Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

26560b24-1014-4bff-a212-9245757ed8e0.png
https://twitter.com/Oreo/status/1365038991469281280 (https://archive.vn/4YPG2)
 

It's probably not the case, but I could almost imagine this being tongue-in-cheek. You have to figure that a lot of the PR people for companies across the country are rolling their eyes when they trot this stuff out.

"Brad, you need to post something trans-positive on the Twitter feed."

"We're a fucking cookie company."

"Just do it before we get lynched."

"Alright: "Trans people exist." They are a verifiable phenomenon in the world. Happy now?"

They get a pat on the back, the odds of the words being misconstrued as bigotry are slim, and they have put out almost no money or effort into doing it.
 
* Don't be alone in a room with a woman at any time for any reason no matter what. If you absolutely have to, leave the room and seek an HR chaperone. At the very least, leave the door open and secretly record the meeting.
1614300739901.png
1614300761343.png


Gee, after watching shit like Henry Cavill (correctly) mentioning that there are women willing to misrepresent (if not outright lie about) situations for personal, professional, social, and economic gain, I wonder why more and more guys think the "Pence Rule" is worth quietly following?

1614300793325.png

1614300810837.png


Wherever the "Open Source Community Thread" has ended up, it worth noting that the feminist infiltration of it led to tons of bullshit, and a lot of hapless autistic techtards getting accused of sexual harassment for being autists that were getting non-negative attention from women for the first time in their lives.
Like i said before, sometimes they cannot get rid of the department. If they are lucky, they go to another building and not bother anyone, but usually they can't get rid of this dead weight or else they will get swamped with a crapload of lawsuits over harassment and discrimination.

Even a friend of mine told me stories about people who get a job through a lawsuit because the company might as well take some dead weight rather than go through legal litigation.

It doesn't help that the HR departments of a lot of tech and corporations are 10,000% pozzed by "Critical Studies" type fucks.
 
Last edited:
poortaste.JPG

poortaste2.JPG

All this "muh solidaritee" bullshit between minorities is just everyone else worshipping black people, letting them walk over them and pretend that they're poor oppressed victims who are perfect, flawless little creatures. But what do you expect from someone who writes for The Grauniad Guardian like Sonia Sodha?
soniasodha.JPG
soniasodha2.JPG
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1951004
View attachment 1951009
All this "muh solidaritee" bullshit between minorities is just everyone else worshipping black people, letting them walk over them and pretend that they're poor oppressed victims who can do no wrong. But what do you expect from someone who writes for The Grauniad Guardian like Sonia Sodha?
View attachment 1951028View attachment 1951029
Give her credit, at least she's admitting minorities can be bigots too. That's something you almost never hear coming from SocJus types.
 
Well gee, when you're part of the demographic that's causing the most trouble, yeah, you're the ones who get dragged for it. If you niggers would stop defending the worst among you and immediately pivoting to "sheeeeit, wha' 'bout whitey?" every time there's a crime problem in your community, there'd be fewer people trying to declare Orientals honorary white people and pulling them into white supremacist movements. But here we are. Have fun after you're done making racism great again. Maybe Joe "Urban Jungle" Biden can tell those Uncle Toms they aren't black for you.
 
Any criticism of "cancel culture" is just lies from people who hate progress.

Here's an excerpt:

View attachment 1951501

The author is unironically defending that black student from Smith College who got that janitor fired.

I've noticed they're really desperate to defend cancel culture a lot more than usual lately. They're hellbent on portraying themselves as heroes, leaders, and most of as victims.
"The problem for critics of "cancel culture" was not, however, the abuse of power. It was not that Smith College took the side of a student in abusing her power. It was the abuse of power by a Black person who isn't supposed to have any power to abuse."

First off, how the hell do you contradict yourself that hard that quickly? You say that critics weren't after her for abusing her power, but then say that they were, indeed, criticizing her for an abuse of power.

Secondly, I'd love to see the criticisms in question, because I imagine a fair amount of them were sarcastic in regards to "black people not having power." Without wishing to generalize, it's a common-enough trend for black people to pull the race card and act like they're oppressed and powerless when they're really not. Something this author fully admits.

"Critics of "cancel culture" would rather not talk about the old hierarchies of power, however, because talking about the old hierarchies of power makes things that don't make sense make sense. The question is almost never about language and freedom of speech. The question is almost always about who is doing what to whom, when, where, why and how."

This sounds like the author is making a case for us living in the Jim Crow era, just with the roles reversed. Makes enough sense to me. Back then, if a black guy courted a white woman, or sat in the "white" section at a theater, that was grounds for being lynched. Now, it's white people who have to fear disproportionate mob retaliation. As the author says:

"Those with power to name, name. Those without the power to name, don't name. Those with power call it "cancel culture." Those without the power sit in silence."

You think I don't have reasons to fear the mob? To fear how powerful and bold they've become to slander people over false accusations? To fear how pervasive their lies will haunt you for the rest of your life, when you're truly innocent? There's a reason I'm on Kiwi Farms.

It's not just black people, though. As discussed in the previous pages, women with power and influence to gain will claim harassment from men, even in situations where it is false. Yet, when men take action to protect themselves from false accusations, they're still the bad guy.

The problem isn't black people or women. It's people abusing their inborn identities as an easy way to gain power over others, and their peers who are far-too-willing to give them the power to do so, usually because of "Muh historical atrocities!" This is why the mantra of "seeing color" to "defeat racism" is so dangerous.
 
Well gee, when you're part of the demographic that's causing the most trouble, yeah, you're the ones who get dragged for it. If you niggers would stop defending the worst among you and immediately pivoting to "sheeeeit, wha' 'bout whitey?" every time there's a crime problem in your community, there'd be fewer people trying to declare Orientals honorary white people and pulling them into white supremacist movements. But here we are. Have fun after you're done making racism great again. Maybe Joe "Urban Jungle" Biden can tell those Uncle Toms they aren't black for you.
The white asian Reich will live for a thousand years
download (4).jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've noticed they're really desperate to defend cancel culture a lot more than usual lately.
But remember, it doesn't actually exist. I like reminding them about this when they cancel one of their own, and that canceled dude is whining about being exposed as a rapist or whatever.
 
Back