US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Beer, Splinters RCVD, GenderCop and 22 others
Click to expand...
1614619895745.png
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: PozzedByCoronachan, Honest Coyote, Irrational Exuberance and 13 others
Random Internet Person said:
Ain’t that the anti-vaxers’ new tune? Guess not every conspiracy is a theory.
Click to expand...
The useful part about conspiracy theorists is that they can bundle up the actual truths they want to hide with the crazy shit that gets expoused, decisively dismiss the crazy shit, then just say they dealt with the other stuff with the crazy shit. People are pretty conditioned to ignore any possibility of nuance in any information these days, so its not hard to get away with a one bad apple approach to hiding stuff.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, XtrmGamr719, PureP and 4 others
Random Internet Person said:
No impeachment. If you believe the conspiracies, the plan is to tinker with things so Biden steps down, Kamala comes in, and she's able to be POTUS for a decade. And with 2020, HR1, and refining and solidifying the methods of the 2020 election, and trust in the process going lower that causes GOP turnout to plummet, she'll get her decade.





Honestly, this is just what MAGA has said will happen: the mainstream will will become state TV, and anyone who doesn't get with the program will be lucky to become controlled opposition.
Click to expand...
HR1 is something i'm worried about since it's something that could pass with dems having all the government branches. It reinforces the idea that they were able to get away with these because of the pandemic.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, XtrmGamr719, Only A Retard Sometimes and 5 others
dailycaller.com

Chris Wallace Presses Psaki On Border Policy: ‘Isn’t The Biden Administration Contributing To This Crisis?’

Chris Wallace pressed White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Sunday about whether Biden's administration is "contributing" to the crisis at the border
dailycaller.com dailycaller.com

Archive - (https://archive.vn/KUQOY)


Chris Wallace Presses Psaki On Border Policy: ‘Isn’t The Biden Administration Contributing To This Crisis?’​

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace pressed White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Sunday about whether President Joe Biden’s administration is “contributing” to the crisis at the United States-Mexico border.

The onset of Biden’s presidency has reportedly sparked an influx of migrants from Central America. Meanwhile, the president’s administration has come under fire of late for opening a temporary facility for unaccompanied migrant children that was harshly criticized when it was open under former President Donald Trump.

“Isn’t the Biden administration contributing to this crisis by reversing the Trump policy which called for immediately returning migrant children who crossed the country, unaccompanied children who cross the border by themselves,” Wallace asked Psakiduring an interview on “Fox News Sunday.” “Border patrol officials are saying that you are creating a surge, and that by May we could see a bigger surge than we saw during the worst moments of the 2019 crisis on the border.”

“Well, Chris, the vast majority of families and adults are turned away at the border,” Psaki responded. “This is not the time to come and we have been very clear about that. But our approach in the Biden administration is that we think the most humane step we can take here is to have these children unaccompanied, kids under 18, not send them back to take a treacherous path forward.”

Psaki, who similarly brushed off criticism last week during a press briefing exchange with Fox News’ Peter Doocy, defended the decision as “right” and the “most humane.”

“But aren’t you, by changing the policy, aren’t you encouraging some of these young people to come, which means you’re going to have a bigger crisis on the border?” Wallace pressed.

Psaki responded by insisting that though the administration has told migrants “this is not the time to come,” sending minors “back on a treacherous trip” would not be “humane.”

“The vast majority of any family that’s coming together, any adults that’s coming are turned away at the border,” she said. “Because we have not had time to put in place comprehensive immigration policies yet at this point in time.”
 
  • Like
  • Dislike
Reactions: XtrmGamr719, Exterminatus, Vyse Inglebard and 2 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back