in real life and isn't any less degenerate or creepy than liking loli shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Toolbox, rsrerer53%%t4rt5454rEDRSD and 8 others
KokoroKoroki said:
The argument I've seen from furries when someone points out the valid argument that liking furry porn would make you a zoophile if you follow the same line of logic as liking loli shit makes you a pedophile usually goes like this:

"No they TECHNICALLY aren't animals because these characters are anthropomorphic therefore it's not actual animal porn."

Which begs the question, why bother jerking it to furry porn if the anthropomorphism is what interests them? If that were the case, they could just jack off to regular porn instead since anthropomorphism is applying human characteristics to non-human creatures or animals.

It's almost as if it's not the human characteristics that interest them, it's the animal features, kind of like ZOOPHILES.

Both are bad, but furries really shouldn't be talking shit about lolicons if they have furry porn in their likes, the shit they like would still be illegal in real life and isn't any less degenerate or creepy than liking loli shit.
Click to expand...
Even if it wasn't about loli BS, furries aren't exactly known for their self-awareness. Anything that they can jack off to is good, anything they don't like isn't. Simple as that.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: WalterPresson96, Toolbox, UnsufficentBoobage and 6 others
Saffronette said:
Something I've been thinking about. How would all those furries who lambast loli/shota feel if their favorite fetishes were banned? Like inflation, vore, and diapers? I'd imagine if some out of touch politician saw some of the freaky furry porn online they'd probably go out of their way to ban it (like how Australia banned hentai products).

They'd say something like,"Vore is disgusting and should be banned because it promotes cannibalism" or "adults wearing baby clothes promotes pedophilia"

It sounds ridiculous, but considering how ignorant a lot of these politicians are I wouldn't put it past them. Plus I don't think furries would have a lot of support regarding it because...y'know.
Click to expand...
When i see furries who have diaper fetishes be against loli/shota sometimes I want to comment that at least the weeb's fetish is potty trained.

and honestly, i noticed a lot of people against fetishes because "it promotes xyz" usually end up being into or having done worse shit.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Big Fish, WalterPresson96, Brit Crust and 14 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back