This story came up earlier in the thread- It sounds highly accurate
The best part is when her pissed off troon spouse has a hissy fit because dilating his stink ditch hurts and he proceeds to smack her across the face with a bloody dilator and she consoles him...
Though I have dated trannies I want no part of anyone getting SRS. This woman pretty much confirmed the sum of all my fears about having anything to do with a post op.
Honestly I was with one that had fake tits and it was just... awful. Her tits didn't move freely they were just balloons stuck on a man chest. Very much Mr Garrison titty vibes.
Hey Mom, look at me, I'm famous now!
Also, going seriously on the "everyone says that Trans people are legit because medical staff says so" road will only lead that person crashing into a wall that's named "Lying for easy Money".
Let's not be obtuse, men's deodorants do smell different from women's because men smell different from women. Men's deodorants also smell stronger than women's.
The difference is really not that great. Its sort of the same smell just more intense. I think this is another one of those Big Differences Between The Sexes that exist only in these peoples heads.
Anyway, this particular claim is not one I have heard before (although it seems like a reasonable extrapolation from what I do know and from the facts you mention) and wonder if it is your own. If you would change "enough opportunities for easily acquired food" as you wrote it to instead "not a cognitively demanding environment" then as I understand it your view would be fairly mainstream among the evo-psych community.
You flatter my ego by assuming that, but sadly I am going to have to say no LOL
I can't remember who originated it, but it was illustrated in a contrast between two known species of bipedal apes that co-existed in Africa... 3 million years ago: Homo erectus, our ancestor, and Australopithecus boisei, "the nutcracker man". Anyway, to give you a quick rundown - A. boisei walked on two legs, but behaved pretty much like a modern day gorilla. The species had specialized on eating one particular plant that grew in abundance then and there, so it was a pretty lethargic and unambitious ape that exhibited the same type of sexual dimorphism as a gorilla (it was more closely related to chimps, however). Whilst food was abundant, A. boisei thrived and easily outcompeted the much less robust H. erectus for territory. H. erectus in turn had to develop more creative ways for finding and acquiring food, which selected for intelligence over bulk and brute strength.
Then a change happened in the ecosystem, and the plants A. boisei had been dependent on disappeared. And guess what? So did they. H. erectus both 1. needed fewer calories, and 2. had been forced to become smarter, so they came up on top and set the ground for H. sapiens to behave similarly.
So the theory goes something like this: Diminished access to food ---> a less robust physique and increased cognitive capability are selected for ---> female pickiness arises due to survival of the tribe depending on these traits being expressed.
EDIT: I'll now add something that indeed is a theory of my own. Could it be possible that female mate selection was also driven at least in part by increasing cognitive skills driving a more refined sense of time and a greater understanding of the future? Chimps struggle with object permanence. They live in the here and now, and there is no real proof that they can conceptualize the future.
I wonder what the wives that help their husbands transition think after they inevitably leave them? Do they feel horror at what they participated in? Guilt about encouraging the loved ones delusions to a point where they willing mutilated themselves? It seems like it's a loose loose situation either
This is kind of old milk, but hey, ya know, whatever. I've seen this troon pop up here and there, so I wanted to document his past biggest kerfuffle. One tranny's spergout caused an 8 month long debate among atheists about what is and isn't transphobic, and who is or isn't transphobic.
EssenceOfThought, or Peter/Ethel, is a white dude with long hair who lives in India, but he's oppressed because he has ladybrain. He makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community from the perspective of an unchecked narcissist.
Rationality Rules, or Stephen Woodford, is another dude with long hair, but he knows he's a dude. He also makes youtube thunkpieces about the secular community and does so from the perspective of someone with basic reading comprehension.
In March 2019, Rationality Rules made a video about trans women in sports, pointing out some basic fact like... the fact that males generally outperform females in sports. He fully toed the line that trans women are women and all that, but he happened to include some clips from people who were calling the innocent twans gorls men. One clip was one from evil, evil Joe Rogan, who bathes in trans blood like some kind of modern Bathory. He also made a mistake where he said that the effects of HRT don't counter any advantage that male puberty might confer, and then made a comparison between a female and a male that hadn't undergone HRT.
EssenceOfThought made a series of videos in response. In the first one, he says that Woodford is a transphobic meanie alt-lite poopy head. He makes much of the mistake Woodford made regarding the HRT comparison and the Rogan clip. At one point in the video he asserts that Woodford made the video purely to attack trans women. From then on, his position was that Woodford was a violent transphobe, and that anyone who supported or didn't denounce Woodford was also a violent transphobe.
After this, the Atheist Community of Austin-- a nonprofit that runs some podcasts and call in shows for atheists-- decries Woodford as a transphobe, right after featuring him on their podcast. The atheist community in general began picking sides, with one side standing behind EoT and the other side loosely going, "is this a real problem?" After community backlash, the ACA retracts this.
Woodford released an apology vid and tried to clarify his stance. He took down the original vid and donated the ad rev from it to some tranny charity. EoT decided it's not good enough. Makes some thin connections to Trump. Says Woodford is responsible for the removal of trans people's human rights. He also says that Woodford's donation and demonetization of the video wasn't enough, because he didn't credit EoT for the idea of doing this. Then he brings up Rachel Oates.
Rachel Oates is a redhead youtuber cis oppressor, and a friend of Woodford. In response to a possible blocklist of people who support Woodford, Oates said she ought to be put on it, because she believes she can be friends with people she disagrees with, and she advocates for finding common ground between those who believe EoT's accusations of transphobia and people with above room temperature IQ. The blocklist was from a secret atheist troon facebook group that was made to protect against Woodford's general existence, so EoT decided this was a transphobic attack. All the other atheist troons on twitter demanded that Oates call out Woodford, which she refused to do. EoT began accusing Oates of also trying to strip trans people of their rights.
Later on, in yet another twitter spat, EssenceOfThought tells someone to "do the world a favor and exit it." What they allegedly meant to say was "leave Woodford's Evil Transphobia Cult" which makes more sense in context. Some especially fragile people, including Oates, took this as suicide bait. Oates wanted an apology. At some point here, EoT blocked her. She again asked for an apology and asked for one of her followers to ping him so he could see it. This has been presented by those who support EoT as sending her subscribers to harass EoT, which is, as you may have guessed, violent transphobia. EoT tweets about Oates being a transphobic bigot, an opportunistic vulture, and says she has trans blood on her hands. EoT also called her a shit spewing sewer mouth, a lying piece of shit, and a bigot in general. Oates responds with a video of her cutting her wrists. I can't find the fucking vid, but here's the tweet thread she released it on.
EssenceOfThought accuses her of using self harm to silence trannies. If that worked, my arms would be pure scar tissue. I'd just sit on twitter with a veggie peeler. Can only find screenshots of this.
After realizing this wasn't a good look, EoT released a two page statement where he said he hadn't seen the video until later, and that he called the cops to do a wellfare check on Oates. And how he wouldn't have sent those meanie tweets if he'd known Oates was painting her apartment red. Oates is fine, and now focuses on fighting shitty poetry published by internet celebrities.
EoT then began attacking the ACA directly, by accusing them of voting in two of Woodford's "drinking buddies" on to the board. In a video, he suggested that there was a concerted effort of Woodford's fans to rig the board election to make sure the ACA stays transphobic.
The words of a completely sane individual:
A lot of people who were invested in this trans narrative walked out. Here's a collection of transcripts. None of them have notability now that they left the ACA, which is very funny. They've attempted to form the Progressive Secular Alliance. Never heard of it? No one else has, either.
EoT continued trying to get some more shit spinning, including an attempt to get Matt Dillahunty, the president of the ACA, cancelled for violent transphobia. But, the atheists were all shitted out. EoT now stirs shit up with bigger twans creators. Most notably Contrapoints, Jerry Peet and Sophie Labelle.
At some point, Contrapoints pissed off the enbies. I don't remember how, but pissing off enbies is as easy as not liking Steven Universe. Because of this, Contrapoints released a video about being cancelled. EoT released a 40-something minute long video critisizing Contra's cancellation vid. In the transcript he reveals having been a furry, to the surprise of no one. In this video, he says Contrapoints is a big meanie transphobe because he played a 6 second clip of Buck Angel, the gender crit ftm porn star. Surprisingly, Breadtube seems to have taken this accusation with more salt than the atheist community had, and were actively skeptical of EoT's accusations. Almost no shit was stirred.
EoT made a couple videos about Jerry Peet, but that fizzled out as well with almost no shit stirred. Maybe the other narcissists can sense when a narcissist is trying to latch.
Most recently, EoT is taking shots at Sophie Labelle. With a tweet thread, EoT calls out Labelle for being disgusting. This is the most normal I've seen him act, so I expect this will give him a broader platform, since other troons are boosting this thread in particular. That's why I wanted to go through this whole backstory in this much length. I highly anticipate more content from this one.
I went to go look at the transcript of the video where he admits to being a furry. I see he's still having a sane one:
Also another good one:
"admitted he was a furry" was a bit of an understatement BTW:
The modern world's a dangerous place for the young aspie. Furry groomers, retarded body-mod fads etc. they really never can catch a break.
More on the matter:
"GayFurry77777" and "furry music videos." Very nice. This is proof once again, that parents need to make sure they have some actual oversight. Especially when the child is as big an autist as Peter here.
So, he got goaded into ERPing with "GayFurry77777," very not that surprising actually.
This is basically correct. In practice if not necessarily in theory; your modal homosexual isn't any more likely to be a pedo or whatever and your standard lesbian is less likely to be complicit in child predation (since she won't have a boyfriend), but in actuality LGBT+ just means "dumping ground for people with aberrant sexual preferences." Naturally, this means lots of pedophilic types.
So, good sensible response. Being honest here, Peter. Though, I guess purging degeneracy from the Furry Fandom is a bit like drying water.
This is sensible too, if a little too extreme for my tastes.
I also turned up this:
It's a real who'd a thunk it thing, pedophilia and furries? How could it be?
Some thoughts on the matter from the wise Mr. Lineham:
There's a sort of general comment to be made here about the incoherence and ridiculousness of his views. He, of course, legitimately deserves sympathy for the things that happened to him as a child, especially the sexual abuse. Even for the getting groomed into doing furry ERP with GayFurry7777, my feeling is always that it is important to carve out the space for people to dissociate themselves from any feelings of responsibility for things they did as minor. Kids are stupid and we were all no exception to this rule.
That said, the way he thinks about the problem of pedos/abusers/malevolent individuals generally, is frankly retarded. "Community policing" or whatever retarded nonsense does not effectively stop this kind of stuff nor will it ever. The hard truth is that people have their motivations and you are not going to change them. Nobody really cares that deeply or at least that constantly about ensuring everyone is "safe" and even if they did it probably wouldn't matter. The only reliable way to avoid kid's being groomed/abused etc. is to simply remove the possibility by enforcing more restrictive norms. For example, no fucking kids (both senses) in LGBT spaces (especially not "queer" autists who are just looking for somewhere where they won't get bullied), advise parents to restrict their child's internet access if they start hanging around on furry forums etc. Alternatively, you can just set stricter standards for belonging, like say: no autistic male troons allowed..?
People love to shout that anyone who doesn't unconditionally accept trannies has a "fifth grade understanding of biology", yet then go and give the most reductionist and disingenuously phrased descriptions of chromosomal disorders possible. I would be pretty pissed off if I had one of these legitimate disorders and then found out that people are using me to defend their decision to act out on their fetishes.
"Some unfortunate people have really fucked up sex chromosome mutations that render them 99% infertile, among other things. So how dare you claim that I, with normal XY chromosomes, could somehow NOT become a bimbo princess ditz womxn?!?!
I'm going to start acting like a retard in public and screaming on airplanes while collecting disability checks from now on. How dare you say I can't! Don't you know that some people are born with 47 chromosomes?!?!
The best part is when her pissed off troon spouse has a hissy fit because dilating his stink ditch hurts and he proceeds to smack her across the face with a bloody dilator and she consoles him...
For the record I may fuck trannies but I want no part of anyone getting SRS. This woman pretty much confirmed the sum of all my fears about having anything to do with a post op.
Honestly I was with one that had fake tits and it was just... awful. Her tits didn't move freely they were just balloons stuck on a man chest. Very much Mr Garrison titty vibes.
