Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Dick Pooman]

@TamarYaelBatYah What are you doing for Purim? Are you inviting one of your 35+ non-Christian mountain men suitors over?

 

[TheShedCollector]

@TamarYaelBatYah Would you allow someone to skull fuck you?
Like grab your melon with both their hands and go to town on your melon, abusing it for their own pleasure. All holes open, no hole exempt.
Thoughts?

There's not enough space to do that in the back of her car without putting four retarted potato gremlins into the boot.

Or making them wait outside.

 

[Ash Gassem]

What the fuck is going on in this thread?

 

[Dizzyuntildeath]

What the fuck is going on in this thread?

Jew curse. Keep walking.

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

What the fuck is going on in this thread?

We're being the worst thread on the site, please join

 

[Illuminati Order Official]

Deadpool is tall and walks with his chin tilted uo

Fnaarf has brown hair and is medium height. She slouches when she sits.

LoverofPi has medium brown hair and chews his food slowly

Burmese Rice Farmer is of Eastern descent and gets his pants dry cleaned doesn't like wrinkled in his pants

You Baby Yoda have dark hair and wear cologne often

Karl der Grosse has light brown hair, wears collared shirts and likes potato chips and soda for snacks

Toasty has light brown hair. She eats green vegetables a lot for dinner

Can I please have my characteristics described for me?

 

[Skeletor]

I liked this thread better when it was about butt stuff and not skull fucking.

 

[Karl der Grosse]

We've stopped bothering to treat Melinda like a thinking adult and making fun of her "intellectual" posts and started making fun of her obvious unfulfilled thirst instead.

 

[White Baby]

We've stopped bothering to treat Melinda like a thinking adult and making fun of her "intellectual" posts and started making fun of her obvious unfulfilled thirst instead.

Null thinks this thread is bad now? Eventually we (and by "we" I mean "not me but everybody else") will get the grand prize: nudes. Then the thread can be closed permanently.

 

[Deadpool]

We're being the worst thread on the site, please join

A terrible, shitty thread for a terrible, shitty person. It's kinda fitting tbh.

 

[DarkAlien]

Null thinks this thread is bad now? Eventually we (and by "we" I mean "not me but everybody else") will get the grand prize: nudes. Then the thread can be closed permanently.

I come around a lot less with her being active. Her constant uneducated opinions based on her little book and religious beliefs is tiresome. As well as everyone (I've been guilty of it too) trying to catch her in a lie or contradiction. Trying hard to get her to admit she is wrong about something, which her fragile little ego will never let her do.

Null's point might be that arguing with her and getting stupid and exasperating responses is our own fault.

Makes me think of this

http://hcut.to/v/xjLew74

 

[Bloitzhole]

You're all Free Masons, that's how you act.

Just to clarify - are all 64718 registered members on this site (besides yourself, your ex and Andrew Carlson) Masons?
Or is it just the half dozen or so regularly engaging you in the thread and the rest are just normal people here to laugh at other subjects of this forum (this subforum alone has over 1700 topics after all and there's over 20.000 topics in total across the Kiwi Farms, not counting articles and news related discussions)?
Is Josh a mason as well? Also why do you think Masons specifically would target you?
Not being facetious, just curious what your thought process is.

 

[obliviousbeard]

Null's point might be that arguing with her and getting stupid and exasperating responses is our own fault.

Well, you know what they say - don't try to wrestle a pig in mud, after a while you're all muddy and tired and then you'll realize the pig enjoys it.

 

[LoverofPi]

We've stopped bothering to treat Melinda like a thinking adult and making fun of her "intellectual" posts and started making fun of her obvious unfulfilled thirst instead.

Honestly, Mel would probably be happier if she just admitted she liked sex without having to make it about reproduction. She's very obviously got an extremely active libido and has let it control her on a number of occasions just by her own admissions.

I come around a lot less with her being active. Her constant uneducated opinions based on her little book and religious beliefs is tiresome. As well as everyone (I've been guilty of it too) trying to catch her in a lie or contradiction. Trying hard to get her to admit she is wrong about something, which her fragile little ego will never let her do.

Null's point might be that arguing with her and getting stupid and exasperating responses is our own fault.

Makes me think of this

http://hcut.to/v/xjLew74

I would never expect to get Mel to admit to being at fault or in the wrong. For all her insistence about everyone else being narcs, she lives every day by the narcissist's prayer.
But it does make her absolutely angry when you point them out, and that makes me laugh.

Just to clarify - are all 64718 registered members on this site (besides yourself, your ex and Andrew Carlson) Masons?
Or is it just the half dozen or so regularly engaging you in the thread and the rest are just normal people here to laugh at other subjects of this forum (this subforum alone has over 1700 topics after all and there's over 20.000 topics in total across the Kiwi Farms, not counting articles and news related discussions)?
Is Josh a mason as well? Also why do you think Masons specifically would target you?
Not being facetious, just curious what your thought process is.

I don't think Mel's ever met a conspiracy theory she didn't like. Anything to feel like she has special knowledge, that she's figured out something that's eluded everyone else, no matter how absurd it is to someone else.

 

[Young Ned of the Hill]

Just to clarify - are all 64718 registered members on this site (besides yourself, your ex and Andrew Carlson) Masons?
Or is it just the half dozen or so regularly engaging you in the thread and the rest are just normal people here to laugh at other subjects of this forum (this subforum alone has over 1700 topics after all and there's over 20.000 topics in total across the Kiwi Farms, not counting articles and news related discussions)?
Is Josh a mason as well? Also why do you think Masons specifically would target you?
Not being facetious, just curious what your thought process is.

More importantly, why does she think the Masons woul admit Josh in 6 gorillion years? They kinda do exhaustive background checks, ya know.

 

[PomegranateKing]

This is why you don't get absorbed into poking the lolcow.

Interaction sounds interesting and all, but dealing with a screaming woman in a supermarket is nowhere near as enjoyable as watching a screaming woman in a supermarket as she makes an ass of herself.

It's just more fun to watch and enjoy the ride. I for one look forward to the reply, then the subsequent dismissal. But interacting with Melinda? It lost its flavor. Now she's more interested in misinformation and shitposting. The line between her perceived truth and clearly outrageous ramblings has blurred into an unsustainable mess. Not worth sorting through, honestly.

Edit: cross-post and attempting to limit my posting, Melinda's newest docs

A reply to the motion to dismiss and a motion for the judge to recuse himself over gender bias! LOL!

 

[Useful_Mistake]

@TamarYaelBatYah motion to recuse? Again? Lol, good luck.

a) You missed the judge's point. His point was that if you found his registered location(his mother's house), according to law you should serve him there. Anyway, due to bad wording on his part, this is probably the best argument you have, not that this shows bias. Your point is completely ruined by your last sentance(second paragraph), which proves the judge right, and you unable to read.
Judge denying that treating Null as a buisness when he is a person, does not show any bias. It shows that he follows proper law.
It doesn't matter what the "best route" would have been. Serving him the way you did is acceptable only as alternative service, as the judge very clearly showed.
Nothing stopped you from serving him per law, and your failure to do so is on you.
Likewise, it does not matter where Null says he should be served. What matters is what law says.
Actual notice (per law) was not given. All of this is moot, because your citation is heavily taken out of context, context being the courts ability (which it may use if it wants to) to order alternative service. In fact, that case presents strong arguments as to why your service was faulty.
Also why are you using Mariland district court argument for this? It would be useful if this was from the court of appeals or something, but it is not.
b) Clearly it's not evidence enough, since Null did not receive service.
No legal citations to prove your point. It's also wrong.
Doesn't show bias.
c) No citacions to support your claim.
Telling the plaintiff that she needs not court's permission to engage in discovery is nothing more than a fact. It was not permission or order for the court for you to do so. The reason why discovery is stayed is not because you are a woman, but because the judge sees that there is a good argument to be made that the court has no authority over Null, a question that needs to be first answered.

All in all, bad doc

Her responce is bad as well.
Tldr on the important bit
Mel: "There is nothing to suggest I should follow law! I made up my own law for service and how dare you tell me I'm wrong".

 

[Narr Then]

She sounds even more unhinged than usual, and that's saying something

 

[Viridian]

@TamarYaelBatYah motion to recuse? Again? Lol, good luck.

a) You missed the judge's point. His point was that if you found his registered location(his mother's house), according to law you should serve him there. Anyway, due to bad wording on his part, this is probably the best argument you have, not that this shows bias. Your point is completely ruined by your last sentance(second paragraph), which proves the judge right, and you unable to read.
Judge denying that treating Null as a buisness when he is a person, does not show any bias. It shows that he follows proper law.
It doesn't matter what the "best route" would have been. Serving him the way you did is acceptable only as alternative service, as the judge very clearly showed.
Nothing stopped you from serving him per law, and your failure to do so is on you.
Likewise, it does not matter where Null says he should be served. What matters is what law says.
Actual notice (per law) was not given. All of this is moot, because your citation is heavily taken out of context, context being the courts ability (which it may use if it wants to) to order alternative service. In fact, that case presents strong arguments as to why your service was faulty.
Also why are you using Mariland district court argument for this? It would be useful if this was from the court of appeals or something, but it is not.
b) Clearly it's not evidence enough, since Null did not receive service.
No legal citations to prove your point. It's also wrong.
Doesn't show bias.
c) No citacions to support your claim.
Telling the plaintiff that she needs not court's permission to engage in discovery is nothing more than a fact. It was not permission or order for the court for you to do so. The reason why discovery is stayed is not because you are a woman, but because the judge sees that there is a good argument to be made that the court has no authority over Null, a question that needs to be first answered.

All in all, bad doc

Her responce is bad as well.
Tldr on the important bit
Mel: "There is nothing to suggest I should follow law! I made up my own law for service and how dare you tell me I'm wrong".

I can't even with these motions.

Cousinfucker's Response to Motion to Dismiss: "I am a poor abused victim who needs justice! Judge Jones, I know I have no actual statute or case law supporting my claims (which is why I can't properly cite any), but please make my abusers pay!"

Cousinfucker's Motion to Recuse: "Judge Jones, you are a horrible misogynist, and if you rule against me it's obviously only because I am a woman! Also, I know the law better than you!"

And the judge is getting both of these on the same day! I'm suuuuure that proving Null and his lawyer 100% right on her being a vindictive, vexatious litigant will go well for her!

She sounds even more unhinged than usual, and that's saying something

Agreed. You can positively smell her seething behind every sentence. I love it when she writes legal dross while super big mad, because her "victim" mask completely falls away and she reveals the true motivations behind all her lolsuits: harassing Null and trying to ruin him financially.

 

[obliviousbeard]

Eh, I'm sure she's already drafting a game plan for the next lawsuit. Remember the big manic posting spree she had when the default judgement that got overturned was issued? Yeah, that was probably the greatest feeling she's ever had, and now when she's gotten a taste of it, you'll bet she tries her best to chase that high.