Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

[Drowningman]

This cow is pumping out more laughs than a BLM "peaceful Protest" in Wisconsin.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

@

It's right there in the ruling Pam. Read it again.

I didn't receive it in the mail.

I'm going to speak to the clerks office and others.

Any US District attorneys and clerks posting here have to identify themselves as such.

 

[LoverofPi]

@

I didn't receive it in the mail.

I'm going to speak to the clerks office and others.

Any US District attorneys and clerks posting here have to identify themselves as such.

Why do you think they have to do that, Pam?

NEW DOC @Whale Spotter @Viridian @LoverofPi

Spoiler: That's not how you appeal, Pam.

View attachment 1952843View attachment 1952846View attachment 1952847View attachment 1952848View attachment 1952849

Instead of appealing, she submitted yet another amended complaint. Needless to say, this is moot because her suit is still dismissed.

Updated Courtlistener link

The incompetence is just perfect. The perfect cherry on the sundae of idiodicy. A chef's kiss of failure.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I didn't receive it in the mail.

You could have always looked it up on the court system. It's free.

I'm going to speak to the clerks office and others.

Pointless. If you are going to claim you didn't get it (and you are going to have to convince them somehow), you should probably raise it on appeal. There is not much the clerk can do at this point. Otherwise, file a rule 60 motion, and hope the court reverses it's ruling.

Any US District attorneys and clerks posting here have to identify themselves as such.

Not true.

Why do you think they have to do that, Pam?

That's a very good question.

 

[Narr Then]

@

I didn't receive it in the mail.

I'm going to speak to the clerks office and others.

You can look it up online, like @Useful_Mistake did.

Any US District attorneys and clerks posting here have to identify themselves as such.

Talking bollox again. Don't you think that those people have better things to do with their time?

Anyway, even if they were, they don't have to identify themselves. What TV programme did you get that from?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

You can look it up online, like @Useful_Mistake did.

What makes this argument even more persuasive, in my opinion, is that the place she could have looked it up was PACER, a federal (free) database specifically created for looking things like that up. So, it's not like it's hard, or she would have had to make some expenses.

 

[Analog Devolved]

NEW DOC @Whale Spotter @Viridian @LoverofPi

Spoiler: That's not how you appeal, Pam.

View attachment 1952843View attachment 1952846View attachment 1952847View attachment 1952848View attachment 1952849

Instead of appealing, she submitted yet another amended complaint. Needless to say, this is moot because her suit is still dismissed.

Updated Courtlistener link

This is incoherent trash. 5 pages of sperging and now she includes the based judge's as conspirators. I can't wait until this is shitcanned and the next chimp out begins.

Go back and reread, gaslighter.




Spoke to someone.

I've read it a few times for a good hearty laugh. Mark my words, this filing is pure insanity and will be tossed out like all the others.

@

I didn't receive it in the mail.

I'm going to speak to the clerks office and others.

Any US District attorneys and clerks posting here have to identify themselves as such.

You don't need it in the mail. The links were provided for you to show the complaint was dismissed with prejudice.

There's no DA here. No clerks. Just you and a handful of shitposting internet trolls you assign celebrity personalities to.

The clerk and everyone else in the legal system will laugh at you and tell you to fuck off.

Just because it was created in 2018 it doesn't mean it is not new evidence. Did you add it to your original insane lolsuit as evidence? No? Then it is considered "new evidence". This is why you constantly fail.

Wow you are really mad today.
There are no credible threats. At most someone talking a lot of shit to get you riled up. By the way, some of those threats were made by you.

Very likely.

Pam lonely ma'am Swain has no one in her life except her mother and kiwi farms posters. She rants about threats to get attention. Even negative attention is meaningful human contact to her.

Pam loves to make threats but loses her mind when someone actively trolls her. No matter how dumb or obvious the bait spamela falls for it hook line and sinker every single time.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I can't wait until this is shitcanned

The lawsuit is already dismissed, and they are not likely going to read this.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

Talking bollox again. Don't you think that those people have better things to do with their time?

No. They aren't smart or intelligent with talents and hobbies to occupy them. They are all on here. Like you.

 

[Narr Then]

No. They aren't smart or intelligent with talents and hobbies to occupy them. They are all on here. Like you.

But they're smart and intelligent enough to be judges and DAs?

Choose one Pammy.

 

[discombobulate]

No. They aren't smart or intelligent with talents and hobbies to occupy them. They are all on here. Like you.

If you really believe that I don't suggest insulting them here. That's a great way to run out their patience.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

No. They aren't smart or intelligent with talents and hobbies to occupy them. They are all on here. Like you.

Prove it.

Also, in regards to you not receiving (allegedly) mailed version of R&R, the 11th circuit has judged that that does not matter, and that PACER system could be used as an alternative to such notice in CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH v. FANE LOZMAN, BIG TOP KOOLERS INC v. CIRCUS MAN SNACKS INC (in a way). Wilbert E. Hollins, v. Department of Corrections of the State of Florida,, 191 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. 1999) found that it is "not unreasonable for [Plaintiff] to rely on the PACER docket."

 

[Situation Type Deal Gorl]

This thread should have never been made in the first place. You harassed an accuser. With repeated death threats. And.....the kicker!?! You pussies cried when I told you off.

[citation needed]

Your trash. You're Harvey's whore lawyers and Tony Robbins. Curse you and your families to hell.

Remove the thread. You didn't get go rape me, so suck it up like the weak limp dicks you are and go away.

None of the people you keep telling this to can remove the thread. Null could, but what's the fun in removing a thread about a deranged person?

Ok.




Toned. 80 lb weights
View attachment 1952618
View attachment 1952620

That's what you call toned? Figures that it's about as stupid and untrue as anything else you post.

See you there.

Nope.

"Of course not, not that this post would be admissible in court."
- are you a judge? Cause rape, choking, and death threat are admissible in court.

None of that happened.

- if you are a judge, are you supposed to be posting here? Cause appeals will include judicial online harassment.

This also won't happen, and you should really learn the difference between an appeal and an amended complaint. You should probably also brush up on what "dismissed with prejudice" means.

@Null is Tony Robbins. He did not have his picture in the courtroom scene.

Nope.

I know how to appeal

No, you really don't.

and this brief I sent was an opportunity for judges to do the right thing. If they can't, then I'll take other measures.

LOL

Hillary Clinton has no right to harass me online.

She doesn't.

Hillary Clinton has no right to contact me or my university or instructors to harass me.

She doesn't.

Hillary Clinton has no right tp contact my family.

She doesn't.

You can insert Tkny Robbins, Harvey Weinstein. Harvey Weinsteins lawyers and everyone else on that brief.

Why should anyone here do your work for you? You want to be batshit crazy, do it yourself.

Better safe than sorry. As of September 28th, 2015 at 5:00pm, Eastern standard time, I do not give Facebook or any entities associated with Facebook permission to use my pictures, information, or posts, both past and future. By this statement, I give notice to Facebook it is strictly forbidden to disclose, copy, distribute, or take any other action against me based on this profile and/or its contents. The content of this profile is private and confidential information. The violation of privacy can be punished by law (UCC 1-308- 1 1 308-103 and the Rome Statute). NOTE: Facebook is now a public entity. All members must post a note like this. If you prefer, you can copy and paste this version. If you do not publish a statement at least once it will be tactically allowing the use of your photos, as well as the information contained in the profile status updates. DO NOT SHARE. You MUST copy and paste.

Is this something the crazy woman posted? Because that's a pile of bullshit.

This thread is admissible.

LOL

@

I didn't receive it in the mail.

Seems like you should be more proactive.

I'm going to speak to the clerks office and others.

I'm sure they'll be delighted.

Any US District attorneys and clerks posting here have to identify themselves as such.

Nope, they do not, but none of them are posting here, so it's irrelevant.

 

[Narr Then]

If you really believe that I don't suggest insulting them here. That's a great way to run out their patience.

That'll be on her next filing

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Is this something the crazy woman posted? Because that's a pile of bullshit.

It's a copypasta. Here's cbs trying its best to explain it.

 

[Cup Noodle]

Ok.




Toned. 80 lb weights
View attachment 1952618
View attachment 1952620

I'll dox my legs when I get a chance.

View attachment 1952650

I like this fan art but after hearing your podcast earlier I've already decided to put the Cup Noodle spin on your request. I don't know If I'll have time tonight but it will be coming.

No one here has even touched you, nor are we in any relationship. That means none of the things you just said are true.

I'm an advocate of consensual choking only.

 

[DocHoliday1977]

But they're smart and intelligent enough to be judges and DAs?

Choose one Pammy.

No.

That'll be on her next filing

I'll recomend new judges.

 

[Narr Then]

No.

I'll recomend new judges.

Yeah, good luck with that.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'll recomend new judges.

As in you will file motion for recusal in your current case?

 

[Cup Noodle]

@DocHoliday1977 After talking with the very kind people at the suicide prevention hotline last night I decided that life is still worth living and I will continue in my love quest for a boyfriend free lolcow. I hope this video of my sik dance moves will help sway you.