Plagued Consoomers / Consoomer Culture - Because if it has a recogniseable brand on it, I’d buy it!

All this blogposting is embarrassing. We need to find some actual consoomer communities to stalk before this thread degenerates into nothing but animu autism and proud fedoras owning the consoomers with FACTS and LOGIC.
The beauty/makeup community is in an absolute state of rampant consoomerism.
Has it reached the point where manfacturers intentionally use ingredients that spoil faster?
Anyone else notice loads of people on welfare/benefits end up as consoomers?
Simple. Born poor feel inadequate for not being rich because if you're not rich you're a failure, society says so. Rich people consume product, how else would you know they're rich?
Born rich that become poor are poor because they consumed too much product.
 
NOOOOOOOOO!!! STOP BEING CREATIVE!!! CONSUME PRODUCT INSTEAD!!!

View attachment 1961599
This asshole is a symptom of a larger problem in American society today: A hatred for imagination. Just having an imagination is stigmatized as weird. To people like this, you must be mentally ill and/or on drugs if you have an imagination. It's sad and makes me wonder why our society thinks like this.
 
All this blogposting is embarrassing. We need to find some actual consoomer communities to stalk before this thread degenerates into nothing but animu autism and proud fedoras owning the consoomers with FACTS and LOGIC.
People need to move to Deep Thots if they want to discuss the definition of consoomers and why they aren't one.
Has it reached the point where manfacturers intentionally use ingredients that spoil faster?
I don't think so, but the guidance on when to throw away products is kind of off in that things usually last longer than the manufacturer says. I think it's just covering their ass, despite the expiration dates being well known people hoard the stuff for years anyway.
 
Maybe I missed it, but I'm surprised people haven't had much if any discussion of the Apple fanatics. The people who are willing to spend 3x or more the price of what a device is worth because of it's logo. For most applications Apple is an objectively inferior brand to use, yet they charge out the ass because people are oh so loyal to their iPhone/iPad etc and will gladly bend over to get the apple with a bite already taken out of it.

I mean, they were proud to announce a monitor stand that costs 1000 fucking dollars and people were excited for it.
View attachment 1966063
Yeah apple is overrated. This picture is a work of art. It perfectly captures blatant apple fanboyism.

I’ve owned apple products but generally I get microsoft or something else. I have had a few iPods and an iPhone but generally they were gifts or part of some other deal. Like buy x or get in y plan and we’ll throw one in for free!

I’ve known more apple fanboys but I also knew someone who would simp for microsoft. It’s not nearly as common and therefore infinitely less annoying but in this case I memba he tried to get me to buy a Zune.
 
Maybe I missed it, but I'm surprised people haven't had much if any discussion of the Apple fanatics. The people who are willing to spend 3x or more the price of what a device is worth because of it's logo. For most applications Apple is an objectively inferior brand to use, yet they charge out the ass because people are oh so loyal to their iPhone/iPad etc and will gladly bend over to get the apple with a bite already taken out of it.

I mean, they were proud to announce a monitor stand that costs 1000 fucking dollars and people were excited for it.
View attachment 1966063
Apple's products are too restrictive. Mac OS runs even fewer programs than Linux, let alone Windows. Their computers are too "trendy" for things like acceptable graphics processors. And their iDevice and iTunes' "syncing" bullshit not only prevents you from having certain types of files on your device, they will also flip out and make you delete shit if both devices don't have the exact same files. Dragging and dropping files using a file manager is much simpler-- you can't do that on an Apple device. Apple charges more money for less features.

If you absolutely need an Apple device, jailbreak the thing. An exploit was released recently that works for all but the most recent version of iOS (archive). If you can't jailbreak it, don't buy an Apple device at all. Even if you can jailbreak it, Android devices are cheaper and just as if not more functional out of the box.

Of course, none of that is a problem for these people. Gotta consoom $2000 walled garden every year!
 
I think social media and smart phones have played a big role in the rise of consoomerism. people with low attention spans from constantly having instant gratification from the internet, and aren't willing to put in the effort to develop and work at a creative hobby. drawing, painting, sewing, music, gardening, baking, reading, writing and whatever all take work, so why not just collect pop culture memorabilia? real hobbies are good and important for your soul
 
I think social media and smart phones have played a big role in the rise of consoomerism. people with low attention spans from constantly having instant gratification from the internet, and aren't willing to put in the effort to develop and work at a creative hobby. drawing, painting, sewing, music, gardening, baking, reading, writing and whatever all take work, so why not just collect pop culture memorabilia? real hobbies are good and important for your soul
At the end of the day, who got more gratification?
The dude who went out and bought this?
funkoshit.jpg

Or the guy who built this?
 
I think social media and smart phones have played a big role in the rise of consoomerism. people with low attention spans from constantly having instant gratification from the internet, and aren't willing to put in the effort to develop and work at a creative hobby. drawing, painting, sewing, music, gardening, baking, reading, writing and whatever all take work, so why not just collect pop culture memorabilia? real hobbies are good and important for your soul
Social media and smart phones just made the more obnoxious parts of consumerism easier to notice. Beanie babies and Pokemon existed before Myspace was even a thought. Pretty much every famous 80's cartoon was just a long toy commercial.
 
Maybe I missed it, but I'm surprised people haven't had much if any discussion of the Apple fanatics. The people who are willing to spend 3x or more the price of what a device is worth because of it's logo. For most applications Apple is an objectively inferior brand to use, yet they charge out the ass because people are oh so loyal to their iPhone/iPad etc and will gladly bend over to get the apple with a bite already taken out of it.

I mean, they were proud to announce a monitor stand that costs 1000 fucking dollars and people were excited for it.
View attachment 1966063
I think Apple fanatics may have been the first group of people to be identified as what we now call "consoomers."

The Onion was poking fun at them years ago, back when they were still producing actually funny content.
 
As much as how I admittedly liked iPhones in spite of the bullshit around it, I find the whole concept of "buying a new one yearly" extremely dumb, and this goes the same for anything gadget-related. All you would do is just pile up your phone collection and nobody actually cares about your collection except you and maybe some cliche group of friends. In the end it's just a smartphone that you would mainly use to call with some apps and that's it. There's not much benefit in having a new one every year.

Why even buy a new iPhone or any mobile device that comes out every year? What's wrong with your present one? Is it just because you want to be hot and trendy and all that insignificant bullshit? If being hot and trendy requires you to spend money for not much purpose then you might as well throw your money off the bridge.
 
Funny you should mention that. One of my Ex girlfriend's dad was a massive consoomer and collected anything imaginable into a warehouse he rented. Homie kicked the bucket at some point, I forget why since it was so long ago. He left behind his life work of collectables he was hoping would one day be valuable (instead of like, buying stock or something) and in there was, lo and behold, a misprint beanie baby. She bought herself a new Alianware computer with the uh, unrealized gains, for lack of a better word. At least as of the time we split she was never able to sell it since all the people that WOULD spent 10k for a plushie with a defective tag either already spent the 10K or were dead.
And the moral of the story is..... the stock market will outperform your excuse for consoomerism unless you strike gold and even then, you still probably take the L in the long run.
In the 90's people were investing in Beanie Babies and they had all these values and projected future values to them etc. But most of the beanies never held any value because TY made so many copies of each one that there was never any sense of scarcity involved. Mistakes and misprints being an exception to this because they're very scarce.
 
Last edited:
In the 90's people were investing in Beanie Babies and they had all these values and projected future values to them etc. But most of the beanies never held any value because TY made so many copies of each one that there was never any sense of scarcity involved. Mistakes and misprints being an exception to this because they're very scarce.
The 90's also saw a comic book crash, didn't they? People were buying special covers thinking they can sell them and get enough money to put their kids through college. But the problem was, the comic companies were making so many variants of covers that the value inflated and they became worthless.

The comic industry never recovered from that crash, they've been on a downward spiral ever since. The SJWs messing up the comic scene were just the final nail in the coffin.
 
Has it reached the point where manfacturers intentionally use ingredients that spoil faster?
"Clean beauty" is is a big trend, and clean usually means it doesn't contain synthetic preservatives. Parabens are the big one that get equated with poison and more and more things are being advertised as paraben free, but parabens are very effective preservatives and a lot of products go bad quicker without them. They're not even a problem if you don't have a sensitivity, it's like people who don't have celiac disease thinking gluten is going to kill them. Another one is extremely powdery matte and slick metallic eyeshadows with high colour payoff. I think a lot of that is driven by self taught influencers who don't actually know shit about what makes a good formula, but they also spoil much faster than more old fashioned formulas from the early 2010's and before.

Influencers also encourage over using products. You've probably seen girls with Instagram Face, this is because of drag/stage makeup that everyone on IG or Youtube did for years, a) because it looks batter on camera, and b) because all the biggest ones are men or trannies trying to make themselves look more feminine. It requires packing an absurd amount of makeup onto your face in layers, and then using more products so you don't look like a creepy mask that you wouldn't need to use otherwise. Contouring became a trend to give some depth back to your face because everyone was shilling super high coverage foundation that erases your features. Overpowdering so your makeup doesn't melt off under hot studio lights is another one.

Someone else brought up decluttering as an excuse to buy more and I think the project pan community deserves a mention too. Project panning is intentionally trying to use up makeup, and it's full of people wasting as much as they can either for clout or an excuse to buy more. People jam their brushes into powders and tap off most of it just to hit the bottom quicker so they can show off a picture of it, blot off lipsticks so they can put them back on 15 times a day, oversharpen pencils to get through them faster, etc. I saw one woman who had a full on shopping addiction and she admitted to gouging out powders to make it look like she used them so people would get off her back about buying things she didn't even use.
 
It's even funnier when you consider the fact that their idea of "real writers" write slop that would make 1980s GI Joe episodes look like Shakespeare meets the Ancient Greek Playwrights, while their idea of "professional game designers" churn out so-so games with shit game-testing that ensures the games are barely finished when they hit the store shelves, requiring entire GIGABYTES of patches to make the game run decently.

Just look at modern Obsidian, Bioware, and CDPRed, for instance. Or look at Fallout 76's launch and how Bethesda handled that dumpster fire when it first came out.

Of course, it's not like writers for fan mods like Fallout: Frontier do any better. But writing your own D&D campaign, fan fic, or original story shouldn't be discouraged, either.
In his hollow, soulless, robotic mind, the amount of money that goes into it and the size of the company that created it is directly proportionate to the quality of the PRODUCT.

All artists are just machines, woodchippers that grind money, which is raw goodness, into art, which is goodness that's in a form that can be enjoyed by the masses. If it's expensive, it's good. No questions asked. That's why he worships professionals and scorns amateurs.

Money isn't something you use to pay rent. It's magical energy that determines the objective worth of anything you create. A published writers is not superior because of his skill or experience, but because of the dollar aura that floats around him transmuting everything he touches into gold.

I can tell you he would keep a billionaire's nail clippings on a pedestal while consigning the Hampton Throne to the flames.

He doesn't have eyes or ears or a brain, all he has is a little money counter with an apple logo on it where his soul ought to be.

If you paid me a million dollars to squeeze out a sloppy turd on his desk and I offered it for sale at a 300% markup price, you can bet my ass he'd snarf it down faster than a hot brownie.

To be fair, they also consider people, who disregard their passion projects and would rather leave the room than to humour them, their friends, so, what are the chances they'd actually come up with a relatable world you can enjoy
Assuming he ever had a concept of friendship to begin with. What a sad, materialistic little bugman he is.

The feeling of being stomped on at the bottom of the hierarchy has been so deeply ingrained in him that he can't imagine a world without it. Just imagine him ingratiating himself to his fellow bugmen who can think of nothing more important than how their taste in entertainment looks to their corporate overlords.

He distantly remembers a time when none of this mattered, the unbridled creativity of his halcyon childhood, the spirit of which he purged from his soul for just another inch of social status from those who would disrespect and discard him like a piece of trash. I'd almost feel sorry for him if he wasn't trying to drag everyone down with him. And for that crime alone, I afford him no sympathy.

He's sacrificed his capacity to imagine... for what? Imagination, as far as he's concerned, is a privilege only reserved for those who have been permitted to do so by a sufficiently large corporation. The plebeians who dare seize these powers lack the sacred wisdom of Hasbro and the unparalleled sagacity of its Marketing Research Team, for the two gods combined understand the tastes of every sane human being who has ever lived. And thus those sacrilegious peasants only capable of bringing forth unsightly abominations which amuse only them.

His very existence is a tragedy and a comedy, and most of all, a walking insult to humanity.

This asshole is a symptom of a larger problem in American society today: A hatred for imagination. Just having an imagination is stigmatized as weird. To people like this, you must be mentally ill and/or on drugs if you have an imagination. It's sad and makes me wonder why our society thinks like this.
It's born from an obsession with being seen as mature by your peers and society at large. Anything that isn't sufficiently bitter and miserable enough is nothing but kid's stuff at best, or the ravings of a murderrapist at worst. For that reason, I have leagues more respect for those DeviantArt degenerates than the insects who lash out at any form of creativity that goes beyond their paradigm of acceptable rebellion.

It's weird, but that doesn't mean it's bad. We should have learned this lesson when we wiped the floor with the Religious Right, but history repeats itself yet again. The west has yet to divest itself from the notion that art cannot be inherently evil. Perhaps in a hundred years we'll begin to stop blaming the things we make and the people who make them, but rather ourselves and the societies which made us.

I could make this small souled bugman the antagonist of a children's book. Enter Mr. Everybody, a psychic demon hellbent on assimilating every last person on earth into his hive mind, so he can always be morally right by saying "Everybody knows that!", as if appeal to popularity and corporate cultural authority ever meant anything in the first place.
 
In his hollow, soulless, robotic mind, the amount of money that goes into it and the size of the company that created it is directly proportionate to the quality of the PRODUCT.

All artists are just machines, woodchippers that grind money, which is raw goodness, into art, which is goodness that's in a form that can be enjoyed by the masses. If it's expensive, it's good. No questions asked. That's why he worships professionals and scorns amateurs.

Money isn't something you use to pay rent. It's magical energy that determines the objective worth of anything you create. A published writers is not superior because of his skill or experience, but because of the dollar aura that floats around him transmuting everything he touches into gold.

I can tell you he would keep a billionaire's nail clippings on a pedestal while consigning the Hampton Throne to the flames.

He doesn't have eyes or ears or a brain, all he has is a little money counter with an apple logo on it where his soul ought to be.

If you paid me a million dollars to squeeze out a sloppy turd on his desk and I offered it for sale at a 300% markup price, you can bet my ass he'd snarf it down faster than a hot brownie.
I suppose in his mind, Rambo 3 is far superior to Terminator 1. Even though everyone knows which film was more iconic and ground-breaking.

Assuming he ever had a concept of friendship to begin with. What a sad, materialistic little bugman he is.

The feeling of being stomped on at the bottom of the hierarchy has been so deeply ingrained in him that he can't imagine a world without it. Just imagine him ingratiating himself to his fellow bugmen who can think of nothing more important than how their taste in entertainment looks to their corporate overlords.

He distantly remembers a time when none of this mattered, the unbridled creativity of his halcyon childhood, the spirit of which he purged from his soul for just another inch of social status from those who would disrespect and discard him like a piece of trash. I'd almost feel sorry for him if he wasn't trying to drag everyone down with him. And for that crime alone, I afford him no sympathy.

He's sacrificed his capacity to imagine... for what? Imagination, as far as he's concerned, is a privilege only reserved for those who have been permitted to do so by a sufficiently large corporation. The plebeians who dare seize these powers lack the sacred wisdom of Hasbro and the unparalleled sagacity of its Marketing Research Team, for the two gods combined understand the tastes of every sane human being who has ever lived. And thus those sacrilegious peasants only capable of bringing forth unsightly abominations which amuse only them.

His very existence is a tragedy and a comedy, and most of all, a walking insult to humanity.
This is what happens when ironically enough, the politically correct trade freedom for a political hierarchy with no honor or grit when compared to older systems. Back then, the king/pope/business owner would give you capital based on how innovative and creative your solutions are to their problems. Now, you're not even allowed to think outside the box unless you have the right level of social authority. We're making our journey from humans with creative minds to drones in a factory with every passing day. And people like him are pushing us down that road even faster.

It's born from an obsession with being seen as mature by your peers and society at large. Anything that isn't sufficiently bitter and miserable enough is nothing but kid's stuff at best, or the ravings of a murderrapist at worst. For that reason, I have leagues more respect for those DeviantArt degenerates than the insects who lash out at any form of creativity that goes beyond their paradigm of acceptable rebellion.

It's weird, but that doesn't mean it's bad. We should have learned this lesson when we wiped the floor with the Religious Right, but history repeats itself yet again. The west has yet to divest itself from the notion that art cannot be inherently evil. Perhaps in a hundred years we'll begin to stop blaming the things we make and the people who make them, but rather ourselves and the societies which made us.

I could make this small souled bugman the antagonist of a children's book. Enter Mr. Everybody, a psychic demon hellbent on assimilating every last person on earth into his hive mind, so he can always be morally right by saying "Everybody knows that!", as if appeal to popularity and corporate cultural authority ever meant anything in the first place.
From where I'm coming from, "mature" doesn't always mean "better". I mean, have you seen series like GI Joe? The original cartoon is seen as childish in comparison to the later series and films that are more "mature", but the former was far more creative, with plots ranging from Cobra threatening the world with a mass teleportation device that they use to shanghai the Red Army and throw them all into a concentration camp, to them burning up all the paper money in America and replacing the "worthless green paper" with a gold-backed currency to gain the people's support. The old show had the range to be creative without making things too grimdark, meaning that they could get mature ideas to kids without scaring the parents.

Art, like all forms of creation, is not inherently evil, but rather, good unless used for evil. The Religious Right failed to understand this, but even they had the sense to back off when people disagreed with them. And yes, those Deviantart degenerates are ten times more respectable than these censor-happy bugmen, because at least half the time they make something worth looking at.

But I don't think we can divert ourselves from blaming art. It's just human nature to point fingers and blame things when shit hits the fan and something bad happens. Whether Christians or atheists or pagans are ruling the world, they will always find something to blame when things go wrong.
 
I find boomer consoomers a fascinating breed, and case in the point is the KISS fanbase. There's people who carpet entire rooms wall-to-wall in KISS merchandise which includes shit like coffins, a football team, and of course lots and lots of Funko Pops. People like this guy below, who got an article in a local news outlet about him (picked him off an image search because I'm lazy and he's the first "interesting" looking individual that comes up when you start searching for people's KISS collection.

kissboomer.jpg

I'll give KISS major credit for putting out all this merchandise though since it's brilliant marketing strategy and produces endless amounts of free advertising. I mean think about it, some KISS fan gets buried in a KISS casket, it makes the local media, someone reads it, and decides to request "Lick It Up" or some other overplayed dad rock hit on the radio.

I also notice that boomer consoomers seem more well-adjusted than your Funko Pop obsessed soyboys. This guy might be a fat bald guy who looks a decade older than he is, but according to the article he's well-adjusted enough to have a kid. I wonder if your soyboy types will ever evolve into something like this?

Can't think of any other similar shit boomers obsess over, aside from Harley-Davidson. I have no idea why some boomers obsess over overpriced motorcycles.
Back then, the king/pope/business owner would give you capital based on how innovative and creative your solutions are to their problems. Now, you're not even allowed to think outside the box unless you have the right level of social authority
You need to study history more and read all about the stupid kings, popes, and CEOs shooting themselves in the foot over petty bullshit. Literally no different.
 
Back